Perhaps CF could license it and slap it in their docs!
I actually have no idea how private networks with WARP are here, but that's a pretty big privacy downgrade for tunneling from the Internet.
I also consider P2P with relay fallback to be highly desirable over always relaying traffic through a third party, too. Firstly, less middlemen. Secondly, it continues working even if the coordination service is unavailable.
The specific term is: https://www.cloudflare.com/service-specific-terms-applicatio...
plantinthebok•2h ago
throwaway678339•1h ago
josteink•1h ago
But are you accusing someone of promoting vendor lock-in (cloudflare) while at the same time promoting vendor lock-in (tailscale)?
If you’re ok with vendor lock-in, shouldn’t you in theory be ok with any vendor?
bingo-bongo•1h ago
fragmede•1h ago
killingtime74•1h ago
comrh•1h ago
k_bx•1h ago
The solution we've found is running a white IP container (or VPS) which looks like regular Wireguard outside, while inside it "forwards" to your existing tailscale network.
I don't remember if we use https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker or https://github.com/juhovh/tailguard
Also see: https://tailscale.com/blog/peer-relays-beta