All of which have had deep funding cuts.
Looks like they received $1 billion in private + government grants, so upper end would be 15%?
> The University ended fiscal year 2024 with an operating surplus of $45 million compared to $186 million in fiscal year 2023, on an operating revenue base of $6.5 billion.
Wow!
"At least 350 Harvard medical grants were terminated by the Trump administration." https://abcnews.go.com/US/350-harvard-medical-grants-termina...
"At Grim Town Hall, Harvard Medical School Leaders Tell Staff to Expect Layoffs and Far-Reaching Cuts" https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/4/16/trump-hms-cuts/
"Snapshots from front lines of federal research funding cuts" https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2025/07/snapshots-of-...
So, 100% cut compared to 2024, or maybe expected funding drastically increased compared to 2024?
> The administration then said it was withholding $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and $60 million in multi-year contract value to the institution.
This doesn't math, but close enough I suppose.
There will be a sudden and sharp decline in the amount of research produced going forward, until (hopefully) a new administration can make funding important scientific research a priority again.
We all read the news. Everyone knows this. Is there no escape even on HN? Just shoot me already.
Not generalizing, i mean you specifically .
I have done research and analysis long enough to understand that we all need to remain humble and refrain from assuming a conclusion without substantial evidence.
When I read the sentence “All of which have had deep funding cuts.” I speculate that this response is a simple signal amplification without any added evidence and without critique. I think it’s an attempt at self and collective affirmation.
Who is to say that funding cuts in academia won’t have short and long-term benefits for society and also result in a net increase in happiness and productivity? We simply don’t know yet. Supply and demand of valuable thought and research may redistribute within the economy!
I think there are very political people out there, the world may benefit from forums which cater to people who are political and separately to those who aren’t very political!
Don't we already have evidence of this? Many developing nations do not have adequate funding for academia and it is not increasing their happiness and productivity. Neither we can see any benefits on the society.
Who is to say that if I stop eating I won't see long-term benefits and also result in a net increase in happiness and productivity?
See how considering the tiniest amount of nuance instead of oversimplifying everything tends to allow more interesting thought patterns?
edit: to a point of course, I don't want them pushing their agenda. Put money in an independent charity.
I don't understand from their research if
1) The the blood flow is following the computational/metabolic demand (via the endothelial cells communicating via gap junctions)
2) the brain is signaling the endothelial cells directly.
Maybe the paper explains it, or maybe more research required.
On the negative side, I definitely have a harder time reaching my maximum pulse when working out.
Insanity•13h ago
konfusinomicon•13h ago
treetalker•12h ago
SlowTao•12h ago
kulahan•12h ago
hnuser123456•11h ago
lithocarpus•10h ago
CoastalCoder•9h ago
tasty_freeze•8h ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness
pessimizer•8h ago
rramadass•6h ago
There is an "Objective Reality" (mutable, evolves into many forms and includes both material/non-material concepts) and a "Witness-Consciousness" (immutable and attributeless). The latter is embodied in one form of the former which we call Sentient Living Beings. But we forget the distinction between the two and experience reality through its own subjective evolutes within the embodied being i.e. Sensory Mind, Intelligence and Ego. Various techniques/practices have been prescribed in Samkhya/Yoga/etc. to break out of this illusion and realize that one is simply pure awareness/consciousness beyond any experience. This is what is called as Kaivalya/Moksa/Nirvana i.e. a state of mind in which there is total freedom from everything to do with objective reality.
See also the paper A landscape of consciousness: Toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications and previous discussion on it here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40844824
edwardbernays•5h ago
rramadass•3h ago
Also see the classic Yoga and Western Psychology: A Comparison by Geraldine Coster - https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.189086/page/n1...
groestl•2h ago
Because the Essence that is the arrangement of molecules replicates onto other molecules, and it is more effective at replicating when it dedicates some of it's molecules to perceive and model it's own existence, in order to run experiments on it. That way it's more likely to find a behavior for the rest of the molecules to successfully replicate. So the molecules experience themselves, and the experience becomes more intense the more advanced the experiments are that can be run on the model.
exe34•1h ago
It's not true that we have to be conscious - we can do things on autopilot too. The same way we can be thoughtless in treating others - we can turn the machinery off.
ccozan•58m ago
Recently I was thinking of a very hard problem and I cannot absolutelly recollect approx 30 minutes of the drive home. Apparently my body and some part of the brain took over the driving, while my cortex was busy with the problem reserving the short term memory completly. I snapped out of the situation when apparently a stronger break was needed, and this intrerupted my flow and popped my attention to the road. Fascinating!
Cthulhu_•1h ago
I do feel like most forms of leisure - watching / playing something, alcohol / drugs, sleeping - are basically this, you lose some of your consciousness and awareness in favor of what you're focusing on, or floating / free associating.
reactordev•8h ago
A chorus of being.
teiferer•4h ago
That's a weird use of the term. Doesn't match how I would define it, but you do you.
exe34•1h ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism
I think it's a bit kooky, but there are weirder things that are true in this little Universe.
exodust•5h ago
teiferer•4h ago
Humans believing that they are special is as old as human history goes. Special as a species, but many groups also consider themselves special, and individuals as well. Seems to be an emergent thing from the human psyche. One that has had terrible consquences over the millenia, but I might be overlooking the upsides.
johnisgood•3h ago
exe34•1h ago
johnisgood•1h ago
motoboi•11h ago
WantonQuantum•10h ago
nis0s•8h ago
teiferer•4h ago
The former could be applied to whatever LLM is the hype of the day.
It's interesting though that the only consciousness that I'm sure of exists is my own. Anybody else's is just somehing I'm assuming. You can measure intelligence, but not consciousness.
jimmygrapes•6h ago
-Bill Hicks Don't take this as downplaying at all, because it's a fantastic and uplifting revelation, so long as one doesn't presume they're the first to consider it (it is even better this way imo)
grishka•4h ago