frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

.name Grandfathered

https://neil.fraser.name/news/2026/11/10/
473•p4bl0•4h ago•94 comments

Smart home devices should work without the internet

https://docodethatmatters.com/home-automation-overnight-success/
444•skittleson•5h ago•166 comments

Synaptics patent claims stop work on DisplayLink drivers

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1102549/acbc92e00cee3a3f/
152•speckx•2h ago•69 comments

Val Town is winding down

https://blog.val.town/winding-down
183•tosh•3h ago•49 comments

What objective is reasoning solving?

https://alexwang.ai/posts/reasoning-as-pathfinding/
38•gmays•1h ago•11 comments

Show HN: Get your coding agent off ~2019 JavaScript, onto modern web primitives

https://github.com/GoogleChrome/modern-web-guidance
139•paulirish•2h ago•38 comments

AlphaProof Code

https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-alphaproof-code/
524•ilreb•8h ago•167 comments

A comprehensive study of how fingerprintable users are

https://fingerprinting.study/
27•tomrittervg•1h ago•2 comments

AMD's Zen 6 Family: Feeding the Beast

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/amds-zen-6-family-feeding-the-beast
117•pixelpoet•3h ago•39 comments

Saltline: First-person shooter built by Fable 5.2

https://claude.ai/artifact/BGY1SztrAYcJQHSsnHHGmp
37•dr00tb•1h ago•35 comments

I deleted all my SSH keys

https://blog.infected.systems/posts/2026-11-03-i-deleted-all-my-ssh-keys/
162•speckx•5d ago•60 comments

Process Explorer for macOS

https://github.com/microsoft/Procexp-Mac
67•ingve•22h ago•30 comments

Blender 5.3 released with Gaussian Splat support

https://www.blender.org/download/releases/5-3/
337•amlib•4h ago•46 comments

Ableton Live 13

https://www.ableton.com/en/live/
219•phaser•7h ago•244 comments

An Open Field Guide to Inference Engineering

https://docs.modelplane.ai/guides/inference-guide
35•d-ramdass•2h ago•3 comments

Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets, and Claude Data

https://claude.com/resources/articles/sheets-whiteboards-data
93•Yorothegoat•2h ago•77 comments

The planet Vulcan: a cautionary tale

https://kevinboone.me/vulcan.html
20•andsoitis•3d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Valencia, Spain in Sim City/Isometric View

https://tinyvalencia.com/
127•leugim•5h ago•33 comments

Amazon saves millions by replacing Sonnet 4.6 with Strands Decider

https://strandsagents.com/blog/amazon-saves-millions-replacing-sonnet-with-strands-decider/
667•aloukissas•14h ago•232 comments

What's new in the .NET 11 runtime

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/whats-new/dotnet-11/runtime
186•stevefan1999•8h ago•135 comments

AI usage generates a fragile codebase

https://evanxmerz.com/post/ai-usage-generates-a-fragile-codebase/
262•plun9•10h ago•315 comments

The Hardest Tarball?

https://stoppels.ch/2026/11/07/the-hardest-tarball.html
133•thatslast•5h ago•28 comments

Life on Claude Nine

https://babuschk.in/posts/2026-01-25-life-on-claude-nine.html
32•reasonableklout•3h ago•1 comments

Starlink Mini 2

https://starlink.com/mini-2
153•robertjfclarke•2h ago•165 comments

Variable-width Bézier curves (2025)

https://luthert.web.illinois.edu/blog/posts/775.html
23•leduyquang753•1d ago•7 comments

NetBSD 11 desktop on a Raspberry Pi 4

https://neongd.com/articles/netbsd11-rpi4.gmi
112•jaypatelani•2d ago•67 comments

What constant surveillance is doing to children and parents

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/12/location-tracking-apps-parental-surveillance/689031/
160•FinnLobsien•10h ago•149 comments

M John Harrison becomes first science fiction author to win the Booker

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/nov/09/m-john-harrison-the-end-of-everything-wins-2026-boo...
100•sorokod•13h ago•84 comments

Taking another shot at the cheap IP camera, part 2

https://ericswpark.com/blog/2026/2026-11-09-ip-camera-pt2/
107•ericswpark•1d ago•35 comments

Queens Public Library under ransomware attack

https://connect.queenslibrary.org/
181•rustyhancock•11h ago•103 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.