frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

https://openciv3.org/
427•klaussilveira•6h ago•97 comments

The Waymo World Model

https://waymo.com/blog/2026/02/the-waymo-world-model-a-new-frontier-for-autonomous-driving-simula...
778•xnx•11h ago•472 comments

How we made geo joins 400× faster with H3 indexes

https://floedb.ai/blog/how-we-made-geo-joins-400-faster-with-h3-indexes
15•matheusalmeida•1d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

https://github.com/valdanylchuk/breezydemo
145•isitcontent•6h ago•15 comments

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

https://github.com/pydantic/monty
135•dmpetrov•6h ago•58 comments

Dark Alley Mathematics

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/three-points/
41•quibono•4d ago•3 comments

A century of hair samples proves leaded gas ban worked

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/a-century-of-hair-samples-proves-leaded-gas-ban-worked/
74•jnord•3d ago•5 comments

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

https://vecti.com
249•vecti•8h ago•118 comments

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

https://github.com/microsoft/litebox
314•aktau•12h ago•155 comments

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

https://eljojo.github.io/rememory/
180•eljojo•9h ago•124 comments

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
311•ostacke•12h ago•85 comments

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

https://hackers-1995.vercel.app/
397•todsacerdoti•14h ago•217 comments

An Update on Heroku

https://www.heroku.com/blog/an-update-on-heroku/
325•lstoll•12h ago•233 comments

PC Floppy Copy Protection: Vault Prolok

https://martypc.blogspot.com/2024/09/pc-floppy-copy-protection-vault-prolok.html
14•kmm•4d ago•1 comments

Show HN: R3forth, a ColorForth-inspired language with a tiny VM

https://github.com/phreda4/r3
48•phreda4•5h ago•8 comments

I spent 5 years in DevOps – Solutions engineering gave me what I was missing

https://infisical.com/blog/devops-to-solutions-engineering
109•vmatsiiako•11h ago•34 comments

How to effectively write quality code with AI

https://heidenstedt.org/posts/2026/how-to-effectively-write-quality-code-with-ai/
187•i5heu•9h ago•131 comments

Understanding Neural Network, Visually

https://visualrambling.space/neural-network/
236•surprisetalk•3d ago•31 comments

I now assume that all ads on Apple news are scams

https://kirkville.com/i-now-assume-that-all-ads-on-apple-news-are-scams/
977•cdrnsf•15h ago•415 comments

Learning from context is harder than we thought

https://hy.tencent.com/research/100025?langVersion=en
144•limoce•3d ago•79 comments

Female Asian Elephant Calf Born at the Smithsonian National Zoo

https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/female-asian-elephant-calf-born-smithsonians-national-zoo-an...
4•gmays•1h ago•0 comments

Introducing the Developer Knowledge API and MCP Server

https://developers.googleblog.com/introducing-the-developer-knowledge-api-and-mcp-server/
17•gfortaine•3h ago•2 comments

FORTH? Really!?

https://rescrv.net/w/2026/02/06/associative
41•rescrv•14h ago•17 comments

I'm going to cure my girlfriend's brain tumor

https://andrewjrod.substack.com/p/im-going-to-cure-my-girlfriends-brain
49•ray__•2h ago•11 comments

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

https://red.anthropic.com/2026/zero-days/
36•lebovic•1d ago•11 comments

Why I Joined OpenAI

https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2026-02-07/why-i-joined-openai.html
56•SerCe•2h ago•45 comments

Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents

https://docs.smooth.sh/cli/overview
77•antves•1d ago•57 comments

The Oklahoma Architect Who Turned Kitsch into Art

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2026-01-31/oklahoma-architect-bruce-goff-s-wild-home-desi...
19•MarlonPro•3d ago•4 comments

Show HN: Slack CLI for Agents

https://github.com/stablyai/agent-slack
40•nwparker•1d ago•10 comments

Planetary Roller Screws

https://www.humanityslastmachine.com/#planetary-roller-screws
36•everlier•3d ago•8 comments
Open in hackernews

Google confirms more ads on your paid YouTube Premium Lite soon

https://www.neowin.net/news/google-confirms-more-ads-on-your-paid-youtube-premium-lite-soon/
63•01-_-•8mo ago

Comments

_Algernon_•8mo ago
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin...

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/...

bugtodiffer•8mo ago
i thought lite was removed again because it just doesnt work
saubeidl•8mo ago
It's time to switch away from Chrome, anyways.

You can't give the ad-peddlers control over your digital existence.

Firefox has gotten quite good over the years. Personally, I like Zen, which has the UX of Arc, but an open source FF base.

pil0u•8mo ago
I have uBlock Origin on FF, just this morning it stopped working on YouTube. YouTube now tells me I am allowed for 3 videos because I'm adblocking them.
worble•8mo ago
Nearly every time I see this, it's because people have other addons colliding which cause issues.

You only need uBlock origin; get rid of Ghostery, Privacy Badger, adblock for youtube or any of that other stuff. Other extensions can cause uBlock to not work correctly.

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock?tab=readme-ov-file#all-pro...

> Do NOT use uBO with any other content blocker. uBO performs as well as or better than most popular blockers. Other blockers can prevent uBO's privacy or anti-blocker-defusing features from working correctly.

lan321•8mo ago
I had something like this for a while as well. I think they just target subsets of adblock users since I have multiple friends with the same configuration who didn't get it. My solution was FreeTube with LibRedirect.
pil0u•8mo ago
For the record, I don't have any other adblocker and have not for years since I actually had a clash with Privacy Badger in the past.

No, this is new.

krige•8mo ago
ads, on paid, youtube, premium, lite, what a fantastic word construct, a veritable babel of corporate policies we suffer. If we could only shove "AI generated" in front of "ads", it would be the supreme capture of the current zeitgeist. Big tech in a nutshell, if you will.
ezst•8mo ago
Add the usual army of bootlickers in the comments, defending those corporate interests against their own.
globular-toast•8mo ago
Cue shocked Pikachu...

Look, people are greedy. YouTube evidently works and is enormously profitable. As is the rest of the copyright industry. It didn't disappear once people had the power to make their own copies. If anything the industry has become more profitable and more powerful. None of this is about survival, it's about greed. If you give people the power to take more they will take it, every single time. They might not take it at first, but they will take it eventually. It's really that simple. Stories like this are boring. We know it's coming, and will keep coming. Until we build our communities in such a way that these enormous power imbalances can't happen then there will be stories like this every day.

If you want it to stop then we need AGPL software and a decentralised internet. We are in a local optimum so it will seem worse at first before it gets better.

throw_m239339•8mo ago
> If you want it to stop then we need AGPL software and a decentralised internet. We are in a local optimum so it will seem worse at first before it gets better.

But we already have a decentralized internet, it's just that most people will go for convenience rather of freedom...

Furthermore, some people here keep claiming that they are willing to pay for ad-less services, yet learned nothing from cable TV... even paid streaming services have ads...

globular-toast•8mo ago
It's not really decentralised. Everyone needs a symmetric internet connection. Currently it's common for upload speed to be a fraction of download, like 1/10 is common.
Reubensson•8mo ago
Youtube used to have a lite premium but they removed that. Sounds very similar but shittier with similar/same price.
piva00•8mo ago
I used to be very happy with the old Premium Lite, I didn't need YouTube Music or other features of Premium, just wanted to pay to have ads removed on all devices and it was the perfect product for that.

Then they cancelled it, got the email back in 2023 and resorted back to add-ons to block ads, stopped watching videos on devices that didn't support that, generally only watched YouTube on the computer for educational purposes.

When I saw it was back my first thought was "are you fucking kidding me?", I simply cannot comprehend Google's product strategy, at all. The "data-driven" bullshit for determining features, product tiers, etc. turns out to be just the McNamara fallacy applied to digital products, I can't see another way to explain the whiplash Google goes through in their product decisions, feels like everyone over there responsible for these decisions is only looking at insights, dashboards, etc. without ever thinking about what the hell the product is at its core.

charcircuit•8mo ago
Having shorts be treated the same as music videos makes sense due to how shorts can freely use copyrighted music unlike long form videos on the website.
saubeidl•8mo ago
Ads are psychological warfare.

Adblock is digital self-defence.

throwaway290•8mo ago
[flagged]
dbspin•8mo ago
Modern advertising was invented by Edward Bernays in his book 'Propaganda'. It is literally and specifically designed to manipulate beliefs and behaviour. Broadcast TV was created as content to package advertising, not the other way around. The social impact of advertising is enormous - primarily in reenforcing the helplessness and delusion of inevitably around disengaged consumer capitalism that Mark Fisher referred to as Capitalist Realism. It's pure, constant, unending manipulation - in public spaces, in private spaces embedded in in every drop of media in both explicit and disguised forms. It negates our ability to trust one another and what we see and read. It makes the worst and least democratic aspects of modernity seem eternal and unchangeable. It creates awful incentives and enforces disingenuousness. Advertising is a psychic poison.
eviks•8mo ago
> had ads and belive it or not people survived.

> You know nothing about psychological warfare if you think ads

... cause everyone to die.

throwaway290•8mo ago
You know what actually I don't even know what you think you're saying.
Argonaut998•8mo ago
Ads shape opinions. Why do political parties spend so much on them? Carefully curated ads can control you on subtle levels. Read the Propaganda book that another reply cited and also read Elul’s. Also read the works or experiments by B.F Skinner and then Kaheneman. You’ll notice this golden thread that ultimately culminates in “mind control” today via algorithmic shaping for content curation and advertisement. It’s why people who are terminally online are often ideological extremists and generally mentally unhealthy.
throwaway290•8mo ago
> Ads shape opinions

If you think ads shape opinions and everything else doesn't, you are tragically and ironically misinformed.

The only difference is that ads are explicit about it. There is no better way of subsidizing free content, clearly delimited from the content and not influencing the nature of that content unlike sponsorship blocks for example. If you take away ads all you have left is ads disguised as content + paid only content, because as I said: no one is obligated to feed anyone's black hole of content consumption for free.

dang•8mo ago
Please make your substantive points without crossing into personal attack. That only makes everything worse.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

dang•8mo ago
"Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

planb•8mo ago
> Besides a non-ad-free experience, the $7.99 Premium Lite subscription also removed several other cool features like the ability to download videos for offline viewing and background play, which can be quite convenient for listening to music on the app. Speaking of music, YouTube Premium Lite also does not include access to YouTube Music.

So what's the deal here? $8 for "less ads but none of the premium features"? I'd understand "no ads but none of the premium features" but even for that it would be quite expensive. Who on earth is the target group for this plan?

bell-cot•8mo ago
> Who on earth is the target group ...

Folks who aren't paying much attention, but are paying $8/month.

owebmaster•8mo ago
the "target" group is probably bundles of useless products from partners like "buy our useless SaaS and get a free Youtube Premium subscription!"
philistine•8mo ago
Exactly. You can’t believe how the people at YouTube are salivating at the future conversion rate from people who got Lite from their cell phone provider.
sillyfluke•8mo ago
It's amusing how they unironically continue to do this so plainly even after dystopian shows like black mirror and others mock this tactic aggressively in their latest outings. In the past, companies would try harder to hide a highly publicized bait and switch scam if they continued to make use of it. Subscription monetization schemes have truly hit a dead end if they can't bother even hiding it anymore.
anal_reactor•8mo ago
The deal here is that maintaining a free hosting service for 4k videos is not profitable, even with shitload of ads. This is hard truth that nobody wants to hear. My suggested solution is that once businesses grow beyond certain size, the government should step in and buy them out. This would allow to provide such services at a loss. Like, for example, railway in Europe. The only reason why it's even remotely usable is because it's funded from taxpayers' money. And they also started as private companies that would later become de-facto branches of the government.
Argonaut998•8mo ago
YouTube without an adblocker is borderline unusable. I would have no problem paying for premium if they didn’t also steal your data. They can’t have both, not from me anyway.
crimsontech•8mo ago
Unhook and Channel Block also make my youtube experience much better. I did pay for Premium at one point but they kept pushing "features" that couldn't be disabled, I provided feedback, but I imagine it goes nowhere, so I stopped paying them.

I put a youtube video on the TV last week and all the adverts were deep fakes of famous people saying you can get rich with this one trick and a QR code to scan. One of the videos was a deep fake of the UK PM Keir Starmer saying thousands of people can claim an unknown benefit. How are these adverts not considered harmful?

serial_dev•8mo ago
I used this fact to get rid of my YouTube addiction.

I used to have Premium and listen to videos in the background while working, doing chores, all kinds of stuff. I realized 95% of the content I'm listenting to is garbage, and another 5% percent is good content that deserves my full attention, not just me listening to it while doing other stuff.

Stopped paying for premium, the experience is so unbearable that after a couple of days, I stopped watching YouTube.

I guess I could also just adblock, but they keep breaking every couple of weeks (gee, I wonder why), but honestly I don't mind less YT in my life.

captain_coffee•8mo ago
This cannot be stresses enough. I genuinely do not understand how people can use the free version of YouTube without an adblocker.
recursivecaveat•8mo ago
Setting aside the actual ads, I feel like this Premium Lite cannot be long for the world at this point. It seems this is a common problem with corporations gradually trying to squeeze more juice out of products by increasing their complexity, until its so incoherent that people just won't engage anymore. I'm not sure any ordinary person could actually tell you what they would practically pay for Microsoft Office (I mean Office 365, Microsoft 365, no wait Copilot 365). If I open google shopping it looks like there are 10?? different types of licenses/subscriptions I could purchase labeled as either 365 or Office 2024.

Premium already suffers from the issue that you're paying to not experience something, so exactly how obnoxious the thing you're skipping is a little fuzzy. Once you start adding layers of tweaks to the definition of "some" ads, its hard to imagine people being enthusiastic to pay for it.

saubeidl•8mo ago
If you're on desktop, use ublock origin and sponsor block.

If you're on Android, use tubular (https://github.com/polymorphicshade/Tubular). It has no ads, built-in sponsor block and allows you to download videos and play them in the background for music.

If you're on Android TV, use Smart Tube (https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTube). It basically has the same features as above, but with a TV-friendly UI.

If you're on iOS, consider switching to an OS where a big corp doesn't control what software you can run.

jksflkjl3jk3•8mo ago
Firefox (or Ironfox) with ublock origin and background play fix works great on Android too, no need to use an app.
EspadaV9•8mo ago
How does Tubular compare to PipePipe (https://github.com/InfinityLoop1308/PipePipe). Both seem to be forks of NewPipe + SponsorBlock, but PipePipe seems like it might be a bit more active.
saubeidl•8mo ago
I'm not sure, to be honest. Haven't heard of PipePipe before!
reaperducer•8mo ago
Haven't heard of PipePipe before!

Yo, Dawg. I heard you like pipes in your pipes…

crtasm•8mo ago
What is the first screenshot illustrating? live chat/subtitles..?
EspadaV9•7mo ago
I believe it's either live chat, or comments with a timestamp, I'm not sure. I don't personally use that option, unless I accidentally touch the wrong icon.
xmodem•8mo ago
Sponsorblock has a Safari extension in the iOS app store and it works quite well. Doesn't block ads though.
elpocko•8mo ago
I'm using Firefox with UBO and for quite a while now every YT video stops playing after 45 seconds with an error message. So I made a bookmarklet that opens the embed link instead, which does not error out, but some videos can't be played that way at all.

No one else seems to have that specific problem. Am I the only one with this issue?

kotaKat•8mo ago
> If you're on iOS, consider switching to an OS where a big corp doesn't control what software you can run.

Sure! I literally just picked up a new Razr 2025 last night.

Out of the box, its built in “device pulse” application sideloaded another 15 apps out of the box I never asked for, consented for, or wanted, ranging from scammy games to garbage like Tiktok and Pintrest.

I didn’t get to say “no” to those applications… sounds like a big corp controlled what software I can run. They even put the application installer into the ‘nodisable’ list so I can’t kill it, and I can’t unlock the bootloader or any of that other great stuff everyone says Androids can do.

What now?

saubeidl•8mo ago
It sounds like you didn't pick a phone where a big corp doesn't control what software you can run.

I'd recommend getting a Pixel and installing Graphene.

saratogacx•8mo ago
Did you buy from Morotola or from a phone/service vender like TracPhone? I've had several Moto's in the recent past and they had a couple of light weight utilities but nothing like what you're describing. It sounds like carrier crapware.
philistine•8mo ago
I don’t get ads on YouTube in my iPhone, and all it took was using the website instead of the app. What am I missing exactly?
thiht•8mo ago
This is what I do too. It's not as comfortable as an app, but it works and it's free, definitely good enough to watch a video.
elashri•8mo ago
> If you're on iOS, consider switching to an OS where a big corp doesn't control what software you can run.

There is a beta version of ublock origin lite available now on iOS [1]

[1] https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/327

prmoustache•8mo ago
Most youtube content is made of ads anyway.

It is baffling to me that people would pay to access it: the viewer is the product that is sold, not the youtube content. This is merely a bait. Content creator's customer's are the brands that want to be advertized.

msgodel•8mo ago
Maybe they actually want to partition between the impressionable smartphone/smartTV users and the people who would prefer using mpv to watching ads.

That kind of thing usually kills the platform though.

wina•8mo ago
why is $8/m not enough for them to remove all ads? do they really make that much back from you?
bell-cot•8mo ago
Does it matter, if they can get your $8/month, plus some ad revenue? You don't last long in the C-suite if you're not interested in perpetual profit growth.
toastercat•8mo ago
Stop using adblock, they said, it's immoral, they said, just buy YouTube Premium, they said.
ghusto•8mo ago
Meanwhile over here in uBlock land ...
ghusto•8mo ago
For those voicing the "yeah, well they're not a charity" sentiment:

What Google have done with YouTube is push it at a loss for long enough to kill competition. Once they're the only ones left, they get to dictate everything because there's nobody left to compete.

It's not _illegal_ (not exactly, anyway), but don't expect me to then call using the service and blocking ads "stealing".

spacemadness•8mo ago
I love that neowin has a big popup complaining about using an ad blocker before you can read the article with a big sadface about ads.