frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Transcribe.cpp

https://workshop.cjpais.com/projects/transcribe-cpp
399•sebjones•6h ago•71 comments

Speech Recognition and TTS in less than 500kb

https://github.com/moonshine-ai/moonshine/tree/main/micro
408•petewarden•4d ago•50 comments

Supabase just announced searchable encryption

https://supabase.com/blog/searchable-field-level-encryption-with-cipherstash
23•dandraper•3d ago•2 comments

Better and Cheaper Than IPTV

https://github.com/stupside/castor
148•xonery•6h ago•37 comments

Codex Resets

https://codex-resets.com/
141•denysvitali•8h ago•100 comments

Mathematicians still don't know the fastest way to multiply numbers

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/mathematicians-still-dont-know-the-fastest-way-to-mult...
72•beardyw•5d ago•48 comments

The Kimi K3 Moment

https://stephen.bochinski.dev/blog/2026/07/18/the-kimi-k3-moment/
334•sbochins•13h ago•363 comments

GPT-5.6 used a prompt to close a 30-year gap in convex optimization

https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1uxj3cy/after_openais_cdc_proof_announcement_gpt56_used_a/
549•mbustamanter•18h ago•351 comments

Hardcore IndieWeb: Run your own website 100% independently for only $0.01/day

https://www.neatnik.net/hardcore-indieweb
140•cdrnsf•9h ago•87 comments

Making Software: How to make a font

https://www.makingsoftware.com/chapters/how-to-make-a-font
28•Garbage•4d ago•3 comments

If You Build It, They Will Come

https://www.benlandautaylor.com/p/if-you-build-it-they-will-come
370•barry-cotter•15h ago•130 comments

Classic Amiga titles, free to download

https://amigafreeware.downer.tech/
103•doener•9h ago•14 comments

A Visual Catalog of Retro Macintosh Software

https://www.marciot.com/mac68k-visual-catalog/
31•zdw•1w ago•5 comments

Scrying the AMD GFX1250 LLVM Tea Leaves

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/scrying-the-amd-gfx1250-llvm-tea
11•mfiguiere•2h ago•0 comments

Setting up your spare Mac for Claude Code to control, a step-by-step guide

https://ykdojo.github.io/claude-controls-mac/
218•ykev•15h ago•150 comments

Goodbye, and Thanks for All the Bikesheds

https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3818307
205•Ygg2•14h ago•205 comments

I'm Making Strandfall, a Solarpunk Orienteering Larp

https://mssv.net/2026/04/29/im-making-strandfall-a-solarpunk-orienteering-larp/
134•surprisetalk•5d ago•18 comments

Mayor Mamdani Says Landlords Can't Use AI Images to Advertise

https://petapixel.com/2026/07/16/mayor-mamdani-says-landlords-cant-secretly-use-ai-images-to-adve...
430•gnabgib•9h ago•187 comments

Elixir-lang.org has a new design

https://elixir-lang.org/
217•bbg2401•15h ago•122 comments

AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making

https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/ai-mania-is-eviscerating-global-decision-making/#fnref:3
167•subset•6h ago•61 comments

Gleam Is Now on Tangled

https://tangled.org/gleam.run/gleam
228•nerdypepper•15h ago•144 comments

I built a browser-based P2P file transfer tool using WebRTC

https://airdows.com/
16•SamOkampo•5h ago•11 comments

Is this the end of the once-mighty GoPro?

https://amateurphotographer.com/latest/photo-news/going-going-gone-is-this-the-end-of-the-once-mi...
213•aanet•4d ago•465 comments

Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on an NP-Hard Problem: Does /goal help?

https://charlesazam.com/blog/fable-5-gpt-5-6-sol-goal/
233•couAUIA•20h ago•114 comments

Co-evolution of self-replication and function in a digital primordial soup

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09211
64•vicgalle_•10h ago•7 comments

REO Trucks I4 4WD Pickup Truck Starts at $21,500

https://reotrucks.com
83•b_mc2•13h ago•134 comments

Deepsec

https://github.com/vercel-labs/deepsec
19•handfuloflight•5h ago•0 comments

Parsoid

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Parsoid
18•debo_•1w ago•0 comments

What's the deal with all the random weekly quota resets for agents lately?

https://minimaxir.com/2026/07/agent-quota-reset/
47•minimaxir•12h ago•47 comments

FDA approves new kind of cholesterol pill

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-oral-pcsk9-inhibitor-lower...
77•mgh2•4h ago•43 comments
Open in hackernews

The Fastest Way yet to Color Graphs

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-fastest-way-yet-to-color-graphs-20250512/
62•GavCo•1y ago

Comments

tonyarkles•1y ago
In case you haven't looked at the article, this is looking specifically at the Edge Coloring problem and not the more commonly known Vertex Coloring problem. Vertex Coloring is NP-complete unfortunately.
erikvanoosten•1y ago
You can convert edge coloring problems into vertex coloring problems and vice versa through a simple O(n) procedure.
meindnoch•1y ago
Wrong. You can convert edge-coloring problems into vertex-coloring problems of the so-called line graph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph

But the opposite is not true, because not every graph is a line graph of some other graph.

erikvanoosten•1y ago
Indeed. Thanks, I stand corrected.
tonyarkles•1y ago
Hrm... right. It's been a while. And it looks like both Vertex Coloring and Edge Coloring are both NP-complete (because of the O(n) procedure you're talking about and the ability to reduce both problems down to 3-SAT). I've started looking closer at the actual paper to try to figure out what's going on here. Thanks for the reminder, I miss getting to regularly work on this stuff.

Edit: thanks sibling reply for pointing out that it's not a bidirectional transform.

mauricioc•1y ago
For the edge-coloring problem, the optimal number of colors needed to properly color the edges of G is always either Delta(G) (the maximum degree of G) or Delta(G) + 1, but deciding which one is the true optimum is an NP-complete problem.

Nevertheless, you can always properly edge-color a graph with Delta(G) + 1 colors. Finding such a coloring could in principle be slow, though: the original proof that Delta(G) + 1 colors is always doable amounted to a O(e(G) * v(G)) algorithm, where e(G) and v(G) denote the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively. This is polynomial, but nowhere near linear. What the paper in question shows is how, given any graph G, to find an edge coloring using Delta(G) + 1 colors in O(e(G) * log(Delta(G))) time, which is linear time if the maximum degree is a constant.

Syzygies•1y ago
Yes. The article ran through this point as follows:

"In 1964, a mathematician named Vadim Vizing proved a shocking result: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum number of lines (or edges) connected to a single point (or vertex), and add 1."

I keep wondering why I ever read Quanta Magazine. It takes a pretty generous reading of "need" to make this a correct statement.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
phkahler•1y ago
Is this going to lead to faster compile times? Faster register allocation...
john-h-k•1y ago
Very few compilers actually use vertex coloring for register allocation
isaacimagine•1y ago
Totally. The hard part isn't coloring (you can use simple heuristics to get a decent register assignment), rather, it's figuring out which registers to spill (don't spill registers in hot loops! and a million other things!).
NooneAtAll3•1y ago
and this post isn't even about vertex coloring
DannyBee•1y ago
No.

In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively).

Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.

Not really. Coloring a graph is almost always talking about proper coloring, meaning that things that objects that are related receive different colors.

If you read the introduction, you'll also read that the goal is to "color each of your lines and require that for every point, no two lines connected to it have the same color."

Ps. "How many colors a graph needs" is a very well established term in computer science and graph theory.

mockerell•1y ago
I think the comment referred to the phrase „a graph needs X (colors or whatever)“. For me, this can be read two ways: 1. „a graph always needs at least X colors“ or 2. „a graph always needs at most X colors“.

Personally, I would interpret this as option 1 (and so did the comment above I assume). In that case, the statement is wrong. But I’d prefer to specify „at most/ at least“ anyways.

Or even better, use actual vocabulary. „For every graph there exists a coloring with X colors.“ or „any graph can be coloured using X colors“.

PS: I also agree with the sentiment about quanta magazine. It’s hard to get some actual information from their articles if you know the topic.

JohnKemeny•1y ago
What about this statement:

No matter how large a car is, it is easy to figure out how much money you'll need to buy it. Simply look at the price tag.

(From: No matter how large a graph is, it’s easy to figure out how many colors you’ll need to color it. Simply look for the maximum ...)

mauricioc•1y ago
Parent's point is that sometimes (but not always) the store is perfectly fine selling you a car for $1 less than what the "price tag" of Delta(G)+1 dollars asks for, so "need" is a bit inaccurate.