The source for the font appears here [2] with an Intel copyright.
[1]: https://wiki.softhistory.org/wiki/PhoenixBIOS_4.0_Release_6....
[2]: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-codereview/blob/0a5f23c06d...
Is there any info or research on which width/height ratio of a fixed width font is the best for readability?
I really enjoyed Intel's desktop boards. They weren't particularly flashy, and there were certainly "duds" in there (early MU440EX revs not handling Pentium II CPUs properly, the whole RAMBUS debacle) but in general Intel made a solid (and not at all flashy) board.
With Intel's manufacturing competency you could be assured every board would be consistent. If there was a defect (I'm looking at you, MTH in the 820 chipset) every board would consistently have the same defect.
michalpleban•5mo ago
fredoralive•5mo ago
bananaboy•5mo ago
The energy star logo was also displayed in text modes - by using custom font glyphs!
michalpleban•5mo ago
bananaboy•5mo ago
the-rc•5mo ago
martijnvds•5mo ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAHGKanqO6s
pwdisswordfishz•5mo ago
http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Award_BIOS_logo
jefftk•5mo ago
spogbiper•5mo ago
f1shy•5mo ago
aardvark179•5mo ago
michalpleban•5mo ago
Plus, making the characters shorter would make them also a bit less legible.
f1shy•5mo ago
michalpleban•5mo ago
JdeBP•5mo ago
Also remember that SETUP as a whole was often a mess of different ROM programs from different manufacturers. Far too many thought it their own ROM's business to clear the display and set text mode before they splashed their copyright strings, prompts, self-test, and hardware auto-detection information up.
Yes, they could have done things properly. The way to detect an existing screen size was there from the VGA onwards. And they could have left the display uncleared. And the whole preserve-my-graphical-splash-screen thing eventually did happen.
They did not.
userbinator•5mo ago
When you only have a few KB in total for your option ROM, that's a luxury you can't afford. You can either sacrifice some other important feature of your product to appease the tiny minority, or assume 80x25.
0points•5mo ago
There was also small .com utils circulating that would change to a tiny font so you could have 40, 50 rows of text with tiny fonts, or maybe even more.
bluedino•5mo ago
Text editors like EDIT.COM and the Borland IDE let you select 80x43/50 in the menu
p1necone•5mo ago
Probably.
A lot of software back then was rendering UIs with box drawing characters, doing complicated layout etc - it's probably much easier to retrofit existing software to output the exact same thing in a slightly higher resolution font than to make the display logic support different resolutions properly.