They look dated, or weird, have patchy customer service, and are not even that long range anymore.
Considering all 13 the same might be a stretch, but if you just take the 6 that are the same size as the id.4 you still end up with the same result.
Yet (salute + support for ADF party) * touchy german history = auto non-grata.
Also, Elon should have stick to cars and rockets. His venturing into politics, and into media (with buying X) didn’t help him either. He got demystified, and demolished his image of a super focused half-einstein, half-edison. Now more of an half-Trump. And that didn’t help his car sales either.
15,595 (Tesla) vs. 15,171 (BYD)
TSLA is not down 50% YTD. Its up this year so far.
Can you show the math that shows it down 50% YTD?
> The number of Teslas sold in the January-October period dropped 50.4% to 15,595 units, compared with the same period last year.
> The number of Teslas sold in the January-October period dropped 50.4% to 15,595 units, compared with the same period last year.
YoY is -50%.
The main problem with Musk's proposed pay deal is that he still gets paid billions even if he continues to fail:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/musks-record-tes...
Tesla's sales target is now to have sold 20 million cars in total by 2035. That's fewer cars in total in what will then be the 32 year history of the company than Toyota sold in the last two years:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/business/elon-musk-tesla-...
Tesla's target used to be 20 million per year:
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-...
But Tesla's board doesn't care. They got theirs:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/13/business/tesla-stock-sale...
https://www.afr.com/technology/life-changing-wealth-stopped-...
And it seems that until now, Tesla sales in Eu are 30% less than last year [1]
There is more competition, finally.
[0]: https://www.benzinga.com/tech/25/01/43092840/tesla-struggles...
[1]: https://electrek.co/2025/11/03/tesla-tsla-keeps-getting-batt...
I'll never buy a Tesla. Personally, Musk has delivered generational toxicity to their brand. And he now seeks to be rewarded for that.
The Board is dysfunctional.
moosedman•2h ago
_aavaa_•2h ago
schiffern•1h ago
justapassenger•2h ago
schiffern•1h ago
Tesla is battery-limited, not demand-limited. Adding models would only add complexity without meaningfully increasing revenue.
It helps to know basic fundamental facts about the company.
BigTTYGothGF•1h ago
Per the article, this no longer seems to be the case.
schiffern•1h ago
This article is the same recycled misinformation that's been repeated for years. What's actually happening is that Tesla does regional delivery waves, which results in large month-to-month fluctuations. Nothing new here.
Yes Virginia, the media will distort information to sell eyeballs. Color me shocked!
buellerbueller•1h ago
You fell for the "numbers are real" conspiracy.
BigTTYGothGF•1h ago
> The number of Teslas sold in the January-October period dropped 50.4% to 15,595 units, compared with the same period last year.
mjamesaustin•1h ago
schiffern•1h ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45827800
I really wish people had any media literacy left. This brand of lying without lying is extremely common in modern media, and also extremely easy to spot once you know what to look for.
afavour•1h ago
> KBA said Tesla sold 750 cars in Germany in October, down by 53.5% from a year earlier. The number of Teslas sold in the January-October period dropped 50.4% to 15,595 units, compared with the same period last year.
To be clear, you are suggesting that Tesla had no delivery "wave" between January and October? And that is the sign of a healthy company?
tcfhgj•1h ago
Permit•59m ago
mentalfist•1h ago
ajross•1h ago
I don't know who you're addressing. Lots of people, me included, don't like the conspiracy minded politicization of his fortune but still think the cars are pretty great. Seems like a boring opinion that wouldn't be controversial, but we still find ourselves subtweeted anyway.
(Edit: three downvotes and a Godwin's Law reply drop within seconds, as expected. Seriously folks there are 125k people who work for that company, must everything about it be judged entirely on the last twelve months of one guys mania?)
verdverm•1h ago
No longer are we going to tolerate the intolerant. If you are willing to look past the moral failings, you are seen as part of the problem and should expect consequences. Social dynamics are at work
> (Edit: three downvotes and a Godwin's Law reply drop within seconds, as expected. Seriously folks there are 125k people who work for that company, must everything about it be judged entirely on the last twelve months of one guys mania?)
It seems the answer is a definitive yes, reflect on why this is.
Also, it's far more than 12 months. He's been manic for far longer, if not his entire life. We just saw the unfiltered version for the last 12 months. Now we know
buellerbueller•1h ago
Hmm...
>No longer are we going to tolerate the intolerant. If you are willing to look past the moral failings, you are seen as part of the problem and should expect consequences. Social dynamics are at work
The woke left forcing ideological conformity loses them a lot of support from the center-left, which turns out is not a winning electoral strategy. At which point one must wonder if the wokeness is just performative and virtue signaling, rather than an attempt to gain actual political power.
verdverm•1h ago
It's not about forcing conformity, it's about having basic human decency. Right-wingers belittle and dehumanize so many groups and people it's hard to keep track
see also: Paradox of tolerance
> turns out is not a winning electoral strategy
umm, did you look at the election results from yesterday?
#1 economy (i.e. emotionally driven tariffs)
#2 people don't like seeing children and neighbors disappeared by masked thugs (i.e. due-process and rule-of-law)
BolexNOLA•1h ago
balls187•1h ago
Yes, unfortunately.
Build a thousand bridges...
saubeidl•1h ago
FireBeyond•27m ago
It's like centerists. It's funny how when you push at them they reveal more and more right-leaning opinions.
Libertarians should, ostensibly, probably have a fairly split voting history, but yet it's always much more right-leaning too.
01100011•1h ago
programable•52m ago
hiddencost•1h ago
breve•1h ago
The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.
ajross•46m ago
So... are we cancelling the guy for his opinions or engaging in praxis trying to eliminate his ideology's funding? Very different moral calculus, IMHO, and neither seems very well justified (or implemented[1]) by the attitude I'm seeing in these debates.
[1] I mean, downvoting your fellow lefty traveller in a tiff over the car he drives might feel good but it's clearly not having the desired effect of changing Musk's politics. I am not your enemy, basically. Why are you fighting with the guy who's already voting for your candidates?
postflopclarity•29m ago
TheAlchemist•1h ago
Tesla did not release new cars, except for Cybertruck, for how long ? 5 years ? 10 years ?
Their lineup was great initially, and there was 0 competition. Now there is a lot of competition and their lineup did not change at all.
Their car business is dying. That's why they try to be an AI & Robotics company.
Edit: Here is a good link to follow the sales data - for many countries, it's reported daily. https://eu-evs.com/brandCharts/TESLA/ALL_DAILY/QoQ-Chart
yangikan•1h ago
TheAlchemist•1h ago
2 years ago, while claiming that Tesla is the leader in AI, he launched a private ... AI company (xAI), for which he took Tesla GPU chips, and now he tries to make Tesla ... invest in said company, at a valuation (>B100$) that could only be compared to something like Dogecoin.
All of this, with your and my retirement money, since the stock is in the S&P.
schiffern•1h ago
Tesla is battery-limited, not demand-limited (delivery wave concern trolling from OP's headline aside). Adding models would only add complexity without meaningfully increasing revenue.
It helps to know basic fundamental facts about the company before commenting.
More misinformation. Tesla continuously updates their cars unlike most manufacturers which are stuck in "waterfall" model year refreshes.See Sandy Munro's excellent breakdowns on the phenomenal pace of innovation at Tesla compared to competitors.
TheAlchemist•1h ago
If they are not demand limited, can you explain why they slashed prices, are offering countless promotions which evaporated their margins, and are running the factories at 50% capacity ?
bydo•1h ago
preezer•1h ago
Night_Thastus•1h ago
I would not want to buy one of them for any of those reasons, regardless.
mattmaroon•1h ago
dzhiurgis•13m ago
All cars have issues, but stats favour Tesla all while they are cheapest to repair.
themafia•1h ago
If you think that's true then people aren't buying a quality vehicle they're buying an ideological badge.
If you don't think that's true then people aren't buying them because they're not quality vehicles.
hiddencost•1h ago
themafia•1h ago
Let me be clear about my point though, Tesla's are _not_ quality vehicles, and given a choice, consumers with money will not select them. Politics do not enter into this equation outside of Hacker News.
AndrewDucker•1h ago
2) Even if he only drives away the left wing half of the population that still halves his customer base.
01100011•1h ago
Someone is still giving him money for some reason.
mattmaroon•1h ago
moosedman•1h ago
azakai•1h ago
https://www.usatoday.com/story/cars/news/2025/10/28/tesla-lo...
standardUser•1h ago
jstummbillig•1h ago
electric_mayhem•1h ago
Traded the car in a couple months ago. It was ok, as a car, but I hated what it had become synonymous with so it was worth the financial hit to give up a paid off car. Turns out the new Mach-e which replaced it is better in every way.
Might be some fanboys left, but a bunch of folks who might have fallen into that category in the past have been driven away by Musk’s unconscionable activities.
dzhiurgis•15m ago
I feel there has been shift or perhaps we were cringe tech bros from the start.