Yeah to me, these are just educated guesses and thus whenever used the tool needs that disclaimer.

That said - a lot of (ancient) history is educated guesses based on partial information. Even when we have a lot of writing available, like Cicero, we have to admit that we're seeing the events from a particular point of view, someone with his own biases and motives.

So we try to infer what happened in history based on data that has a certain amount of 'data quality issues' regardless.

It seems extremely niche to me because I've rarely found epigraphy useful, but I've never worked much on classical stuff. Sent this around to a few friends who do and they had similar opinions. It's cool technically, but doesn't address problems they consider important or limiting compared even to standard LLMs.