frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Free Market Lie: Why Switzerland Has 25 Gbit Internet and America Doesn't

https://stefan.schueller.net/posts/the-free-market-lie/
46•talonx•21m ago•13 comments

Virginia bans sale of geolocation data

https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/virginia-bans-sale-of-geolocation-data
623•toomuchtodo•7h ago•106 comments

CarPlay Is Additive

https://www.caseyliss.com/2026/7/2/carplay-is-additive-you-dolts
123•sprawl_•3h ago•157 comments

crustc: entirety of `rustc`, translated to C

https://github.com/FractalFir/crustc
189•Philpax•5h ago•33 comments

Right to Local Intelligence

https://righttointelligence.org/
91•thoughtpeddler•4h ago•37 comments

Since Linux 6.9, LUKS suspend stopped wiping disk-encryption keys from memory

https://mathstodon.xyz/@iblech/116769502749142438
426•IngoBlechschmid•13h ago•191 comments

Reality has a surprising amount of detail (2017)

https://johnsalvatier.org/blog/2017/reality-has-a-surprising-amount-of-detail
184•vinhnx•5d ago•68 comments

Exapunks (2018)

https://www.zachtronics.com/exapunks/
248•yu3zhou4•9h ago•83 comments

An American Privacy Emergency

https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9902
220•flowercalled•4h ago•76 comments

PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube
549•doener•17h ago•255 comments

Podman v6.0.0

https://blog.podman.io/2026/07/introducing-podman-v6-0-0/
425•soheilpro•14h ago•173 comments

Mystery identity of 'Green Boots' climber is finally solved after DNA test

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15943905/Mystery-identity-Green-Boots-climber-macabre-land...
75•FireBeyond•5h ago•37 comments

Is the iPhone birth control? Causal evidence from AT&T's 2007-2011 monopoly [pdf]

https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35310/w35310.pdf
10•Terretta•16h ago•3 comments

How to ask for help from people who don't know you

https://pradyuprasad.com/writings/how-to-ask-for-help/
446•FigurativeVoid•15h ago•67 comments

Perform DFU Restores on Apple Silicon Macs with Macvdmtool (2021)

https://www.bkurtz.io/posts/macvdmtool/
6•gregsadetsky•3d ago•0 comments

Immich 3.0

https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/29439
248•hashier•14h ago•118 comments

Superpowers 6

https://blog.fsck.com/2026/06/15/Superpowers-6/
102•seahorseemoji•2d ago•45 comments

Show HN: zkGolf – Competitive optimization of formally verified circuits

https://zk.golf/
51•rot256•12h ago•6 comments

Postgres transactions are a distributed systems superpower

https://www.dbos.dev/blog/co-locating-workflow-state-with-your-data
137•KraftyOne•9h ago•59 comments

FoundationDB's Flow – Bringing Actor-Based Concurrency to C++11

https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/flow.html
48•sourdecor•13h ago•6 comments

Great Salt Lake Tracker – Grow the Flow

https://growtheflowutah.org/laketracker/
78•cfowles•9h ago•31 comments

This is my attempt to get Vulkan going on NetBSD

https://github.com/segaboy/vulkan-netbsd
89•segaboy81•10h ago•19 comments

The short leash AI coding method for beating Fable

https://blog.okturtles.org/2026/07/short-leash-ai-method/
83•Riseed•9h ago•95 comments

EFF letter to FTC on X consent order [pdf]

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/eff-and-allies-xs-ftc-petition-waive-privacy-violation-orde...
121•Terretta•9h ago•45 comments

Lightning Memory-Mapped Database Manager (LMDB) 1.0

http://www.lmdb.tech/doc/
69•radiator•8h ago•40 comments

Show HN: Inkwell – An RSS reader for e-ink devices

https://kendal.codeberg.page/inkwell/
41•imkendal•12h ago•5 comments

Claude-real-video - any LLM can watch a video

https://github.com/HUANGCHIHHUNGLeo/claude-real-video
97•cortexosmain•9h ago•30 comments

A Special Wireless-Free Nikon Camera Is Publicly Available for the First Time

https://petapixel.com/2026/06/24/a-special-wireless-free-nikon-camera-is-publicly-available-for-t...
33•HardwareLust•1w ago•18 comments

Order a burned CD of your own public GitHub repo

https://forms.cloud.microsoft/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR6G-c11n8yFDlQmk4B-Q...
119•throwaway2027•4h ago•89 comments

Apricot Computers: An underrated British brand

https://dfarq.homeip.net/apricot-computers-an-underrated-british-brand/
31•giuliomagnifico•1d ago•9 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.