> Typically, when researchers try to get a microbe to produce a foreign compound, it creates a major metabolic burden. Without significant genetic manipulation, the microbe resists diverting its essential resources to produce something unfamiliar.
> By linking the cell’s survival to the production of their target compound, the team was able to trick the microbe into creating xanthommatin. To do this, they started with a genetically engineered “sick” cell, one that could only survive if it produced both the desired pigment, along with a second chemical called formic acid. For every molecule of pigment generated, the cell also produced one molecule of formic acid. The formic acid, in turn, provides fuel for the cell’s growth, creating a self-sustaining loop that drives pigment production.
> “We made it such that activity through this pathway, of making the compound of interest, is absolutely essential for life. If the organism doesn't make xanthommatin, it won't grow,” said Bushin.
This is a standard approach in molecular biology. Here is the paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02867-7
Here is an explainer of this very typical technique: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/biotech-dna-tech... and something more detailed: https://www.neb.com/en-us/tools-and-resources/feature-articl...
The insight they had was to link part of the desired biosynthetic pathway to the cells pathway (but they don't explicitly show that this had been necessary EDIT - Fig 3f shows a 45X increase with their strategy over a similar strategy; however, it's not clear that their 'control' was the optimal strategy).
relevant figure: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02867-7/figures/1
Could have some interesting applications.
> natural sunscreens
That could make Beach Day interesting.
quitit•2mo ago
That's a huge outcome.
HK-NC•2mo ago