frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ntsc-rs – open-source video emulation of analog TV and VHS artifacts

https://ntsc.rs/
66•gregsadetsky•1h ago•13 comments

Zeroserve: A zero-config web server you can script with eBPF

https://su3.io/posts/introducing-zeroserve
124•losfair•5h ago•30 comments

Meta confirms 1000s of Instagram accounts were hacked by abusing its AI chatbot

https://this.weekinsecurity.com/meta-confirms-thousands-of-instagram-accounts-were-hacked-by-abus...
106•speckx•2h ago•36 comments

Nvidia is proposing a beast of a CPU system for Windows PCs

https://twitter.com/lemire/status/2062880075117113739
168•tosh•7h ago•333 comments

You Can Run

https://magazine.atavist.com/2026/mccann-cocaine-fugitives
56•bryanrasmussen•4h ago•14 comments

Show HN: Infinite canvas notes in the non-Euclidean Poincaré disk

https://uonr.github.io/poincake/
67•uonr•4d ago•8 comments

Benchmarks in Leipzig

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05818
106•root-parent•6h ago•41 comments

How LLMs work

https://www.0xkato.xyz/how-llms-actually-work/
771•0xkato•3d ago•215 comments

Google will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/05/google-will-pay-spacex-920m-per-month-for-compute/
341•ramanan•8h ago•490 comments

Pokemon Emerald Ported to WebAssembly (100k FPS)

https://pokeemerald.com/
205•tripplyons•9h ago•59 comments

Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-raised-threat-israeli-spying-us-highe...
204•MilnerRoute•2h ago•135 comments

WoofWare.PawPrint, a Deterministic .NET Runtime

https://www.patrickstevens.co.uk/posts/2026-06-04-announcing-woofware-pawprint/
29•Smaug123•2d ago•13 comments

Lambda isn't leaking memory, your metrics are lying to you

https://engineering.taktile.com/blog/onnx-memory-usage-on-lambda/
12•tlarkworthy•2d ago•1 comments

Running Python code in a sandbox with MicroPython and WASM

https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/6/micropython-in-a-sandbox/
54•theanonymousone•6h ago•18 comments

Police in England and Wales told to halt AI use in court statements

https://www.ft.com/content/229e5949-3ebc-4151-8a86-a01b5e259241
115•nmstoker•5h ago•41 comments

Summer of '85: DOSBOS is rejected by ANALOG Computing

https://www.goto10retro.com/p/summer-of-85-dosbos-is-rejected-by
33•ibobev•2d ago•7 comments

S&P 500 rejects SpaceX, also blocking entry for OpenAI and Anthropic

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/sp-500-blocks-fast-spacex-entry-wont-waive-rule-for-u...
1238•maltalex•15h ago•426 comments

Moving beyond fork() + exec()

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1076018/16f01bbbb8e0d1f0/
196•jwilk•6h ago•202 comments

Building Rust Procedural Macros from the Grounds Up

https://www.learnix-os.com/ch02-03-implementing-the-bitfields-proc-macro.html
62•Sagi21805•6d ago•14 comments

Trees to Flows and Back: Unifying Decision Trees and Diffusion Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00414
30•rsn243•7h ago•5 comments

Python JIT project was asked to pause development

https://discuss.python.org/t/an-announcement-from-the-steering-council-regarding-the-jit-project/...
109•kbumsik•5h ago•42 comments

Mbodi AI (YC P25) Is Hiring Founding Machine Learning Engineer (Robotics)

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/mbodi-ai/jobs/WYAcNkX-founding-machine-learning-engineer
1•chitianhao•8h ago

New method turns ocean water into drinking water, without waste

https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/what-is-desalination-definition-ocean-water-704732/
480•speckx•1d ago•200 comments

The intracies of modern camera lens repair (2024)

https://salvagedcircuitry.com/sigma-45mm.html
228•transistor-man•20h ago•83 comments

Ask HN: Why is the HN crowd so anti-AI?

297•Ekami•18h ago•512 comments

Tribute to Jiro Yamada, Automotive Artist (1960-2025) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ2gQ5Md60U
34•NaOH•23h ago•3 comments

Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

498•andrehacker•1d ago•878 comments

Splash Is a Colour Format

https://www.todepond.com/lab/splash/
28•tobr•2d ago•24 comments

Pre-Modern Armies for Worldbuilders, Part I: Why They Fight

https://acoup.blog/2026/06/05/collections-pre-modern-armies-for-worldbuilders-part-i-why-they-fight/
163•gostsamo•16h ago•50 comments

Social Cache Busting

https://www.autodidacts.io/social-cache-busting/
117•surprisetalk•4d ago•43 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.