frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

DOS Game "F-15 Strike Eagle II" reversing project needs DOS test pilots

https://neuviemeporte.github.io/f15-se2/2026/06/20/needyou.html
72•LowLevelMahn•2h ago•18 comments

CSSQuake

https://cssquake.com/
326•msalsas•6h ago•71 comments

SMPTE Makes Its Standards Freely Accessible

https://www.smpte.org/blog/smpte-makes-its-standards-freely-accessible-openingstandards-library-t...
16•zdw•35m ago•5 comments

UHF X11: X11 Built for VisionOS and Apple Vision Pro

https://www.lispm.net/apps/uhf-x11/
11•zdw•32m ago•2 comments

Ember, a native iOS Hacker News reader I built around accessibility

https://github.com/DatanoiseTV/ember-hackernews
11•sylwester•36m ago•2 comments

Show HN: StartupWiki – A Free Alternative to Crunchbase

https://startupwiki.tech/
11•shpran•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Microcrad – Micrograd Reimplemented in C

https://github.com/oraziorillo/microcrad
21•oraziorillo•3d ago•4 comments

VPN ban update for UK households as government looks at 'age-gate'

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/vpn-ban-update-uk-households-34141063
162•iamnothere•3h ago•155 comments

Mencius (2016)

https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iuswrrest/api/core/bitstreams/265d73a0-6bfa-45df-92ff-4e7d3f8be4b1/co...
14•jruohonen•2d ago•1 comments

Vacation With An Artist – Mini-Apprenticeships with Artists in Their Studios

https://vawaa.com/
16•karakoram•2h ago•2 comments

Bootimus – A Self-Contained PXE and HTTP Boot Server

https://bootimus.com
71•car•6h ago•24 comments

Web Browsers on PDAS

https://vale.rocks/posts/pda-browsers
23•robin_reala•3h ago•6 comments

Cargo-Geiger

https://github.com/geiger-rs/cargo-geiger
19•tosh•2h ago•5 comments

Where to Find the Colors Your Screen Can't Show You

https://moultano.wordpress.com/2026/06/19/where-to-find-the-colors-your-screen-cant-show-you/
348•moultano•14h ago•86 comments

From PGP to Mythos: a brief history of export controls that didn't stop anyone

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/19/encryption-spyware-and-now-mythos-history-shows-why-cyber-expor...
98•Brajeshwar•3h ago•42 comments

I Stored a Website in a Favicon

https://www.timwehrle.de/blog/i-stored-a-website-in-a-favicon/
255•theanonymousone•12h ago•87 comments

Temporary Cloudflare Accounts for AI Agents

https://blog.cloudflare.com/temporary-accounts/
57•farhadhf•6h ago•35 comments

The European Social Stack

https://european.social
75•doener•3h ago•63 comments

Windows 11 New Media Player Uses 3.5x More RAM, Charges for Popular Video Codecs

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/windows-11s-new-media-player-uses-35x-more-ram-charges-for-...
90•tcp_handshaker•3h ago•39 comments

Ubisoft co-founder Claude Guillemot has died in a plane crash

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-20/ubisoft-co-founder-claude-guillemot-dies-in-ai...
89•drayfield•3h ago•40 comments

Can you see three trees?

https://www.not-ship.com/can-you-see-three-trees/
262•Pamar•2d ago•128 comments

Computed goto for efficient dispatch tables (2012)

https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2012/07/12/computed-goto-for-efficient-dispatch-tables
32•firephox•3d ago•14 comments

US Scientist John Jumper to Leave Google DeepMind for Anthropic

https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-scientist-john-jumper-leave-google-deepmind-anthropic-2026-...
45•karakoram•3h ago•5 comments

GPT-5.5 hallucinates 3x more than MIT-licensed GLM-5.2

https://arrowtsx.dev/bigger-models/
415•oshrimpton•1d ago•196 comments

Pong in S Favicon

https://pong-in-a-favicon.franzai.com/
21•theanonymousone•5h ago•4 comments

There are no instances in ATProto

https://overreacted.io/there-are-no-instances-in-atproto/
499•danabramov•1d ago•279 comments

Human Judgment as a Specification

https://blog.brownplt.org/2026/06/09/pick.html
33•surprisetalk•3d ago•13 comments

Data Compression Explained (2012)

https://mattmahoney.net/dc/dce.html
175•mtdewcmu•3d ago•29 comments

The Cold War's Accidental Whale Observatory

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-cold-wars-accidental-whale-observatory/
51•pseudolus•3d ago•22 comments

LLMs Are Complicated Now

https://ianbarber.blog/2026/06/19/llms-are-complicated-now/
126•matt_d•16h ago•52 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.