frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Sudden drop in Cloudflare bot traffic after strike on Yandex datacenter

https://radar.cloudflare.com/bots/as13238?dateRange=7d
200•walrus01•2h ago•67 comments

I paid people to try and follow my README

https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2026/10/i-paid-people-to-try-and-follow-my-readme/
32•edent•40m ago•14 comments

IRCv3

https://ircv3.net/
122•basilikum•2h ago•94 comments

LineageOS 24.0

https://lineageos.org/Changelog-32/
168•timschumi•6h ago•42 comments

Nitter: Update Oct 10th seeking funding and legal help

https://nitter.net
145•ForHackernews•1h ago•35 comments

What driving across Europe costs in tolls, vignettes, bridges and fuel

https://copilot.travel/tolls/europe-2026
4•heikkikalliokos•48m ago•1 comments

Weave (YC W25) is hiring ML, AI, product, & design engineers

https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/weave-os
1•adchurch•26m ago

AI is creating a 'human premium' for art created by people

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5vgjm3gk7rzo
28•colinprince•53m ago•22 comments

Build your own decision model

https://nishtahir.com/build-your-own-decision-model/
349•softwaredoug•13h ago•78 comments

2D Vehicles

https://patkerr.co.uk/2d-vehicles/
513•Michelangelo11•3d ago•104 comments

A city-building game in which the city would prefer you didn't

https://housing.over.pizza/
392•JumpCrisscross•15h ago•130 comments

Rat's Register Allocator

https://hexrat.cc/pages/blog/2026_10_07
19•mpweiher•1d ago•1 comments

The Lightbulb Computer

https://lightbulbcomputer.com/
468•oskarth•1d ago•69 comments

How big is a Git commit?

https://ratfactor.com/cards/git-commit-size
47•theanonymousone•2d ago•21 comments

PSPi 6 – Raspberry Pi in a PSP

https://github.com/othermod/PSPi-Version-6
105•therepanic•11h ago•10 comments

When Ldaxr Doesn't Work: Exclusive Accesses and Cacheability on AArch64

https://joelsiks.com/posts/aarch64-exclusive-access-cacheability/
6•joelsiks•1d ago•0 comments

"Robot" Is a Social Construct: Why Your Dishwasher Is Not a Robot

https://robotgirlgang.com/2026/10/08/robot-is-a-social-construct-why-your-dishwasher-is-not-a-robot/
21•birdculture•1h ago•19 comments

Retrofitting language models to operate over bytes

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11111-4
72•theanonymousone•3d ago•12 comments

Nix wrote half of my debugger

https://fzakaria.com/2026/10/07/nix-wrote-half-of-my-debugger
206•ingve•2d ago•49 comments

Show HN: Happy Hangul Day! An RNN for Generating Korean Handwriting Strokes

https://hangul.ink/blog/hangul-day
60•jbaudanza•2d ago•10 comments

Five months treating bugs like patients and coding agents like a medical team

https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/experiment-running-hospital-code/
153•rafiss•1d ago•63 comments

3rd Yandex Cloud Data Center Was Hit

https://status.yandex.cloud/en/incidents/2136
269•defly•4h ago•328 comments

Knuth reward check

https://www.thomas-huehn.com/knuth-reward-check/
200•Curiositry•20h ago•73 comments

Talorys – A self-hosted personal AI agent on Cloudflare's free tier

https://github.com/rociiu/talorys
301•rociiu•1d ago•137 comments

I wish you the best in the Offline

https://daverupert.com/2026/09/i-wish-you-the-best-in-the-offline/
64•birdculture•4h ago•38 comments

Mxc: Microsoft Execution Containers version 1.0.0

https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2026/10/07/microsoft-execution-containers-policy-drive...
197•smokel•2d ago•58 comments

Decade-old RAM is making a comeback

https://www.theverge.com/games/1009140/ram-shortage-intel-amd-ddr4-comeback
92•1potato•1d ago•87 comments

Cyril Hilsum invented the flat-screen displays that hold us in thrall

https://www.economist.com/obituary/2026/10/08/cyril-hilsum-invented-the-flat-screen-displays-that...
9•sohkamyung•1d ago•1 comments

OpenSCAD the Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller

https://openscad.org/
157•b-man•4d ago•120 comments

Deterministic Simulation Testing in Celld

https://celld.dev/docs/engineering/deterministic-simulation-testing/
26•handfuloflight•1d ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.