"Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master." - Commisioner Pravin Lal, Alpha Centauri
7e•23m ago
The second paragraph of the article contradicts the title. There, it is stated that the charges are against a husband for removing evidence (presumably circumstantial evidence) against his wife. Evidence tampering is always illegal, even if it is a box of ideological literature (which presumably would be used to establish motive).
spaceguillotine•18m ago
if they followed the content of the bible they would ban it for being anti-fascist too
WarOnPrivacy•38m ago