Not familiar with state of the art techniques in this realm currently.
People cannot be trusted to just outlaw Huntington's on its own, because the next politician will take power and outlaw some ethnic group they hate, arguing that there is precedence. Which is really annoying.
The chance is 50% for every child of a person with Huntington's. Is it ethical to deliberately have children knowing that they have a 50% chance of of their lifespan being cut in half, then dying in unimaginable pain guaranteed? There is always a risk for birth defects, but this one is a _choice_. Some people knowingly choose this fate for their children instead of adopting - that feels so wrong to me.
Even ignoring the humanitarian side, think of the societal cost. Every patient needs expensive round-the-clock care in the later stages, families and friends watch their loved ones deteriorate. If I was born knowing I had an early expiration date with that fate, I'd certainly need therapy. It's completely preventable.
loa_in_•8mo ago