“2. No public road, within the meaning of the third paragraph of section 66 of the Municipal Powers Act (chapter C-47.1), or public park may be used for the purposes of collective religious practice unless a municipality authorizes, exceptionally and on a case-by-case basis, such a use in its public domain by resolution of the municipal council. For the purposes of this Act, “religious practice” has the meaning assigned by section 10.1 of the Act respecting the laicity of the State (chapter L-0.3)."
But going and reading the older Act respecting the laicity of the State[1] it doesn't actually have a section 10.1, so I'm not sure what that means.
[0] https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-l...
[1]https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/document/lc/L-0.3?lang...
It is fucking insane that the response to people blocking traffic in prayer is to outlaw prayer.
Secularism is giving equal treatment to all religions; this isn't Secularism, this is a thinly veiled, fanatical, Crusade against religion.
I'm a stoopid American but I thought Canadians enjoyed freedom of speech. Since they remind us they have Charter that protects speech. I'd like to know how they differentiate between public speaking and public prayer?
American levels of free speech is unrivaled, so to expect it to apply to other liberal democracies with "free speech" is indeed "stoopid American" thinking.
> Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/1n3608j/leslie_robe...
https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/1jfbsvl/warmington_...
Note the comments.
It is disingenuous of The Guardian to run an article without posting photos of what everyone is annoyed enough about to make new laws regarding.
Otherwise they will watch their rights get stripped away from inside a prison cell with their bank accounts promptly closed.
Canada has nothing like the free speech laws the US has. What they have is a cruel illusion of free speech.
It’s likewise a dirty trick to target a harmless cultural practice for a disfavored group and ban it for “everyone”.
> The province will also limit the offering of kosher and halal meals in public institutions. “We think that when the state is neutral, Quebecers are free,” said Roberge, rejecting allegations the law disproportionately affects minorities. “We have the same rules applying to everyone,” he said.
TIL: Quebec has a secularization minister.
This is all pretty horrific stuff. Does accommodating someone's diet really offend you this much? This is squarely an anti-diversity and anti-inclusion movement with a scoundrel's veneer of equality.
If I try to make you - a non-practitioner - eat that diet, then your reply makes sense. It's a personal matter; I don't get to force it on you or anyone else.
But if you try to remove the option of me being able to get food that fits my diet out in public? Don't try to justify that by saying "religion is a personal matter". That's an absurd rationale.
In the UK, it's becoming increasingly difficult to find restaurants whose meat is not halal. One could argue that a religious diet is in fact being forced upon those who do not practise Islam.
Should we ban people quietly playing musical instruments in public spaces to? Perhaps people walking? Certainly people reading books - they could be religious books or even, gasp, depict sex.
Out of memory, it is often times Muslims praying in the middle of a road or pathway to block other people for no reason than being obnoxious. And then as a reaction they will get this stupid law.
If people want to have a large gathering in the park to pray, they should, but with the permit because your occupying a large portion of a public space.
But as it pertains to suddenly kneeling in traffic and praying, I'm in full agreement. That should not happen. I'm open to people praying wherever they want, but it should not and it cannot arbitrarily inconvenience others specifically to block a road.
Why can't they step across to the sidewalk? Why must they be in the center of the road. This is not a rare occurrence, but I think it's the heart of what is being addressed. Even though they may be going at it badly.
In the US, we have a "See you at the pole" prayer event every year where people gather around American flag poles and pray, which seems like a nice way to gather together as a community to meditate and reflect.
xenospn•2mo ago
gruez•2mo ago
How does praying in public cause others to "walk on eggshells"?
xenospn•2mo ago
dwaltrip•2mo ago
sgarland•2mo ago
xenospn•2mo ago