I'm not saying a pointy fast rocket testbed isn't cool or even useful to try to develop ways of avoiding shockwave impingement during air breathing or lift generation. But this isn't doing the thing.
Which is all that matters for military purpose. Air breathing hypersonic is useful because it offers even more flexibility in trajectories, but that doesn't mean that hypersonic gliders aren't useful.
> just a way to normalize using ballistic missiles, because they look slightly different and have a different name, without everyone freaking out?
Ballistic missiles have never been “not normalized”, they have been used routinely in pretty much every recent conflicts by at least one of the belligerent (usually the non-US side, since ballistic missiles are a way around the lack of airborn capabilities, but the US has its own arsenal: ATACMS are ballistic missiles).
The Oreshnik was famously falsely classified as an HGV in the first weeks by alternative media.
There is so much hype about "hypersonic" that I'm not sure if a true HGV even exists today. The gadget from the article looks like an attempt at it though.
What can I do to resolve this? You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page.
ChuckMcM•9mo ago
0_____0•9mo ago
cushychicken•9mo ago
0_____0•9mo ago
numpad0•9mo ago
cushychicken•9mo ago
This is a public signal of “we got something to Mach 5 and landed it in one piece - twice”.
That’s a pretty good indicator to people who want to get in on hypersonic technology development (I.e. defense contractors) that Stratolaunch is open for business.