frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Anonymous GitHub account mass-dropping undisclosed 0-days

https://github.com/bikini/exploitarium
271•binyu•3h ago•110 comments

OpenRA

https://www.openra.net/
334•tosh•5h ago•70 comments

DSpark: Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference [pdf]

https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSpec/blob/main/DSpark_paper.pdf
648•aurenvale•8h ago•246 comments

Suspicious Discontinuities (2020)

https://danluu.com/discontinuities/
121•tosh•4h ago•32 comments

Fintech Engineering Handbook

https://w.pitula.me/fintech-engineering-handbook/
334•signa11•7h ago•112 comments

Post-Mythos Cybersecurity: Keep calm and carry on

https://cephalosec.com/blog/cybersecurity-in-the-post-mythos-era-keep-calm-and-carry-on/
65•Versipelle•3h ago•19 comments

Zuckerberg's Increasingly Bizarre War on Whistleblowers

https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/27/zuckerstreisand-2/
298•HotGarbage•3h ago•116 comments

Supabase (YC S20) Is Hiring for Multigres

https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/supabase/2e718684-4f75-4a99-8d6b-3b6bd44e4228
1•awalias•57m ago

If you can't hold it, you don't own it

https://dervis.de/physical/
220•cemdervis•6h ago•143 comments

One man, two kernels, and a lot of RISC-V

https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/06/26/one-man-two-kernels-and-a-lot-of-risc-v/5262858
33•LorenDB•1d ago•1 comments

Previewing GPT‑5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/
1084•minimaxir•1d ago•690 comments

Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa, Canada

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X26000476
54•bushwart•2d ago•18 comments

How Many Elementary Particles Are There, Really?

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-many-elementary-particles-are-there-really-20260615/
75•rwmj•5h ago•62 comments

AI Is Designing Radio Chips That Humans Couldn't Even Imagine

https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-radio-chip-design
14•Brajeshwar•3d ago•2 comments

Long Wave radio era set to end with switch-off

https://www.economist.com/britain/2026/06/25/the-bbc-switches-off-its-oldest-service
128•edward•1d ago•118 comments

Researchers have developed pixels that can emit and analyse light together

https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2026/06/a-new-type-of-pixel.html
16•tspng•10h ago•10 comments

Task Failed Successfully: Saturating NIC and Disk Bandwidth

https://blog.mrcroxx.com/posts/task-failed-successfully-saturating-nic-and-disk-bandwidth/
24•MrCroxx•4d ago•8 comments

Beer CSS – Build material design in record time

https://www.beercss.com
107•Seb-C•8h ago•53 comments

Linux on Older Hardware: The Complete Revival Guide

https://www.fosslinux.com/158206/linux-on-older-hardware-revival-guide.htm
157•tapanjk•2d ago•89 comments

The US Army Issued Ocarinas to Soldiers in World War II

https://www.flutetunes.com/articles/my-flute-goes-to-war/
92•tomcam•2d ago•53 comments

Streaming services' obnoxiously loud ads become illegal on July 1 in California

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/streaming-services-obnoxiously-loud-ads-become-illegal-on...
149•speckx•5h ago•35 comments

Why does kinetic energy increase quadratically, not linearly, with speed? (2011)

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/535/why-does-kinetic-energy-increase-quadratically-no...
322•ProxyTracer•19h ago•170 comments

WordStar: A Writer's Word Processor (1996)

https://www.sfwriter.com/wordstar.htm
151•droidjj•14h ago•75 comments

Underarm Bowling Incident of 1981

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underarm_bowling_incident_of_1981
101•EndXA•3d ago•78 comments

Doctors suspected man had brain cancer. He had worms

https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/06/doctors-suspected-man-had-brain-cancer-he-actually-had-worms/
21•Bender•1h ago•8 comments

Anatomy of a Failed (Nation-State?) Attack

https://grack.com/blog/2026/06/25/dissecting-a-failed-nation-state-attack/
126•signa11•15h ago•26 comments

Faster KNN search in Manticore: 2-pass HNSW, batched distances, and AVX-512

https://medium.com/@s_nikolaev/faster-knn-search-in-manticore-2-pass-hnsw-batched-distances-and-a...
46•snikolaev•1d ago•2 comments

Jest/Vitest interactive course (runs in the browser)

https://howtotestfrontend.com/courses/jest-vitest-fundamentals
43•howToTestFE•2d ago•11 comments

Cultures of Making and Relating

https://blog.khinsen.net/posts/2026/06/25/cultures.html
34•akkartik•2d ago•2 comments

MicroVMs: Run isolated sandboxes with full lifecycle control

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/run-isolated-sandboxes-with-full-lifecycle-control-aws-lambda-in...
367•justincormack•4d ago•199 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.