And yes I know that there are Cloudflare employees here so spare me with your pinky swears.
Lying about the scale of thwarted attacks by others is the counter argument
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/05/krebsonsecurity-hit-with...
While it may not impact your site, it does impact your hosting provider. As their costs go up, your costs go up. Anything on the Internet at this point needs DDoS / scraping protection. If may not drop your service, but your ISP or upstreams may blackhole your route.
The "old web" (current web) was largely based on an open exchange of information.
The "new web", post AI bot scraping, is taking its place. Websites are getting paywalls. Advertising revenue is plummeting. Hosting providers are getting decimated by the massive shift in bandwidth demand and impact to systems scraped by the bots.
Everyone hates when I set my app's fonts to courier size 8.
Now I hate Cloudflare with a passion, but even setting that aside, this is journalistic malpractice - it's basically a sponsored post. I was going to say I expected better from Ars Technica, but their glory days are long gone.
smokel•5h ago
How is that more complicated than a for-loop?
ukuina•5h ago
lolinder•3h ago
saulpw•1h ago
jjtheblunt•37m ago
luckylion•25m ago
blitq•5h ago
monster_truck•3h ago
lolinder•3h ago
A well-engineered attack would not draw headlines for its scale because it would take down its target without breaking any records.
motorest•2h ago
You don't hear much about DDoS that are either comparable in size or bring down targets. How do you explain why this one made the news in spite of not having met your arbitrary and personal bar?
lolinder•2h ago
> in spite of not having met your arbitrary and personal bar?
I'm not sure what you mean by this. I didn't establish any sort of bar for what sorts of DDoS should get headlines, I'm just agreeing with OP that that line in the article doesn't make any sense. There may be other reasons to believe this attack was well-engineered but the article doesn't get into them.
rob_c•2h ago
It's that a serious question or bait?
Either way, are you so broken as to not understand what was just typed?