frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

We built another object storage

https://fractalbits.com/blog/why-we-built-another-object-storage/
60•fractalbits•2h ago•10 comments

Java FFM zero-copy transport using io_uring

https://www.mvp.express/
25•mands•5d ago•6 comments

How exchanges turn order books into distributed logs

https://quant.engineering/exchange-order-book-distributed-logs.html
49•rundef•5d ago•17 comments

macOS 26.2 enables fast AI clusters with RDMA over Thunderbolt

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/macos-release-notes/macos-26_2-release-notes#RDMA-over-...
467•guiand•18h ago•237 comments

AI is bringing old nuclear plants out of retirement

https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/12/09/nuclear-power-ai
34•geox•1h ago•26 comments

Sick of smart TVs? Here are your best options

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/12/the-ars-technica-guide-to-dumb-tvs/
434•fleahunter•1d ago•362 comments

Photographer built a medium-format rangefinder, and so can you

https://petapixel.com/2025/12/06/this-photographer-built-an-awesome-medium-format-rangefinder-and...
78•shinryuu•6d ago•10 comments

Apple has locked my Apple ID, and I have no recourse. A plea for help

https://hey.paris/posts/appleid/
867•parisidau•10h ago•445 comments

GNU Unifont

https://unifoundry.com/unifont/index.html
287•remywang•18h ago•68 comments

A 'toaster with a lens': The story behind the first handheld digital camera

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251205-how-the-handheld-digital-camera-was-born
42•selvan•5d ago•19 comments

Beautiful Abelian Sandpiles

https://eavan.blog/posts/beautiful-sandpiles.html
83•eavan0•3d ago•16 comments

Rats Play DOOM

https://ratsplaydoom.com/
334•ano-ther•18h ago•123 comments

Show HN: Tiny VM sandbox in C with apps in Rust, C and Zig

https://github.com/ringtailsoftware/uvm32
167•trj•17h ago•11 comments

OpenAI are quietly adopting skills, now available in ChatGPT and Codex CLI

https://simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/12/openai-skills/
481•simonw•15h ago•272 comments

Computer Animator and Amiga fanatic Dick Van Dyke turns 100

110•ggm•6h ago•23 comments

Will West Coast Jazz Get Some Respect?

https://www.honest-broker.com/p/will-west-coast-jazz-finally-get
10•paulpauper•6d ago•2 comments

Formula One Handovers and Handovers From Surgery to Intensive Care (2008) [pdf]

https://gwern.net/doc/technology/2008-sower.pdf
82•bookofjoe•6d ago•33 comments

Show HN: I made a spreadsheet where formulas also update backwards

https://victorpoughon.github.io/bidicalc/
179•fouronnes3•1d ago•85 comments

Freeing a Xiaomi humidifier from the cloud

https://0l.de/blog/2025/11/xiaomi-humidifier/
126•stv0g•1d ago•51 comments

Obscuring P2P Nodes with Dandelion

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2025/12/08/dandelion/
57•ColinWright•4d ago•1 comments

Go is portable, until it isn't

https://simpleobservability.com/blog/go-portable-until-isnt
119•khazit•6d ago•101 comments

Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/eliminating-state-law-obstruction-of-nati...
169•andsoitis•1d ago•217 comments

Poor Johnny still won't encrypt

https://bfswa.substack.com/p/poor-johnny-still-wont-encrypt
52•zdw•10h ago•65 comments

YouTube's CEO limits his kids' social media use – other tech bosses do the same

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/13/youtubes-ceo-is-latest-tech-boss-limiting-his-kids-social-media-u...
85•pseudolus•3h ago•67 comments

Slax: Live Pocket Linux

https://www.slax.org/
41•Ulf950•5d ago•5 comments

50 years of proof assistants

https://lawrencecpaulson.github.io//2025/12/05/History_of_Proof_Assistants.html
107•baruchel•15h ago•17 comments

Gild Just One Lily

https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2025/04/gild-just-one-lily/
29•serialx•5d ago•5 comments

Capsudo: Rethinking sudo with object capabilities

https://ariadne.space/2025/12/12/rethinking-sudo-with-object-capabilities.html
75•fanf2•17h ago•44 comments

Google removes Sci-Hub domains from U.S. search results due to dated court order

https://torrentfreak.com/google-removes-sci-hub-domains-from-u-s-search-results-due-to-dated-cour...
193•t-3•11h ago•34 comments

String theory inspires a brilliant, baffling new math proof

https://www.quantamagazine.org/string-theory-inspires-a-brilliant-baffling-new-math-proof-20251212/
167•ArmageddonIt•22h ago•154 comments
Open in hackernews

The DEA is now abandoning body cameras

https://www.propublica.org/article/drug-enforcement-administration-ends-body-camera-program-trump
164•bookofjoe•7mo ago

Comments

ty6853•7mo ago
Body cams can be removed at light speed but somehow the process of rescheduling marijuana moves at the speed of molasses.
SlightlyLeftPad•7mo ago
So while we’re talking about government overspending, this money was already spent. What is going to happen with these cameras that are now going to be unused?
rolph•7mo ago
now they can be carried at option rather than at mandate, thus self serving functions for cams now on the table.
SlightlyLeftPad•7mo ago
Cool, so since government accountability is now optional, I suspect we’ll get a few camps. At the very least, these two: honest officers who relish constant supervision and scrutiny, dishonest officers who relish violence and brutality above all else.
collingreen•7mo ago
How would your honest officer group operate alongside the other group, hypothetically? It seems like the kind of thing that group 2 would stamp out pretty quickly and group 1 wouldn't be able to stop.
qingcharles•7mo ago
Aren't a lot of these bodycams provided for free, and in exchange you have to use their cloud to store all the footage until the end of time?

(give the razor, sell the blades...)

spauldo•7mo ago
We don't have treaties with half the world mandating body cams.

(I want weed legalized too, but it's a thorny issue.)

JohnMakin•7mo ago
These can only be a positive to help police absolve themselves from wrongdoing - until such point wrongdoing is so pervasive that it becomes a net negative for them. then the cameras are a liability.

to quote a line ive often been delivered by police -

“if you didnt do anything wrong, what do you have to hide?”

tmpz22•7mo ago
Their counter argument will be "the privacy of the people we interact with" i.e. a SWAT team storming a house when a young child is in the bathroom.
stuaxo•7mo ago
Can't see them traumatising children.
theoreticalmal•7mo ago
Other than the “sorry, we raided the wrong house” situations (which absolutely should out the whole swat team in jail) a judge has to sign a warrant to raid the house, for good reason. The responsibility for the kids being traumatized lies with their parents, committing crimes in the house.
macintux•7mo ago
Committing crimes like registering to vote and being told they could vote?

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/08/florida-voter-fr...

JumpCrisscross•7mo ago
> a judge has to sign a warrant to raid the house, for good reason

We’re arresting and irrevocably detaining folks not only without a warrant, but in violation of court orders.

owebmaster•7mo ago
One more reason for the cameras to be always on
phatskat•7mo ago
> which absolutely should out the whole swat team in jail

Which doesn’t really happen, I mean cops murder innocent people and it’s a struggle to get meaningful consequences for _that_.

This is part of what ACAB means - the justice system is woefully against the interest of the public. If we hadn’t seen time and again cops get away with literal murder, if there were actually consequences, and if police unions didn’t have the ability to hold a community hostage, maybe fewer people would be ACAB. The fact that we even had to have a Supreme Court case about whether cops have a duty to protect civilians (surprise, it was ruled that they don’t) should be evidence that the system is rotten.

JohnMakin•7mo ago
I don’t make commentary publicly on ACAB usually but will share a story. I have had friends and family in law enforcement, but tend to take the view the institution is corrupt and the incentives and profession turns people in the best case scenario to unfeeling instruments of the machine, and in the worst case, turns shitty people into monsters. dunno if that makes me “ACAB” but if I were to take that position I’d say “all cops are bad, bad meaning incompetent, not necessarily evil.”

if you define ACAB in this way and competence defined as protecting the public from crime and maintaining the common good, then yea probably a lot if not ACAB.

I’ll share a story because this one moment in my life I was certain I was milliseconds from death and probably is the closest I ever came to it and it would have been at the hands of a cop “doing their job” with no bad intentions, just doing it poorly.

I worked in public transportation in a small, extremely wealthy community with a police force I’d describe as well funded and is considered highly trained. Part of my job required me to work very late hours into 2-4am. I took public transportation to work and bicycled home.

Unbeknownst to me, there had been some type of home invasion in the area as I was leaving work at 3am, and they shut the area down with roadblocks and set heavily armed officers up at every street intersection. I was riding my bike through the side alleys like I usually did to get home, unaware of the situation.

It’s pitch black except for some street lights nearby. Suddenly I get lit up by half a dozen bright lights in my face with armed officers pointing their weapons and screaming at me to get off my bike and on the ground. i did but had my backpack still on, they screamed to take it off as I did on my knees i saw an officer walk straight forward to me quickly with his hands on his gun aiming directly at my skull. I will never forget the look in his eyes, i felt i was toast. luckily i didnt panic and slowly put the backpack on the ground. then they realized i was a transportation worker and let me go and told me there had been a robbery. I was rattled but left.

The thing that really chapped my ass though and made the situation worse was at the next intersection, almost the exact same thing happened, because the bozos at the first one didnt radio their idiot friends and tell them not to shoot me. so twice in the space of like 5 mins i get guns drawn on me - they figured it out quicker the second time, but i stupidly popped off a little “are you gonna point your guns at me a third time or tell the next guys not to shoot me,” which didnt help the tension and got my bag searched for my trouble.

Experiencing something like that and knowing what a razors edge it could have been to dying for essentially no reason at the hands of a moron that makes more than i ever will with a pension irks me and always probably will.

dghlsakjg•7mo ago
Having the recording, viewing the recording internally, and releasing the recording to the public are all separate things.

These are solved problems. Hundreds of agencies use body cams now, and this has been dealt with.

bee_rider•7mo ago
I basically agree with you, but also am not sure how to square this with my belief that we are really gathering way too much information as a society (it always leaks).
clipsy•7mo ago
> but also am not sure how to square this with my belief that we are really gathering way too much information as a society

I think a good starting point for squaring this is to examine it in the context of what else the administration is doing (or not doing) to protect the privacy of citizens. This move has an enormous deleterious effect on police accountability in exchange for a fairly small increase in citizen privacy, so if the administration is ignoring more effective ways to improve the citizenry's privacy you can safely infer what really motivated their decision to back away from body cams.

itsanaccount•7mo ago
its about power.

you smoking a cig in an alley on your 15 minute break? you should have every right and privilege on earth.

you running 10,000 person strong group of people with the legal right to use force against your fellow man fighting to deny people their personal liberties with a long history of corruption? i don't care if there's cameras in the bathrooms.

tzs•7mo ago
I think you misread the thread. The posters above weren’t talking about the bathrooms of the DEA. The are talking about the bathrooms of the people the body cam wearing DEA officers encounter.
itsanaccount•7mo ago
[flagged]
baranul•7mo ago
When transparency to the public is no longer important, it looks like being able to secretly abuse others has become more important for such agencies.

It's back to the public not actually knowing what really happened, except in situations where its recorded by a 3rd party or there is a whistleblower from their own ranks. And we have to hope these people are brave enough to step forward and handle the pressure placed on them because they did, in order for justice to prevail.

sjsdaiuasgdia•7mo ago
This administration is allergic to accountability, so this tracks.
93po•7mo ago
this is a really odd thing to hear when the premise of DOGE is literally accountability. there is a lot of hyperbole and misinformation around DOGE, but at its root it's elon saying "if you spend millions of dollars you have to, at minimum, write a single sentence as to why"

obligatory trump and elon suck, im not defending them. just pushing back against misinformation

jhp123•7mo ago
The premise of DOGE is accountability to the personal whims and judgments of Elon Musk ... when we talk about accountability in government we usually mean, accountability to the public
BriggyDwiggs42•7mo ago
The messaging around doge involves some mention of accountability, alongside many other things like claims of fraud etc. That doesn’t mean that’s what doge actually does. You’re taking them at their word when their actions speak loudly.
93po•7mo ago
what perspective do you have on their actions outside of what corporate media says, which is constantly attacking both of them? if we're going to say "let's look at the actions" then let's look at what they're actually doing instead of the hysterical narrative being spun around it by organizations who have a monetary and political reason to do so
BriggyDwiggs42•7mo ago
Most of my awareness of doge comes from browsing the resources they’ve released or watching small commentators do the same. I don’t particularly like or trust corporate media as a rule. My top complaints would be

1 - a lack of transparency. They are very public about the small number of cuts that they can make look good to their base while obscuring/not elucidating a clear, extensive list of their actions. It’s not easy to examine the details of cut programs beyond short descriptions of dubious accuracy.

2 - clear political bias. The cuts/“fraud” they do publicize are frequently just things which appear, on their surface, to be ideologically liberal or left, rather than examples of clear waste or fraud. I say surface level appearance because the details of the cut are rarely more than a single sentence description and a monetary amount.

3 - security concerns. Doge isn’t careful enough/lacks the oversight to be handling Americans’ sensitive records. Their approach is very deliberately to behave more like a small startup, but they neglect security far too much as a consequence.

I think a department of government efficiency is a good idea, but I think doge pretends to be such a thing in order to cut government programs for ideological reasons without having to go through the legislature.

93po•7mo ago
1. https://www.doge.gov/savings this seems like incredibly transparency for a brand new government initiative that's like 100 days old. and in the ways it doesn't provide enough info, it acknowledges that, and says they're working on it, which i believe.

2. i agree that there is a lot of highlighting of stuff that is cut that is aligned with leftist ideology, e.g. money spent on programs that are gender affirming or involving trans/LGBTQ issues. i am LGBTQ/trans myself and I am massively in support of all initiatives to make the world a more loving, kind, accepting place. but i can also empathize that government attempts to do so are probably rampant with fraud and abuse and theft and waste, and it's not clear to me to what extent our government should be funding things surrounding social issues like this at all.

3. again i think this is a sentiment based on hyperbolic media reporting and is hard to substantiate with concrete evidence other than "MSNBC had an anonymous source that said so". it's also hard to know how much the claims, if true, are misaligned with "business as usual" in the government. if doge has access to personal information to help reduce social security fraud, is that really unusual? it seems like it's necessary if you're going to audit fraud and catch things like a 9 year old getting veteran benefits or whatever.

i think doge is definitely framing cuts in ideological ways for political points. and i believe they are specifically looking for and cutting DEI related stuff, because they've plainly stated as much. but problematic framing and motivations aside, i do think it's a massive net benefit, and especially if their work helps weed out and cut off people who systemically commit fraud and waste for years and for millions/billions of dollars.

azemetre•7mo ago
The entire purpose of DOGE is to attack the government while forcing them to use private services.

Don’t believe their lies because they’re just that lies.

Nothing they are doing is efficient because they don’t care. They just want to attack the government.

—-

For something HN relevant please look back at all the stupid comments Musk made after he was forced to acquire Twitter. Comments like there being hundreds of “ghost employees” or wanting devs to print their code changes.

jazzyjackson•7mo ago
There is already a government accountability office, www.gao.gov
const_cast•7mo ago
> just pushing back against misinformation

People pointing out that the premise and actions of something are contradictory isn't misinformation. Rather, it's revealing misinformation - the premise.

We can't just believe everything anyone says, especially when their actions are so obvious in contradiction. It feels like I'm being gaslit.

sjsdaiuasgdia•7mo ago
I refuse to believe a person this credulous exists who is also not either a supporter or somehow "neutral" on Trump and Musk.

You're a troll.

93po•7mo ago
you're using somewhat inflammatory language which i think is a bit further along the troll spectrum than me simply stating my perspective without attacking anyone. you could say the same thing without the attack.

you can look at my post history - i do routinely push back against things that i consider factually not true that are both trump and elon related, but i have also very frequently and loudly voiced my concerns and opinions about the ways they have hateful and problematic behaviors

my post history is also extremely, extremely left. i am very anti-capitalism and pro progressive causes, and i'm also trans. i have no desire to support the agendas of two people who don't respect me as a human being

i push on misinformation because i think there are real, meaningful things to attack these two people on. and i think the hyperbole of everything they do is literally what hitler would do distracts from the real issues.

i want to talk about ending wars, making sure everyone has basic access to housing and healthcare, that people can feel safe living their lives in ways that has literally no impact on anyone else. i want to end massive income and wealth inequality. and trump and elon are massively fucking those things up. i want to focus on that harm, and not the stuff people are making up

i also want to shed light on the problematic things that trump does that other presidents have also done. obama also had kids in cages. this isn't "whataboutism", it's an attempt to highlight that the problem isn't republicans versus democrats, though i recognize republicans are uniquely harmful. they both really, really suck, and cause millions of deaths a year. i want to highlight that voting blue isn't usually solving the biggest problems while acknowledging that it does solve some of them

mountainriver•7mo ago
The DEA has been caught doing some incredibly sketchy things in the past. Considering most drugs should be legalized or at least decriminalized, they provide little benefit and are now allowed even more freedom to exert their unnecessary power.

I didn’t know Biden had issued an executive order on this. That’s exactly what we needed.

ranger_danger•7mo ago
I predict this will only last until too many agents get shot with no evidence.