frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The last-ever penny will be minted today in Philadelphia

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/12/business/last-penny-minted
339•andrewl•4h ago•480 comments

Project Euler

https://projecteuler.net
125•swatson741•3h ago•32 comments

Steam Machine

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steammachine
741•davikr•2h ago•373 comments

Steam Frame

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steamframe
542•Philpax•2h ago•165 comments

Yt-dlp: External JavaScript runtime now required for full YouTube support

https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/15012
737•bertman•10h ago•458 comments

GLP-1 drugs linked to lower death rates in colon cancer patients

https://today.ucsd.edu/story/glp-1-drugs-linked-to-dramatically-lower-death-rates-in-colon-cancer...
46•gmays•1h ago•35 comments

Learn Prolog Now

https://lpn.swi-prolog.org/lpnpage.php?pageid=top
205•rramadass•5h ago•119 comments

Launch HN: JSX Tool (YC F25) – A Browser Dev-Panel IDE for React

39•jsunderland323•3h ago•35 comments

Archive or Delete?

https://email-is-good.com/2025/11/05/archive-or-delete/
24•speckx•1w ago•26 comments

Blasting Yeast with UV Light

https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/p/results-from-blasting-yeast-with
18•Gormisdomai•2h ago•1 comments

LLM Output Drift in Financial Workflows: Validation and Mitigation (arXiv)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07585
8•raffisk•58m ago•2 comments

Async and Finaliser Deadlocks

https://tratt.net/laurie/blog/2025/async_and_finaliser_deadlocks.html
35•emailed•2h ago•10 comments

Ioannis Yannas invented artificial skin for treatment of burns–dies at 90

https://news.mit.edu/2025/professor-ioannis-yannas-dies-1027
96•bookofjoe•1w ago•5 comments

How Tube Amplifiers Work

https://robrobinette.com/How_Amps_Work.htm
23•gokhan•2h ago•10 comments

A brief look at FreeBSD

https://yorickpeterse.com/articles/a-brief-look-at-freebsd/
53•todsacerdoti•8h ago•16 comments

Valve Announces New Steam Machine, Steam Controller and Steam Frame

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Steam-Machines-Frame-2026
129•doener•2h ago•5 comments

.NET 10

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-dotnet-10/
435•runesoerensen•1d ago•369 comments

Fighting the New York Times' invasion of user privacy

https://openai.com/index/fighting-nyt-user-privacy-invasion
196•meetpateltech•6h ago•203 comments

Maestro Technology Sells Used SSD Drives as New

https://kozubik.com/items/MaestroTechnology/
121•walterbell•2h ago•46 comments

Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/12/waymo-robotaxis-are-now-giving-rides-on-freeways-in-these-3-cit...
238•nharada•4h ago•279 comments

Yann LeCun to depart Meta and launch AI startup focused on 'world models'

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/metas-chief-ai-scientist-yann-lecun-depart-and-launch-ai-start-fo...
762•MindBreaker2605•13h ago•577 comments

What happened to Transmeta, the last big dotcom IPO

https://dfarq.homeip.net/what-happened-to-transmeta-the-last-big-dotcom-ipo/
182•onename•11h ago•102 comments

The Single Byte That Kills Your Exploit: Understanding Endianness

https://pwnforfunandprofit.substack.com/p/the-single-byte-that-kills-your-exploit
18•andwati•3d ago•5 comments

Micro.blog launches new 'Studio' tier with video hosting

https://heydingus.net/blog/2025/11/micro-blog-offers-an-indie-alternative-to-youtube-with-its-stu...
89•justin-reeves•7h ago•27 comments

NetHack4 Philosophy

http://nethack4.org/philosophy.html
54•suioir•1w ago•23 comments

The Geometry Behind Normal Maps

https://www.shlom.dev/articles/geometry-behind-normal-maps/
90•betamark•7h ago•5 comments

Anthropic invests $50B in US AI infrastructure

https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-invests-50-billion-in-american-ai-infrastructure
25•asciimike•5h ago•5 comments

Show HN: Cancer diagnosis makes for an interesting RL environment for LLMs

26•dchu17•3h ago•10 comments

Building a CI/CD Pipeline Runner from Scratch in Python

https://muhammadraza.me/2025/building-cicd-pipeline-runner-python/
24•mr_o47•3d ago•3 comments

UK pauses intelligence-sharing with US on suspected drug vessels in Caribbean

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/11/uk-suspends-intelligence-sharing-with-us-amid-air...
80•beardyw•2h ago•25 comments
Open in hackernews

Is your electric bill going up? AI is partly to blame

https://www.npr.org/2025/11/06/nx-s1-5597971/electricity-bills-utilities-ai
40•ilamont•1h ago

Comments

namegulf•1h ago
Especially if you're in the east coast
MostlyStable•1h ago
No, it's not. Regulations making building new power plants, especially renewables, and extra especially nuclear, in addition to making power lines difficult to build, are to blame. Yes, in an environment where power availability is ~fixed on short-to-medium time scales, adding a new large demand will increase prices.

But a fixed supply is a policy choice, and is not the fault of AI companies.

rc5150•1h ago
"Yes, in an environment where power availability is ~fixed on short-to-medium time scales, adding a new large demand will increase prices."

You just nullified your own point.

MostlyStable•1h ago
No, the point of my comment is that, while that is true, that's not the "cause".
J_McQuade•57m ago
Now assume there were no such regulations and factor in the time it takes to actually plan, build, and commission a new power station and associated grid infrastructure. I'm not sure that your distinction matters in any real way.
MostlyStable•43m ago
>time it takes to actually plan, build, and commission.

This is, currently, mostly regulatory. Yes, in the absence of any regulations at all it would still take time to plan, build, and commission, and I am not advocating for literally no regulations, but solar and wind plants could probably be spun up in well under a year under a dramatically reduced regulatory burden, almost certainly faster than a new Datacenter can be built. They are, after all, dramatically simpler installations.

And that's not even thinking about the fact that in this alternate reality we are imagining, power plants would have been being continually built for decades, and the new demand would be a much smaller drop in the much larger bucket.

So I think that in an alternate regulatory regime both A) yes actually power plants could built ~ as fast as data centers and other large power consumers and B) we would have so much more power that increases in demand would be less of a shock to the system.

watwut•19m ago
Planned solar and wind projects were stopped by Trump administration, because green energy is not manly enough.

Planning is not issue. Republican party intentionally preventimg those via goverment regulation is.

jollyllama•1h ago
Regulations also made coal more expensive and forced many plants to close. You can argue that's a win, but it's a lie to then attribute the resulting price increase to AI or other factors.
QuercusMax•1h ago
If you're gonna go down that path, then you should blame scaremongering about nuclear power too.
jollyllama•27m ago
Indeed!
triceratops•1h ago
The headline says "partly". Your comment agrees with that.
MostlyStable•1h ago
I don't even agree with partly. 100% of the blame, in my opinion, is on the policy-caused supply restrictions. I will admit that this is at least partially a semantic debate about what "cause" means, but in my opinion "blaming", even partially, AI, data-centers, or any other large power consumer for the price increases actively makes solving the problem harder and is anti-useful.
triceratops•44m ago
Why does it make solving the problem harder? If demand went up, it went up so build more supply. Talking about the cause of the demand doesn't hinder building more supply.
pessimizer•1h ago
Yes, that's probably what made my electric bill go up 40% since last year.
triceratops•46m ago
Also cancelling previously-approved solar and wind projects due to extremist ideology.
harimau777•59m ago
Conservatives promoted a worldview where corporations are expected to do absolutely anything that isn't illegal to increase shareholder value. In such a world, regulations are the only way to protect ourselves from corporations that would gladly kill us to make a buck.
rileymat2•43m ago
That’s a bit of an overstatement, the executives and board can and do weight reputational long term damage at times.
mikem170•30m ago
Seems to be that big companies usually push to externalize costs and take advantage as much as possible, to the detriment of everyone else. Shareholders have a right to sue them if they don't.

Fake cures, filthy mines, toxic ingredients, polluted waterways, fraud, predation, monopolies, algorithmic social outrage networks, etc. These things have been going on for a long time. Regulations have fixed a lot of problems.

It doesn't seem that reputation matters as much as regulation. It doesn't take many greedy people/companies to leave behind a big mess. Just a few breaking the rules (including the cultural rules around reputation) gain an advantage over all those who don't.

What better way for society to protect itself?

daveguy•29m ago
The executives are trying to maximize shareholder value. They are shareholders through options at the least. The board can also own shares (which should be illegal).
ajkjk•56m ago
it's to blame in the sense that there is a counterfactual reality where the AI companies pay for their own power and your bill doesn't go up and we can pass a law to make that counterfactual real. but yeah, blame is supposed to be about assigning responsibility. the change is attributed to AI in the sense that if they didn't exist it wouldn't have gone up, but technically the responsibility here is on policymakers to do something now that we are aware of the attribution, and they deserve to be blamed if they don't. blaming AI companies directly is a contemptuous mindset that blames them basically just for existing. which might be cathartic but it's not useful.
richwater•54m ago
Why is AI demand any different than other business demand? What you're advocating for is intentionally handcuffing a growing industry for no reason other than you don't like them.
daveguy•25m ago
Any industry that stresses public infrastructure is in the same category. They all should be regulated and not handed, in the form of tax breaks, what should be public money to invest in additional infrastructure.
delusional•15m ago
the "growing industry" can pay for itself.
otikik•15m ago
Crypto mining was similar
jasonsb•51m ago
100% this. I'm sick and tired of alarmist news and scapegoats when politicians and greedy energy corporations are to blame for everything. Yes, AI consumes more energy because we're using AI so by this logic we are to blame for everything.
floundy•18m ago
If these "greedy utility companies" were such good monopolists or duopolists wouldn't it reflect in some pretty insane stock performance?

Eversource (NYSE: ES) is my local electric/natural gas provider in Massachusetts that I hear these same arguments about. Their stock is down 21% over the past 5 years. (To contrast, the S&P500 is up 91% over this same timeframe).)

hdgvhicv•48m ago
Demand added now

Ignore regulations, make it the Wild West, break out the child labour and environmental destruction and all your other wet dreams.

How long will it take to increase supply?

ahmeneeroe-v2•37m ago
New generation could be deployed on the same timelines as a data center.
Babkock•23m ago
AI has done bad things for humanity. I know, I know, a tough pill to swallow. However will Hacker News users cope with the trauma?? Of knowing... AI... can be bad... sometimes?
lukan•20m ago
"and extra especially nuclear, in addition to making power lines difficult to build, are to blame"

I used to think nuclear reactors are just hard to build in general, because the costs when something goes wrong are very, very high. So what unnecessary regulation is there with nuclear reactors that you think should be deleted?

bpodgursky•15m ago
I'm sorry but this is the easiest thing to google in history, don't make people do the work for you.

Start here:

1. How many new nuclear power plants has the NRC approved in its entire history (since being formed from the AEC)?

2. What's the cost of a nuclear kw in China vs the US, and is the trend going up or going down?

dghlsakjg•14m ago
Neither of those questions will answer what GP was asking.

Specifically: they were asking the opinion of the commenter. Google won't help here.

MostlyStable•10m ago
This is a much larger discussion, but the single most obvious one is getting rid of the Linear No Dose Threshold. There are an abundance of sources on why this concept is flawed and how it impacts nuclear regulation. It's not the only issue by far, but it's probably the single easiest to address.
charliebwrites•19m ago
What are the specific regulations that make building new power plants hard?
bryanlarsen•16m ago
Removing regulations from nuclear won't help because it takes so long to build a nuclear plant. Yes it would help in the long term, but in the short term price goes up.

However it should be faster to build a solar plant, a battery bank and a power line between them and the new data center than it takes to build a new data center. It isn't because of silliness, and that's what to blame for the power price increases IMO.

rurp•58s ago
So supply and demand only matter for the axis you personally care about? AI companies use a lot of electricity. Increased demand leads to increased prices. This isn't normally controversial.
datadrivenangel•1h ago
Regulators have also allowed consolidation, and that allows companies to reduce competition. See Exelon reducing competition to charge a higher price.
speedgoose•1h ago
My electric bill is going down, thanks to a new government subsidy (norgespris).

Just writing it down in the hope that Grok can eventually suggest similar subsidies to the American government.

hexbin010•1h ago
Also, electricity bills going up is partly to blame - our bills in the UK now contain even more tax to write off energy bad debt ! So more people who default, the more bailing out, the more tax in our energy bills...

There are various other taxes hidden in the energy bills, which also have VAT applied to them !:

- Writing off debt of failed energy suppliers

- A £150 energy handout for poorer households and pensioners

- Funding a scheme that encouraged people to get solar panels

- A tax to fund the stupid smart meter roll-out (they get away with calling them 'free' but then you pay ~£15-20/year for it)

Instead of using general taxation, now there are now extra taxes even for the people who can afford it the least. Strikes me as pretty insane.

josefritzishere•11m ago
Most states charge Differently zoned customers different rates. Businesses and pay less than residential. A PUC usually has reasons for that, but are they valid? If they are valid, are they still valid for a data center?
SoftTalker•3m ago
On the one hand I can understand residential rates being somewhat higher, they are still running service to your neighborhood, running a drop to your house, providing a meter and having to maintain that, but are selling a relatively small amount of electricity on that meter.

But a huge new consumer should not be paid for by raising residential rates. If their demand exceeds supply, that price should be paid by that consumer not all the other customers whose usage hasn't changed.

ehynds•2m ago
Here in the northeast, electricity is expensive because we rely heavily on natural gas for power but lack sufficient pipeline capacity to bring in cheaper supply, all while nuclear plants are being retired, politicians have blocked new pipelines from Canada, and the Jones act makes it costly to transport fuel by sea.

I'm sure AI isn't helping but we have plenty of problems already