frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Epic Games announces Lore version control system

https://lore.org/
718•regnerba•5h ago•401 comments

The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-mythos-safety-nicholas-carlini-20bceaa3
46•Brajeshwar•49m ago•31 comments

Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

https://github.com/Adam-CAD/CADAM
98•zachdive•3h ago•47 comments

GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/glm-5-2-is-the-new-leading-open-weights-model-on-the-artif...
670•himata4113•10h ago•343 comments

Show HN: An 8-bit live gamecast for baseball

https://ribbie.tv/watch
136•brownrout•3h ago•80 comments

How we run Firecracker VMs inside EC2 and start browsers in less than 1s

https://browser-use.com/posts/firecracker-browser-infra
103•gregpr07•1d ago•53 comments

RFC 10008: The new HTTP Query Method

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10008/
265•schappim•9h ago•121 comments

U.S. science is in chaos

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/americas-compact-between-science-and-politics-is-broken/
415•presspot•10h ago•474 comments

US holds off blacklisting DeepSeek, more than 100 firms deemed security risks

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/us-holds-off-blacklisting-chinas-deepseek-more-than-100-firms...
180•giuliomagnifico•16h ago•160 comments

The Competitive Moat That AI Can't Replicate

https://ghostinthedata.info/posts/2026/2026-06-13-human-connection-moat/
51•speckx•2h ago•28 comments

Want your images back? That'll be $5

https://www.lutr.dev/want-your-images-back-sure-that-ll-be-5-dollars
538•lutr•7h ago•229 comments

Trellis AI (YC W24) hiring a product lead to build agents for healthcare access

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/trellis-ai/jobs/Cg94htp-product-lead
1•macklinkachorn•3h ago

Why thinking out loud with someone beats thinking alone

https://www.thesignalist.io/s/the-dialogue-dividend/
102•kodesko•7h ago•36 comments

MicroUI – A tiny, portable, immediate-mode UI library written in ANSI C

https://github.com/rxi/microui
142•peter_d_sherman•8h ago•43 comments

Show HN: Inkwash, a watercolor sketching app and explanation

https://johnowhitaker.github.io/inkwash/about
116•Yenrabbit•3d ago•18 comments

AI chemist improves a challenging reaction in medicinal chemistry

https://openai.com/index/ai-chemist-improves-reaction/
28•ilreb•2h ago•12 comments

TREX: An AI code reviewer that runs your code

https://www.greptile.com/blog/trex-code-execution
34•dakshgupta•4h ago•6 comments

The Capitoline Wolf

https://thehappytraveler.ca/travel-guide-italy/capitoline-wolf-siena-rome-myths/
9•jruohonen•3d ago•0 comments

Hacker News but for independent blogs

https://bubbles.town/
457•headalgorithm•12h ago•159 comments

Kirkland Roundabouts

https://kirklandroundabouts.com
114•DenisM•2d ago•88 comments

AI demands more engineering discipline. Not less

https://charitydotwtf.substack.com/p/ai-demands-more-engineering-discipline
257•BerislavLopac•5h ago•122 comments

Image Compression

https://www.makingsoftware.com/chapters/image-compression
111•vinhnx•3d ago•14 comments

Volkswagen started blocking GrapheneOS users

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/35949-volkswagen-app?page=3
323•microtonal•5h ago•222 comments

Show HN: StarScope – Free astronomy dashboard for observers outside the US/UK

https://starscope.live/feed
5•xenophin•2d ago•1 comments

Why do commercial spaces sit vacant? (2025)

https://www.freerange.city/p/why-do-commercial-spaces-sit-vacant
76•Redoubts•13h ago•110 comments

Seventeen Camels and Where They Can Take You

https://mathenchant.wordpress.com/2026/06/15/seventeen-camels-and-where-they-can-take-you/
19•ibobev•2d ago•7 comments

The founder's playbook: Building an AI-native startup

https://claude.com/blog/the-founders-playbook
178•e2e4•13h ago•139 comments

Abandoned and Little-Known Airfields

https://airfields-freeman.com/
134•wizardforhire•3d ago•38 comments

French physicist and media star loses doctorate after plagiarism investigation

https://www.science.org/content/article/french-physicist-and-media-star-loses-doctorate-after-pla...
120•bookofjoe•4h ago•116 comments

Show HN: High-Res Neural Cellular Automata

https://cells2pixels.github.io/
170•esychology•10h ago•44 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.