After watching how it behaves across X, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube - its clear the recommendations and nudges are coordinated. It is more than likely there are secret data sharing agreements to enable it.
Its insidious because it controls your reach and "score" across all platforms and then can "attack" you by attempting to surface content to push your buttons negatively across channels.
My opinion is this isnt anything to do with advertising, its a kind of government level shaping operation to try to create societal stability.
I personally have seen:
- The algorithm deliberately "neg" me multiple times, it knows what I don't like and shows me content to trigger keywords it knows will get my attention or deliberately cause insecurity ("old" "broke" "loser" "creep" "bigot" "fat"). I never interact with any content with these words, but it shows them - My conclusion is this is some sort of behavioral nudge. It happens across platforms.
- After I spoke out about Microsoft's approach to H1B, my content was permanently shadowbanned and limited on LinkedIn
- YouTubers continually censor themselves. Instead of "sex" they say "ess." Instead of "murder" they say "delete." They are consciously changing their speech. This is pure 1984.
Furthermore, I am convinced the algorithm also "shapes" the opinions of those around you in relation to you. Something much bigger than simply "being advertiser friendly" is going on, its a back door social credit score, emotional containment and psychological warfare structure.It will only get worse.
I wouldn't say they were nudged, but rather just addicted to engagement.
There are a lot more fun people out there, but ones shoveling misery are just really memorable. Have a wonderful day =3
There are many mobile readers, for desktop I like QuiteRss & RSS Guard.
Now it's at most just websites, out of sight out of mind unless I'm really bored. Actually relevant or important information doesn't change that frequently, and I'd rather my favorite websites make a deliberate editorial effort to surface worthwhile stories I can check in on maybe once a week. The content drip, self selecting or not, is just too habit forming and not necessary at all.
Why not?
See Privacy Badger for details... =3
I go to the gym regularly...
For whatever it's worth after years of being in a space that felt very similar to this my solution was... Having a kid and / or going to Recurse Center and / or moving to a non-LA/NY city.
I don't know if any of it's causal but I have finally crossed over some kind of line. I read books again (like I ever really did), I don't think about social media, I don't have that toxic icky parasocial relationship feeling, I don't even know how to use social media UIs when I see them anymore.
Its fantastic, I'm sure writing / reading this kind of post is a good first step so bravo and welcome (back) to the resistance.
Wait does HN count as social media? Does linkedin? Does Slack ir Teams at work? Does SMS??
Hope it helps in remembering to call friend and family!
Otherwise everybody figuring out how to disable the infinite scrolling or control your own subscriptions gets punished by the dark-pattern-pushers through the legal system.
Unscramble ROT-13 in order to stop a full-page autoplaying video? Federal felony.
Another thing I’ve noticed about people, even when we’re talking in person. Whenever a topic arises that requires confirmation or something similar, they pull out their phone and start “googling.”
I’m OK with saying, “I don’t know.” I’ve stopped defending my opinions and let the conversation flow, and I listen. This is very liberating.
Of course, stopped non-critical notifications[2] a decade ago, and there are no social Apps on my phone.[3] I’m lucky to be able to stop a habit cold turkey. Of course, a little help from a blocker is beneficial at the beginning, but I can quickly get used to not using/visiting apps and websites.
I’ve forgotten who said it but here is how it goes, “Build up a network of people, tools, utilities, system to stay away from Algorithm.”
1. https://brajeshwar.com/2024/watch-tiny-handy-computer/
2. https://brajeshwar.com/2014/missing-step-productivity-activi...
Oh yes this is a good one! I've been doing it for years. I've managed to sensitize a few people about it enough to change habits.
News? You can still subscribe to a newspaper or a magazine like it's 1985, they aren't worse at all than they used to be. Dating? Tinder or local country-specific dating sites work better, and always did. Professional contacts? They never came from social media.
1) Deleted all social media accounts, deleted apps and logged out of anything that has what you might call a newsfeed (including RSS).
1.1) Switched all important notifications to email.
2) Uninstalled the web browser from my phone.
3) Stopped reading the news and blocked my most frequently visited sites using parental controls. Instead of reading the news I just ask an AI (Grok is good at this) to summarize the latest headlines and I can ask any many follow up questions as I’d like.
The unifying theme is letting go of the idea of “missing something”. You don’t need to keep up with your friends online, you don’t need to keep up with the news, you don’t need to scroll to find inspiration. You can find all those things offline.
But the hard part is knowing how much things I've found online have contributed meaningfully to my life. For that reason alone I'm considering this an experiment. What will it be like to do this for 6 months, or a year? What will I want to go back to? What won't I miss?
4 weeks in and my daily lived experience is noticeably different. I feel different when I'm walking to the coffee shop, or working, or driving the kids to school.
So just to make sure I'm understanding you - you think it's a good idea to cut yourself off from the outside world and then proceed to get your news solely from an AI that is known to be actively manipulated by its CEO to output disinformation? If I wanted to immerse myself in a false reality, this would probably be the best possible way to do it. If you are seriously doing this, please stop.
I come up against this argument a lot, that by stopping reading the news I've somehow "cut myself off from the outside world". I still read books, study history, do research on topics that interest me, talk to my friends and family about what's happening in the world. I'm not cutting myself off from the outside world, I'm cutting myself off from simulacrum of the world created by news media and social networks.
Its not perfect. Ironically I still can doomscroll on it, but it is much bettter.
For youtube if you disable reccomendations, shorts eventually the feed disappears. I also use an extension called youtube block feed, which only allows me to see my subscriptions.
Its an imperfect firewall, but I am happy with it so far.
- Infinite scrolling
- Use of recommendation algorithms
- When feeding a recommendation algorithm, taking into account how long a user viewed a certain post without otherwise reacting to it (also disregarding users starting to type a reply that they end up discarding, etc.)
One example: I built a workbench for myself out of 4"x6" fir beams (quite a cheap solution). I had to glue several together for the work surface, which required ensuring that beams had perfectly flat surfaces to come together under pressure. I broke my planer on the first one. I had to use my hand planes, so first I had to get good at planing, learning to sharpen them properly, tune them for fast work, and then start planing in earnest. I used winding sticks to check the parallel-ness of the surface. Then I set to work planing the perpendicular surface, constantly checking with a t-square. Many evenings, lots of sweat, lots of learning what works and doesn't, and then just suffering a lot of repetitive doing and measuring and doing and checking.
Google helped a lot at finding various messageboards and articles that hinted at how to do it, but nothing replaced the experience of doing it, nor offered the knowledge and skill gained.
I wrote it up here:
https://uxdesign.cc/getting-unhooked-from-technology-86ca8be...
I still use a YouTube Unhook extension (a better one than the one I wrote, though with nearly the same name, hilariously), though I'm not as good at some of the other practices I used to use. My attempts to avoid tech's magnetism is confounded by my current role in developer relations, where social media is a necessary part of the job. But maybe my next role will be one where I can detach from it a bit more.
cornfieldlabs•6h ago
We are also building a non-algorithmic private social network if anyone's interested: https://waitlist-tx.pages.dev
(Thanks to everyone who have already joined the waitlist and provided feedback)
Varun08•6h ago
cornfieldlabs•4h ago
Edit: Raising VC funding is the main cause of enshittification. We don't plan on doing that. It is not gonna cost us that much to run - there are not many non-techies who are ready to quit dooms-scrolling. Techies go for sites like Mastodon. So it will be a small group of people who would find this useful and that's enough. It is something we have always wanted to build and building and maintaining is fun.
sangeeth96•5h ago
I wish I could pay for YouTube and other apps and they'd stop cramming their decisions on my feed and instead let _me_ control the experience. At least, let me have reverse-chronological feeds on my home, mute/block channels I don't care about, hide content types and give me more recommendations based on the things I actually like or prefer to consume at that point. I still want to use their apps but almost all of their product leads have decided even paying for something like "Premium" wouldn't entitle a customer to having control over their experience. It's gross.
alisonatwork•4h ago
The only downside is that it's still centralized behind the scenes so you still get the weird algorithm gimmickry inside the content like people superstitiously saying or not saying certain words in the first few minutes, nonsense like "nothing to add, just commenting for the algorithm", that weird tendency to dopily repeat the same sentences around what I guess would be an ad break if I ever saw ads etc. I try to mitigate this by sending money to specific creators, showing that an alternative income source to YouTube could be possible, but of course that's still funneled through Patreon which is another centralized for-profit service that has a vested interest in getting creators to provide membership tiers and value-adds that chip away at their motivation to put out meaningful content that enriches broader society.
I've come to think that centralization is a bigger problem than "the algorithm". I don't remember having these issues anywhere near as much when people shared their stuff independently. To be fair, though, back then most people were doing it as a hobby outside of their day job.
gnarlouse•2h ago
sangeeth96•1h ago
fgbarben•5h ago
cornfieldlabs•4h ago