frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

https://openciv3.org/
567•klaussilveira•10h ago•159 comments

The Waymo World Model

https://waymo.com/blog/2026/02/the-waymo-world-model-a-new-frontier-for-autonomous-driving-simula...
885•xnx•16h ago•537 comments

How we made geo joins 400× faster with H3 indexes

https://floedb.ai/blog/how-we-made-geo-joins-400-faster-with-h3-indexes
89•matheusalmeida•1d ago•20 comments

What Is Ruliology?

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/01/what-is-ruliology/
16•helloplanets•4d ago•8 comments

Unseen Footage of Atari Battlezone Arcade Cabinet Production

https://arcadeblogger.com/2026/02/02/unseen-footage-of-atari-battlezone-cabinet-production/
16•videotopia•3d ago•0 comments

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

https://github.com/valdanylchuk/breezydemo
195•isitcontent•10h ago•24 comments

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

https://github.com/pydantic/monty
197•dmpetrov•11h ago•88 comments

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

https://vecti.com
305•vecti•13h ago•136 comments

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

https://github.com/microsoft/litebox
352•aktau•17h ago•172 comments

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
348•ostacke•16h ago•90 comments

Delimited Continuations vs. Lwt for Threads

https://mirageos.org/blog/delimcc-vs-lwt
20•romes•4d ago•2 comments

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

https://hackers-1995.vercel.app/
450•todsacerdoti•18h ago•228 comments

Dark Alley Mathematics

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/three-points/
77•quibono•4d ago•16 comments

PC Floppy Copy Protection: Vault Prolok

https://martypc.blogspot.com/2024/09/pc-floppy-copy-protection-vault-prolok.html
50•kmm•4d ago•3 comments

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

https://eljojo.github.io/rememory/
247•eljojo•13h ago•150 comments

An Update on Heroku

https://www.heroku.com/blog/an-update-on-heroku/
384•lstoll•17h ago•260 comments

Zlob.h 100% POSIX and glibc compatible globbing lib that is faste and better

https://github.com/dmtrKovalenko/zlob
9•neogoose•3h ago•6 comments

How to effectively write quality code with AI

https://heidenstedt.org/posts/2026/how-to-effectively-write-quality-code-with-ai/
227•i5heu•13h ago•172 comments

Show HN: R3forth, a ColorForth-inspired language with a tiny VM

https://github.com/phreda4/r3
66•phreda4•10h ago•11 comments

Why I Joined OpenAI

https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2026-02-07/why-i-joined-openai.html
111•SerCe•6h ago•90 comments

I spent 5 years in DevOps – Solutions engineering gave me what I was missing

https://infisical.com/blog/devops-to-solutions-engineering
134•vmatsiiako•15h ago•59 comments

Female Asian Elephant Calf Born at the Smithsonian National Zoo

https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/female-asian-elephant-calf-born-smithsonians-national-zoo-an...
23•gmays•5h ago•4 comments

Introducing the Developer Knowledge API and MCP Server

https://developers.googleblog.com/introducing-the-developer-knowledge-api-and-mcp-server/
42•gfortaine•8h ago•12 comments

Understanding Neural Network, Visually

https://visualrambling.space/neural-network/
263•surprisetalk•3d ago•35 comments

Learning from context is harder than we thought

https://hy.tencent.com/research/100025?langVersion=en
165•limoce•3d ago•87 comments

I now assume that all ads on Apple news are scams

https://kirkville.com/i-now-assume-that-all-ads-on-apple-news-are-scams/
1037•cdrnsf•20h ago•429 comments

Show HN: ARM64 Android Dev Kit

https://github.com/denuoweb/ARM64-ADK
14•denuoweb•1d ago•2 comments

FORTH? Really!?

https://rescrv.net/w/2026/02/06/associative
58•rescrv•18h ago•22 comments

Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents

https://docs.smooth.sh/cli/overview
86•antves•1d ago•63 comments

WebView performance significantly slower than PWA

https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40817676
22•denysonique•7h ago•4 comments
Open in hackernews

How did X-Rays gain mass adoption?

https://www.aditharun.com/p/how-did-x-rays-gain-mass-adoption
13•tinymagician•7mo ago

Comments

JohnMakin•7mo ago
Otherwise interesting post that caused a little bit of confusion for me, as the dates listed at the start of the article are in the mid 1980's, when I think it meant to be the mid 1890's.
dhosek•7mo ago
It kind of makes me wonder whether this person used ChatGPT or something along those lines to create it. I stopped reading when it was clear that they had let such glaring errors be published in the first paragraph.
bawolff•7mo ago
Otoh, reversing digits in numbers is a super common mistake that humans make. If anything i feel like this type of error points to human authorship.

Or at least it would be if they did it once, but they made the same mistake multiple times which is bizarre. I dont know what to think about that.

auserisme•7mo ago
This seems very clearly written by AI to me. There are multiple grammatical or flow errors (see the references to "bullet"). There is a very ChatGPT "in summary" point section.
tinymagician•7mo ago
The dates are my fault, thanks to those who pointed it out, its been fixed. I sort of write the way my brain thinks so the in summary is just my way of reminding myself of what's going on.

I used an LLM to gather sources but wrote it myself. The writing having flow errors/grammar is more just a function of poor proofreading on my end - my brain skips words and flow sometimes. I'm not a great writer.

I see your point with the "bullet" namely - Some surgeons doubted the image quality, felt bullet could be left safely in the body, and worried about patient privacy (seeing through clothes). It should read "Some surgeons doubted the image quality. Others felt that the bullet could be left safely in the body and worried about patient privacy (seeing through clothes). The article has been updated.

Thanks for everyone's comments, I appreciate them.

lawlessone•7mo ago
>The expense of the machine costs only about $400 while a good coil is valued at from $200 to $600. But, of course, this need not be considered by physicians, since all are wealthy

This is interesting. Would doctors build/assemble their own machines?

Definitely not the case with newer forms of imaging.

retrac•7mo ago
As the quote says, you only really need two components: an induction coil and a Crookes tube. If connecting the two counts as building their own machine, then yes many early doctors did build their own. An induction coil was an off-the-shelf part (as much as anything electrical was in the 1890s). The Crookes tube was initially a custom piece, but workshops started turning them out as soon as the Roentgen pictures caught on.

Maybe worth pointing out that both doctors and laboratory scientists historically had a close relationship with glass blowers and glass work. Many doctors back then would have known someone who was able to make them a Crookes tube (often themselves). A sufficiently hard vacuum pump was I think the trickiest part?

trhway•7mo ago
similarly waiting for mass adoption of iPhone based ultrasound and some kind of laser computational tomography-interferometry (capable to see at least few centimeter deep). We're probably can do iPhone bases X-ray too - the CCDs are very sensitive so the dose at dental Xrays is already much lower than film-based, and may be we can go even lower with small discharge device (at the level of unrolling a duct tape roll) Naturally, add in some diagnostic AI, and you get tricorder :)
margalabargala•7mo ago
I'm not sure I agree with the premise that cfDNA has not reached widespread acceptance.

For example, 94% of OBGYNs in the US that have training for high risk pregnancies, offer NIPT tests [0].

Basically anyone in the US who is pregnant can order a NIPT test for very little money.

[0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4303457/

tinymagician•7mo ago
For prenatal care sure we have adopted. I was thinking more along the lines of cancer treatment and detection.
cortesoft•7mo ago
I had no idea X-rays were invented in 1986!
xattt•7mo ago
Dr. Wilhem Röntgen was moon-walking with joy.
saulpw•7mo ago
They weren't! X-rays were the first step towards nukes. 1895 for X-rays and 50 years later in 1945 for the atomic bomb.
ulfw•7mo ago
What is the point of these hallucinationed AI blobs the internet is filling up with.

None of the dates in this "article" are correct and are off by a hundred years.

Worthless and don't waste your time reading it. Go to ChatGPT if you're bored and want more lies and invented bullshit

Brave world we live in now

tinymagician•7mo ago
Sorry man, I brain-farted and mixed up the 9 and the 8 (1986 --> 1896). Wasn't written by chatgpt though
tzs•7mo ago
> The public was fascinated by this technology and studios offered the public “views of their bones” and “shoe fitting” images

For shoe fitting there were actually x-ray machines in shoe stores. They were widely used, especially when buying shoes for children. Wikipedia has a nice description [1]:

> The shoe-fitting fluoroscope, also sold under the names X-ray Shoe Fitter, Pedoscope and Foot-o-scope, was an X-ray fluoroscope machine installed in shoe stores from the 1920s until about the 1970s. The device was a metal construction covered in finished wood, approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) tall in the shape of short column, with a ledge with an opening through which the standing customer (adult or child) would put their feet and look through a viewing porthole at the top of the fluoroscope down at the X-ray view of the feet and shoes. Two other viewing portholes on either side enabled the parent and a sales assistant to observe the toes being wiggled to show how much room for the toes there was inside the shoe. The bones of the feet were clearly visible, as was the outline of the shoe, including the stitching around the edges.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope