I used hamstrung at work recently and I reflected that it is somewhat old fashioned English word. I asked a friend afterwards and they were unfamiliar with the term.
In doing investigation around the word, I discovered its origins are in the brutal history of the transatlantic slave trade, where captured runaway slaves would have their hamstrings severed to prevent them from ever running again.
Too little too late has been done to save it. it ran rudderless for 30 years under the hand of marketers and grifters who used stock buybacks and deception to ensure it looked strong in the press. It pioneered things like gaming compiler results to achieve benchmark supremacy. it squandered its potential at the helm of a leadership that cared more about profit than innovation.
Perhaps it will sell to Texas Instruments or motorola but these arent the cherished powerhouses of industry our octogenarian congress reminisces they were. Motorola spends its days focused on niche telecom like apco p25 and IoT nannyware like the snitch puck https://infocondb.org/con/def-con/def-con-33/unmasking-the-s.... it develops very little of the SoC or chips it uses.
the government needs intel, but i suspect will in administrations to come grow increasingly weary and frustrated with its morass of managerial bloat, bureaucratic stagnation and inability to evolve the business model.
They have a ways to go.
Chrysler merged with Mercedes (Daimler). Then they were sold to Cereberus. Then filed for bankruptcy. Became 'new' Chrysler. Then bought by Fiat. Merge with Puegot.
I could see an embargo or tariffs on TSMC chips… but is Intel better with competition or worse? Do other countries care as much as the US? They may buy TSMC anyways.
And how would they do that?
CNT (Carbon Nanotubes) on rGO (reduced Graphene Oxide) wafers should work due to the difference in work functions between each form of carbon.
Semiconductor fabrication with (SiC) Silicon Carbide is already demonstrated.
Carbon epoxide (C_n H_2n O_n) would probably also be a sufficient substrate for electronic computing.
/?hnlog graphene, out of graphene :
- "Ask HN: How much would it cost to build a RISC CPU out of carbon?" (2024) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41153490
tyleo•12h ago
The M4 is ~40% faster on almost every test I’ve run (I’ll be sharing raw data in a blog soon). The M4 is faster on battery than the i9 is sucking juice from the outlet.
I feel like there are issues more fundamental than supply shortages. A wide gap has opened up in performance and an even wider gap in performance/power.
I’d like to know Intel’s answer to that.
elorant•12h ago
bn-l•12h ago
WoodenChair•12h ago
intrasight•12h ago
pixelpoet•11h ago
tyleo•11h ago
bigbadfeline•7h ago
But of course, Apple isn't Apple, nor is AMD AMD - they're both Taiwan's TSMC.
tyleo•7h ago
Maybe another chip has similar power/performance but:
1. I haven’t seen real-world examples showing that
2. It might not run the desktop workloads I care about
Maybe some other TSMC-based device is out there that suits my needs but if it is, it at least has piss poor advertising.
bigbadfeline•2h ago
xrd•10h ago
For example, does a Asus ROG laptop match M chips from Apple? For example, I see Asus ROG g16 indicates a 13th gen Intel chip. Am I wrong to assume these are the same thing and don't suffer the same problems?
Any links I should review?
dontlaugh•8h ago
tyleo•11h ago
Intel may get faster but the competition should also be expected to get faster.
tonyedgecombe•9h ago