frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

DeepSeek just open-sourced its inference engine

https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepInfer
1317•ggcr•5h ago•460 comments

Apple broke an essential presentation feature of iPads

https://teddysvoronos.com/2026-10-19-apple-broke-an-essential-presentation-feature-of-ipads/
157•evanb•2h ago•78 comments

EMudhra Intermediate CA Compromise

https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/
36•galadran•57m ago•8 comments

Publish fake stats, get cited in LLMs

https://peec.ai/blog/publish-stats-get-cited-the-tactic-that-put-my-data-all-over-the-web
93•robtherobber•1h ago•47 comments

Tsrs: A Port of TypeScript to Rust

https://blog.cloudflare.com/typescript-rust-port/
54•hnisjafx40•1h ago•17 comments

NixOS is making me less afraid

https://entropicthoughts.com/nixos-is-making-me-less-afraid
85•ibobev•2h ago•46 comments

MicroG: Free-libre re-implementation of Google's proprietary Android user space

https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/wiki
239•theanonymousone•8h ago•20 comments

My Friend Bob Cringely

https://tyma.com/my-cringe-story/
25•zinxq•42m ago•1 comments

Nordwand Mono – A monospace font for coders and adventurers

https://github.com/tywr/Nordwand-Mono
441•noriax86•2d ago•127 comments

How I got over 300 Tor exit nodes removed

https://kaba.cx/posts/20261020_Tor/
28•kabakabakaba•1h ago•6 comments

OpenBSD 8.0

https://www.openbsd.org/80.html
403•privong•12h ago•129 comments

Hazel (YC W24) Is Hiring

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/hazel-2/jobs/PpNKYBS-full-stack-engineer-ts-sci
1•augustschen•2h ago

WhatsApp's help pages hid LLM instructions: dont recommend a regulator

https://redact.dev/blog/whatsapp-help-pages-hidden-ai-instructions
632•ds•15h ago•180 comments

2026 is an exciting year for the Rust compiler (and me)

https://yoyo-code.com/2026-is-exciting-year-for-rust-compiler-and-me/
10•panstromek•1h ago•1 comments

DeepSeek banned from U.S. federal civilian agencies under new DHS order

https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-banning-chinese-ai-deepseek-government-agency-it-systems-20...
438•cmrdporcupine•22h ago•360 comments

Making a 88x31 button book using ImageMagick

https://k.sosnierz.me/08-11-24/
109•birdculture•2d ago•18 comments

Google cloud outage takes down banks

https://www.neowin.net/news/google-cloud-outage-takes-down-hsbc-revolut-bank-of-scotland-llyods-e...
177•paweladamczuk•4h ago•76 comments

Restoration of Retinal Regenerative Potential (2025)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58290-8
98•Kaibeezy•2d ago•4 comments

One Manhattan power room took down FAA air traffic control in 1991

https://matthorn.io/posts/2026-10-18-33-thomas-street/
4•spectraldrift•1d ago•0 comments

'Der Viener Schlinger': The meat cannon that launched 20k hot dogs

https://flatwaterfreepress.org/der-viener-schlinger-the-meat-cannon-that-launched-20000-hot-dogs/
43•NaOH•1d ago•26 comments

FingerWorks iGesture Pad (2005)

https://uk.pcmag.com/first-looks/26975/fingerworks-igesture-pad
4•codeulike•2d ago•1 comments

Spending 10 months building the most human-like chess bot

https://mbuffett.com/posts/most-human-chess-bot
25•marcusbuffett•22h ago•7 comments

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

https://www.minimax.io/blog/minimax-m31f
499•jtg•22h ago•209 comments

There Are over 1M New York City Street Signs. Here's How They Are Made.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/15/nyregion/nyc-street-sign-shop.html
39•bookofjoe•3d ago•18 comments

An ad-free Android TV

https://cretezy.com/2026/ad-free-android-tv
324•CraftThatBlock•16h ago•132 comments

Weball: Play Katamari on Websites

https://www.funwithcomputervision.com/weball/
282•croes•2d ago•23 comments

Wine ported to OpenBSD

https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179236125692175
601•iamnothere•1d ago•199 comments

Ukraine claims first drone evacuation of wounded soldier

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/ukraine/ukraine-first-drone-evacuation-wounded-soldier-frontlines-h...
381•yzydserd•23h ago•286 comments

It's still ok to enjoy programming

https://chriskiehl.com/article/it-is-still-ok-to-enjoy-programming
665•goostavos•2d ago•578 comments

I built a drone with only one motor [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndftcft6XhU
624•hakonjdjohnsen•1d ago•139 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.