frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Build your own decision model

https://nishtahir.com/build-your-own-decision-model/
61•softwaredoug•1h ago•6 comments

2D Vehicles

https://patkerr.co.uk/2d-vehicles/
333•Michelangelo11•3d ago•77 comments

A city-building game in which the city would prefer you didn't

https://housing.over.pizza/
137•JumpCrisscross•3h ago•47 comments

Nix wrote half of my debugger

https://fzakaria.com/2026/10/07/nix-wrote-half-of-my-debugger
108•ingve•1d ago•16 comments

The Lightbulb Computer

https://lightbulbcomputer.com/
196•oskarth•20h ago•40 comments

Knuth reward check

https://www.thomas-huehn.com/knuth-reward-check/
134•Curiositry•8h ago•50 comments

Why DuckDB 2.0 is faster

https://motherduck.com/blog/why-duckdb-20-is-faster/
124•tosh•6h ago•43 comments

Five months treating bugs like patients and coding agents like a medical team

https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/experiment-running-hospital-code/
38•rafiss•1d ago•14 comments

Talorys – A self-hosted personal AI agent on Cloudflare's free tier

https://github.com/rociiu/talorys
236•rociiu•13h ago•119 comments

Mxc: Microsoft Execution Containers version 1.0.0

https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2026/10/07/microsoft-execution-containers-policy-drive...
153•smokel•1d ago•35 comments

REA Reverse – Engineer Anything

https://rea.tools/
689•modinfo•23h ago•300 comments

Recent AI models struggled to match a human algorithmic innovation

https://epoch.ai/publications/innovationeval
70•merksittich•1d ago•54 comments

Unikernels were hard. key word: were

https://ghuntley.com/unikernels/
83•ghuntley•9h ago•38 comments

OpenSCAD the Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller

https://openscad.org/
92•b-man•4d ago•77 comments

Getting old Macromedia Director Games to run on modern Hardware

https://werwolv.net/posts/macromedia_copy_protection/
25•speckx•1d ago•5 comments

Grieving the loss of details

https://purplesyringa.moe/blog/grieving-the-loss-of-details/
333•signa11•4d ago•265 comments

Nvidia in talks to acquire US 'open' model startup Reflection AI

https://www.ft.com/content/052610c5-22b4-4dd4-932e-b7f9f0628b6a
106•arkj•5h ago•74 comments

Rampart: Browser native on-device PII radaction

https://ndstudio.gov/posts/say-hello-to-rampart
68•nateb2022•1d ago•29 comments

Bitwarden Dual License Model

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/published-version-update-in-app-stores/102750
337•Cider9986•9h ago•244 comments

Apple/macOS removed from official Unix registry

https://www.opengroup.org//openbrand/register/
239•john_alan•13h ago•214 comments

C for Rust programmers

https://bd103.dev/blog/2026-10-07-c-for-rust-programmers/
90•xyproto•2d ago•96 comments

Food processing influences metabolism and brain activity

https://news.vt.edu/articles/2026/10/research_fralinbiomed_upfhutelin.html
97•gmays•18h ago•78 comments

Telegram Desktop vulnerability allowed any user's file to be stolen

https://beaksec.github.io/posts/telegram-desktop-one-click-account-takeover/
402•g-b-r•21h ago•257 comments

Eye of Sauron: Long-Range Hidden Spy Camera Detection (2024)

https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity24/presentation/zhang-qibo
301•ortusdux•3d ago•72 comments

I would like the value of my home to rise, while my property taxes fall

https://conversableeconomist.com/2026/09/28/i-would-like-the-value-of-my-home-to-rise-while-my-pr...
203•colinprince•10h ago•483 comments

Chernobyl particles reveal unexpectedly stable nuclear fuel after 40 years

https://phys.org/news/2026-10-chernobyl-particles-reveal-unexpectedly-stable.html
124•geox•3d ago•48 comments

How strong is the strong interaction?

https://cerncourier.com/how-strong-is-the-strong-interaction/
44•EA-3167•1d ago•11 comments

MrBeast 'spends millions reverse engineering the algorithms on each platform'

https://www.barchart.com/story/news/5472260/mrbeast-told-billionaire-mark-cuban-he-spends-million...
51•theanonymousone•8h ago•54 comments

Takeshi's Castle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeshi%27s_Castle
92•tosh•5h ago•33 comments

Whooping Cranes Learned to Migrate by Following Costumed Pilots

https://theverifiedpost.com/article/whooping-cranes-ultralight-costumed-pilots-operation-migration
54•kgolubic•1d ago•7 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.