"Failure Mechanisms in Democratic Regimes – an Army’s Role"
https://angrystaffofficer.com/2025/03/02/failure-mechanisms-...
I submitted it now for discussion on its own:
It's more of a game mechanics issue than technical, there is a lot of rubble, obstacles and destroyed roads, specially the highways. Vehicles also make the world smaller. It might be fun anyway.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/01/world/africa/russia-wagne...
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/29/africa/russian-mercenarie...
Militaries often make very stupid decisions. A friend was in Defence Materials figuring out what tanks Australia should buy. The M1 Abrams had a support crew of something like 30 vehicles following it everywhere it went (each tank!) and required a full engine rebuild insanely often, something like every 1000 hours.
They are HORRIFIC for logistics.
Australia bought them.
Ultimately that is the reason they bought them. The Aussie ones will never leave Australia, but can be used for training.
If the big one ever comes, those trained aussies can fly wherever in the world the US has brought a stack a M1s and be good to go.
Narrator: The Aussie ones are in fact leaving Australia https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/the-australian-m1a1-t...
But Australia made the buy decision before the war.
I guess they should have known better.
If that is true it is delightfully ironic. I have heard that the main reason the M1 has a turbine is that the army saw the dramatic improvement in reliability that turbines brought to their helicopters and said "that, we want that in a tank"
johnea•8mo ago
Let's just call it what it is: The whole premise is stupid, and was the biggest detractor from "suspension of disbelief" while watching the movie.
This is the same stupidity that's causing rural residents to shoot themselves in the foot by refusing to adopt electrification.
There is NO other technology that allows the level of technical autonomy, post-apocalyptic or otherwise, that is afforded by electricity.
People with rural acres could be supporting ALL of their own residential and agricultural energy consumption with onsite electrical generation. Instead, due to culture war side taking, they hobble themselves to be ever dependent on the petro-extraction and refinement industries.
rightbyte•8mo ago
Mad Max was a dystopian movie in a dysfunctional state. I don't know how the exaggerated view of it became the franchise.
decimalenough•8mo ago
There's a scene in Fury Road where a muscle car type vehicle blows up in such a way that it's propelled high up into the air, and then blows up again in mid-air. The physics to make this possible exist only in Hollywood, but hey, this way you get two pretty explosions.
anyonecancode•8mo ago
snypher•8mo ago
andrewflnr•8mo ago
defrost•8mo ago
BriggyDwiggs42•8mo ago
lurk2•8mo ago
The majority of the content I see in this space is overwhelmingly supportive of rolling your own grid. The point isn’t to reject electrification as a technology, but to reduce or eliminate reliance upon the electrical grid. A lot of homesteaders operate wood boilers for heat simply because it’s cheaper, but the truck-driving redneck you’re envisioning lost faith in industrial society a long time ago.
nine_k•8mo ago
A horse-drawn buggy would be a consistent (and sustainable) choice, instead of a truck. Preppers and rednecks are quite distinct though.
roenxi•8mo ago
awnird•8mo ago
monero-xmr•8mo ago
no_wizard•8mo ago
Mel Gibson the man, not so much
monero-xmr•8mo ago
IncreasePosts•8mo ago
ivape•8mo ago
If an apocalypse happened, believe it or not, the few remnants of Earth would have all the world's knowledge via an LLM. How could that be? Wasn't everything destroyed? Nope.
Filligree•8mo ago
Refined gasoline, diesel or even propane? That stuff degrades. After a few years it's useless.
shoxidizer•8mo ago
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/04/24/dying-to-keep-war...
monero-xmr•8mo ago
giraffe_lady•8mo ago
AngryData•8mo ago
I mean sure, fuel refining knowledge isn't super common, but plenty of people still know enough about it and chemistry to less efficiently produce fuels as long as they have a source material, be it an actual oil well or enough organic materials, with some basic tooling. Tooling which we would already know exists by the fact that people are maintaining a fleet of vehicles. And you also have to remember that Max himself was alive and working in world pre-collapse, it isn't a world 10+ generations into an apocalypse, only like 2 maybe bordering on 3 generations of apocalypse with some people still remembering the old world, albeit in a decaying state.
There are hippies that process wood into usable liquid fuels you can find on youtube. If we wanted to be more realistic, they would be driving less, and have a far higher percentage of diesel vehicles because diesel is so much easier to make and the engines are easier to run on even garbage fuels. But Mad Max isn't like 200 years post-apocalypse.
duped•8mo ago
I'm not going to sit here and argue Beyond Thunderdome is high art or anything, but kind of the whole point of the Mad Max films is not just to comment on resource scarcity and control but to make them the call to action for everything in the story. You're asking "who's making all the gas" because that's exactly what George Miller wants you to be thinking about.
Cordiali•8mo ago
I really didn't like Fury Road. It just felt like an over-the-top rehash of the end of Mad Max 2, without meaningfully expanding the world. Everything was far too polished, excessive, and wasteful, for no particular purpose.
01HNNWZ0MV43FF•8mo ago
Your gas went bad a year after the hammer fell? The Prius Prime can drive highway speed on its battery, and you can charge that with solar and an inverter.
Need to break camp and make yourself scarce in 5 minutes? Toss some fuel tanks in the back and floor it. The Prius Prime has a 600-mile EPA range on gasoline.
_dain_•8mo ago
it's a little more complicated than that. check out the map of which states use gas stoves vs electric.
https://www.statista.com/chart/29082/most-common-type-of-sto...