frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Cloudflare Global Network experiencing issues

https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/?t=1
2011•imdsm•5h ago•1325 comments

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Live in AI Studio

https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat?model=gemini-3-pro-preview
342•preek•2h ago•143 comments

Gemini 3 for developers: New reasoning, agentic capabilities

https://blog.google/technology/developers/gemini-3-developers/
229•janpio•1h ago•61 comments

A Day at Hetzner Online in the Falkenstein Data Center

https://www.igorslab.de/en/a-day-at-hetzner-online-in-the-falkenstein-data-center-insights-into-s...
41•speckx•1h ago•5 comments

5 Things to Try with Gemini 3 Pro in Gemini CLI

https://developers.googleblog.com/en/5-things-to-try-with-gemini-3-pro-in-gemini-cli/
38•keithba•1h ago•9 comments

Gemini 3

https://blog.google/products/gemini/gemini-3/
244•meetpateltech•1h ago•66 comments

Google Antigravity, a New Era in AI-Assisted Software Development

https://antigravity.google/blog/introducing-google-antigravity
151•meetpateltech•1h ago•86 comments

Strix Halo's Memory Subsystem: Tackling iGPU Challenges

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/strix-halos-memory-subsystem-tackling
13•PaulHoule•50m ago•5 comments

Google Brings Gemini 3 AI Model to Search and AI Mode

https://blog.google/products/search/gemini-3-search-ai-mode/
36•CrypticShift•1h ago•3 comments

Solving a Million-Step LLM Task with Zero Errors

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09030
17•Anon84•1h ago•0 comments

Nearly all UK drivers say headlights are too bright

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1j8ewy1p86o
410•YeGoblynQueenne•3h ago•389 comments

Short Little Difficult Books

https://countercraft.substack.com/p/short-little-difficult-books
79•crescit_eundo•3h ago•35 comments

How Quake.exe got its TCP/IP stack

https://fabiensanglard.net/quake_chunnel/index.html
343•billiob•9h ago•69 comments

Do Not Put Your Site Behind Cloudflare If You Don't Need To

https://huijzer.xyz/posts/123/do-not-put-your-site-behind-cloudflare-if-you-dont
295•huijzer•4h ago•223 comments

Show HN: Optimizing LiteLLM with Rust – When Expectations Meet Reality

https://github.com/neul-labs/fast-litellm
11•ticktockten•1h ago•3 comments

Google Antigravity

https://antigravity.google/
139•Fysi•1h ago•105 comments

The Miracle of Wörgl

https://scf.green/story-of-worgl-and-others/
94•simonebrunozzi•6h ago•49 comments

Gemini 3 Pro Model Card

https://pixeldrain.com/u/hwgaNKeH
379•Topfi•5h ago•249 comments

Looking for Hidden Gems in Scientific Literature

https://elicit.com/blog/literature-based-discovery
6•ravenical•5d ago•0 comments

Mathematics and Computation (2019) [pdf]

https://www.math.ias.edu/files/Book-online-Aug0619.pdf
40•nill0•4h ago•9 comments

Ruby 4.0.0 Preview2 Released

https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2025/11/17/ruby-4-0-0-preview2-released/
138•pansa2•3h ago•46 comments

GoSign Desktop RCE flaws affecting users in Italy

https://www.ush.it/2025/11/14/multiple-vulnerabilities-gosign-desktop-remote-code-execution/
43•ascii•4h ago•18 comments

Beauty in/of mathematics: tessellations and their formulas

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00036811.2025.2510472
11•QueensGambit•5d ago•0 comments

How many video games include a marriage proposal? At least one

https://32bits.substack.com/p/under-the-microscope-ncaa-basketball
302•bbayles•5d ago•72 comments

I've Wanted to Play That 'Killer Shark' Arcade Game Briefly Seen in 'Jaws'

https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/15694/jaws-arcade-video-game-killer-shark-atari-sega-elect...
19•speckx•4d ago•4 comments

Langfuse (YC W23) Hiring OSS Support Engineers in Berlin and SF

https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/langfuse/5ff18d4d-9066-4c67-8ecc-ffc0e295fee6
1•clemo_ra•10h ago

The Uselessness of "Fast" and "Slow" in Programming

https://jerf.org/iri/post/2025/the_uselessness_of_fast/
94•zdw•6d ago•48 comments

Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-aisuru-botnet-used-500-000-ips-in-15-tb...
451•speckx•23h ago•286 comments

The surprising benefits of giving up

https://nautil.us/the-surprising-benefits-of-giving-up-1248362/
165•jnord•12h ago•132 comments

Ditch your (mut)ex, you deserve better

https://chrispenner.ca/posts/mutexes
114•commandersaki•6d ago•132 comments
Open in hackernews

Gemini 3 for developers: New reasoning, agentic capabilities

https://blog.google/technology/developers/gemini-3-developers/
225•janpio•1h ago

Comments

wohoef•1h ago
Curious to see it in action. Gemini 2.5 has already been very impressive as a study buddy for courses like set theory, information theory, and automata. Although I’m always a bit skeptical of these benchmarks. Seems quite unlikely that all of the questions remain out of their training data.
aliljet•1h ago
Understanding precisely why Gemini 3 isn't front of the pack on SWE Bench is really what I was hoping to understand here. Especially for a blog post targeted at software developers...
cube2222•1h ago
Yeah, they mention a benchmark I'm seeing the first time (Terminal-Bench 2.0) and are supposedly leading in, while for some reason SWE Bench is down from Sonnet 4.5.

Curious to see some third-party testing of this model. Currently it seems to primarily improve of "general non-coding and visual reasoning" primarily, based on the benchmarks.

nico1207•16m ago
They are not even leading in Terminal-Bench... GPT 5.1-codex is better than Gemini 3 Pro
svantana•1h ago
SWEBench-Verified is probably benchmaxxed at this stage. Claude isn't even the top performer, that honor goes to Doubao [1].

Also, the confidence interval for a such a small dataset is about 3 percent points, so these differences could just be up to chance.

[1] https://www.swebench.com/

pawelduda•1h ago
Why is this particular benchmark important?
aliljet•1h ago
Thus far, this is one of the best objective evaluations of real world software engineering...
adastra22•43m ago
Idk, Sonnet 4.5 score better than Sonnet 4.0 on that benchmark, but is markedly worse in my usage. The utility of the benchmark is fading as it is gamed.
meowface•41m ago
I think I and many others have found Sonnet 4.5 to generally be better than Sonnet 4 for coding.
adastra22•25m ago
Maybe if you confirm to its expectations for how you use it. 4.5 is absolutely terrible for following directions, thinks it knows better than you, and will gaslight you until specifically called out on its mistake.

I have scripted prompts for long duration automated coding workflows of the fire and forget, issue description -> pull request variety. Sonnet 4 does better than you’d expect: it generates high quality mergable code about half the time. Sonnet 4.5 fails literally every time.

pertymcpert•38m ago
I find 4.5 a much better model FWIW.
RamtinJ95•25m ago
I concur with the other commenters, 4.5 is a clear improvement over 4.
spookie•54m ago
Does anyone trust benchmarks at this point? Genuine question. Isn't the scientific consensus that they are broken and poor evaluation tools?
mudkipdev•37m ago
I make my own automated benchmarks
ponyous•1h ago
Just generated a bunch of 3D CAD models using Gemini 3.0 to see how it compares in spatial understanding and it's heaps better than anything currently out there - not only intelligence but also speed.

Will run extended benchmarks later, let me know if you want to see actual data.

giancarlostoro•58m ago
I'm not familiar enough with CAD what type of format is it?
ponyous•55m ago
It’s not a format, but in my mind it implies designs that are supposed to be functional as opposed to models that are meant for virtual games.

It generated a blender script that makes the model.

bilbo0s•46m ago
Did your prompt instruct it to use blender?
ponyous•43m ago
Yes. I’ve been working and refining the prompt for some time now (months). It’s about 10k tokens now.
adastra22•44m ago
I would have used OpenSCAD for that purpose.
ponyous•40m ago
I started with a lighter weight solution (JSCAD) first and quickly hit the limitations. So I wanted to explore the other side of it - fully complex over the top software (blender).

I guess openscad would be a sweet spot in the middle. Good shout, might experiment.

adastra22•28m ago
Blender is not CAD. Edit: I’m not but picking. Totally different data structures and internal representations.
ponyous•24m ago
Computer aided design. Tree.js can be CAD. But I agree it’s not meant for CAD even though you can do it.
koakuma-chan•38m ago
When I see CAD, I always think of Casting Assistant Device.
lfx•33m ago
Just hand sketched what 5 year old would do on the paper - the house, trees, sun. And asked to generate 3d model with tree.js.

Results are amazing! 2.5 and 3 seems way way head.

ponyous•26m ago
Based on my benchmarks (run 100s of model generations).

2.5 stands between GPT-5 and GPT-5.1, where GPT-5 is the best of the 3.

In preliminary evals Gemini 3 seems to be way better than all, but I will know when I run extended benchmarks tonight.

srameshc•1h ago
I think I am in this AI fatigue phase. I am past all hype with models, tools and agents and back to problem and solution approach, sometimes code gen with AI , sometimes think and ask for a piece of code. But not offloading to AI and buying all the bs, waiting it to do magic with my codebase.
amelius•57m ago
Yeah, at this point I want to see the failure modes. Show me at least as many cases where it breaks. Otherwise, I'll assume it's an advertisement and I'll skip to the next headline. I'm not going to waste my time on it anymore.
jstummbillig•48m ago
I think it's fun to see what is not even considered magic anymore today.
mountainriver•7m ago
People would have had a heart attack if they saw this 5 years ago for the first time. Now artificial brains are “meh” :)
Kiro•47m ago
I agree but if Gemini 3 is as good as people on HN said about the preview, then this is the wrong announcement to sleep on.
redsymbol•30m ago
Why?

Not trying to challenge you, and I'd sincerely love to read your response. People said similar things about previous gen-AI tool announcements that proved over time to be overstated. Is there some reason to put more weight in "what people on HN said" in this case, compared to previous situations?

rvz•24m ago
Because either:

1. They likely work at the company (and have RSUs that need to go up)

2. Also invested in the company in the open market or have active call options.

3. Trying to sell you their "AI product".

4. All of the above.

m3kw9•20m ago
it's not AI fatigue, its that you just need to shift mode to not pay attention too much to the latest and greatest as they all leap frog each other each month. Just stick to one and ride it thru ups and downs.
fosterfriends•57m ago
Gemini 3 and 3 pro are good bit cheaper than Sonnet 4.5 as well. Big fan
mccoyb•52m ago
I truly do not understand what plan to use so I can use this model for longer than ~2 minutes.

Using Anthropic or OpenAI's models are incredibly straightforward -- pay us per month, here's the button you press, great.

Where do I go for this for these Google models?

kachapopopow•41m ago
ai studio, you get a bunch of usage free if you want more you buy credits (google one subscriptions also give you some additional usage)
mccoyb•41m ago
I see -- so this is the "paid" AI studio plan?

Does that have any relation to the Gemini plan thing: https://one.google.com/explore-plan/gemini-advanced?utm_sour...

?

kachapopopow•39m ago
that's for the first party google integrations - not 3rd party. ai studio just gives you an api key that you can use anywhere.
fschuett•35m ago
Update VSCode to the latest version and click the small "Chat" button at the top bar. GitHub gives you like $20 for free per month and I think they have a deal with the larger vendors because their pricing is insanely cheap. One week of vibe-coding costs me like $15, only downside to Copilot is that you can't work on multiple projects at the same time because of rate-limiting.
mccoyb•32m ago
I'm asking about Gemini, not Copilot.
Xevion•23m ago
Copilot lets you access all sorts of models, including Gemini 3.

https://i.xevion.dev/ShareX/2025/11/Code_9LWnDqpeCe.png

jstummbillig•23m ago
You were asking about the model. You can use the model (Gemini 3 Pro) in Github Chat.
mccoyb•22m ago
Got it -- thanks both.
dboreham•25m ago
Also Google discontinues everything in short order, so personally I'm waiting until they haven't discontinued this for, say 6 months, before wasting time evaluating it.
closewith•15m ago
Yeah, it truly is an outstandingly bad UX. To use Gemini CLI as a business user like I would Codex or Claude Code, how much and how do I pay?
deanc•51m ago
The AntiGravity seems to be a bit overwhelmed. Unable to set up an account at the moment.
jordanpg•44m ago
What is Gemini 3 under the hood? Is it still just a basic LLM based on transformers? Or are there all kinds of other ML technologies bolted on now? I feel like I've lost the plot.
meowface•39m ago
I am very ignorant in this field but I am pretty sure under the hood they are all still fundamentally built on the transformer architecture, or at least innovations on the original transformer architecture.
anilgulecha•34m ago
It's a mixture-of-experts model. Basically N smaller model pieces put together, and when inference occurs, only 1 is active at a time. Each model piece would be tuned/good in one area.
dankobgd•42m ago
every day, new game changer
hubraumhugo•41m ago
No gemini-3-flash yet, right? Any ETA on that mentioned? 2.5-flash has been amazing in terms of cost/value ratio.
clusterhacks•34m ago
I wish I could just pay for the model and self-host on local/rented hardware. I'm incredibly suspicious of companies totally trying to capture us with these tools.
lfx•32m ago
Technically you can!

I haven't seen it in the box yet, and pricing is unknown https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/r...

clusterhacks•16m ago
That's interesting. While I suspect the pricing will lean heavily into enterprise sales rather than personal licenses, I personally like the idea buying models that I then own and control. Any steps from companies that make that more possible is great.
slackerIII•32m ago
What's the easiest way to set up automatic code review for PRs for my team on GitHub using this model?
icapybara•26m ago
Anyone know how Gemini CLI with this model compares to Codex and Claude Code?
alach11•19m ago
This is a really impressive release. It's probably the biggest lead we've seen from a model since the release of GPT-4. Seems likely that OpenAI rushed out GPT-5.1 to beat the Gemini 3 release, knowing that their model would underperform it.
m3kw9•18m ago
If it ain't quantum leap, new models are just "OS updates".
bityard•18m ago
> Whether you’re an experienced developer or a vibe coder

I absolutely LOVE that Google themselves drew a sharp distinction here.