Is the implication these services are used so little it isn't worth AWS continuing to invest in developing or maintaining beyond bare-minimum KTLO ops?

Amazon Glacier on the list is a pretty big surprise to me.

Amazon following the lead of Google Cloud of shutting down AWS services is not a good sign.

This is why you should never use niche aws services.

Amazon S3 Object Lambda seems like a massive category to deprecate

Wow. I can’t believe Glacier is on that list.

Does not be accessible to new customers mean a new test account that rolls into the same parent org would no longer have access either?

They should get real and include App Runner on this list.

So much promise as a Heroku alternative with all the AWS integrations but it's basically dead now. Not a peep from them on their public roadmap over at github.

We're having to go back to Fargate with all the operational overhead that entails.

Starting a new service was a path towards promotion at AWS, so they ended up launching 100s of services to the point where there were 10 different ways to do everything. I’m glad they’re culling them.

Glad to see this, but there’s a lot more cleanup to do. AWS went from having a few core excellent services with a strong innovation pipeline to a chaotic “jack of all trades master of none” approach with no clear product strategy. Some of the recent panic trying to catch up on AI has resulting in even more slop thrown at the wall hoping something sticks.

We love you, but focus on the core infrastructure bits and stop chasing everything that moves! Your customers build better apps and services that you do… just build great building blocks and folks will be very happy.