It kind of is like cabal bacteria, actually.
This schmaltzy student-teacher roleplay immersion-journalism feels false and infantilizing to me. It makes me mistrustful of the text and I avoid reading essays written like it. The facts are embedded in an artificial adventure narrative as one feeds a dog a pill by hiding it in peanut butter. Why? Would the non-sensationalized, plainly framed information content be too un-stimulating for readers? Are false narratives hidden inside?
>Obama chuckled. "You mean the Chaos Emeralds?"
"Given that rice agriculture alone accounts for about 11 percent of human-driven methane emissions, adding cable bacteria to rice paddies could have an enormous positive impact on the environment."
Who knew rice paddies were such a huge contributor to climate change.
https://www.dairyherd.com/news/business/ireland-proposes-cul...
dsign•6mo ago
teruakohatu•6mo ago
This benefits the top cells in the chain by making the mud less hospitable to competitors. So the bottom cells and top cells all win.
There is a much better article here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250130131404/https://www.scien...