frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Dolly Parton's Imagination Library

https://imaginationlibrary.com/
234•jumploops•3h ago•41 comments

Why I Am a Programmer

https://www.alfie.wtf/programming/why-i-am-a-programmer.html
44•jruohonen•2h ago•6 comments

Eunice is almost here

https://armincat.com/articles/eunice-is-almost-here
40•armcat•1h ago•30 comments

What goes into making an animated film?

https://www.disneyanimation.com/process/
17•embedding-shape•1h ago•7 comments

Gheist campaign plants secret-dumping workflows using stolen GitHub tokens

https://www.wiz.io/blog/gheist-attempted-scaled-abuse-of-stolen-github-tokens-stumbles
30•acossta•2h ago•0 comments

A 10-year-old CNN outperforms frontier LLMs for skin cancer diagnosis

https://lynchlab.net/llm-skin-cancer
307•sungam•4h ago•159 comments

I refuse to accept a censored Internet. Join Me at FOSDEM 27

https://talkweb.eu/openweb/4558/
284•Tomte•4h ago•151 comments

Oregon Police Are Charging a Local News Outlet $2.5M for Records About One Cop

https://theintercept.com/2026/10/01/oregon-police-misconduct-public-records-cost-fee/
256•tdeck•3h ago•65 comments

Overgrown, when plants invade your abandoned tabs

https://charliegerard.dev/blog/overgrown-extension/
10•speckx•3d ago•0 comments

The U.S. Power Grid

https://nomagicpill.site/knowledge/powergrid.html
28•surprisetalk•3d ago•10 comments

VCF Southwest 2026, but Edited on Silicon Graphics for '90s TV [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46wxttvq9qY
40•zdw•1d ago•11 comments

Show HN: Hurston-1 open source TTS that speak Southern American and Afro-English

https://huggingface.co/destined/hurston-1
24•Gcarter08•20h ago•10 comments

We should be more ambitious with the software we build

https://danluu.com/ambitious/
719•ltratt•23h ago•664 comments

UTS #39: Unicode Security Mechanisms

https://unicode.org/reports/tr39/
23•robin_reala•4h ago•4 comments

Active incident at Dreamhost forcing password reset

https://www.dreamhoststatus.com/
83•greenchair•8h ago•32 comments

The State of Context Engineering

https://www.dbreunig.com/2026/10/24/the-state-of-context-engineering.html
3•pchristensen•1h ago•0 comments

Where the Romans Fought (interactive map)

https://iosiflazaridis.github.io/battles-of-the-romans/
9•endorphine•2h ago•1 comments

JetBrains Thinkrail

https://github.com/JetBrains/thinkrail
114•hmokiguess•5h ago•76 comments

Recreate the Apollo Guidance Computer

https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/recreate-the-apollo-guidance-computer/
33•Brajeshwar•3d ago•2 comments

AI use leads UC Berkeley math professor to see 'no point' in grading homework

https://www.dailycal.org/news/campus/academics/ai-use-leads-uc-berkeley-math-professor-to-see-no-...
154•romanhn•5h ago•237 comments

Focused Company Operating Principles

https://focused.io/operating-principles
3•mooreds•1h ago•0 comments

Cerebras Deploys Trillion-Parameter AI Models

https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/how-we-deploy-trillion-parameter-frontier-models-on-cerebras
339•gmays•19h ago•123 comments

Moderna and Merck say their mRNA cancer vaccine cut death, recurrence by 42%

https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/10/personalized-mrna-cancer-vaccine-cut-melanoma-death-recurr...
96•_Microft•2h ago•15 comments

Root shell on Samsung TV

https://twitter.com/log4j/status/2113014142600953868?s=46
704•testing22321•1d ago•540 comments

OpenAI and Anthropic cut their LLM prices by up to 80% within a few months. Why?

https://minimaxir.com/2026/10/cheap-llms/
4•minimaxir•22m ago•2 comments

All you need is Wide Events, not "Metrics, Logs and Traces"

https://isburmistrov.substack.com/p/all-you-need-is-wide-events-not-metrics
55•bootlegbilly•3h ago•15 comments

The Goose Programming Language

https://aardappel.github.io/goose/
549•bobbydigitales•1d ago•341 comments

fheroes2: A recreation of Heroes of Might and Magic II game engine

https://github.com/ihhub/fheroes2
188•tosh•10h ago•66 comments

How Japanese Dried Bonito Is Made

https://kottke.org/26/10/how-japanese-dried-bonito-is-made
175•bookofjoe•3d ago•48 comments

Sabre Wulf Remastered

https://gp-64.com/swr/
53•adunk•4h ago•8 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.