frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/36469-grapheneos-has-been-ported-to-android-17-and-official-rele...
599•Cider9986•9h ago•259 comments

Running local models is good now

https://vickiboykis.com/2026/06/15/running-local-models-is-good-now/
1190•jfb•15h ago•472 comments

Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

https://mll.sh/humiliating-iis-servers-for-fun-and-jail-time/
186•denysvitali•7h ago•46 comments

DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/16/doj-claims-xais-unpermitted-gas-turbines-are-a-matter-of-nation...
32•dlgeek•2h ago•13 comments

Wolfram Language and Mathematica Version 15, AI Assistant, Symbolic Music, More

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/06/launching-version-15-of-wolfram-language-mathematica-...
135•alok-g•7h ago•51 comments

TIL: You can make HTTP requests without curl using Bash /dev/TCP

https://mareksuppa.com/til/bash-dev-tcp-http-without-curl/
359•mrshu•13h ago•165 comments

Working in Glass

https://www.asimov.press/p/glass
17•bookofjoe•5d ago•1 comments

Calvin and Hobbes and the price of integrity

https://therepublicofletters.substack.com/p/calvin-and-hobbes-and-the-price-of
360•pseudolus•14h ago•161 comments

GPT‑NL: a sovereign language model for the Netherlands

https://www.tno.nl/en/digital/artificial-intelligence/gpt-nl/
182•root-parent•12h ago•156 comments

Has AI already killed self-help nonfiction books?

https://tim.blog/2026/06/12/has-ai-already-killed-nonfiction/
244•imakwana•13h ago•252 comments

Stop Using JWTs

https://gist.github.com/samsch/0d1f3d3b4745d778f78b230cf6061452
328•dzonga•13h ago•193 comments

Apple plans change to Hide My Email that could make it less effective

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/16/apple-plans-to-change-its-hide-my-email-privacy-feature-that-co...
15•memalign•54m ago•1 comments

Subterranean fungi networks more than 100 quadrillion km in length

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/jun/11/arbuscular-mycorrhizal-fungi-plant-life-climate-g...
18•tosh•5d ago•1 comments

Stop Killing Games fails to secure EU law despite 1.3M signatures

https://www.dexerto.com/gaming/stop-killing-games-fails-to-secure-eu-law-despite-1-3m-signatures-...
120•slymax•4h ago•37 comments

SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B

https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/spacex-buy-anysphere-60-billion-2026-06-16/
970•itsmarcelg•19h ago•1468 comments

But yak shaving is fun (2019)

https://parksb.github.io/en/article/32.html
238•parksb•15h ago•71 comments

The Amphibious Villagers of Indonesia

https://www.economist.com/interactive/1843/2026/06/12/the-amphibious-villagers-of-indonesia
16•haritha-j•2d ago•3 comments

All about the IBM 1130 Computing System

http://ibm1130.org/
27•jruohonen•2d ago•10 comments

A brief tour of the PDP-11, the most influential minicomputer of all time (2022)

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/03/a-brief-tour-of-the-pdp-11-the-most-influential-minicompu...
63•jensgk•2d ago•19 comments

A Nipkow Disk Mechanical TV Simulator

https://analogtv.net/mechanical-lab
38•ambanmba•2d ago•5 comments

10Gb/s Ethernet: switching to a Broadcom SFP+ module

https://www.gilesthomas.com/2026/06/10g-ethernet-switching-to-broadcom-sfp-plus
122•gpjt•12h ago•118 comments

NetNewsWire Status

https://inessential.com/2026/06/15/netnewswire-status.html
33•droidjj•1h ago•3 comments

Show HN: cuTile Rust: Safe, data-race-free GPU kernels in Rust

https://github.com/nvlabs/cutile-rs
62•melihelibol•10h ago•12 comments

Qwen-Robot Suite: A Foundation Model Suite for Physical World Intelligence

https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen-robotsuite
153•ilreb•17h ago•26 comments

Apple's weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness

https://www.theverge.com/tech/942854/apple-vehicle-motion-cues-review-really-work
692•neilfrndes•14h ago•212 comments

Mechanical Watch (2022)

https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/
669•razin•18h ago•115 comments

Formal Methods and the Future of Programming

https://blog.janestreet.com/formal-methods-at-jane-street-index/
101•nextos•5d ago•4 comments

Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/why-is-meta-destroying-its-engineering
522•throwarayes•13h ago•473 comments

Frood, an Alpine Initramfs NAS (2024)

https://words.filippo.io/frood/
45•ethanpil•10h ago•12 comments

Apple is about to make Hide My Email useless

https://arseniyshestakov.com/2026/06/16/apple-is-about-to-make-hide-my-email-useless/
460•SXX•11h ago•282 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.