frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

The Management Skill Nobody Talks About

https://terriblesoftware.org/2025/08/22/the-management-skill-nobody-talks-about/
59•matheusml•47m ago•17 comments

Io_uring, kTLS and Rust for zero syscall HTTPS server

https://blog.habets.se/2025/04/io-uring-ktls-and-rust-for-zero-syscall-https-server.html
296•guntars•9h ago•55 comments

What about using rel="share-url" to expose sharing intents?

https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/08/what-about-using-relshare-url-to-expose-sharing-intents/
24•edent•1h ago•6 comments

What the Hell Is Going On?

https://catskull.net/what-the-hell-is-going-on-right-now.html
102•todsacerdoti•6h ago•33 comments

LabPlot: Free, open source and cross-platform Data Visualization and Analysis

https://labplot.org/
48•turrini•4h ago•7 comments

DeepSeek-v3.1

https://api-docs.deepseek.com/news/news250821
600•wertyk•18h ago•177 comments

Launch HN: Inconvo (YC S23) – AI agents for customer-facing analytics

3•ogham•38m ago•0 comments

Everything Is Correlated

https://gwern.net/everything
171•gmays•11h ago•72 comments

Control shopping cart wheels with your phone (2021)

https://www.begaydocrime.com/
204•mystraline•12h ago•71 comments

Code formatting comes to uv experimentally

https://pydevtools.com/blog/uv-format-code-formatting-comes-to-uv-experimentally/
296•tanelpoder•17h ago•185 comments

An interactive guide to SVG paths

https://www.joshwcomeau.com/svg/interactive-guide-to-paths/
364•joshwcomeau•3d ago•35 comments

Weaponizing image scaling against production AI systems

https://blog.trailofbits.com/2025/08/21/weaponizing-image-scaling-against-production-ai-systems/
424•tatersolid•1d ago•122 comments

Crimes with Python's Pattern Matching (2022)

https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/python-abc/
217•agluszak•17h ago•87 comments

From GPT-4 to GPT-5: Measuring progress through MedHELM [pdf]

https://www.fertrevino.com/docs/gpt5_medhelm.pdf
111•fertrevino•14h ago•83 comments

How does the US use water?

https://www.construction-physics.com/p/how-does-the-us-use-water
189•juliangamble•1d ago•150 comments

1981 Sony Trinitron KV-3000R: The Most Luxurious Trinitron [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHG_I-9a7FY
73•ksec•1d ago•52 comments

Building AI products in the probabilistic era

https://giansegato.com/essays/probabilistic-era
158•sdan•18h ago•91 comments

AWS CEO says using AI to replace junior staff is 'Dumbest thing I've ever heard'

https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/21/aws_ceo_entry_level_jobs_opinion/
1457•JustExAWS•1d ago•617 comments

Show HN: OS X Mavericks Forever

https://mavericksforever.com/
365•Wowfunhappy•3d ago•156 comments

Being confidently wrong is holding AI back

https://promptql.io/blog/being-confidently-wrong-is-holding-ai-back
64•tango12•1h ago•96 comments

My other email client is a daemon

https://feyor.sh/blog/my-other-email-client-is-a-mail-daemon/
172•aebtebeten•1d ago•22 comments

Beyond sensor data: Foundation models of behavioral data from wearables

https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00191
218•brandonb•22h ago•47 comments

How well does the money laundering control system work?

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/735665
251•PaulHoule•1d ago•287 comments

AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/8289
656•freetonik•18h ago•397 comments

Using Podman, Compose and BuildKit

https://emersion.fr/blog/2025/using-podman-compose-and-buildkit/
280•LaSombra•1d ago•102 comments

Elegant mathematics bending the future of design

https://actu.epfl.ch/news/elegant-mathematics-bending-the-future-of-design/
130•robinhouston•3d ago•13 comments

Benchmarks for Golang SQLite Drivers

https://github.com/cvilsmeier/go-sqlite-bench
85•cvilsmeier•3d ago•24 comments

Privately-Owned Rail Cars

https://www.amtrak.com/privately-owned-rail-cars
156•jasoncartwright•1d ago•245 comments

Miles from the ocean, there's diving beneath the streets of Budapest

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/18/travel/budapest-diving-molnar-janos-cave
133•thm•3d ago•32 comments

Scientists No Longer Find X Professionally Useful, and Have Switched to Bluesky

https://academic.oup.com/icb/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/icb/icaf127/8196180?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
128•sebg•15h ago•100 comments
Open in hackernews

The Minecraft code no one has solved (2024) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nz2LeXwJOyI
30•zichy•6h ago

Comments

boredpudding•4h ago
It's solved, full write-up here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MinecraftUnlimited/comments/1cvo5py...

Tl:dr; It was a release file for their Minecon event. It was never meant to be public. Obsessing over a password protected in a company's S3 bucket is weird and crosses many limits.

djmips•4h ago
Telling people they should not try and crack something is kind of like the Streisand effect.
teruakohatu•4h ago
> Telling people they should not try and crack something is kind of like the Streisand effect.

More like a reverse-streisand effect. They were honest about the contents of the file, it was Minecraft 1.0 and not interesting, but the community didn't accept the explanation.

charcircuit•4h ago
>is weird and crosses many limits.

It's similar in format to communities that obssess over "lost media." The inability to pirate or get access to something becomes an obsession. Even if the piece of media exists in an archive somewhere, that doesn't matter to them because it's about the fact that they themselves don't have access to it that has become the obsession.

LiamPowell•4h ago
There's also the piracy communities where a majority of users believe they have some sort of inherent right to watch something merely because it exists. I don't understand where that sentiment comes from.
bakugo•3h ago
> I don't understand where that sentiment comes from.

Human nature. Refusing to accept being told "no" by some greater force is the instinct that pushed humanity forward to where we are today.

Bjartr•1h ago
That's a rather romantic way to say stubbornness is sometimes effective
lovich•3h ago
I mean, part of the deal with IP law is you get government protection for your idea, in exchange for society having access to it.

I’m personally of the mind that if my tax dollars went towards protecting your shit, you owe society access.

This is not defending the ones who believe they have the right to things sans that deal

jaccola•3h ago
This argument is so ridiculous I must be misunderstanding you.

By your logic you owe me access your house since my tax dollars pay for the legal system that gives you property rights?!

mattmanser•3h ago
It's not ridiculous, that's the deal (at least it was). It's not actual property. It's a made up concept, you actually lose nothing physical if it's copied. That concept was created and granted to encourage people to create.

You get a certain period to commercialize it, then it's public property. Hiding it away to prevent that is a breach of the spirit of the agreement society made with the creator.

That you believe it's a "ridiculous" argument shows how much you've been brainwashed by corporations.

All this stuff is generally built on the shoulders of previous works, that are public domain. Copying story structures, phrasing, etc. Even entire storylines.

And that's before we get onto the fact that all these corporations benefited from eveything we paid for. Laws to protect their IP, enforcement, infrastructure paid with by public money, education of workers, etc..

They've got their hands out to take, take, take, but when it comes to holding up to their part of the bargain, it's suddenly extensions on copyright terms, minor tweaks to "renew" IP that was never part of the original deal, etc. while feeding a ton of cash to politicians in what looks like a bribe, acts like a bribe, but is termed "lobbying".

charcircuit•2h ago
>It's a made up concept

Physical property is made up too. You don't lose anything from someone sleeping on your couch either.

yrxuthst•2h ago
If someone is sleeping on your couch, then you lose the ability to sleep on it yourself, because they are taking up the space.
charcircuit•1h ago
Well then they can sleep in your bed if you want the couch or someone else in your home you aren't using.
c22•7m ago
But then how do we determine who has priority for the couch? The singleton nature of the couch requires some form of access control to prevent disputes. No such restriction exists for a memory of the couch, once we have each been exposed to it we can enjoy the memory perpetually and simultaneously with no conflicts.

Artificially restricting what can be remembered and by whom solely on the basis that some forms of memory produce new physical artifacts ("copies") is absurd on its face.

That said, the ability to monetize a memory is much more like the couch. In theory this is the resource copyright aims to protect. In practice, experts disagree to what extent piracy impacts potential monetization leaving us with two sides of the debate tending to talk past eachother.

nkrisc•2h ago
Physical property rights are made up too. How can you claim to own something if you aren’t actively defending it nor physically possessing it in that moment.

Do you “own” your house even when you’re not home? Yes, you do, because we all agreed on this made up thing called “property rights” and we pay our tax dollars to have it enforced. Otherwise whoever is in your house “owns” it until you or someone else forcible removes them or convinces them to leave.

All our rules are “made up”.

navane•1h ago
Nuance beaten by a strawman. Well done.

You know what, your words are all made up.

hebocon•3h ago
Without IP law it is all or nothing: obfuscate, hide, encrypt, and protect lest it become public domain.

With IP law you are given the exclusive, enforceable right to control the distribution and sale of an idea for N years... at which point it becomes public domain.

In either case the decision to publish an idea will inevitably make it public domain. The government protects their shit because $REASONS but there is absolutely no obligation for it to be made public until that protection lapse. In matters of human culture this seems like a bug, not a feature but enforcing some standard of "reasonable worldwide availability" by force seems impossible. The invisible hand of piracy "solves" this oversight and functions like a safety valve.

Not an endorsement of either side, just an observation.

mik1998•1h ago
This was fine when N = 28. Now it's life of the author plus 95 so there is almost no possibility of anything released in your lifetime to be a part of the public domain before you die.
zdragnar•2h ago
If that were the case then no physical artwork could be privately held. That, too, is covered by IP laws but there is no obligation to provide society access.
haskellshill•2h ago
> if my tax dollars went towards protecting your shit, you owe society access

Well, the protection is only from random people accessing one's stuff, so this is a very silly (in fact nonsensical) argument. "If my tax dollars went towards you having right X, I thus deserve to infringe on that right X".

nkrisc•2h ago
> I’m personally of the mind that if my tax dollars went towards protecting your shit, you owe society access.

Our tax dollars go towards protecting lots of different things for lots of different people (including me and you) that we have no rights to at all, nor ever will.

vintermann•2h ago
That should be the default assumption. It's restrictions which require justification in a liberal society, not freedoms.
Peritract•1h ago
"Everyone has to share everything" is a restriction, not a freedom.
tmtvl•1h ago
Where did that come from? 'You aren't allowed to prevent others from sharing this thing' is completely different from 'you have to share this thing'. 'Everyone is allowed to share everything' is a freedom, not a restriction.

Whether or not it's a freedom people should have is a difficult question to answer because we don't know what the modern world would be like without copyright (I expect creators would try and get paid for creating more works so it might look like how nowadays some shows end in cliffhangers to give the creators some leverage over the publishers to say 'look, people want to know what comes next, maybe you should let us do another season').

II2II•1h ago
Freedoms are a balancing of rights between two or more parties, and are never absolute. Complicating the matter futher: it is very unlikely that all parties are going to agree what that balancing of rights looks like. For example, someone who shares knowledge (e.g. a teacher) is going to have a very different perspective on copyright law than a person who sells knowlege (e.g. a publisher).
vintermann•28m ago
Yeah yeah, but the one I replied to couldn't understand why people felt entitled to see something just because it exists.

I can totally understand that, it just means they don't buy the various excuses for why they shouldn't be allowed to. I wouldn't either, in most "lost media" cases.

matheusmoreira•45m ago
> I don't understand where that sentiment comes from.

If you actually wish to understand, I can point to a thread where this was discussed somewhat at length by others and myself not too long ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907830

TL;DR:

Public domain is the natural state of information. Intellectual property is an absurd state granted monopoly on what boils down to numbers. Copyright in particular is a functionally infinite monopoly that robs us of our public domain rights. Copyright infringement is civil disobedience of unjust laws and arguably a moral imperative. Copyright enforcement requires the destruction of computer freedom as we know it as well as everything the word "hacker" stands for and therefore it must be resisted even if it destroys the copyright industry. It makes zero economic sense to charge money for information which has infinite availability, therefore society must figure out how to pay creators before the work is produced.

lupusreal•59m ago
Interest in lost media is a harmless hobby, which occasionally yields positive fruit. Reddit looked for the identity of the song "Subways of your Mind" for 17 years before it was found, and I'm sure the band was pleased to learn their music had found such interest so many years later. Where's the harm? Calling it "obsession" to make it sound bad can be done to any hobby.
aswip•3h ago
I guess only boxpig41 knows what else was protected that caused them to replace the file just to avoid the chance that the real password might get out and those might be unlocked, though at this point I’m assuming those encrypted files are gone or are no longer important.
cedws•3h ago
I disagree with this and what Dinnerbone says about locks. It doesn’t matter who file was intended for, it’s on the internet, if people want to use their silicon to do some mathematics to turn some numbers into some other numbers that’s their choice. It’s not equivalent to breaking into a house.
boredpudding•23m ago
I agree it's not the equivalent, but the file could've contained things like Minecon attendees. That would still mean it's badly secured of course, but putting a huge community effort behind it and youtubers making 'Biggest Secret in Minecraft' videos about it would suddenly turn into very bad taste.
neuroelectron•3h ago
so weird. many limits.

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

IT4MD•45m ago
Thanks for posting that AACS key. It's been awhile since I've seen it running around the internet and we need more of that kind of thing, these days.
de6u99er•1h ago
>He mentioned that he does not want people to nag him about it and that “It's brought up every single year, I'm hoping this is the last ”. Finally putting an end to a 13 year old mystery.

Ouch

esnard•1h ago
Weird. The file was cracked in May 2024, while the password had appeared in a database leak which was added in HIBP (and thus pretty much public) back in October 2017.

Unsure why it took the community so long to crack the file.

boredpudding•25m ago
The cracking basically started the moment youtubers presented it as 'a mystery'.
catsma21•5m ago
the salt for the passwords in the bitly breach isn't known, and the few plaintexts available were lost to time
snowram•16m ago
It is rather common in gaming to communities to find people completely obessed over ultra specific details of their favorite game. It isn't even the first time for Minecraft, see the "pack.png" case.
picafrost•3h ago
Internet denizens love opening a locked box. This phenomenon has been weaponized by the gaming industry in the form of loot boxes.
astrobe_•1h ago
It is strange to me that people obsess on programming in-game with "red stone" etc. That said I am dayjob programmer so the last thing I want to do on my free time and is to program stuff.

I made a game that uses the Luanti "voxel" engine (MC-likes games of course, but also transposition of other genres), and even programming that is bit of a chore but that's the price to pay to play the game you want to play (there's much more to that than just programming/modding; game design is a rabbit hole).

But I think that it would be more rewarding for those who are curious about programming to start modding, especially in Luanti because it is relatively well documented and it's Lua. In a way, making it rain with the programmable particle spawner the engine provides is a loot box locked by an API, with hints on how to open it in the docs ;-)

catsma21•3m ago
https://i.redd.it/zj0csp06b4sd1.png
teekert•1h ago
Maybe add to title: “but is solved now”. Would have saved me some time thinking they might go somewhere.