Disregarding the noise present in all exchanges, the Argentine peso has been continuously dropping, compared to USD, for decades. If it were to have a sustained climb, that would be quite the event, but that aside the question is how fast it is falling, and whether the rate is increasing or decreasing. An extreme one-time rise or fall would be significant, but that hasn't happened.
programmertote•8h ago
jordanb•8h ago
ta9000•8h ago
gdulli•8h ago
donavanm•8h ago
I dont know why “bail out” is the headline term, it’s closer to a “currency backstop” AFAIK. The us is effectively extending hard dollars in exchange for pesos, allowing the argentine govt to not be destroyed in the open currency markets. If this works the peso would retain (or gain) value as the country recovers (economically, due to the ongoing reforms) and the us could feasibly even profit.
On the USD and peso backstop its important to note that “dollarization” was a big talking point for milei. But argentina never had anywhere close to enough USD reserves or even USD economic flows to make that at all feasible ever. Like many many billions away from plausible. So there was a background theme of trying to catch them out on that as well since the last elections.
Edit: and for context the current run against the peso is effectively because of dumb milei posturing ahead of regional elections, and a strong populist/peronist result. Lots of fear that if its repeated at the upcoming national elections then argentina goes back to kirchner style populism and debt/economic blow up.
jordanb•8h ago
durandal1•8h ago
Daishiman•7h ago
Are you Argentinian? Do you even realize this is at least the third or fourth time in the country’s history where this exact scenario has happened?
coliveira•8h ago
donavanm•8h ago
But its hard to argue with arresting the inflation, gdp, and budget surplus numbers. Im not sure how the economy is “going south.” Generously the policies have arrested the slide?
I dont imagine the typical argentine is better off with 200% inflation, 50% unemployment, and a 57% poverty rate. Avoiding that return seems to be quite a benefit for just about everyone?
Daishiman•7h ago
Sure it is. Public education and science funding is at a historic minimum that is destroying tons of long term scientific and educational initiatives. Roads are falling apart in a gigantic country and what’s left of rail is being scrapped for parts and sold to private entities that will let rails decay just like everywhere else where it was privatized.
Consumer spending continues to go down, industry is not competitive with this fake exchange rate causing a loss of high quality jobs and forcing everyone to take a second job as an Uber driver.
We’ve seen this play out again and again. The government will default, then hyperinflation and social crises until the low prices of everything make the economy competitive again.
This has played out again and again with far more competent governments and we keep being right about it.
nradov•7h ago
In the long run there are things they can do to raise revenue and cut waste. But when you're stuck in a deep hole the first thing you need to do is stop digging.
rightbyte•5h ago
nradov•4h ago
Longer term they could maybe sell off some state assets but it takes time to bring in any cash that way.
AbraKdabra•6h ago
Education was always shit. I live in Argentina, the PISA results from last exam are demential and I doubt they can get worse, don't lie to people please. There's absolutely no way in the world education can get to today levels in one and a half years of Milei.
> Roads are falling apart in a gigantic country
Roads were NEVER good, either you don't live in Argentina and you definitely can't have an opinion, or you live here and never left your house. Again, please don't lie to people, we have been living in hell for 20 years, nothing breaks like you say in one and a half years.
> and what’s left of rail is being scrapped for parts and sold to private entities that will let rails decay just like everywhere else where it was privatized.
Whoa you have a crystal magic ball? The kukas governed for 20 years, don't tell me all the railroad system decayed exactly when Milei assumed...
watwut•5h ago
Each time, you have initial seeming success and then crash.
clipsy•8h ago
If.
nocoiner•8h ago
donavanm•8h ago
Although, to be fair, I can see the perspective that argentine _debt_ is magic beans funded by hopes, wishes, and the IMFs argentine refinancing.
sofixa•53m ago
> Although, to be fair, I can see the perspective that argentine _debt_ is magic beans funded by hopes, wishes, and the IMFs argentine refinancing.
Exactly. FX isn't magic beans. The currency of a country that has defaulted more time than anyone cares to remember is magic beans though.
There is a reason for the old saying "There are 4 types of economies - developed, developing, Argentina and Japan".
8note•8h ago
nashashmi•8h ago
clipsy•8h ago
estearum•8h ago
Sometimes it really is that simple.
https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/bailing-out-bessents-budd...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/09/us/politics/argentina-bai...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/09/trump-argentina...
martythemaniak•8h ago
jauntywundrkind•7h ago
Maybe there's some more elaborate way this will enrich certain American cronies. Maybe.
But I tend to think the answer comes if we look back 80 years. A lot of bad evil people needed a friendly state to run to after WWII ended. Today, beyond just being friends-of-an-(evil-doing)-feather together with some other exploitative public-services-destroying extremists, part of me thinks, maybe perhaps: Argentina is being set up as a new exit, a new place to flee too, when justice comes a calling.
rubyn00bie•7h ago
> Citrone, the co-founder of Discovery Capital Management, is also a friend and former colleague of Bessent—a fact that has not been previously reported in US media outlets. Citrone, by his own account, helped make Bessent very wealthy.
I think it's simply that Bessent can give his buddy (Citrone), who made him (Bessent) "very wealthy," a bailout at zero cost to any of them. $20 billion is really insignificant for the US government, even if a gross waste of tax dollars, and they know there's not going to be a single repercussion.
> Argentina is being set up as a new exit, a new place to flee too, when justice comes a calling.
I too have been thinking that lately. It wouldn't be ideal for any of them but, from their perspectives, it surely would be better than the alternative.
treis•7h ago
It's a good thing he didn't give into hyperbole...
magicalist•7h ago
https://ph.ucla.edu/news-events/news/research-finds-more-14-...
cobbal•7h ago
> Forecasting models predicted that the current steep funding cuts could result in more than 14,051,750 (uncertainty interval 8,475,990-19,662,191) additional all-age deaths, including 4,537,157 (3,124,796-5,910,791) in children younger than age 5 years, by 2030.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
croon•1h ago
refurb•6h ago
piva00•1h ago
Sometimes you have to go by circumstantial evidence which, in this case, is quite clear: Rob Citrone helped Bessent to make a lot of money, Citrone is deeply invested in Argentinian bonds and overall economy; Bessent controls the US purse, we can be very suspicious about this move since it doesn't make any sense for the US to burn money to help bail out Argentina.
If you have a better theory for why this was done it might help reduce the suspicious nature of it. Just calling "there are no sources" doesn't.
vkou•8h ago
2. What kind of god-king wouldn't reward his friends and allies?
dysoco•8h ago
Trump doesn't want Milei's government to fail, he needs successful examples of neoliberal, anti-woke, populist, anti-inmigration governments and Milei is probably his best bet. He's not helping Argentina, he's helping a political ally's party.
Betting on the Peso doesn't make sense. It's a lot of money but it's <1% USA's budget. Trump was probably thinking the American media would not pay too much attention to it but apparently it slightly backfired and they did.
loeg•8h ago
dysoco•8h ago
thehappypm•8h ago
anonymars•7h ago
nradov•8h ago
https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/china-briefs/chinas-overseas-...
estearum•8h ago
Not compelling at all to say the US just generally has an imperative to buy debt or lend to countries whenever they're least creditable just because China might do it anyway.
nradov•7h ago
estearum•7h ago
Argentina also would not be getting some special treatment. There are far more strategically important and similarly struggling economies in the Americas and elsewhere that the US could choose to assist and is not.
There's just no coherence to this theory.
This is rich guys helping out their rich guy buddies using taxpayer dollars.
zmgsabst•6h ago
Carrot, stick.
> This is rich guys helping out their rich guy buddies using taxpayer dollars.
Almost all foreign aid is this, complete with kickbacks such as donations to the Clinton Foundation, etc. Even domestically, eg, the high percentage of homeless and poverty support disappearing into NGO pockets.
igor47•3h ago
hulitu•4h ago
The world policeman is doing world policeman things. Luckily things are starting to get worse for the world policeman so those things might happen less.
actionfromafar•3h ago
mrcwinn•7h ago
hulitu•4h ago
thrance•55m ago
dzhiurgis•23m ago
bediger4000•7h ago
Speculation is that some of Bessent's buddies are financially exposed to an Argentinian default, and that this keeps them safe from losing money on a sovereign default.
denkmoon•7h ago
nine_zeros•7h ago
WhereIsTheTruth•5h ago
https://www.csis.org/analysis/south-americas-lithium-triangl...
watwut•5h ago
That is it.
hulitu•4h ago
piva00•3h ago
[0] https://www.bloomberglinea.com/2024/10/18/exclusive-rob-citr...