frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Computational Complexity of Air Travel Planning [pdf] (2003)

http://www.demarcken.org/carl/papers/ITA-software-travel-complexity/ITA-software-travel-complexity.pdf
76•rochoa•1y ago

Comments

buildsjets•1y ago
This is well over 20 years old and is based on pre 9/11 flight data. I would suspect that a lot has changed since then. So proceed with no caution at all.
gwern•1y ago
Since these sorts of things usually only get more and more complex over time, I would guess that it's all still true, but much more so.
throw0101b•1y ago
(2003)
throw0101b•1y ago
The PDF was produced by ITA, which famously used Common Lisp:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITA_Software

From 2001, a message from the same author as the linked paper:

> (Here's an email Carl de Marcken of ITA Software sent to a friend, describing their experiences using Lisp in one of the software industry's most demanding applications.)

* https://www.paulgraham.com/carl.html

Qem•1y ago
Are there any public, open, comprehensive datasets on flights?
dieselerator•1y ago
> Are there any public, open, comprehensive datasets on flights?

Airlines and commercial aviation operators schedule their own flights. That is a dynamic schedulle. So, perhaps there is no "comprehensive data set".

However, FlightAware makes publicly available scheduled and completed flight data over many routes in the USA. You can search by route and get a list of flights.

Flight information includes filed departure time, route of flight, and speed. For completed flights actual time, altitude, and route is shown. For example, a search on the route Dallas/Fort Worth to Austin lists 45 flights.

I hope that helps.

foundart•1y ago
A very interesting dive into, as the title says, the computational complexity of air travel planning. Graph algorithms with lots of complexity added due to the wide variety of fare conditions that airlines have dreamt up over the years.

The article may be from 2003 but I would call it an evergreen. While I imagine some of the details have changed since then, I suspect that the complexity has only grown since then.

foundart•1y ago
It makes me wonder: Would an airline that drastically simplified its fares be more likely to appear in flight search results?

Simplifying the fares would make it less computationally expensive and, in theory, could take fewer steps to answer a flight planning query.

Imagine a flight search planner that, say, fanned out N airline-specific workers when handling a planning query and then displayed to the user whatever results it got back within some time limit. If FooAir had simple fares, the FooAir searcher would likely run faster than searchers for other airlines. Thus it would be more likely to return results for more queries, assuming the deadline is fairly tight because of usability metrics. (People don't tend to stick around waiting for slow results.)

sjburt•1y ago
At least a few years ago (~2014), the fare search was actually nearly instant, but all major airfare search sites added a delay because customers had the impression they were getting a better deal when they had to wait. It seems like the delay has been dialed back lately.
teleforce•1y ago
This is a very popular article that get submitted every now and then (nearly every year) [1].

I think this kind of problem would be a very nice for logic, optimization and constraint programming that probably can be solved with modern tools like Google OR-Tool or Monash University MiniZinc [1],[2],[3].

[1] Past:

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Computational%20Complexity%20o...

[2] Logic, Optimization, and Constraint Programming: A Fruitful Collaboration - John Hooker - CMU (2023) [video]:

https://www.youtube.com/live/TknN8fCQvRk

[3] Google OR-Tools:

https://developers.google.com/optimization

[4] MiniZinc:

https://www.minizinc.org/

Why Janet? (2023)

https://ianthehenry.com/posts/why-janet/
271•yacin•4h ago•128 comments

Please don't spam people looking for employment. It's just cruel

165•IliaLitviak•35m ago•36 comments

Adafruit Receives Demand Letter from Fenwick Legal Counsel on Behalf of Flux.ai

https://blog.adafruit.com/
301•semanser•4h ago•102 comments

Fidonet: Technology, Use, Tools, and History

https://www.fidonet.org/inet92_Randy_Bush.txt
14•BruceEel•37m ago•1 comments

Expanding Project Glasswing

https://www.anthropic.com/news/expanding-project-glasswing
36•surprisetalk•1h ago•24 comments

A walking tour of surveillance infrastructure in Seattle

https://coveillance.org/a-walking-tour-of-surveillance-infrastructure-in-seattle/
25•eustoria•1h ago•2 comments

Apple rejected my dictation app for using the accessibility API

https://www.mitmllc.com/blog/apple-rejected-my-dictation-app/
130•RZelaya•2h ago•87 comments

CSS-Native Parallax Effect

https://dan-webnotes.com/posts/2026-06-02-css-native-parallax-effect/
69•dandep•4h ago•35 comments

You Don't Love Systemd Timers Enough

https://blog.tjll.net/you-dont-love-systemd-timers-enough/
104•yacin•4h ago•60 comments

The newest Instagram “exploit” is the goofiest I've seen

https://www.0xsid.com/blog/meta-account-takeover-fiasco
1991•ssiddharth•22h ago•444 comments

Great Question (YC W21) Is Hiring Applied AI Interns

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/great-question/jobs/J5TNvQH-ai-engineer-intern
1•nedwin•2h ago

Can the stockmarket swallow Anthropic, SpaceX and OpenAI?

https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2026/06/01/can-the-stockmarket-swallow-anthropic-...
516•1vuio0pswjnm7•14h ago•895 comments

Muxcard, a dyi credit card size computer

https://github.com/krauseler/muxcard
149•sargstuff•2d ago•45 comments

macOS needs its grid back

https://blog.hopefullyuseful.com/blog/macos-needs-its-grid-back/
324•ranebo•13h ago•190 comments

Webcam head tracking, webcam to control in‑game FOV

https://www.openfov.com/
40•mwit2023•2d ago•23 comments

Show HN: Eyeball

https://eyeball.rory.codes/
55•mrroryflint•5h ago•23 comments

Martin Scorsese Is Embracing A.I

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/business/media/martin-scorsese-artificial-intelligence.html
28•stephen37•52m ago•28 comments

CQL: Categorical Databases

https://categoricaldata.net/
69•noworriesnate•3d ago•19 comments

OpenAI frontier models and Codex are now available on AWS

https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-models-and-codex-are-now-available-on-aws/
319•typpo•16h ago•111 comments

Chipotlai Max

https://github.com/cyberpapiii/chipotlai-max
297•nigelgutzmann•15h ago•50 comments

Why Custom Attributes in .NET Give Me Nightmares

https://blog.washi.dev/posts/custom-attributes-and-why-they-suck/
12•jandeboevrie•2d ago•2 comments

Strace-ui, Bonsai_term, and the TUI renaissance

https://blog.janestreet.com/strace-ui-bonsai-term-and-the-tui-renaissance/
95•matt_d•10h ago•54 comments

Stop Ruining It

https://seths.blog/2026/06/stop-ruining-it/
55•herbertl•4h ago•18 comments

CS336: Language Modeling from Scratch

https://cs336.stanford.edu/
514•kristianpaul•1d ago•49 comments

Debug Project

https://debug.com/
249•Eridanus2•17h ago•98 comments

AI Agent Guidelines for CS336 at Stanford

https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
459•prakashqwerty•21h ago•143 comments

Should you normalize RGB values by 255 or 256?

https://30fps.net/pages/255-vs-256-division/
292•pplanu•20h ago•123 comments

How is Groq raising more money?

https://www.zach.be/p/how-the-hell-is-groq-raising-more
133•hasheddan•13h ago•59 comments

Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/01/microsoft-builds-its-ultimate-macbook-pro-rival-with-the...
253•jbk•1d ago•524 comments

Fooling around with encrypted reasoning blobs

https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2026/05/29/fooling-around-with-encrypted-reasoning-blobs/
119•supermatou•4d ago•28 comments