frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Running local models is good now

https://vickiboykis.com/2026/06/15/running-local-models-is-good-now/
120•jfb•1h ago•42 comments

Mechanical Watch (2022)

https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/
407•razin•4h ago•70 comments

Subquadratic – Introducing SubQ 1.1 Small

https://subq.ai/subq-1-1-small-technical-report
31•EDM115•52m ago•12 comments

Correlated randomness in Slay the Spire 2

https://tck.mn/blog/correlated-randomness-sts2/
168•rdmuser•5h ago•57 comments

I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2064095424420487226
616•apitman•10h ago•312 comments

Show HN: Hackers for Granny (defense against industrialized elder fraud)

https://professorsigmund.com/praxis/hackers_for_granny_manifesto.html
34•Prof_Sigmund•1h ago•7 comments

A backdoor in a LinkedIn job offer

https://roman.pt/posts/linkedin-backdoor/
1444•lwhsiao•19h ago•273 comments

The time the x86 emulator team found code so bad they fixed it during emulation

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260615-00/?p=112419
415•paulmooreparks•10h ago•130 comments

Google Chrome update will close the door on ad blockers

https://9to5google.com/2026/06/15/google-chromes-next-update-will-mark-the-end-of-popular-ad-bloc...
121•speckx•1h ago•77 comments

An interview with an Apple emoji designer

https://shadycharacters.co.uk/2026/06/ollie-wagner/
45•nate•2d ago•21 comments

Google Chrome's Next Update Will Mark the End of Popular Ad Blockers

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/06/15/205219/google-chromes-next-update-will-mark-the-end-of-p...
40•arnejenssen•37m ago•15 comments

Getting Creative with Perlin Noise Fields

https://sighack.com/post/getting-creative-with-perlin-noise-fields
106•0x000xca0xfe•2d ago•17 comments

Unicorn – The Ultimate CPU Emulator

https://www.unicorn-engine.org/
33•tosh•4h ago•10 comments

4× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell on Water, and the One Card That Wouldn't Behave

https://sabareesh.com/posts/blackwell-waterblock/
27•sabareesh•3d ago•24 comments

Feds freaked over Fable 5 after simple 'fix this code' prompt, not jailbreak

https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/06/15/feds-freaked-over-fable-5-after-simple-fix-this-c...
376•_tk_•6h ago•219 comments

Banned Book Library in a Wi-Fi Smart Light Bulb

https://www.richardosgood.com/posts/banned-book-library/
508•sohkamyung•17h ago•300 comments

TinyWind: A pixel pirate sailing game with real wind physics (380k+ kms sailed)

https://tinywind.io
941•tinywind•23h ago•166 comments

The history of butterfly swimming

https://www.swimming.org/sport/history-of-butterfly/
8•mooreds•2d ago•2 comments

Understanding the rationale behind a rule when trying to circumvent it

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260611-00/?p=112415
81•tosh•8h ago•26 comments

SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B

https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/spacex-buy-anysphere-60-billion-2026-06-16/
212•itsmarcelg•4h ago•153 comments

Trinket.io shutting down, so we saved it and hosted it a trinket.strivemath.org

https://trinket.strivemath.org/
81•apulkit6•6h ago•11 comments

SpaceX to acquire Cursor for $60B in stock, days after blockbuster IPO

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/16/spacex-to-acquire-cursor-for-60b-in-stock-days-after-blockbuste...
13•frb•3h ago•2 comments

I Love the Computer

https://michaelenger.com/blog/i-love-the-computer/
282•speckx•19h ago•155 comments

'Wow, it really worked ': 70s TV show causing worldwide panic today

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2026/jun/16/alternative-3-mockumentary-missing-scientist...
55•defrost•2h ago•27 comments

Show HN: Garden of Flowers – an archive of pictorial typography before ASCII art

https://garden-of-flowers.heikkilotvonen.com/
116•california-og•11h ago•16 comments

Color Photos of Stalin-Era Soviet Union Taken by a US Diplomat

https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/stalin-era-soviet-union-pictures-martin-manhoff/
97•Cider9986•2d ago•33 comments

I hacked into the worst e-bike and fixed it [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPrtVGimBYs
146•alexis-d•5d ago•72 comments

I Fired Google

https://www.theartofdoingstuff.com/i-fired-google/
89•speckx•1h ago•82 comments

CJEU: Social networks are the 'publishers' of algorithmically-altered feeds

https://bsky.app/profile/stevepeers.bsky.social/post/3mofdspytds2l
5•handelaar•12m ago•1 comments

Peopleless economy? Not technically impossible

https://gmalandrakis.com/writings/ad-economicum.html
255•l0new0lf-G•18h ago•481 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.