frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

LegoGPT: Generating Physically Stable and Buildable Lego

https://avalovelace1.github.io/LegoGPT/
359•nkko•8h ago•101 comments

Show HN: Hyvector – A fast and modern SVG editor

https://www.hyvector.com
53•jansan•2h ago•14 comments

Data manipulations alleged in study that paved way for Microsoft's quantum chip

https://www.science.org/content/article/data-manipulations-alleged-study-paved-way-microsoft-s-quantum-chip
26•EvgeniyZh•1h ago•1 comments

Amazon's Vulcan Robots Now Stow Items Faster Than Humans

https://spectrum.ieee.org/amazon-stowing-robots
59•Luc•1h ago•43 comments

Void: Open-source Cursor alternative

https://github.com/voideditor/void
801•sharjeelsayed•20h ago•313 comments

Implementing a Struct of Arrays

https://brevzin.github.io/c++/2025/05/02/soa/
20•mpweiher•2h ago•0 comments

Zombieverter: Open source VCU for reusing salvage EV components

https://openinverter.org/wiki/ZombieVerter_VCU
37•trainsarebetter•3d ago•5 comments

Dead Reckoning

https://www.damninteresting.com/dead-reckoning/
103•repost_bot•9h ago•29 comments

Reservoir Sampling

https://samwho.dev/reservoir-sampling/
457•chrisdemarco•20h ago•84 comments

The Linux Kernel's PGP Web of Trust

https://blog.kleine-koenig.org/ukl/the-linux-kernels-pgp-web-of-trust.html
9•JNRowe•2h ago•0 comments

How "Night of the Living Dead" Accidentally Became Public Domain

https://screenrant.com/night-living-dead-movie-public-domain-copyright-accident/
27•edavis•2d ago•19 comments

Starlink User Terminal Teardown

https://www.darknavy.org/blog/a_first_glimpse_of_the_starlink_user_ternimal/
207•walterbell•9h ago•66 comments

Audiobookshelf: Self-hosted audiobook and podcast server

https://www.audiobookshelf.org/
112•fjk•10h ago•51 comments

WASM 2.0

https://www.w3.org/TR/wasm-core-2/
118•lioeters•5h ago•49 comments

Usenix ATC Announcement

https://www.usenix.org/blog/usenix-atc-announcement
77•eatbitseveryday•9h ago•6 comments

Fui: C library for interacting with the framebuffer in a TTY context

https://github.com/martinfama/fui
135•Bhulapi•14h ago•47 comments

A flat pricing subscription for Claude Code

https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/11145838-using-claude-code-with-your-max-plan
191•namukang•15h ago•189 comments

Full Control.xyz Freeform Gcode

https://fullcontrol.xyz/#/models
22•downboots•4d ago•1 comments

eBPF Mystery: When is IPv4 not IPv4? When it's pretending to be IPv6

https://blog.gripdev.xyz/2025/05/06/ebpf-mystery-when-is-ipv4-not-ipv4-when-its-ipv6/
73•tanelpoder•9h ago•20 comments

Apple is planning smart glasses with and without AR

https://www.theverge.com/news/663600/apple-smart-glasses-chips-ar-chip
10•matthewsinclair•1h ago•1 comments

Malaya's Timeless Design

https://www.linyangchen.com/Philately
26•cenazoic•3d ago•1 comments

Robotics meets the culinary arts

https://actu.epfl.ch/news/robotics-meets-the-culinary-arts/
25•gnabgib•4d ago•6 comments

Progress toward fusion energy gain as measured against the Lawson criteria

https://www.fusionenergybase.com/articles/continuing-progress-toward-fusion-energy-breakeven-and-gain-as-measured-against-the-lawson-criteria
213•sam•21h ago•110 comments

When Abandoned Mines Collapse

https://practical.engineering/blog/2025/5/6/when-abandoned-mines-collapse
203•impish9208•2d ago•64 comments

Podfox: First Container-Aware Browser

https://val.packett.cool/blog/podfox/
93•pierremenard•14h ago•15 comments

A Formal Analysis of Apple's iMessage PQ3 Protocol [pdf]

https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity25/sec25cycle1-prepub-595-linker.pdf
124•luu•10h ago•79 comments

From: Steve Jobs. "Great idea, thank you."

https://blog.hayman.net/2025/05/06/from-steve-jobs-great-idea.html
1025•mattl•18h ago•262 comments

No! Repent! From! Harlan! (1998)

https://harlanellison.com/text/amaz_int.htm
16•Michelangelo11•3d ago•3 comments

Linear Programming for Fun and Profit

https://modal.com/blog/resource-solver
4•hmac1282•4h ago•0 comments

Finding a Bug in Chromium

https://bou.ke/blog/chromium-bug/
54•bouk•4d ago•9 comments
Open in hackernews

Product Purgatory: When they love it but still don't buy

https://longform.asmartbear.com/purgatory/
40•doppp•4d ago

Comments

steveBK123•4d ago
I think there's lots of interesting example companies/products like this outside the startup/software space.

For those into photography, Sigma makes great 3rd party lenses at reasonable prices for other brands, which drives their revenue. But they are privately held and able to take more experimental risk making oddball cameras at low volumes. A lot of people laud their product design and give fairly positive reviews without actually buying them.

I've owned a few myself, but they are always a "camera for someone who already has 2 other cameras" type of product. Sometimes "no one has designed a product like this before" is for good reason, and predictive of poor sales.

So maybe to bring this back to software - consider if your product simplifies a customers life / replaces anything, or simply adds more complexity & risk to their stack.

FinnLobsien•3d ago
I think this also has a lot to do with HOW your product is bought.

May products are discovered. They're cool, they're novel, let's try. Those commonly end up in this situation where users like the thing but never buy it.

But the closer your product category is to being infrastructure, the less this happens.

In the space I'm in (billing/metering) but also many others, you don't stumble upon a product, think "that's cool" and hot-swap an important part of your architecture. You convene a buying committee and compare vedors.

Of course this advantage (everyone you speak with has higher buying intent) is counteracted by the fact that these types of products aren't "sexy" in the sense that they'll go viral with a snazzy animation.

rdtsc•8h ago
Another, reason products end in "purgatory" is that the customer is already using something like it. During market research that's the final question people forget to ask. You might ask "Do you have a need for this product?" - "yes". "Do you like the product?" - "yes!", "Would you pay money for it?" - also, "yes". If you stop here and go hire 10 developers and spend millions of dollars to build it you might be screwed, because you forgot to ask "But do you already use something like that?" and the answer might also be "yes".
dustincoates•5h ago
If your market research is asking the questions "Do you have a need for this product?" and "Do you like the product?" then you're asking the wrong questions. Ideally, you aren't mentioning your product until the very end if at all. Instead, you should be asking about the problems and how those problems are being solved today.

If they aren't being solved at all, they likely aren't really a problem. If they are being solved, you need to have a clear picture of why the new solution will justify the switching costs.

satvikpendem•5h ago
Indeed, people should read The Mom Test to understand what kinds of questions to ask. Hint, never ask directly if they'd want it because everyone says yes. If you ask them to buy and they say yes, collect their credit card info right then and there and charge them, that's one of the few ways to validate actual demand.