frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Protecting SSH Keys with macOS Secure Enclave

https://gatezh.com/posts/macos-secure-enclave-ssh-keys/
222•js2•6h ago•81 comments

Plane lifted into back garden as bunker takes shape

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqkgjv4pj023o
32•edward•1d ago•20 comments

Smart home devices should work without the internet

https://docodethatmatters.com/home-automation-overnight-success/
987•skittleson•20h ago•352 comments

.name Grandfathered

https://neil.fraser.name/news/2026/11/10/
861•p4bl0•18h ago•188 comments

Scion is back and is going to sell a kei truck in America

https://www.theautopian.com/scion-is-back-and-its-going-to-sell-a-freaking-kei-truck-in-america/
484•NaOH•15h ago•316 comments

Greg Kurtzer's Ginux is now a userspace kernel

https://github.com/gmkurtzer/ginux
77•d3Xt3r•5h ago•36 comments

A great old-timey game-programming hack (2013)

https://blog.moertel.com/posts/2013-12-14-great-old-timey-game-programming-hack.html
184•palsecam•9h ago•35 comments

Apple has new Mac app coming to make running local AI models easy

https://9to5mac.com/2026/11/10/apple-has-new-mac-app-coming-to-make-running-local-ai-models-easy/
282•linolevan•14h ago•237 comments

To deter bioterrorism, U.S. imposes new rules on ordering synthetic DNA

https://www.science.org/content/article/deter-bioterrorism-u-s-imposes-new-rules-ordering-synthet...
109•Metacelsus•8h ago•72 comments

Six Math Essentials

https://teorth.github.io/tao-web/six-math-essentials.html
260•digital55•14h ago•50 comments

Synaptics patent claims stop work on DisplayLink drivers

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1102549/acbc92e00cee3a3f/
416•speckx•17h ago•234 comments

Starlink Mini 2

https://starlink.com/mini-2
430•robertjfclarke•17h ago•455 comments

AlphaProof Code

https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-alphaproof-code/
643•ilreb•23h ago•186 comments

Why Amstrad chose the 3" drives

https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/amstrad-cpc-hardware/why-amstrad-chose-the-3-drives/
52•Skyfall106•4d ago•14 comments

Why I wrote the BEAM book (2025)

https://happihacking.com/blog/posts/2025/why_I_wrote_theBEAMBook/
104•zenincognito•1d ago•17 comments

A Compendium of Abandoned Greenhouses

https://www.messynessychic.com/2015/01/15/a-compendium-of-abandoned-greenhouses/
50•ohjeez•2d ago•3 comments

Val Town is winding down

https://blog.val.town/winding-down
390•tosh•17h ago•97 comments

Show HN: Get your coding agent off ~2019 JavaScript, onto modern web primitives

https://github.com/GoogleChrome/modern-web-guidance
377•paulirish•17h ago•118 comments

Tracking Anthropic-discovered vulnerabilities

https://www.vulncheck.com/blog/anthropic-glasswing-november-update
407•panic•13h ago•195 comments

Good Enough for a Tuesday Night

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/good-enough-for-a-tuesday-night
3•Michelangelo11•1d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Black Ops II statically recompiled to native ARM64 macOS

https://github.com/adrbn/bo2-mac
31•adrbn•6h ago•2 comments

Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets, and Claude Data

https://claude.com/resources/articles/sheets-whiteboards-data
237•Yorothegoat•17h ago•172 comments

Hacking the Meta Ray-Ban smartglasses

https://p0pcycle.com/2026/11/06/hacking-the-meta-ray-ban-smartglasses/
121•moooooky•3d ago•41 comments

AI usage generates a fragile codebase

https://evanxmerz.com/post/ai-usage-generates-a-fragile-codebase/
569•plun9•1d ago•537 comments

A ZIP-style Prolog VM for trilog

https://github.com/no382001/zipc
16•triska•1d ago•6 comments

LLMs Play Zachtronics' TIS-100

https://tis-100.wincon.dev/
73•fairestvalue•10h ago•15 comments

AMD's Zen 6 Family: Feeding the Beast

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/amds-zen-6-family-feeding-the-beast
244•pixelpoet•18h ago•99 comments

$30M Raised to Redo the CPU

https://tendrils.co/blog/2026-11-10/30m-raised
109•shioyama•13h ago•113 comments

Process Explorer for macOS

https://github.com/microsoft/Procexp-Mac
212•ingve•1d ago•68 comments

"Jumping genes" helped ants evolve after the extinction of the dinosaurs

https://www.uni-muenster.de/news/view.php?cmdid=15659&utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_pl...
13•gmays•2d ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.