To end up going bankrupt with 1B in debts, the problem is elsewhere
I don’t think there was no alternative. I think it was an easier, more short term, and more selfish (in relation to fellow countrymen and descendants), choice.
I do think consumers have a responsibility here: for the last 30 years i've only had european cars. Even if they're a bit less advanced or a bit more expensive, it's a choice for a healthy local economy. Only the last car was a Tesla, as it seemed to be the best EV choice, but that will not happen again. Again, voting with my wallet, i will not sponsor the actions of a wanna be dictator.
If you would have gone back twenty years and been like “hey, you know how you think the Germans are running ChryslerDodgeJeep into the ground? … just wait until you see what the Italians do… and then the French right after that!!”
I wouldn’t have believed it. Turns out the Germans really weren’t so bad.
Honestly, Stellantis is making the wrong move at every turn and one possibility that makes sense is stripping the company… or some elaborate revenge plot… because it seems like they speedrunning destruction.
Germans and Italians had a multi decade lead on EV motors, battery, self driving and electronic tech over China (why I entered the industry) but they shelved it because they wanted to sell more diesel engines, outsourced all R&D to the lowest bidder to save costs and invest all profits into share buybacks or dividends instead of R&D (why I exited the industry).
Are the German and Italian executives in charge of those decisions being held accountable for the mess they created, or are the enjoying a golden retirements/parachutes while thousands of workers are now being laid off and governments forced to spend taxpayer money to bail out their mistakes and rescue what's left to prevent further layoffs? What were the lavishly paid EU politicians and regulators watching over in that time?
To me this is another nail in the western industry players falling victims to their own short sighted greed coffin. If only there have been any past examples in history to serve as cautionary tales, cough, Kodak, cough. /s
Also, on the topic of EU EV demand since you brought it up, a lot of Europeans are more urbanized, living in apartment buildings compared to US single family homes, so most don't have chargers at home to justify an EV purchase but still need cars to get to work, so of course that without matching charging infrastructure at home or at work, Europeans couldn't justify the purchase of an EV especially given the lower purchasing power compared to USaians. Not to mention that as a double whammy, EU city dwellers are also more likely to be tenants than owners which again, doesn't incentivize owners to invest in EV infrastructure.
I live in a supposedly rich EU country on paper, and public charging infrastructure is still severely lacking. Only newly built post-2018 apartments have power sockets in the garage so you can install a charger, the rest? God speed. Government action here has been lacking on public EV infrastructure front, they just gave subsidies for EVs which were ultimately just handouts to businesses and rich people who owned their own single family homes with chargers and solar panels, but now that market of house owners is saturated, since they already own EVs so of course sales have tanked, d'uh!
It was just another politically driven short sighted move, and now again, they're looking at fixing just the resulting effect and not the root cause. So in a Kafkaesque way, the huge amount of EU regulation, protectionism and interference had done more harm than good to the EU EV industry versus ripping the band aid during the good economic times and letting free market run its course, so now the industry is stuck with an economic recession to boot waiting for more regulations to save it, which might again, harm it more in the long term instead of making it competitive.
> but now that market of house owners is saturated, since they already own EVs so of course sales have tanked, d'uh!
How are you defining tanked? They stalled for about a year but have resumed growth.
> Europeans couldn't justify the purchase of an EV especially given the lower purchasing power compared to USaians.
And yet, somehow, Europe remains a larger market for electric cars than the US (of course, China is far larger than either).
> so now the industry is stuck with an economic recession to boot waiting for more regulations to save it
Again, VW etc seem fairly healthy. Stellantis not so much (though they are somehow still profitable), but their strategy of just owning all the brands that everyone thinks no longer exist and not doing much with them always seemed fairly incoherent.
All in all, this feels like you've come up with a narrative, and are just running with it regardless of reality, tbh.
You're putting words in my mouth that I never said. I never made such claims. Obviously it will not, since the auto industry gets more government protections than the likes of Nokia or Blackberry did, but a good indicator is to monitor sales in regions that don't have specialized tariffs on Chinese vehicles to protect western ones, like Australia maybe.
>pretty much everything you have claimed is dubious or flat-out incorrect.
YOU think they are incorrect. I don't think everything I said is incorrect, especially the parts about manufacturers outsourcing critical innovation causing them to fall behind, EV infrastructure in my EU country being deficient leading people not to buy EVs, and consumer purchasing power/habits. The only part where I am wrong is about current sales numbers, but spot sales and rarely an indicator of the general industry trend or future.
Funny thing is, the rest of the industry has now caught up to this particular ugliness, so as it turns out it was futuristic. I really disliked the look of the Nissan Leaf ten years ago, but I now own one and whilst I don't love it's stylings, it's not stand-out-in-the-crowd ugly like it used to be - not because it's changed, but all the other cars have caught up (to the ugly, unfortunately).
I just wonder whether they made them look like 'normal' cars back then would they have sold better?
(VW kind of had the opposite problem; whereas BMW went "let's make the weirdest possible electric car", the eGolf and eUp were so normal-looking that I think people generally didn't realise they exist; a lot of people thought that the id.3/4 were their first electric cars.)
China's approach was interesting. There was no giant state automaker, but about 70 of them. At one point, each province had its own auto industry. About like the US auto industry in 1910. There's been steady consolidation, or elimination of the losers. Mergers of China auto companies seem to be rare.
Then came BYD. BYD won by sheer competence. They got good at batteries. They figured out how to make lithium iron phosphate batteries take up less volume and charge faster with their "blade battery". Now they could make safe electric cars with reasonable but not great range.
Somebody at BYD had an insight - the E-Axle. The motor is mounted to the axle and differential, like a railroad locomotive bogie. The power train for a basic car or truck consists of an E-Axle, a battery, an electronics power box that handles motor, battery, and charging inputs. The electronics box talks CANbus to the dashboard and controls. Using those standard, mass-produced components, a wide variety of cars and trucks can be built. That got costs way down. Then BYD did some good car designs and got good at production.
The main government incentive was help on the charging infrastructure side. Also, it's been hard for years to get a registration to drive an IC car in Beijing. There's a very limited quota.
US companies are still trying to build gas cars with an electric power train substituted. This works but does not bring costs down. Tesla is electric-first, but has other problems.
The "Made in China 2025" plan [1], adopted in 2015, is now mostly complete.[2] After 2019, the government of China stopped publicizing the "Made in China 2025" in foreign media, but the plan continued to be executed.
South China Morning Post (2024): "The analysis found that China has met over 86% of the 260 targets under MIC25, achieving or surpassing goals in sectors such as EVs, renewable energy, robotics, and biopharmaceuticals. However, key targets in advanced photolithography, intercontinental aircraft, and new materials were missed, with new materials having the lowest completion rate at 75%"
It's an impressive success of long-term planning.
> their own short sighted greed coffin
The $100,000 pickup truck comes to mind.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025
[2] https://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Was-MIC25-Success...
A lot of similar innovations ~20 years ago at German and Italian companies like Siemens VDO or Magneti Marelli. The issue is none of them were ever put into mass production, they were just left to rot on shelves while the Chinese out innovated them. It's the exact same story how Kodak invented the digital camera but shelved it to keep its film business alive till Canon and Nikon out innovated them.
>It's an impressive success of long-term planning.
China and CCP really shined at this, contrary to western expectations who thought it would be another USSR 2.0 waiting for it to collapse under state mismanagement and have them sweep in and buy the nation's assets at a discount. Then in a twist of irony, the opposite happened as China turned out to be better at maneuvering capitalism than the inventors of capitalists.
While the western business leaders only plan for next quarter and western politicians only plan for next election, all of which leads to short sighted greed driven "get rich quick while you still can then pull the ladder from under you" decisions on all fronts, leaving the future generations to pick up the tab and try to fix the past mistakes, all of which bogs down development, China moves at lightning speed.
Due to the lack of accountability of politicians and the greed of wealthy elites who own them, most of the democratic west became low trust societies, where people can't trust politicians to have their interest at heart anymore.
That's why you see people voting the most extreme and destructive anti-establishment candidates in almost every major democracy, because voting the least worst option as was the norm, simply resulted into a slow march towards feudalism: unaffordable housing, higher taxes, stagnating wages, decline in quality of public services, increased illegal migration, etc.
So why would people choose to vote for the same thing for multiple decades? That would be the definition of insanity.
China has formal Five Year Plans. Currently, the fourteenth Five Year Plan is finishing up, and the fifteenth, to start in 2026, is being worked on. They're published openly, but few in the West read them. They're general in the sense that they don't specify who does what, but specific in that they specify what should be emphasized and funded.
Historically, the Five Year Plans were aspirational and political through at least the 1980s. There were some major disasters. Search "Great Leap Forward". Some time in the 1990s, the planning system seemed to gain focus and started to become effective in guiding industrialization.
The Five Year Plans drive capital allocation. If a company wants to do something that's in the plan, it's easier to get money, loans, land, and such than for business areas not in the plan.
This is different from Soviet central planning, which was more like a very sluggish manufacturing scheduling system that told specific plants what to do. Updating was annual, which is far too slow for that level of control. Search "Gosplan".
3200 acres... the whole damn thing is vertically integrated. they make everything for their cars in the one giant factory.
Amazing stuff... BYD is destined to be bigger than toyota ever was
Thanks, this is something important I forgot about.
Tesla and BYD went fully vertically integrated by now, while EU car companies have done the exact opposite over the last 20-30 years in the quest for maximizing shareholder returns, outsourcing everything to the cheapest bidder and resorted to mostly badge engineering, assembling cheap parts from various OEMs under high markups sometimes not even in their own factories, hoping the brand prestige alone will carry them.
When you outsource everything, in time you also loose core competence. Bringing back core competence is difficult but not impossible except now they're in a recession so they have a lot less money than before to invest in innovation.
They rebranded the local dealership and service centre here “stellantis and you” at great cost. No one actually seems to know who the hell stellantis is or which car brands they own or sell.
That sort of stuff always feels like a death spiral.
The previous disaster was splitting lines. I had a Citroen which I was told was not a Citroen but a DS. Turned out it was both and put together with left over parts from both ranges. This caused all sorts of service problems.
What's left of Chrysler is one minivan line. That's it.
[1] https://s3-prod.autonews.com/2024-09/Dealer%20letter%20to%20...
Wikipedia: "Under the leadership of Tavares, Stellantis faced mounting criticism over its cost-cutting strategy, declining sales, and strained relationships with key stakeholders. Tavares implemented aggressive restructuring measures, including workforce reductions and tight control over product development, which some analysts blamed for delays in new model launches and weakening brand performance, particularly in North America.[45] U.S. dealers expressed concern about rising inventories and brand mismanagement, while the United Auto Workers criticized the company over job cuts and halted investment plans. Stellantis reported a 70% drop in net profit in 2024, with global shipments and U.S. market share declining significantly.[48] Amid internal friction with the board and worsening financial performance, Tavares resigned in December 2024, two years before his contract was set to expire."
So the car companies rushed out EVs, panic spent on R&D. But without subsidies, most buyers didn't want them, as the charging infrastructure wasn't there (many people don't own garages or driveways or have 30 mins to sit in a charging point).
Now the west is delaying their previous targets to ban ICE cars.
I don’t know why Stellantis didn’t get the memo. Other car companies for sure did.
That said, whatever about the Chinese subsidiary, it is, somehow, still profitable!
aetherspawn•6h ago
Between this, Nissan and a dozen others, I guess there’s a lot of running-on-debt going on.
1: it’s so difficult with the latest round of laws making a very high level of ADAS mandatory. Huge spend in R+D, particularly software and vertical integration, and then again huge spend on the physical car electronics.
deepsun•5h ago
thrwaway55•5h ago
epolanski•5h ago
metaphor•5h ago
In the US, authoritative data sources[1] suggest otherwise.
[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1KzJF
Mindless2112•5h ago
UltraSane•3h ago
slaw•2h ago
readthenotes1•5h ago
adrianN•5h ago
metaphor•5h ago
[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1KzKj
lynx97•4h ago
mrighele•4h ago
* Lower emissions, requiring more expensive engines.
* Making cars easier to recycle (but more expensive to build)
* Adding mandatory accessories for safety reasons. Here you can find an example of what that has been recently added. [1]. Nice stuff, but it doesn't come for free.
[1] https://autovista24.autovistagroup.com/news/what-is-the-gene...
morsch•3h ago
eptcyka•44m ago
giingyui•2h ago
tarsinge•1h ago
Stellantis for example knew about the problem of their engine blowing up since before 2020, but they chose to ignore it. Small turbocompressed engines are or new at this point and how to make them reliable is known too.
Or take VW, cheating before 2015 so regulation is not an excuse, and since a decade most failures are parts like coolant circuits because of cheap plastic, gearboxes, and a lot of non safety related electronics features. And what is the replacement for family mmovers? Luxury SUVs or 75k€ iD Buzz.
Edit: So in short multiple things can be true: legal reasons for price increases, but also bad marketing choices.
Edit2: actual study showing at least half the price increase was chosen: https://institut-mobilites-en-transition.org/publications/le...
dmix•5h ago
rafaelmn•4h ago
vkou•4h ago
mjmas•4h ago
newsclues•3h ago
jaggs•3h ago
patrickhogan1•3h ago
At some point, we need to stop talking about what we did in high school 10 years ago and start figuring out how to make everything we interact with better by tapping into the collective intelligence of 8 billion people.
jaggs•3h ago
Have you seen the level of robotic automation in Chinese car factories?
Not sure what universe you live in...
aetherspawn•4h ago
patrickhogan1•3h ago
A UBS teardown estimated the BYD Seal’s (premium version) gross margin at roughly 16%. These cars are selling for $50k in Thailand. These data points suggest BYD is leveraging vertical integration, not selling the Seal at a loss.
I used to think the same way until this year on a trip to Asia. I was genuinely surprised by the range of new Chinese cars. Not just the low-cost models, but truly impressive, high-end vehicles with super innovative designs. I am very pro local manufacturing. But as a builder at heart, I have to admire the builder innovation energy coming out of Chinese auto companies. This wasn't just centrally planned... Its clear innovation.
maxglute•3h ago
maxglute•3h ago
This strange conspiracy theory considering PRC cars sell for 40-80%+ markup vs domestic market. Struggle to think of single sector where cheap Chinese entrants have hiked prices after eliminating competition. What has happened is they eliminate competitors and prices stays low because they're good at building things cheaply, while keeping things cheap also prevents new competitors. Like they've been exporting cheap / value goods for 20+ years now. When are they going to jack up the price?
ffsm8•3h ago
I think the issue isn't running the established companies in the ground - EVs aren't really that complicated for new brands to bootstrap if China stopped their subventions... It's where these cars are being produced, and that's already China for almost everything, or am I wrong there?
Seriously, if China wanted to ruin these companies it could just pass a legislation that makes production for $established_brand impossible, and that company would be hard pressed for years to get production up and running - and I sincerely doubt they would have enough runway to get through that.
JSteph22•3h ago
Yes, you're wrong. Most car parts in the current supply chain are not coming from China and Stellantis is a prime example of this.
ffsm8•1h ago
You're completely right, ICE car production can not be fully sourced to China.
I was thinking solely about EVs. It made sense to me, because that's the market China is targeting. Battery production, chip production, electric motors, smelting etc keeps getting outsourced to China. And these are the building blocks for electric cars, hence my comment. But the precise machining and assembly for ICE cars has not been moved to China at this point in time.
My point isn't really a personal insight into the industry though. ultimately, I'm merely parroting what has been covered before like with
https://www.businessinsider.com/china-rare-earth-restriction...
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/auto-c...
https://www.businessinsider.com/3-ways-chinese-evs-are-diffe...
v5v3•2h ago
moltar•3h ago
eisa01•3h ago
piva00•3h ago
martinpw•3h ago
Also the tariffs are higher on pure EVs. Plugin hybrids have a lower tariff. As a result, BYD plugin hybrid sales are growing faster than pure electrics in the EU:
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/chines...
LtdJorge•3h ago
v5v3•2h ago
But they are still competitive to the local competition and so will sell.
As a new entrant, they will be seeking to establish their brands on the roads so may have loss leaders too.
zeusly•2h ago
ViewTrick1002•3h ago
We can always debate exactly how fair it is, and if the European companies would be forced to become better if competing without a tariff shielding them.
But the EU tariffs are nothing like the 100% tariff Biden instituted to completely shut Chinese cars out of the American market.
v5v3•2h ago
If they had tariffed Chinese cars out of the market, there would be a trade war between them.
RamblingCTO•1h ago
rafaelmn•59m ago
If there were no tarrifs you would see a flood of cheap EVs around you - like 10k€ city cars.
jandrewrogers•5h ago
bn-l•5h ago
charcircuit•5h ago
rsynnott•2h ago
v5v3•2h ago
revenue down 17% Net profit down 70% at a meagre 5billion.
https://www.stellantis.com/en/news/press-releases/2025/febru...
They need to spend billions on an ongoing basis in R&D