This is an article I stumbled upon recently: https://medium.com/@saraswatp/understanding-scaled-dot-produ...
Apparently the author did not bother to do basic proofreading of the article even once before posting it.
Yet it showed up at the top of my Google search results. I guess that's the state of today's Internet in a nutshell.
entshitification at its best...
Even this article is mostly just tech gossip, even if it were human generated.
It was amazing early on in demonstrating what search could be, but frankly there’s not much reason for it to exist much longer.
The big players can, and are, just replicating its core functionality. The moat is gone.
I’d have to agree that they’re probably near the top of the list of companies about to get wiped out by a bubble deflation. Possible they get acquired by some sucker looking to establish AI creds but the market for that has probably passed as Wall Street is becoming super skeptical of all things AI at the moment.
Perplexity beats Google, ChatGPT, and Claude if you want an answer with citations and want it fast. Claude deep research is more thorough, but that's going to be a wait. ChatGPT web search is slower, uses few citations, and looks like more of the answer is coming from the model than the results. It's also possible that the quality and speed of Perplexity would vanish with scale and the only reason they look so good right now is because they have so many fewer users.
The mid to long term problems I see are:
#1 Google could cut them off from Youtube and a big chunk of their value is gone without recourse.
#2 over time the open web is going to shrivel and switch to paid or even die as ad revenue drops and bot traffic increases (already at this point probably, just countermeasures haven't been fully adopted.)
#3 goes with the previous point, more content is going to be AI generated and not fact checked which will dramatically drop the value of the output. This of course is a problem for all LLMs. Google may be the one who has a big advantage here given their advanced AI research and that they already have an index of the pre-LLM internet.
There are so many wrappers. I feel like companies that are propped up by wrappers will always be competing against basic features being released by <insert AI company>. Wrappers also just feel low effort.
That is only uneducated people. The ‘wrapper’ is the product people pay for. The ‘wrapper’ gets all the revenue.
> Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.
Perplexity is one of my first options for search (and superficial research) at this point.
They just signed a $400m deal with Snapchat. They’ll get acquired or something, worst case. They’ll be fine.
Edit: this might be an interesting case for Polymarket. Retail can’t be on or against private companies, but maybe a prediction market would be good for revealed preferences vs stated preferences here
zaphar•2mo ago
rs186•2mo ago
brador•2mo ago
y42•2mo ago