frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Show HN: Refine – A Local Alternative to Grammarly

https://refine.sh
130•runjuu•4h ago•52 comments

How I build software quickly

https://evanhahn.com/how-i-build-software-quickly/
58•kiyanwang•3h ago•24 comments

Let's Learn x86-64 Assembly (2020)

https://gpfault.net/posts/asm-tut-0.txt.html
272•90s_dev•11h ago•62 comments

Show HN: Ten years of running every day, visualized

https://nodaysoff.run
484•friggeri•3d ago•206 comments

Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

https://open-web-advocacy.org/blog/apples-browser-engine-ban-persists-even-under-the-dma/
115•yashghelani•2h ago•52 comments

Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs

https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17424
113•martythemaniak•10h ago•31 comments

A Century of Quantum Mechanics

https://home.cern/news/news/physics/century-quantum-mechanics
40•bookofjoe•3d ago•33 comments

How does a screen work?

https://www.makingsoftware.com/chapters/how-a-screen-works
434•chkhd•19h ago•88 comments

Binding Application in Idris

https://andrevidela.com/blog/2025/binding-application/
24•matt_d•3d ago•1 comments

The underground cathedral protecting Tokyo from floods (2018)

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20181129-the-underground-cathedral-protecting-tokyo-from-floods
116•barry-cotter•3d ago•36 comments

OpenCut: The open-source CapCut alternative

https://github.com/OpenCut-app/OpenCut
347•nateb2022•12h ago•108 comments

APKLab: Android Reverse-Engineering Workbench for VS Code

https://github.com/APKLab/APKLab
115•nateb2022•12h ago•8 comments

Telefónica DE shifts VMware support to Spinnaker due to cost

https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/11/telefnica_germany_shifts_vmware_support/
14•rbanffy•1h ago•5 comments

A technical look at Iran's internet shutdowns

https://zola.ink/blog/posts/a-technical-look-at-irans-internet-shutdown
189•znano•17h ago•77 comments

Show HN: FFmpeg in plain English – LLM-assisted FFmpeg in the browser

https://vidmix.app/ffmpeg-in-plain-english/
94•bjano•3d ago•21 comments

Show HN: Built a desktop app to organize photos locally with duplicate detection

https://organizer.flipfocus.nl/
12•mcvanhassel•4d ago•11 comments

Show HN: ArchGW – An intelligent edge and service proxy for agents

https://github.com/katanemo/archgw/
88•honorable_coder•1d ago•8 comments

Hypercapitalism and the AI talent wars

https://blog.johnluttig.com/p/hypercapitalism-and-the-ai-talent
93•walterbell•13h ago•60 comments

Burning a Magnesium NeXT Cube (1993)

https://simson.net/ref/1993/cubefire.html
40•leoapagano•3d ago•12 comments

East Asian air cleanup likely contributed to acceleration in global warming

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02527-3
6•defrost•36m ago•0 comments

The Scourge of Arial (2001)

https://www.marksimonson.com/notebook/view/the-scourge-of-arial/
38•andsoitis•9h ago•21 comments

Myanmar’s proliferating scam centers

https://asia.nikkei.com/static/vdata/infographics/myanmar-scam-centers/
79•WaitWaitWha•5h ago•13 comments

Concurrent Programming with Harmony

https://harmony.cs.cornell.edu/book/
4•todsacerdoti•3d ago•0 comments

The upcoming GPT-3 moment for RL

https://www.mechanize.work/blog/the-upcoming-gpt-3-moment-for-rl/
206•jxmorris12•4d ago•87 comments

Bitcoin passes $120k milestone as US Congress readies for 'crypto week'

https://www.ft.com/content/1d4c5942-7190-45e1-9167-a5eacfd93982
5•sandbach•53m ago•1 comments

GLP-1s are breaking life insurance

https://www.glp1digest.com/p/how-glp-1s-are-breaking-life-insurance
328•alexslobodnik•15h ago•390 comments

Show HN: A Raycast-compatible launcher for Linux

https://github.com/ByteAtATime/raycast-linux
169•ByteAtATime•17h ago•50 comments

James Webb, Hubble space telescopes face reduction in operations

https://www.astronomy.com/science/james-webb-hubble-space-telescopes-face-reduction-in-operations-over-funding-shortfalls/
97•geox•7h ago•58 comments

C3 solved memory lifetimes with scopes

https://c3-lang.org/blog/forget-borrow-checkers-c3-solved-memory-lifetimes-with-scopes/
113•lerno•2d ago•93 comments

Five companies now control over 90% of the restaurant food delivery market

https://marketsaintefficient.substack.com/p/five-companies-now-control-over-90
233•goinggetthem•13h ago•238 comments
Open in hackernews

Stellantis declares bankruptcy in China, with $1B in debts

https://www.italpassion.fr/en/stellantis/stellantis-declares-bankruptcy-in-china-with-1-billion-in-debts/
94•teleforce•7h ago

Comments

aetherspawn•6h ago
I am an automotive components supplier and I’ve always wondered how automotive giants are staying open or even turning any profit at all (1)

Between this, Nissan and a dozen others, I guess there’s a lot of running-on-debt going on.

1: it’s so difficult with the latest round of laws making a very high level of ADAS mandatory. Huge spend in R+D, particularly software and vertical integration, and then again huge spend on the physical car electronics.

deepsun•5h ago
New cars prices doubled in the last 20 years. If anything, I would expect them to make record profits actually.
thrwaway55•5h ago
This is honestly tighter then you might think accounting for inflation. A 2000 1$ is 1.87$ today. 2005 seems like they should be doing a lot better since it's 1.65$ but it's not nearly as gangbusters as this comes across.
epolanski•5h ago
That doesn't cope with less vehicles being sold overall and inflation, even if margins on a single car have never been higher I think (at least in US).
metaphor•5h ago
> New cars prices doubled in the last 20 years.

In the US, authoritative data sources[1] suggest otherwise.

[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1KzJF

Mindless2112•5h ago
The CPI's hedonic quality adjustment means that this graph doesn't mean what you think it means.
UltraSane•3h ago
Cars HAVE gotten a LOT better over time.
slaw•2h ago
Cars today are better than 50 years ago, but not much better than 15 years ago.
readthenotes1•5h ago
Also, that's not adjusted for inflation (tho obviously that may be difficult given how much this contributes to CPI)
adrianN•5h ago
So prices have roughly kept up with inflation?
metaphor•5h ago
No[1], far from it in the US...thank goodness.

[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1KzKj

lynx97•4h ago
That is called inflation. Almost everything doubled its price in the last 20 years. My rent, for instance...
mrighele•4h ago
At least in Europe, car are more expensive to make than 20 years ago, even inflation adjusted, as the EU keeps adding new and stricter regulations.

* Lower emissions, requiring more expensive engines.

* Making cars easier to recycle (but more expensive to build)

* Adding mandatory accessories for safety reasons. Here you can find an example of what that has been recently added. [1]. Nice stuff, but it doesn't come for free.

[1] https://autovista24.autovistagroup.com/news/what-is-the-gene...

morsch•3h ago
Cars have also gotten much bigger, heavier and more powerful.
eptcyka•44m ago
Difficult to make a small car that has all the safety and matches the price. It is easier to justify the bigger car at its price than the smaller car, since 2x bigger car will not be 2x more expensive to make.
giingyui•2h ago
Cars in Europe are also more expensive because the EU allowed all brands to buy one another and now they don’t have to compete in price anymore.
tarsinge•1h ago
You forgot the largest factor for price increases: manufacturers positioning all models as luxury ones. All the while cutting corners on quality control. Take French ones, they went from not the most well built but affordable cars for the masses to pseudo luxury expensive cars that still fall to pieces after 5 years. Who’s gonna buy that?

Stellantis for example knew about the problem of their engine blowing up since before 2020, but they chose to ignore it. Small turbocompressed engines are or new at this point and how to make them reliable is known too.

Or take VW, cheating before 2015 so regulation is not an excuse, and since a decade most failures are parts like coolant circuits because of cheap plastic, gearboxes, and a lot of non safety related electronics features. And what is the replacement for family mmovers? Luxury SUVs or 75k€ iD Buzz.

Edit: So in short multiple things can be true: legal reasons for price increases, but also bad marketing choices.

Edit2: actual study showing at least half the price increase was chosen: https://institut-mobilites-en-transition.org/publications/le...

dmix•5h ago
It helps markets like US and Canada have essentially banned competition from Chinese car makers and tightly controlled automotive trade in general from many other countries.
rafaelmn•4h ago
EU also tariffed Chinese cars out of the market.
vkou•4h ago
It's difficult to compete with automation.
mjmas•4h ago
Or slave labour
newsclues•3h ago
Or IP theft
jaggs•3h ago
Yeah because the Western auto makers were developing advanced electric cars for decades before the Chinese started their program. Good catch. /s
patrickhogan1•3h ago
We need to move past these debates or we’ll slip further behind. China is repeating Japan’s trajectory: early products may have been rough, but Toyota grew into an innovation powerhouse. No one questions the Prius’s impact today.

At some point, we need to stop talking about what we did in high school 10 years ago and start figuring out how to make everything we interact with better by tapping into the collective intelligence of 8 billion people.

jaggs•3h ago
Oh come on, you can do better than that, surely? :)

Have you seen the level of robotic automation in Chinese car factories?

Not sure what universe you live in...

aetherspawn•4h ago
In my country China has been selling cars below market value (for years now) to basically run everyone else out of business. I don’t think it’s anything to do with being cheaper to build and more to do with they’re selling at a loss, which they don’t care because centralised government, and a smart one at that, and then playing the long game waiting for all local manufacturing to go bankrupt before they hike the prices.
patrickhogan1•3h ago
What country and what models were they selling?

A UBS teardown estimated the BYD Seal’s (premium version) gross margin at roughly 16%. These cars are selling for $50k in Thailand. These data points suggest BYD is leveraging vertical integration, not selling the Seal at a loss.

I used to think the same way until this year on a trip to Asia. I was genuinely surprised by the range of new Chinese cars. Not just the low-cost models, but truly impressive, high-end vehicles with super innovative designs. I am very pro local manufacturing. But as a builder at heart, I have to admire the builder innovation energy coming out of Chinese auto companies. This wasn't just centrally planned... Its clear innovation.

maxglute•3h ago
At end of the day, Chinese companies still have to compete with each other which drives price down (so much so that CCP recently stepping in to try to make it less cut throat). Granted strategic industries like auto that eventually coalesce into oligopolies might coordinate / collude to set prices better, but IMO PRC manufacturing is too big for that - 20 country sized provinces trying to build their own champions. What we have seen is PRC companies start climbing value chain, i.e. anker going from entry to premium tier, but every step along the way some other Chinese company comes along and fills out the low end.
maxglute•3h ago
> playing the long game waiting for all local manufacturing to go bankrupt before they hike the prices.

This strange conspiracy theory considering PRC cars sell for 40-80%+ markup vs domestic market. Struggle to think of single sector where cheap Chinese entrants have hiked prices after eliminating competition. What has happened is they eliminate competitors and prices stays low because they're good at building things cheaply, while keeping things cheap also prevents new competitors. Like they've been exporting cheap / value goods for 20+ years now. When are they going to jack up the price?

ffsm8•3h ago
You hear this argument all the time, and I'm sure there is substance to it... But I cannot help but feel that it's misconstruing reality a little.

I think the issue isn't running the established companies in the ground - EVs aren't really that complicated for new brands to bootstrap if China stopped their subventions... It's where these cars are being produced, and that's already China for almost everything, or am I wrong there?

Seriously, if China wanted to ruin these companies it could just pass a legislation that makes production for $established_brand impossible, and that company would be hard pressed for years to get production up and running - and I sincerely doubt they would have enough runway to get through that.

JSteph22•3h ago
>that's already China for almost everything, or am I wrong there?

Yes, you're wrong. Most car parts in the current supply chain are not coming from China and Stellantis is a prime example of this.

ffsm8•1h ago
Oof, I was to imprecise in my wording, which contextualized my comment badly.

You're completely right, ICE car production can not be fully sourced to China.

I was thinking solely about EVs. It made sense to me, because that's the market China is targeting. Battery production, chip production, electric motors, smelting etc keeps getting outsourced to China. And these are the building blocks for electric cars, hence my comment. But the precise machining and assembly for ICE cars has not been moved to China at this point in time.

My point isn't really a personal insight into the industry though. ultimately, I'm merely parroting what has been covered before like with

https://www.businessinsider.com/china-rare-earth-restriction...

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/auto-c...

https://www.businessinsider.com/3-ways-chinese-evs-are-diffe...

v5v3•2h ago
And labour costs that are 20% or so lower.
moltar•3h ago
Doesn’t seem to stop them. I see more and more on the roads in Portugal. Even started appearing in car rentals recently.
eisa01•3h ago
It was only EVs…
piva00•3h ago
There are BYDs everywhere in Scandinavia, doesn't look like Chinese EVs have been tariffed out of the market at all.
martinpw•3h ago
Well for a start Norway is not in the EU and therefore does not have tariffs on Chinese EVs, so would not expect any impact in that part of Scandinavia at least.

Also the tariffs are higher on pure EVs. Plugin hybrids have a lower tariff. As a result, BYD plugin hybrid sales are growing faster than pure electrics in the EU:

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/chines...

LtdJorge•3h ago
This is the first year I've seen BYD cars in Spain.
v5v3•2h ago
They have added tariffs so the pricea of Chinese EVs cannot be ridiculously low.

But they are still competitive to the local competition and so will sell.

As a new entrant, they will be seeking to establish their brands on the roads so may have loss leaders too.

zeusly•2h ago
Portugal is also a weird market because cars in general are much pricier than in other EU countries.
ViewTrick1002•3h ago
The EU tariffs are based on the portion of cost they calculated to be state aid. Ensuring fair competition.

We can always debate exactly how fair it is, and if the European companies would be forced to become better if competing without a tariff shielding them.

But the EU tariffs are nothing like the 100% tariff Biden instituted to completely shut Chinese cars out of the American market.

v5v3•2h ago
Not a case of 'tariffed Chinese cars out of the market', more tariffed so they are priced similar to the market.

If they had tariffed Chinese cars out of the market, there would be a trade war between them.

RamblingCTO•1h ago
I don't think this is true. Chinese automakers are fine and increasing market share here in Germany.
rafaelmn•59m ago
I think the Chinese are losing money with the tarrifs but trying to get market share and the plan around tariffs is bringing assembly to Europe like all the other carmakers have to in order to work around the tarrifs.

If there were no tarrifs you would see a flood of cheap EVs around you - like 10k€ city cars.

jandrewrogers•5h ago
They aren’t turning a profit on the hardware in many cases. They hope to make it up by selling financing and data from the platforms.
bn-l•5h ago
I really don’t want my car to be a “platform”.
charcircuit•5h ago
No one is forcing you to upgrade the trim on your car. That such an upgrade is available is beneficial. For something so expensive one would hope that it is extendable and you would not have to buy a whole new car if you wanted something different.
rsynnott•2h ago
Astonishingly, Stellantis (the global business, not the Chinese subsidiary) is profitable, somehow. Pays a dividend, and everything.
v5v3•2h ago
2024

revenue down 17% Net profit down 70% at a meagre 5billion.

https://www.stellantis.com/en/news/press-releases/2025/febru...

They need to spend billions on an ongoing basis in R&D

WhereIsTheTruth•4h ago
Western elites are finding out how bad of an idea it was to betray their own people for a quick buck, returning home will be difficult
ako•4h ago
Assuming you’re referring to CEOs outsourcing production to china to reduce costs? I doubt they had any real alternative with consumers always buying the cheapest option. Either move production overseas, or loose all sales to companies that do produce at lower cost. But you say, consumers don’t earn enough to buy locally produced products. True, but raising salaries won’t fix it, as it will make local manufacturing even more expensive. The whole system is not really sustainable.
WhereIsTheTruth•3h ago
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/opinion/article/2024/04/17/the-exo...

To end up going bankrupt with 1B in debts, the problem is elsewhere

atom_arranger•2h ago
Tesla was built on American R&D and manufacturing and is competitive in terms of cost and features. It’s probably easier to not innovate and go for almost guaranteed short term profit by relocating existing manufacturing processes though.

I don’t think there was no alternative. I think it was an easier, more short term, and more selfish (in relation to fellow countrymen and descendants), choice.

ako•8m ago
And tesla replaced many workers with automation to stay competitive, and also has factories in europe and china.

I do think consumers have a responsibility here: for the last 30 years i've only had european cars. Even if they're a bit less advanced or a bit more expensive, it's a choice for a healthy local economy. Only the last car was a Tesla, as it seemed to be the best EV choice, but that will not happen again. Again, voting with my wallet, i will not sponsor the actions of a wanna be dictator.

Thorrez•3h ago
It sounds like the Chinese plants were created to sell cars in China. Is that betraying their own people?
SV_BubbleTime•4h ago
Automotive EE here…

If you would have gone back twenty years and been like “hey, you know how you think the Germans are running ChryslerDodgeJeep into the ground? … just wait until you see what the Italians do… and then the French right after that!!”

I wouldn’t have believed it. Turns out the Germans really weren’t so bad.

Honestly, Stellantis is making the wrong move at every turn and one possibility that makes sense is stripping the company… or some elaborate revenge plot… because it seems like they speedrunning destruction.

senectus1•4h ago
how much of this is China eating their lunch.. forcing them into poor decisions?
FirmwareBurner•4h ago
Another (former)auto EE here. Their own poor decisions resulted in China eating their lunch. They couldn't stop shooting themselves in the foot, high on their own arrogance of European hundred year old industry superiority. Man, I wish I had a way to digitally export my memory of the townhall meeting in 2014 of a German luxury brand exec laughing on how bad Chinese EVs were. I bet, they aint laughing now, that's for sure.

Germans and Italians had a multi decade lead on EV motors, battery, self driving and electronic tech over China (why I entered the industry) but they shelved it because they wanted to sell more diesel engines, outsourced all R&D to the lowest bidder to save costs and invest all profits into share buybacks or dividends instead of R&D (why I exited the industry).

Are the German and Italian executives in charge of those decisions being held accountable for the mess they created, or are the enjoying a golden retirements/parachutes while thousands of workers are now being laid off and governments forced to spend taxpayer money to bail out their mistakes and rescue what's left to prevent further layoffs? What were the lavishly paid EU politicians and regulators watching over in that time?

To me this is another nail in the western industry players falling victims to their own short sighted greed coffin. If only there have been any past examples in history to serve as cautionary tales, cough, Kodak, cough. /s

olivermuty•4h ago
While this is mostly true, a big missing context is that europeans simply didnt want to buy electric cars for a long time.
FirmwareBurner•4h ago
Ah yes, the classic "let's blame the customer for not buying our shit products", amirite?! How come they were buying Teslas like crazy in 2014-2020 though, if they "didn't want to buy EVs"? The problem is European makers just didn't want to sell EVs to begin with, it was just an annoyance for them so they were doing the bare minimum for compliance and virtue signaling to the EU regulators, and only making some low volume ugly EVs or ICE platforms that they converted to be crappy EVs. European makers were even giving Tesla money for their CO2 credits lol, that's how much they didn't want to sell EVs. Just let that sink in for a second that European companies would just rather pay off an US car company than sell EVs and somehow nobody in the EU thought this was a problem?! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

Also, on the topic of EU EV demand since you brought it up, a lot of Europeans are more urbanized, living in apartment buildings compared to US single family homes, so most don't have chargers at home to justify an EV purchase but still need cars to get to work, so of course that without matching charging infrastructure at home or at work, Europeans couldn't justify the purchase of an EV especially given the lower purchasing power compared to USaians. Not to mention that as a double whammy, EU city dwellers are also more likely to be tenants than owners which again, doesn't incentivize owners to invest in EV infrastructure.

I live in a supposedly rich EU country on paper, and public charging infrastructure is still severely lacking. Only newly built post-2018 apartments have power sockets in the garage so you can install a charger, the rest? God speed. Government action here has been lacking on public EV infrastructure front, they just gave subsidies for EVs which were ultimately just handouts to businesses and rich people who owned their own single family homes with chargers and solar panels, but now that market of house owners is saturated, since they already own EVs so of course sales have tanked, d'uh!

It was just another politically driven short sighted move, and now again, they're looking at fixing just the resulting effect and not the root cause. So in a Kafkaesque way, the huge amount of EU regulation, protectionism and interference had done more harm than good to the EU EV industry versus ripping the band aid during the good economic times and letting free market run its course, so now the industry is stuck with an economic recession to boot waiting for more regulations to save it, which might again, harm it more in the long term instead of making it competitive.

rsynnott•2h ago
This feels vaguely ahistorical; the best-selling manufacturer of EVs in Europe in any given quarter has usually been VW AG (European) for a while now.

> but now that market of house owners is saturated, since they already own EVs so of course sales have tanked, d'uh!

How are you defining tanked? They stalled for about a year but have resumed growth.

> Europeans couldn't justify the purchase of an EV especially given the lower purchasing power compared to USaians.

And yet, somehow, Europe remains a larger market for electric cars than the US (of course, China is far larger than either).

> so now the industry is stuck with an economic recession to boot waiting for more regulations to save it

Again, VW etc seem fairly healthy. Stellantis not so much (though they are somehow still profitable), but their strategy of just owning all the brands that everyone thinks no longer exist and not doing much with them always seemed fairly incoherent.

All in all, this feels like you've come up with a narrative, and are just running with it regardless of reality, tbh.

FirmwareBurner•1h ago
I understand why you'd feel that way but let's remember that Nokia and Blackberry also had their strongest year ever in 2008-2009 years after the iPhone launched so it can be pretty deceiving to decide the future is fine just by looking at a graph of today.
rsynnott•1h ago
What's your thesis here, that BYD et al will totally replace the European car industry or something? This doesn't seem to be particularly plausible, and, as above, pretty much everything you have claimed is dubious or flat-out incorrect.
FirmwareBurner•49m ago
>What's your thesis here, that BYD et al will totally replace the European car industry or something?

You're putting words in my mouth that I never said. I never made such claims. Obviously it will not, since the auto industry gets more government protections than the likes of Nokia or Blackberry did, but a good indicator is to monitor sales in regions that don't have specialized tariffs on Chinese vehicles to protect western ones, like Australia maybe.

>pretty much everything you have claimed is dubious or flat-out incorrect.

YOU think they are incorrect. I don't think everything I said is incorrect, especially the parts about manufacturers outsourcing critical innovation causing them to fall behind, EV infrastructure in my EU country being deficient leading people not to buy EVs, and consumer purchasing power/habits. The only part where I am wrong is about current sales numbers, but spot sales and rarely an indicator of the general industry trend or future.

bluecalm•3h ago
Do you remember the EV offerings from European car companies back then? Ugly, weird shapes, "futuristic" features instead of utility. They made those because regulation requires them to but they didn't really want to sell many of them.
BLKNSLVR•3h ago
It felt as if they were trying to torpedo their own success in EVs. Even BMW managed to make an ugly car, their EV i3.

Funny thing is, the rest of the industry has now caught up to this particular ugliness, so as it turns out it was futuristic. I really disliked the look of the Nissan Leaf ten years ago, but I now own one and whilst I don't love it's stylings, it's not stand-out-in-the-crowd ugly like it used to be - not because it's changed, but all the other cars have caught up (to the ugly, unfortunately).

I just wonder whether they made them look like 'normal' cars back then would they have sold better?

rsynnott•2h ago
The i3 was arguably a pretty interesting idea; it didn't work out, and people wanted more 'normal' electric cars, but it was a reasonable experiment.

(VW kind of had the opposite problem; whereas BMW went "let's make the weirdest possible electric car", the eGolf and eUp were so normal-looking that I think people generally didn't realise they exist; a lot of people thought that the id.3/4 were their first electric cars.)

Animats•3h ago
> Their own poor decisions resulted in China eating their lunch.

China's approach was interesting. There was no giant state automaker, but about 70 of them. At one point, each province had its own auto industry. About like the US auto industry in 1910. There's been steady consolidation, or elimination of the losers. Mergers of China auto companies seem to be rare.

Then came BYD. BYD won by sheer competence. They got good at batteries. They figured out how to make lithium iron phosphate batteries take up less volume and charge faster with their "blade battery". Now they could make safe electric cars with reasonable but not great range.

Somebody at BYD had an insight - the E-Axle. The motor is mounted to the axle and differential, like a railroad locomotive bogie. The power train for a basic car or truck consists of an E-Axle, a battery, an electronics power box that handles motor, battery, and charging inputs. The electronics box talks CANbus to the dashboard and controls. Using those standard, mass-produced components, a wide variety of cars and trucks can be built. That got costs way down. Then BYD did some good car designs and got good at production.

The main government incentive was help on the charging infrastructure side. Also, it's been hard for years to get a registration to drive an IC car in Beijing. There's a very limited quota.

US companies are still trying to build gas cars with an electric power train substituted. This works but does not bring costs down. Tesla is electric-first, but has other problems.

The "Made in China 2025" plan [1], adopted in 2015, is now mostly complete.[2] After 2019, the government of China stopped publicizing the "Made in China 2025" in foreign media, but the plan continued to be executed.

South China Morning Post (2024): "The analysis found that China has met over 86% of the 260 targets under MIC25, achieving or surpassing goals in sectors such as EVs, renewable energy, robotics, and biopharmaceuticals. However, key targets in advanced photolithography, intercontinental aircraft, and new materials were missed, with new materials having the lowest completion rate at 75%"

It's an impressive success of long-term planning.

> their own short sighted greed coffin

The $100,000 pickup truck comes to mind.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025

[2] https://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Was-MIC25-Success...

FirmwareBurner•3h ago
>Somebody at BYD had an insight - the E-Axle.

A lot of similar innovations ~20 years ago at German and Italian companies like Siemens VDO or Magneti Marelli. The issue is none of them were ever put into mass production, they were just left to rot on shelves while the Chinese out innovated them. It's the exact same story how Kodak invented the digital camera but shelved it to keep its film business alive till Canon and Nikon out innovated them.

>It's an impressive success of long-term planning.

China and CCP really shined at this, contrary to western expectations who thought it would be another USSR 2.0 waiting for it to collapse under state mismanagement and have them sweep in and buy the nation's assets at a discount. Then in a twist of irony, the opposite happened as China turned out to be better at maneuvering capitalism than the inventors of capitalists.

While the western business leaders only plan for next quarter and western politicians only plan for next election, all of which leads to short sighted greed driven "get rich quick while you still can then pull the ladder from under you" decisions on all fronts, leaving the future generations to pick up the tab and try to fix the past mistakes, all of which bogs down development, China moves at lightning speed.

Liftyee•2h ago
I've often wondered if this long-term planning and foresight is fundamentally incompatible with a democracy running on sub-decade cycles. I imagine the two could coexist if voters themselves were more aware of their candidates' long term effects, but they need to trust politicians to actually produce results (and not get voted out next cycle).
FirmwareBurner•2h ago
>but they need to trust politicians to actually produce results (and not get voted out next cycle).

Due to the lack of accountability of politicians and the greed of wealthy elites who own them, most of the democratic west became low trust societies, where people can't trust politicians to have their interest at heart anymore.

That's why you see people voting the most extreme and destructive anti-establishment candidates in almost every major democracy, because voting the least worst option as was the norm, simply resulted into a slow march towards feudalism: unaffordable housing, higher taxes, stagnating wages, decline in quality of public services, increased illegal migration, etc.

So why would people choose to vote for the same thing for multiple decades? That would be the definition of insanity.

Animats•1h ago
That is a very good question.

China has formal Five Year Plans. Currently, the fourteenth Five Year Plan is finishing up, and the fifteenth, to start in 2026, is being worked on. They're published openly, but few in the West read them. They're general in the sense that they don't specify who does what, but specific in that they specify what should be emphasized and funded.

Historically, the Five Year Plans were aspirational and political through at least the 1980s. There were some major disasters. Search "Great Leap Forward". Some time in the 1990s, the planning system seemed to gain focus and started to become effective in guiding industrialization.

The Five Year Plans drive capital allocation. If a company wants to do something that's in the plan, it's easier to get money, loans, land, and such than for business areas not in the plan.

This is different from Soviet central planning, which was more like a very sluggish manufacturing scheduling system that told specific plants what to do. Updating was annual, which is far too slow for that level of control. Search "Gosplan".

senectus1•3h ago
not to mention their vertically integrated factory they're building.. https://old.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/1jnv3...

3200 acres... the whole damn thing is vertically integrated. they make everything for their cars in the one giant factory.

Amazing stuff... BYD is destined to be bigger than toyota ever was

FirmwareBurner•11m ago
> vertically integrated factory they're building

Thanks, this is something important I forgot about.

Tesla and BYD went fully vertically integrated by now, while EU car companies have done the exact opposite over the last 20-30 years in the quest for maximizing shareholder returns, outsourcing everything to the cheapest bidder and resorted to mostly badge engineering, assembling cheap parts from various OEMs under high markups sometimes not even in their own factories, hoping the brand prestige alone will carry them.

When you outsource everything, in time you also loose core competence. Bringing back core competence is difficult but not impossible except now they're in a recession so they have a lot less money than before to invest in innovation.

eptcyka•25m ago
Would you say that Ferdinand Piech did a bad job with VAG? Or were his successors at fault there?
crinkly•4h ago
Stellantis are doing a wonderfully disastrous rebrand thing at the moment after finishing a previous one.

They rebranded the local dealership and service centre here “stellantis and you” at great cost. No one actually seems to know who the hell stellantis is or which car brands they own or sell.

That sort of stuff always feels like a death spiral.

The previous disaster was splitting lines. I had a Citroen which I was told was not a Citroen but a DS. Turned out it was both and put together with left over parts from both ranges. This caused all sorts of service problems.

barkingcat•2h ago
What is an EE in automotive parlance?
alextingle•2h ago
Electrical Engineer?
Animats•4h ago
This isn't a China problem. This is a Stellantis problem. Read the infamous letter from the organization of Stellantis dealers to the CEO.[1] That's from last September. The CEO was fired, but it didn't help much.

What's left of Chrysler is one minivan line. That's it.

[1] https://s3-prod.autonews.com/2024-09/Dealer%20letter%20to%20...

mlsu•3h ago
What is the 2023 mistake that he is referring to?
Animats•2h ago
The usual thing when some finance guy is in charge. Cut costs, raise prices, increase short term profits, defer the collapse until later. The collapse came within a year. But for one year, Tavares was the highest paid CEO in automotive.

Wikipedia: "Under the leadership of Tavares, Stellantis faced mounting criticism over its cost-cutting strategy, declining sales, and strained relationships with key stakeholders. Tavares implemented aggressive restructuring measures, including workforce reductions and tight control over product development, which some analysts blamed for delays in new model launches and weakening brand performance, particularly in North America.[45] U.S. dealers expressed concern about rising inventories and brand mismanagement, while the United Auto Workers criticized the company over job cuts and halted investment plans. Stellantis reported a 70% drop in net profit in 2024, with global shipments and U.S. market share declining significantly.[48] Amid internal friction with the board and worsening financial performance, Tavares resigned in December 2024, two years before his contract was set to expire."

tibbydudeza•4h ago
The Silverado will save the business - the problem is more the Fiat side of the business - Peugeot still makes good stuff - they would have been better off merging with Renault.
cyp0633•3h ago
Stellantis brands sales in China have been in decline long before the emergence of EVs. There is indeed some existence of Stellantis in China via Leapmotor (laugh).
speedgoose•3h ago
I am not an automotive industry advisor, but I guess this could have been avoided if the group strategy wasn’t about maximising short term profits and manufacturing mediocre cars.
v5v3•2h ago
The West indicated to their companies that ICE cars were being phased out by 2030 and set incentives and penalties. (To complete with China ev).

So the car companies rushed out EVs, panic spent on R&D. But without subsidies, most buyers didn't want them, as the charging infrastructure wasn't there (many people don't own garages or driveways or have 30 mins to sit in a charging point).

Now the west is delaying their previous targets to ban ICE cars.

speedgoose•1h ago
China has now a strong lead in EVs while Stellantis did the bare minimum by manufacturing bad EVs sharing a platform with fossil cars, and selling them at premium prices.

I don’t know why Stellantis didn’t get the memo. Other car companies for sure did.

eptcyka•41m ago
Very rarely does one need to dit 30 minites at a charger, without doing anything else.
rsynnott•2h ago
I'm always a little shocked that Stellantis keeps going; it's pretty much a collection of all the car brands where, on seeing one, people go "wait, they still make those?!"

That said, whatever about the Chinese subsidiary, it is, somehow, still profitable!

yourusername•2h ago
PSA (Peugeot/Citroen) seems viable. The rest does seem like a collection of car makers with a bad reputation and a limited/outdated model range.
noiwillnot•1h ago
Fiat seems doing well in Southern Europe.
aussieguy1234•2h ago
I guess this shows what happens if you're a car company and don't embrace new technology (electric cars specifically) fast enough.