frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

CRISPR tech selectively shreds cancer cells, including "undruggable" cancers

https://innovativegenomics.org/news/crispr-technique-selectively-shreds-cancer-cells/
377•gmays•4h ago•98 comments

I Am Not a Reverse Centaur

https://blog.miguelgrinberg.com/post/i-am-not-a-reverse-centaur
98•ibobev•1h ago•56 comments

How to Setup a Local Coding Agent on macOS

https://ikyle.me/blog/2026/how-to-setup-a-local-coding-agent-on-macos
71•kkm•1h ago•21 comments

Malware developers added nuclear and biological weapons text to to their spyware

https://twitter.com/jsrailton/status/2064661778978533571
120•marc__1•23h ago•81 comments

Pirates, a naval warfare game inspired by Sid Meier's Pirates

https://piwodlaiwo.github.io/pirates/
59•iweczek•2h ago•25 comments

A PDF that changes based on how its read

https://sgaud.com/texts/pdf
71•SarthakGaud•2h ago•32 comments

Slightly reducing the sloppiness of AI generated front end

https://envs.net/~volpe/blog/posts/reduce-slop.html
123•FergusArgyll•4h ago•79 comments

Looking Forward to Postgres 19: It's About Time

https://www.pgedge.com/blog/looking-forward-to-postgres-19-its-about-time
63•xngbuilds•2h ago•18 comments

A dumpster arrived behind my university's library

https://yalereview.org/article/sheila-liming-the-end-of-books
121•mooreds•5h ago•94 comments

Law Enforcement's "Warrior" Problem (2015)

https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-128/law-enforcements-warrior-problem/
32•bookofjoe•2h ago•21 comments

Where Did Earth Get Its Oceans? Maybe It Made Them Itself

https://www.quantamagazine.org/where-did-earth-get-its-oceans-maybe-it-made-them-itself-20260612/
68•ibobev•3h ago•43 comments

There Is Life Before Main in Rust

https://grack.com/blog/2026/06/11/life-before-main/
33•mmastrac•1d ago•10 comments

Launch HN: BitBoard (YC P25) – Analytics Workspace for Agents

https://bitboard.work/
16•arcb•2h ago•6 comments

Keygen.music

https://keygen.music
104•soupspaces•3h ago•62 comments

AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42

https://lantian.pub/en/article/fun/ai-agent-bankrupted-their-operator-scan-dn42lantian.lantian/
1317•xiaoyu2006•14h ago•475 comments

A Peter Thiel-Backed Tribunal Is Putting Journalists on Trial

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/peter-thiel-tribunal-journalists-trial-1...
40•cdrnsf•46m ago•7 comments

Introduction to UEFI HTTP(s) Boot with QEMU/OVMF

https://blog.yadutaf.fr/2026/06/12/introduction-to-uefi-https-boot-qemu-ovmf/
35•jtlebigot•4h ago•8 comments

Hazel (YC W24) Is Hiring a Full Stack Engineer

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/hazel-2/jobs/3epPWgu-full-stack-engineer-ts-sci
1•augustschen•6h ago

Maxproof

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13473
112•ilreb•7h ago•8 comments

Cosmodial Sky Atlas

https://killedbyapixel.github.io/Cosmodial/
9•memalign•1h ago•1 comments

A Call to Action: Stop the FCC's KYC Regime

https://blog.lopp.net/call-to-action-stop-the-fcc-kyc-regime/
271•FergusArgyll•4h ago•174 comments

I Won't Buy You a Coffee

https://hakkerman.eu/blog/i-wont-buy-you-a-coffee/
39•speckx•49m ago•31 comments

WASI 0.3

https://bytecodealliance.org/articles/WASI-0.3
196•mavdol04•5h ago•80 comments

Show HN: StackScope – I crawled over 40k indie launches to see what they ship

https://stackscope.dev/
27•datafreak_•4h ago•8 comments

If you are asking for human attention, demonstrate human effort

https://tombedor.dev/human-attention-and-human-effort/
1392•jjfoooo4•20h ago•440 comments

New privacy frontier: Europe eyes crackdown on smart glasses

https://www.politico.com/www.politico.eu/article/new-privacy-frontier-europe-eyes-crackdown-smart...
51•1vuio0pswjnm7•2h ago•30 comments

How we made hit video game Prince of Persia

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2026/jan/05/raiders-of-the-lost-ark-hit-video-game-prince-of-...
249•msephton•2d ago•100 comments

"Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?"

https://correresmidestino.com/dont-you-just-upload-it-to-chatgpt/
90•speckx•1h ago•88 comments

Encrypted Spaces An architecture for collaborative applications

https://encryptedspaces.org/
47•_____k•7h ago•5 comments

Show HN: Script to bulk delete Claude chats from the web UI

https://github.com/MatteoLeonesi/bulk-delete-claude-chat
42•ML0037•4h ago•14 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.