frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Tell HN: Help restore the tax deduction for software dev in the US (Section 174)

430•dang•1h ago•189 comments

Apple Announces Foundation Models Framework for Developers to Leverage AI

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/apple-supercharges-its-tools-and-technologies-for-developers/
62•thm•27m ago•21 comments

Launch HN: Chonkie (YC X25) – Open-Source Library for Advanced Chunking

48•snyy•2h ago•16 comments

Why Go is a good fit for agents

https://docs.hatchet.run/blog/go-agents
25•abelanger•5d ago•18 comments

Hokusai Moyo Gafu: an album of dyeing patterns

https://ndlsearch.ndl.go.jp/en/imagebank/theme/hokusaimoyo
82•fanf2•3h ago•11 comments

Why quadratic funding is not optimal

https://jonathanwarden.com/quadratic-funding-is-not-optimal/
59•jwarden•3h ago•46 comments

Doctors could hack the nervous system with ultrasound

https://spectrum.ieee.org/focused-ultrasound-stimulation-inflammation-diabetes
62•purpleko•3h ago•3 comments

The new Gödel Prize winner tastes great and is less filling

https://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2025/06/the-new-godel-prize-winner-tastes-great.html
62•baruchel•3h ago•10 comments

Bruteforcing the phone number of any Google user

https://brutecat.com/articles/leaking-google-phones
285•brutecat•4h ago•103 comments

Algovivo an energy-based formulation for soft-bodied virtual creatures

https://juniorrojas.com/algovivo/
24•tzury•2h ago•2 comments

Show HN: Somo – a human friendly alternative to netstat

https://github.com/theopfr/somo
3•hollow64•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Munal OS: a graphical experimental OS with WASM sandboxing

https://github.com/Askannz/munal-os
3•Gazoche•37m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Glowstick – type level tensor shapes in stable rust

https://github.com/nicksenger/glowstick
19•bietroi•2h ago•0 comments

Maypole Dance of Braid Like Groups (2009)

https://divisbyzero.com/2009/05/04/the-maypole-braid-group/
25•srean•2h ago•3 comments

Apple introduces a universal design across platforms

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/apple-introduces-a-delightful-and-elegant-new-software-design/
19•meetpateltech•1h ago•23 comments

A man rebuilding the last Inca rope bridge

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/last-inca-rope-bridge-qeswachaka-tradition
30•kaonwarb•2d ago•5 comments

Finding Shawn Mendes (2019)

https://ericneyman.wordpress.com/2019/11/26/finding-shawn-mendes/
293•jzwinck•10h ago•45 comments

LLMs are cheap

https://www.snellman.net/blog/archive/2025-06-02-llms-are-cheap/
221•Bogdanp•6h ago•211 comments

Potential and Limitation of High-Frequency Cores and Caches (2024)

https://arch.cs.ucdavis.edu/simulation/2024/08/06/potentiallimitationhighfreqcorescaches.html
6•matt_d•3d ago•1 comments

Frederick Forsyth has died

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/jun/09/frederick-forsyth-day-of-the-jackal-author-and-former-mi6-agent-dies-aged-86
14•Tomte•46m ago•3 comments

The Legend of Prince's Special Custom-Font Symbol Floppy Disks (2016)

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/04/princes-legendary-floppy-disk-symbol-font.html
29•arbesman•4d ago•10 comments

Anthropic's AI-generated blog dies an early death

https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/09/anthropics-ai-generated-blog-dies-an-early-death/
53•Sourabhsss1•2h ago•36 comments

Trusting your own judgement on 'AI' is a risk

https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/trusting-your-own-judgement-on-ai/
58•todsacerdoti•1h ago•10 comments

Why Android can't use CDC Ethernet (2023)

https://jordemort.dev/blog/why-android-cant-use-cdc-ethernet/
311•goodburb•21h ago•124 comments

Riding high in Germany on the world's oldest suspended railway

https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2025/jun/09/riding-high-in-germany-on-the-worlds-oldest-suspended-railway
171•pseudolus•18h ago•86 comments

Endangered classic Mac plastic color returns as 3D-printer filament

https://arstechnica.com/apple/2025/06/new-filament-lets-you-3d-print-parts-in-authentic-1980s-apple-computer-color/
221•CobaltFire•4d ago•72 comments

CoverDrop: A secure messaging system for newsreader apps

https://github.com/guardian/coverdrop
44•andyjohnson0•10h ago•7 comments

What happens when people don't understand how AI works

https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2025/06/artificial-intelligence-illiteracy/683021/
203•rmason•21h ago•238 comments

Omnimax

https://computer.rip/2025-06-08-Omnimax.html
181•aberoham•21h ago•46 comments

Administering immunotherapy in the morning seems to matter. Why?

https://www.owlposting.com/p/the-time-of-day-that-immunotherapy
211•abhishaike•1d ago•168 comments
Open in hackernews

Defiant loyalists paid dearly for choosing wrong side in the American Revolution

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/meet-the-defiant-loyalists-who-paid-dearly-for-choosing-the-wrong-side-in-the-american-revolution-180986716/
97•bookofjoe•5h ago

Comments

saysjonathan•4h ago
Now I want to see 'Tories' used derisively in modern American politics.
dontlaugh•4h ago
Go ahead.

In the UK there’s regular Tories (Conservative Party), red Tories (Labour Party under Blair or Starmer), tartan Tories (SNP), etc.

In the US it seems like you only have red and blue Tories.

shortrounddev2•4h ago
Actually there's a massive difference between Democrats and Republicans in the US, and that difference matters a lot
dontlaugh•4h ago
Is there? They seem only distinguishable aesthetically to me.

They’re much closer to each other than UK’s Tories and Labour, for sure.

ceejayoz•4h ago
> They seem only distinguishable aesthetically to me.

This is likely to depend heavily on what positions you care strongly about.

redeux•4h ago
There are a lot of similarities when it comes to their tendency towards Corporatocracy and military spending, but it largely ends there.

When it comes to taxes, fiscal priorities, rights for individuals, foreign policy, crime and punishment, and of course social issues they are very different and in most cases take the opposite approach.

For example, Republicans want lower taxes for the wealthy while Democrats want lower taxes for the lower and middle classes. Republicans want to restrict individuals rights - especially for non-christian white males, Democrats don't. Republicans favor heavy handed punishment including capital punishment, Democrats favor rehabilitation and a ban on capital punishment. Republicans want to blow up the national debt through tax breaks and pork, Democrats want to control the debt through responsible spending and investments. Republicans want to stop investment in education and science while Democrats want to increase investment in these areas. These are all very real and not just aesthetics.

TheOtherHobbes•3h ago
Democratic voters want those things. It's not at all obvious the party establishment does.

The tell is that when Republicans push through their policies, Democratic opposition is weak and ineffectual. Instead of ferocious opposition the Dems send one of their famous sternly worded letters.

Since at least 2000 the party establishment has absolutely refused to do any of the things it could do to change this - including packing the Supreme Court, supporting and promoting grass roots activism between elections, using the filibuster, and so on.

Biden couldn't even get any of Trump's prosecutions over the line - including televised evidence of insurrection, and treasonous mishandling of official state secrets (!)

However it's spun, there is a very obvious reluctance to challenge the extremes of Republicanism.

The party is far more likely to censure one of its non-centrists than its centrists, while the opposite is true of the Republicans.

maxwell•2h ago
The Democrats operate as if they're controlled opposition. It's like their donors pay them to blunt their base. They haven't accomplished anything legislatively this century beyond pass the 1993 Republican healthcare plan under Obama's name. They couldn't even raise the minimum wage.
MentatOnMelange•2h ago
In my experience this is dead on. People have short attention spans but this has been happning the whole 21st century. In 2008 Obama won the primary despite the best efforts of leadership to nominate clinton. They even scrambled the "super delegates" (delegates who vote for the candidate chosen by senior leadership) hoping that even if Obama won more delegates, they could override the voters choice.

Of course, they failed, and democrats won 2 elections in a row running a candidate labeled a radical socialist. Obama became the only 21st century president to win the poplar vote twice, and the DNC has been trying to drag the party back in the 20th century ever since, blaming their own voters when it doesn't work.

It boggles my mind that they refused to even engage with the "undecided movement", which created a grass-roots get out to vote movement out of thin air. In swing states no less.

The starkest contrast between the two parties is womens rights and to a lesser extent LGBTQ rights. Although I'm not even sure how true this is anymore with so many politicians backing Cuomo, who resigned because an investigation found overwhelming evidence he sexually harrassed and assaulted female employees. And I'm pretty sure people like Chuck Schumer and other centrists view the LGBTQ community as a liability.

FridayoLeary•4h ago
Not as much as you'd think. It's remarkable how similar their tactics and rhetoric are.
SavageNoble•4h ago
Yeah, no. The Overton window is so incredibly small in America that normal, run of the mill political positions - either left or right - in the rest of the world are deemed extremist and radical in America.

Your Corporate media is the problem.

ta1243•4h ago
Things have been far more polarised since the rise of social media. You can blame fox news and cnn or whatever all you want, but given how far the US is from the days of Clinton, Reagan, Nixon, Kennedy etc I don't see how you can simply blame "corporate media".
JKCalhoun•4h ago
Social media is the new corporate media.
TheOtherHobbes•4h ago
Both are true. The end of the Fairness Doctrine normalised the psychotic distortions and lies pumped out by Fox. But the same machine that uses Fox also runs bot farms, astroturfing operations, and curated social media algorithms to normalise even more extreme RW POVs.

And here we are.

lesuorac•3h ago
Fox is a cable network.

Fairness doctrine only applied to limited spectrums (Radio) not to cable.

detourdog•3h ago
Corporate media used to have regulations on how much local media any single company could own. I think the consolidation of media ownership made it easier to have a single corporate vision.
CaptWillard•2h ago
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 has something to do with it.

Also, a lot of what has happened goes back to the Church Committee and the fact that no meaningful reforms were made after that.

lenerdenator•4h ago
Pretty sure the Murdochs are 'Strayan.
anon291•3h ago
On the other hand, both American parties are radical compared to the rest of the world on human rights issues such as free speech
Yizahi•3h ago
The problem is not media, at least not primarily. The problem is an ancient and not-democratic first past the post system, preventing emergence of any alternative, good or bad.
pwndByDeath•4h ago
Under the lenses of a duopoly, American politics seems like a well oiled machine, oiled by the tears of the constituency, but they are working together. The orange tumor seems to be a new thing that for some reason smells like fundamentalist state.
moogleii•4h ago
Recently learned that one of Ben Franklin's sons was a loyalist. He fled to England after the war.
jplrssn•4h ago
As did everyone else who read the article :-)
FridayoLeary•4h ago
>What’s more, much of the population, “probably a statistical majority, [just] wanted to get on with their own lives without worrying about declaring their allegiance to one side or the other,”

Still the same today.

morkalork•4h ago
The absolute truth right here. Just go on reddit to see it any time a roadway gets blocked on protest.
aaomidi•3h ago
Reddit is one of the most as astroturfed platforms out there.
stormfather•2h ago
Ghislaine Maxwell, for instance, was a mod on /r/worldnews and one of the most prolific posters.
disposition2•4h ago
Thanks for sharing, I’ve always enjoyed the Smithsonian magazine and its articles, hope to visit some day.

I’m hoping all the RIFs, reductions / eradication of IMLS, etc. don’t reduce the gains in & sharing of knowledge from these institutions, but if I am being honest it kind of feels like it’s purposeful destruction.

So I’ll enjoy it while we have it.

mcphage•3h ago
I’m planning to take my kids to Washington this summer to see the Smithsonian museums. It doesn’t seem like a great time to go to Washington, but I don’t know if they’ll be there, or in what state, next summer or the summer after.
ben7799•3h ago
I have always thought the fact Boston was a hotbed of revolution and New York city was a loyalist stronghold (as the article mentions) has had some small subconscious effect on the ongoing rivalry between the two cities all the way to the present day.

We joke about the Red Sox and the Yankees but deep down there is this smidgen of it that goes all the way back.

Also from the article, amazing how William Franklin has been almost erased by history even though Benjamin Franklin is endlessly discussed in elementary history in the US. A fascinating addition to the story. I'm sure historians are familiar with this, but it's likely something every day Americans should all know about. I know it was not mentioned in my education through high school, including AP history. There was scant discussion of loyalists, the Tories were definitely mentioned but it was not covered in the same way the community & family divisions of the Civil War were.

taeric•3h ago
This feels odd. Many people paid dearly for being involved, period? It isn't like we have any dynasties that survived through the era, did we?

Specifically, 46 people signed the declaration of independence. How many of those are remembered today? Do I expect that people on the "other side" had it worse? Yeah, but this framing implies a spoils system.

This always makes it odd to read about narratives that go about people's connection to family land. It is almost anti American in how we were founded and grew. I know we have a few estates that are named and known. Is that a larger number than I realize?

runako•2h ago
Sharp contrast here with the aftermath of our bloodiest war.
sys32768•2h ago
American descendants of loyalists often hide their roots.

I know this because my grandmother told me a few years before she passed that her father, a mason and devoted patriot, once confided a scandalous family secret: there are loyalists in our family tree.

Sadly, grandma's research never got her to the root of this claim despite much research, but thanks to online resources and some helpful Canadians, I discovered the truth.

Grandma's grandfather had emigrated from New Brunswick, Canada, during the Civil War, in which he served the Union.

It turns out his great-grandfather was a captain in the Queen's Guard during the American revolution, born in Connecticut. He and his wife and children had fled after the war with other loyalists to New Brunswick, Canada. They suffered many deprivations, although the loyalist commission board compensated them about half their worldly goods they lost in America.

This captain had married a woman whose brother fought for the Americans at Bunker Hill.

While researching my grandmother's grandfather from Canada, I discovered a telling white lie: he would tell the local busybody newspaper that he was visiting his sister in New York. Thing is, he had no sister in New York. Instead, I discovered the Canadian newspapers not long after were reporting he had arrived from America to visit his sister in New Brunswick.

I was blown away by all this rich history, but when I shared my discoveries with all the remaining family on that side, nobody expressed excitement. In fact, the one person who used to call me up to discuss family history, stopped calling me.