Unrelated: yeah, this article is a little creepy, but damn is it interesting technically.
Do people not realize we're beyond 1984? In 1984 the tech wasn't always listening, rather it had the capacity to. Much of it was about how not knowing meant you'd act as if you were just in case. It was making reference to totalitarian states where you don't know if you can freely talk to your neighbor or if they'd turn you in, where people end up creating a double speak
Maybe in data collection, but no one's watching.
With AI, someone can always be watching you. It's really the killer app for AI.
Maybe I'm not understanding it, but as I get it, LLMs weren't really important: all they did was further interpreting outputs of a fronting audio-to-text classifier model.
You don't need them, but they are one way to do it that people know how to implement.
Identifying patterns is fairly amenable to analytic approaches, interpreting them, less so.
I see comments like GP's often enough that I think Apple just does a bad job explaining how/why it works.
Oh, I absolutely do.
There are also stats on the screen during tracking that ideally should appear as early as possible.
However, any system with a mic, like your cellphone listening for a "Hey Siri" prompt, or your fridge, could theoretically be coupled with an llm on an adhoc basis to get a fuller picture of what's going on.
Pretty cool, if an attacker or govt force with a warrant can get an audio stream they can get some clues although of course not probatory evidence.
device.sensors.enabled = false
have any effect for browser based access, or is this strictly the app?
chasing0entropy•2mo ago
https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10028982
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.13834.pdf
thewebguyd•2mo ago
Serves as a useful reminder that just because someone may not care if these companies collect this data now, they are storing it, sometimes indefinitely, and as technology advances, will be able to make more use of it than they were at the time you agreed to share it with them.
It's like all the ransomware gangs hoarding the encrypted data they stole, waiting for a quantum computing breakthrough to be able to decrypt it.
Not sure what to do about it, if anything, but the average person is severely under-equipped and undereducated to deal with this and protect themselves from the levels of surveillance that are soon to come.
skybrian•2mo ago
I was probably sitting in front of a computer.
jazzyjackson•2mo ago
Same with secure messaging. You might not care that [insert boogeyman here] know what you're doing all day, but people you interact with may be harmed by you being leaky.
Anyway, the whole point is your lack of imagination is not a good reason to embrace surveillance. Rejecting surveillance on principal slows down our descent into a panopticonical hellscape.
globalnode•2mo ago
I wonder what ad-tech or whatever org would do if we got to a state where they just couldnt track or id people. Would we still have free entertainment on the net? would the net even still be mainstream?
skybrian•2mo ago
fsflover•2mo ago
hexbin010•2mo ago