frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

SQLite is all you need for durable workflows

https://obeli.sk/blog/sqlite-is-all-you-need-for-durable-workflows/
414•tomasol•10h ago•214 comments

The dead economy theory

https://www.owenmcgrann.com/p/the-dead-economy-theory
772•WillDaSilva•12h ago•965 comments

Naphtha Shortages Having a Growing Impact in Japan

https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02783/
24•takakaze•1h ago•8 comments

Snowboard Kids 2 is 100% Decompiled

https://blog.chrislewis.au/snowboard-kids-2-is-100-decompiled/
100•GaggiX•3d ago•28 comments

Notes from the Mistral AI Now Summit

https://koenvangilst.nl/lab/mistral-ai-now-summit
318•vnglst•11h ago•114 comments

Print with dozens of colors: Our new open-source ColorMix for PrusaSlicer

https://blog.prusa3d.com/our-new-open-source-colormix-model-in-prusaslicer-and-easyprint_136079/
105•rented_mule•3d ago•13 comments

MCP is dead?

https://www.quandri.io/engineering-blog/mcp-is-dead
116•nadis•4h ago•98 comments

Shift will clean homes for free to train future robots

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/939765/ai-training-data-startup-shift-free-cl...
99•evilsimon•8h ago•145 comments

It's hard to justify buying a Framework 12

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/its-hard-to-justify-framework-12/
240•watermelon0•13h ago•421 comments

Math-to-Manim

https://github.com/HarleyCoops/Math-To-Manim
4•georgewsinger•2d ago•0 comments

WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/white-house-proposes-new-rules-giving-political-appoin...
66•jordanpg•2h ago•34 comments

Show HN: Tiny-vLLM – high performance LLM inference engine in C++ and CUDA

https://github.com/jmaczan/tiny-vllm
106•yu3zhou4•8h ago•10 comments

Perry Compiles TypeScript directly to executables using SWC and LLVM

https://www.perryts.com/
7•0x1997•41m ago•7 comments

Liquid AI reveals 8B-A1B MoE trained on 38T

https://www.liquid.ai/blog/lfm2-5-8b-a1b
161•simjnd•11h ago•60 comments

Bijou64: A variable-length integer encoding

https://www.inkandswitch.com/tangents/bijou64/
210•justinweiss•12h ago•74 comments

You can just say it

https://noperator.dev/posts/you-can-just-say-it/
254•antirez•12h ago•125 comments

What Is a Dickover?

https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover
166•tambourine_man•4h ago•78 comments

Ember.js 7.0

https://blog.emberjs.com/ember-released-7-0/
29•satvikpendem•3h ago•6 comments

Citing 'severe' math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEM

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-05-27/uc-math-professors-demand-return-of-sat-for-s...
507•brandonb•1d ago•700 comments

On Rendering Diffs

https://pierre.computer/writing/on-rendering-diffs
148•amadeus•8h ago•46 comments

Is AI causing a repeat of frontend’s lost decade?

https://mastrojs.github.io/blog/2026-05-23-is-AI-causing-a-repeat-of-frontends-lost-decade/
302•xyzal•16h ago•262 comments

The Last Technical Interview

https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-last-technical-interview-bc13ddcf4564
71•headalgorithm•7h ago•37 comments

The mysterious Hy3 LLM is topping OpenRouter Model Rankings by a large margin

https://minimaxir.com/2026/05/openrouter-hy3/
112•freediver•1d ago•97 comments

Free full BGP feed. IPv4 and IPv6 (2020)

https://lukasz.bromirski.net/post/bgp-w-labie-3/
30•pm2222•5h ago•12 comments

The California state assembly has passed the 'Protect Our Games Act'

https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/22330/stop-killing-games-movement-gains-momentum-california-...
204•TechTechTech•7h ago•207 comments

GTA 6 Developers Unionize

https://rockstarintel.com/gta-6-developers-announce-rockstar-games-union/
591•AndrewKemendo•12h ago•415 comments

Show HN: TV Explorer. Adding advanced UI to free online TV

https://tvexplorer.live
115•dtagames•11h ago•36 comments

We should be more tired than the model

https://vickiboykis.com/2026/05/28/we-should-be-more-tired-than-the-model/
156•tosh•15h ago•132 comments

Letter from the Duke of Wellington to the British Foreign Office (1809)

https://wellsoc.org/society-member-pages/anecdotes-of-wellington/
53•backuprestore•10h ago•15 comments

CAPTCHAs can still detect AI agents

https://research.roundtable.ai/captchas-detect-ai/
67•timshell•11h ago•55 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.