frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

CBP is monitoring US drivers and detaining those with suspicious travel patterns

https://apnews.com/article/immigration-border-patrol-surveillance-drivers-ice-trump-9f5d05469ce8c...
377•jjwiseman•1h ago•279 comments

Nano Banana Pro

https://blog.google/technology/ai/nano-banana-pro/
645•meetpateltech•6h ago•402 comments

Introducing Kagi Assistants

https://blog.kagi.com/kagi-assistants
37•ingve•1h ago•18 comments

Data-at-Rest Encryption in DuckDB

https://duckdb.org/2025/11/19/encryption-in-duckdb
60•chmaynard•2h ago•10 comments

NTSB Preliminary Report – UPS Boeing MD-11F Crash [pdf]

https://www.ntsb.gov/Documents/Prelimiary%20Report%20DCA26MA024.pdf
92•gregsadetsky•3h ago•107 comments

New Glenn Update – Blue Origin

https://www.blueorigin.com/news/new-glenn-upgraded-engines-subcooled-components-drive-enhanced-pe...
10•rbanffy•16m ago•0 comments

Mozilla Says It's Finally Done with Two-Faced Onerep

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/11/mozilla-says-its-finally-done-with-two-faced-onerep/
52•todsacerdoti•2h ago•29 comments

Run Docker containers natively in Proxmox 9.1 (OCI images)

https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/Finally_run_Docker_containers_natively_in_Proxmox_9.1.html
15•jandeboevrie•32m ago•3 comments

The Lions Operating System

https://lionsos.org
71•plunderer•3h ago•9 comments

Microsoft makes Zork open-source

https://opensource.microsoft.com/blog/2025/11/20/preserving-code-that-shaped-generations-zork-i-i...
295•tabletcorry•3h ago•115 comments

Android and iPhone users can now share files, starting with the Pixel 10

https://blog.google/products/android/quick-share-airdrop/
274•abraham•4h ago•204 comments

Okta's NextJS-0auth troubles

https://joshua.hu/ai-slop-okta-nextjs-0auth-security-vulnerability
161•ramimac•2d ago•52 comments

Go Cryptography State of the Union

https://words.filippo.io/2025-state/
86•ingve•4h ago•37 comments

We are replacing OOP with something worse

https://blog.jsbarretto.com/post/actors
36•ibobev•1h ago•36 comments

New OS aims to provide (some) compatibility with macOS

https://github.com/ravynsoft/ravynos
7•kasajian•1h ago•0 comments

Launch HN: Poly (YC S22) – Cursor for Files

31•aabhay•3h ago•30 comments

Free interactive tool that shows you how PCIe lanes work on motherboards

https://mobomaps.com
94•tagyro•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: How are Markov chains so different from tiny LLMs?

95•JPLeRouzic•3d ago•55 comments

What's in a Passenger Name Record (PNR)? (2013)

https://hasbrouck.org/articles/PNR.html
37•rzk•4d ago•10 comments

Show HN: F32 – An Extremely Small ESP32 Board

https://github.com/PegorK/f32
140•pegor•1d ago•18 comments

Freer Monads, More Extensible Effects (2015) [pdf]

https://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/extensible/more.pdf
61•todsacerdoti•6h ago•6 comments

Two recently found works of J.S. Bach presented in Leipzig [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hXzUGYIL9M#t=15m19s
61•Archelaos•3d ago•40 comments

Interactive World History Atlas Since 3000 BC

http://geacron.com/home-en/
266•not_knuth•11h ago•122 comments

New Proofs Probe Soap-Film Singularities

https://www.quantamagazine.org/new-proofs-probe-soap-film-singularities-20251112/
6•tzury•5d ago•0 comments

Show HN: My hobby OS that runs Minecraft

https://astral-os.org/posts/2025/10/31/astral-minecraft.html
79•avaliosdev•2d ago•11 comments

IBM Delivers New Quantum Package

https://newsroom.ibm.com/2025-11-12-ibm-delivers-new-quantum-processors,-software,-and-algorithm-...
43•donutloop•1w ago•13 comments

Red Alert 2 in web browser

https://chronodivide.com/
341•nsoonhui•9h ago•113 comments

Show HN: A game where you invest into startups from history

https://startupgambit.com
26•vire00•5d ago•14 comments

Theft of 'The Weeping Woman' from the National Gallery of Victoria

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft_of_The_Weeping_Woman_from_the_National_Gallery_of_Victoria
57•neom•5d ago•39 comments

50th Anniversary of BitBLT

https://mastodon.sdf.org/@fvzappa/115574872559813280
49•todsacerdoti•18h ago•8 comments
Open in hackernews

Mozilla Says It's Finally Done with Two-Faced Onerep

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/11/mozilla-says-its-finally-done-with-two-faced-onerep/
52•todsacerdoti•2h ago

Comments

netule•1h ago
Good. I really wish Mozilla would rely less on these shady backroom deals and open up to direct user funding. The Mozilla Foundation accepts donations, but they don't go toward funding Firefox; instead, they fund advocacy campaigns.

> Firefox is maintained by the Mozilla Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation. While Firefox does produce revenue — chiefly through search partnerships — this earned income is largely reinvested back into the Corporation. The Mozilla Foundation’s education and advocacy efforts, which span several continents and reach millions of people, are supported by philanthropic donations.[1]

[1]: https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/donate/help/#frequently...

dralley•1h ago
>Good. I really wish Mozilla would rely less on these shady backroom deals and open up to direct user funding. The Mozilla Foundation accepts donations, but they don't go toward funding Firefox; instead, they fund advocacy campaigns.

Yes, charitable donations go to charitable causes, not development of a browser which produces profits for a for-profit entity. There's no legal way to channel charitable donations back into a business. To do otherwise would be tax fraud.

This is not a "gotcha", this is a persistent misunderstanding of what is and is not possible in tax law.

kgwxd•1h ago
Is there not a difference between a charity and a non-profit?
PunchyHamster•1h ago
But then it would be possible to fund firefox development directly, just not get the tax break for it right ?
johannes1234321•1h ago
There are however two options available:

* Make the browser development the charitable work, or

* accept funding to non-charitable company

However Mozilla earns "enough" from Google, so they don't have to try to make either work.

alwa•46m ago
Why isn’t the browser development organized as charitable work?

From the Corp’s Wikipedia page [0]:

> As a non-profit, the Mozilla Foundation is limited in terms of the types and amounts of revenue it can have.

Is this an oblique way of saying they couldn’t take Google bucks that way?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation

hrimfaxi•44m ago
Yes. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/unrelated-business...
FuriouslyAdrift•18m ago
Then they wouldn't be able to pay their CEO $7 million a year...
pavon•17m ago
> Make the browser development the charitable work

They probably cannot do this. The IRS generally does not consider writing open source software to meet the requirements of a 501c3, for example [1]. They aren't super consistent about it so some groups have gotten 501c3 exemption in the past, but for the most part there is a reason that 501c3 open source foundations focus on support activities, conferences, and not software development.

> accept funding to non-charitable company

They could do this, just like they did for Thunderbird, and I wish they would.

[1] https://www.mill.law/blog/more-501c3-rejections-open-source-...

icepush•1h ago
You can make donations to a for-profit business. You just can't deduct it from your taxable income.
spelk•42m ago
I don't have any input on direct user funding for Firefox, but Thunderbird is also developed by a for-profit entity and accepts direct user funding with no charitable tax deductions as well. [0] https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/donate/

[0] https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/donate/

fhd2•41m ago
Exactly, and to my knowledge the receiving party needs to pay profit tax on them. It's called a donation, but technically more of a pay-what-you-want model. Several businesses do that.
ehutch79•30m ago
sell $50 keychains. done.
input_sh•28m ago
The corporation already sells user-facing products: Mozilla VPN, MDN Plus, Firefox Relay, Pocket (previously).

Feel free to subscribe to them to give money directly to the Mozilla Corporation, the future you're looking for is already here.

abawany•50m ago
it's particularly strange to see Mozilla engage in these silly machinations when the Thunderbird team has moved on to the model of direct user funding.
shellwizard•1h ago
I wish they would let users fund Firefox development directly and not Mozilla's own agenda
SG-•1h ago
how much have you funded?
stronglikedan•1h ago
Why would you think they have funded anything given that they clearly stated they are against funding Mozilla's agenda which is currently the only option?
starik36•1h ago
Browser development is done by Mozilla Corporation which is a for-profit entity. It's illegal to donate to it. This is by design of the US tax code.

You can donate to Mozilla Foundation (parent entity of Mozilla Corporation), which is a non-profit. But you can't expressly state that the money go towards browser development.

jonas21•1h ago
It's perfectly legal under US law to donate to a for-profit corporation. The donor just can't take a tax deduction for it.
alwa•52m ago
Do I understand correctly that the parent nonprofit Foundation can decide to use some of its donor money to fund its for-profit Corporation (with the same tax treatment as any other investment, and of the corporation’s profits before they’re returned to the Foundation)? But donors can’t direct their gifts to that use if the donors still intend to deduct them as charitable donations?

And thus I guess Foundation has to do a good amount of conventional non-profitty stuff like “education and advocacy,” otherwise it would just be a flimsy facade for what’s substantially a for-profit endeavor?

Why is the browser arm organized as a for-profit at all?

input_sh•43m ago
It's the other way around, Mozilla Corporation is profitable and those profits go directly to the Mozilla Foundation which owns 100% of it.

This idea that Mozilla doesn't have enough money to fund Firefox is just wrong, Firefox development is perfectly sustainable, it earns more money than it spends. If you want to give money to the Mozilla Corporation instead of the foundation, you do the same thing as with any company: you purchase products from them (such as their VPN or MDN Plus, both of which are owned by the corporation).

> Why is the browser arm organized as a for-profit at all?

So that they can make business deals with the likes of Google, which they wouldn't be able to do as a non-profit.

Edit: I really wish there was a single thread about Mozilla where this isn't 80% of the completely unnecessary "discussion".

starik36•32m ago
Right. It is legal. But in the tax code it's called a "gift", rather than a "donation".
drtgh•56m ago
This sounds extremely necessary, but what warrants the funds reaching such a exclusive destination?

I think that Firefox needs an exclusive non-profit foundation, but I don't think Mozilla Corporation/Foundation would allow it, so a fork with a new name (marketing problem) sounds necessary (although splitting the forces may not be a good idea?), I wonder if the current Firefox's forked communities could join forces to create such non-profit foundation, and start from there, making grow the developers under such non-profit foundation, the new main tree.

slabity•1h ago
Damn, I apparently missed the memo that the backend service for Mozilla Monitor was shady while I used it.

Are there any actual services like this that work properly? I've noticed whenever it indicated that a service has removed my data, that same service would come back online as having my data a few weeks later.

blakesterz•46m ago
Wondering the same thing, like is DeleteMe better? Or at least not like this thing?
201984•58m ago
"403 Forbidden" error unfortunately.
Steve-Tony•54m ago
Mozilla ended its partnership with OneRep (used in its Monitor Plus service) after an investigation revealed OneRep’s CEO, Dimitri Shelest, ran multiple people-search and data broker companies. Ars Technica +1

Despite this, Mozilla says they haven’t found a values-aligned replacement yet, so OneRep continues to power the backend temporarily.

ugh123•20m ago
> Onerep’s founder had created dozens of people-search services

How in the world was this not considered fraud, or in the very least - breach of contract?