frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

London Gatwick has launched a robotic airport parking service

https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/gatwick-airport-robotic-parking-stanley-robotics/
228•agotterer•5h ago•172 comments

Decker

https://beyondloom.com/decker/
33•tosh•1h ago•6 comments

Design is compromise

https://stephango.com/design-is-compromise
105•ankitg12•3h ago•48 comments

Show HN: CheapSecurity – Lightweight, Self-Hosted CCTV for Linux SBCs

https://github.com/gmrandazzo/CheapSecurity
50•zeldone•3h ago•12 comments

Jimothy the raccoon has a rare spinal condition. Here's what that means

https://www.popsci.com/science/whats-jimothy-raccoon-condition/
62•speckx•5d ago•23 comments

How to Write English Prose

https://thelampmagazine.com/blog/how-to-write-english-prose
26•geneticdrifts•2h ago•7 comments

Htmx 4.0, the first JavaScript library to release exclusively on the Game Boy

https://swag.htmx.org/en-cad/products/htmx-4-the-game
205•rcy•7h ago•68 comments

Introduction to Data-Oriented Design [pdf]

https://www.gamedevs.org/uploads/introduction-to-data-oriented-design.pdf
18•tosh•1h ago•4 comments

Go Analysis Framework: modular static analysis by go team

https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis
147•AbuAssar•7h ago•24 comments

Building the Grace Cathedral Experience

https://blog.playcanvas.com/building-the-grace-cathedral-experience/
7•ovenchips•4d ago•0 comments

How to Block Some of the Bots

https://nochan.net/b/Internet-Crap/20260606-How-To-Block-Some-Of-The-Bots/
13•Bender•1h ago•9 comments

Show HN: HART OS – an open-source AI OS built so frontier AI needs no datacenter

https://github.com/hertz-ai/HARTOS
7•hevolveai•1h ago•1 comments

The Strongest El Niño Ever

https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/the-strongest-el-nino-ever
98•ndsipa_pomu•1h ago•37 comments

Using ThinkPad T480 as a mobile phone

https://grego.site/blog/thinkphone
24•marosgrego•2h ago•8 comments

The New AI Superpowers: Focus and Followthrough

https://www.rickmanelius.com/p/the-new-ai-superpowers-focus-and
71•mooreds•6h ago•26 comments

Kill The Cookie Banner

https://killthecookiebanner.eu/
595•rapnie•7h ago•287 comments

I learned PCB design, 3D printing and C just to listen to music

https://pentaton.app/blog/2026-07-12-introducing-pentaton-lp/
130•interfeco•3d ago•26 comments

Using sed to make indexes for books (long)

https://www.pement.org/sed/make_indexes.txt
22•TMWNN•3d ago•3 comments

GrapheneOS protections against data extraction from locked devices

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/40700-grapheneos-protections-against-data-extraction-from-locked...
319•Cider9986•13h ago•195 comments

Show HN: The Occult Gatsby

https://occultgatsby.work
15•morganw•1h ago•3 comments

What's Under Your Feet in New York City?

https://practical.engineering/blog/2026/7/21/whats-under-your-feet-in-new-york-city
113•sohkamyung•4d ago•20 comments

Show HN: Reverse Minesweeper

https://sunflowersgame.com/
80•pompomsheep•6h ago•26 comments

French firefighters face 'pyrocumulonimbus' for first time

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20260726-french-firefighters-face-pyrocumulonimbus-for-firs...
49•saaaaaam•1h ago•20 comments

Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

https://www.wsj.com/tech/google-discloses-94-1-billion-in-spacex-stock-marking-6-stake-91655d7c
264•1vuio0pswjnm7•7h ago•206 comments

A shell colon does nothing. Use it anyway

https://refp.se/articles/your-shell-and-the-magic-colon
358•olexsmir•1d ago•153 comments

Sum of Cubes via Difference Tables

https://leancrew.com/all-this/2026/07/sum-of-cubes-via-difference-tables/
10•surprisetalk•3d ago•2 comments

Terence Tao: Mathematics in the Age of AI [pdf]

https://teorth.github.io/tao-web/slides/age-of-ai-icm-2026.pdf
70•Anon84•9h ago•32 comments

An Inside Look at the Token Reseller Market

https://vectoral.com/blog/token-relay-market
93•mlenhard•4h ago•50 comments

An ESP32 based plane radar for my desk

https://blog.ktz.me/esp32-plane-radar/
249•alexktz•17h ago•54 comments

Ruff v0.16.0 – Significant new updates – 413 default rules up from 59

https://astral.sh/blog/ruff-v0.16.0
323•vismit2000•10h ago•203 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.