frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

2002: Last.fm and Audioscrobbler Herald the Social Web

https://cybercultural.com/p/lastfm-audioscrobbler-2002/
46•cdrnsf•52m ago•13 comments

Hashcards: A plain-text spaced repetition system

https://borretti.me/article/hashcards-plain-text-spaced-repetition
181•thomascountz•5h ago•68 comments

Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (December 2025)

80•david927•5h ago•256 comments

JSDoc is TypeScript

https://culi.bearblog.dev/jsdoc-is-typescript/
31•culi•2h ago•38 comments

Do dyslexia fonts work? (2022)

https://www.edutopia.org/article/do-dyslexia-fonts-actually-work/
30•CharlesW•2h ago•26 comments

The Typeframe PX-88 Portable Computing System

https://www.typeframe.net/
77•birdculture•4h ago•20 comments

Developing a food-safe finish for my wooden spoons

https://alinpanaitiu.com/blog/developing-hardwax-oil/
91•alin23•4d ago•45 comments

In the Beginning was the Command Line (1999)

https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs81n/command.txt
40•wseqyrku•6d ago•14 comments

AI and the ironies of automation – Part 2

https://www.ufried.com/blog/ironies_of_ai_2/
187•BinaryIgor•8h ago•74 comments

GraphQL: The enterprise honeymoon is over

https://johnjames.blog/posts/graphql-the-enterprise-honeymoon-is-over
122•johnjames4214•4h ago•94 comments

Shai-Hulud compromised a dev machine and raided GitHub org access: a post-mortem

https://trigger.dev/blog/shai-hulud-postmortem
150•nkko•11h ago•91 comments

Advent of Swift

https://leahneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2025/12/advent-of-swift.html
15•chmaynard•1h ago•4 comments

Disk can lie to you when you write to it

https://blog.canoozie.net/disks-lie-building-a-wal-that-actually-survives/
25•jtregunna•2d ago•13 comments

GNU recutils: Plain text database

https://www.gnu.org/software/recutils/
44•polyrand•2h ago•9 comments

Price of a bot army revealed across online platforms

https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/price-bot-army-global-index
45•teleforce•5h ago•8 comments

Illuminating the processor core with LLVM-mca

https://abseil.io/fast/99
48•ckennelly•6h ago•4 comments

Standalone Meshtastic Command Center – One HTML File Offline

https://github.com/Jordan-Townsend/Standalone
34•Subtextofficial•5d ago•8 comments

Linux Sandboxes and Fil-C

https://fil-c.org/seccomp
326•pizlonator•22h ago•128 comments

Baumol's Cost Disease

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect
52•drra•9h ago•60 comments

Vacuum Is a Lie: About Your Indexes

https://boringsql.com/posts/vacuum-is-lie/
68•birdculture•8h ago•38 comments

Compiler Engineering in Practice

https://chisophugis.github.io/2025/12/08/compiler-engineering-in-practice-part-1-what-is-a-compil...
90•dhruv3006•14h ago•15 comments

Stop crawling my HTML – use the API

https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/12/stop-crawling-my-html-you-dickheads-use-the-api/
100•edent•3h ago•103 comments

iOS 26.2 fixes 20 security vulnerabilities, 2 actively exploited

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/12/ios-26-2-security-vulnerabilities/
95•akyuu•5h ago•80 comments

Efficient Basic Coding for the ZX Spectrum (2020)

https://blog.jafma.net/2020/02/24/efficient-basic-coding-for-the-zx-spectrum/
42•rcarmo•9h ago•10 comments

Apple Maps claims it's 29,905 miles away

https://mathstodon.xyz/@dpiponi/115651419771418748
137•ColinWright•8h ago•120 comments

Kimi K2 1T model runs on 2 512GB M3 Ultras

https://twitter.com/awnihannun/status/1943723599971443134
175•jeudesprits•8h ago•88 comments

Using e-ink tablet as monitor for Linux

https://alavi.me/blog/e-ink-tablet-as-monitor-linux/
243•yolkedgeek•5d ago•91 comments

Getting into Public Speaking

https://james.brooks.page/blog/getting-into-public-speaking
87•jbrooksuk•4d ago•33 comments

More atmospheric rivers coming for flooded Washington and the West Coast

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/12/weather/washington-west-coast-flooding-atmospheric-rivers-climate
34•Bender•3h ago•8 comments

I fed 24 years of my blog posts to a Markov model

https://susam.net/fed-24-years-of-posts-to-markov-model.html
276•zdw•1d ago•111 comments
Open in hackernews

Science Communications on YouTube

https://blogs.memphis.edu/awindsor/2025/02/25/science-communication-on-youtube/
35•azhenley•1w ago

Comments

vinceguidry•4h ago
Can't leave out Dr. Angela Collier: https://www.youtube.com/@acollierastro

Hopefully author reads HN.

andrewflnr•3h ago
She's very hit or miss in her quality IMO. Also, she's explicitly disclaimed the title of "science communicator", so she might not want to be on this list anyway. :)

I kind of wish they hadn't included Veritasium either. He seems to have gone downhill.

MPSimmons•2h ago
I don't know to what extent it has directly impacted his quality, but it appears that Derek sold Veritasium to a private equity firm

https://www.electrify.video/post/electrify-completes-majorit...

hermitcrab•1h ago
I can't imagine that is going to end well. Hopefully I am wrong about that.
the__alchemist•2h ago
Her content is mostly meta, vs science comm/teaching. I am really torn on her: Great communicator, funny, accomplished. Seems confident/smug?/conservative for a scientist. Something about her word choice and style feels more politician than learner/researcher. Not sure how to phrase this.
andrewflnr•1h ago
That's an interesting perspective. I definitely don't get a "politician" tone from her. Her tone seems very casual to me. Conservative in the broad sense, maybe (definitely not politically).
the__alchemist•1h ago
Now that you point it out, I agree. Not sure the appropriate analogy.
mat_b•4h ago
No mention of PBS Space Time? That show is high quality.
smokel•4h ago
Link for the lazy: https://www.youtube.com/c/pbsspacetime
gnz11•3h ago
PBS also did a recent live stream on the topic of science communication with some notable YouTubers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPKxk3s-8Yc
ThrowawayTestr•4h ago
Some people might take issue with the Veritasium recommendation. I think he's great though.
Workaccount2•4h ago
I was an avid viewer until he stepped in my area of expertise and leveraged technicalities, half-truths, and misrepresentation to really juice up the click-baityness and "wow!" factor.

My interest in his videos plunged after that, and it seemed like he was re-alinging for consistent high views over straight hard factual education. Frankly I wish I could purge him from my feed at this point (youtube still recommends all his videos incessantly, despite me not watching one for at least a year now. On paper I am the ideal viewer though, so...)

estimator7292•3h ago
On your homepage, click the three dots next to a video and click "do not recommend channel"

It's one of the very few things that actually work

AuthAuth•3h ago
Do not recommend channel doesnt work. It only pauses recommendations for a few weeks. I've selected do not recommend on channels several times and they still sneak back in.
dkdcio•2h ago
I highly recommend turning off watch history on YouTube. it stops recommending you videos entirely; just watch what you subscribe to
AlexErrant•1h ago
I have a dedicated Chrome profile/account for watching videos that I don't want infecting my primary account's recommendations. Right click, "Open link as".
quamserena•3h ago
He was bought out by private equity.[0] That’s why the channel is different now.

[0] https://www.electrify.video/post/electrify-completes-majorit...

Workaccount2•3h ago
Yeah, that would explain it.
rramadass•2h ago
This explains why i have been finding his recent videos somewhat disjointed/disorganized and titles click-baity. The quality of the content has most certainly gone down.
xvilka•57m ago
What particular area, if I may ask?
mmooss•4h ago
Who has time for videos? I know lots watch them, but wow - reading is so much more efficient. I can skip ahead - and skim - or revisit; I can annotate; I can save, transcribe (copy/paste), I read so much faster than even accelerated video can play .... and all so much more easily.

By sticking to reading, am I missing out on content?

Edit: Not a criticism of watching video, I'm wondering if I'm missing substantial things. If I didn't read, for example, I'd miss a lot that doesn't exist in video or audio. Same thing with podcasts.

jonahrd•3h ago
I'm a much more auditory/visual learner, so these videos work really great for me. I'm glad that reading works for you!
mmooss•3h ago
I'm not criticizing, sorry; just trying to understand.

I find video more compelling, generally. Obviously video has more ways to communicate - graphically, empirically, etc. It's not that reading works more effectively, but far more efficiently.

bane•3h ago
Let me turn your question around, what are the benefits of communicating science via video such that it's a very popular medium that people use to learn about science?
mmooss•3h ago
I think video is much more compelling to people in many ways (similar to TV vs reading a book), including to me. Part of that is seeing a person talking to you with all the cues of expression, voice, etc. There's a lower cognitive threshhold for engaging.

Video also has communication modes that text/print lacks: dynamic graphics and empirical video (showing the thing itself happening), audio, speech and expression (as described above).

With all that, I find it quite frustrating to see it consume so much time that could be spent reading and processing several things. How do others on HN - intellectually curious and serious, often busy - reconcile that?

Though my question is really, am I missing things by not watching video - things I won't realistically get through print? I mean high-quality things - I want the equivelant of a paper, review paper, or book by a professional in the field.

quamserena•3h ago
3blue1brown has great math visualizations. I find the top 10% of YouTube videos are worth the time over reading, and the bottom 90% are comparable or slower. Those are also nice though because you can put them on while doing other stuff, like eating or doing the laundry.
senthil_rajasek•3h ago
“I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.”

-Confucius [1]

For certain concepts such as Linear Algebra, for instance books allow me to "do" and understand. Which is why I read more than I watch videos.

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2826962/

griffzhowl•3h ago
It's similar to the benefits of attending lectures (or watching them on yt): there are more informal asides and intuition-pumps, and maybe more detailed explanations of intermediate steps in calculations than you usually get in books.

And for videos specifically, it can obviously help understanding in many cases to have animated visualizations

mmooss•3h ago
A good point. Personally, I've never liked attending lectures except for the chance to ask questions. If I must 'attend', I prefer afterward at 2x.
MangoToupe•1h ago
Lectures have the added benefit of not relying on video, though. You can consume them when doing chores, driving, etc.
freefaler•16m ago
For serious lectures (not story telling like history or other humanities) you can't be doing anything on the side if you want to understand. Try listening to a math lecture, or chemistry lecture while doing dishes :)

I found the same to be true with audiobooks, nothing serious can't be "just listened to". I've tried to "listen" to a good biology non-fiction on how live evolved from the primordial soup. Shit, in the first chapters there were covalency chemistry and other stuff that I needed to sit down and write to understand.

Too stupid to do it while doing chores I guess...

mmooss•6m ago
I agree about serious lectures, but ...

> not story telling like history or other humanities

Those are not serious humanities lectures. The serious ones are not storytelling, but serious examination of the evidence or of its analysis. There are far more factors, complexity, and uncertainty in an historical event or process than in a petri dish, and the event can't even be reproduced. It's impossible to use the same kind of scientific method and obtain the same kind of certainty, and requires far more critical thinking, judgment, and analysis.

What caused Andrew Jackson to be elected? There's a relatively simple story told, but the reality is enormously complex and uncertain.

andrewflnr•3h ago
It's not science communication, but I don't know where to find anything quite like Perun's content in written form. It's military/economics issues, often pretty granular, at just the right level of detail for an interested layman.
mmooss•14m ago
There are endless military and economic publications, from nonsense to easy overviews to serious research. What does Perun produce? Do you have an example?

(I can suggest some if you are interested and give me a better idea.)

rf15•3h ago
Who has time for reading? Audio content at least allows you to absorb information while your hands and eyes can be busy with other things: cleaning, driving, etc.

Besides, teaching videos and also books often share a common weakness: low information density. Youtubers and Authors both like to talk so damn much without saying anything. Give me a good story or documentation catalogue any day, but stop mixing the two.

mmooss•3h ago
> teaching videos and also books often share a common weakness: low information density

Here we agree, but for books I don't need to read the low-density material. Review articles, for example, are fantastic. Scholarly books can be overwhelming due to density x size.

> Audio content at least allows you to absorb information while your hands and eyes can be busy with other things: cleaning, driving, etc.

Not with high-density content, IME.

legitster•2h ago
I can watch/listen to videos while doing many other menial tasks pretty effectively (laundry, cleaning, washing, etc).

Also, some of the videos are pretty dang entertaining.

II2II•2h ago
I find videos are a convenient way to get an overview of something I'm interested in, yet not so deeply invested in that I want to learn it in depth. In other words, I can do the chores and learn a bit more about the world in the process. In that respect, I would say that reading is much less efficient.

If it is something I am interested in learning in depth, then I would agree that books are usually more efficient.

Well, with a caveat.

Some people appear to record themselves as they pursue their hobbies, then post it to YouTube. (Sometime's it's organic. Sometimes it's partially planned out.) In those cases it is a bit like a very one-sided mentorship. The host will either realize they're doing something that they would never write about, whether it is in a script or a blog or a book, then discuss it. Other times they don't make note of what they're doing, for the same reason they wouldn't write about it, but you see it because they are doing it. Written communication can be lossy.

mmooss•16m ago
> Written communication can be lossy.

That's a great insight.

jraines•1h ago
They are good summaries. They’ve essentially replaced low- to mid- depth magaize articles, and some of the high depending on the topic
griffzhowl•3h ago
For more in-depth physics, combining mathematical detail with excellent visualizations, the best channels I've found are

Richard Behiel, Physics Explained, Dr Jorge Diaz

For mathematics, I really appreciate the simpl but effective format of Richard Borcherds (Fields medalist)

https://www.youtube.com/@richarde.borcherds7998

panopoly•1h ago
> Richard Behiel

Behiel is to 3Blue1Brown as a popular children's cartoon is to its late sequel series that aged up with its audience.

Excellent work.

I especially like his more recent trend of going line by line through famous papers. EPR and Bell's Inequality to date.

zkmon•3h ago
No 3B1B?
xvilka•2h ago
List is incomplete without some other high quality channels already mentioned in other threads, but also Anton Petrov[1]'s channel, Sixty Symbols[2], Science Clic[3] and Artem Kirsanov[4]. Animalogic[5] certainly worth mentioning. And absolutely stunning Journey to Microcosmos[6].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/@whatdamath

[2] https://www.youtube.com/@sixtysymbols

[3] https://www.youtube.com/@ScienceClicEN

[4] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR2uRTQ53V_egXKFflMMaaw

[5] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwg6_F2hDHYrqbNSGjmar4w

[6] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBbnbBWJtwsf0jLGUwX5Q3g

ngruhn•1h ago
ScienceClic has extremely good animations. And it's run by some guy in his early 20s. He knows the physics, he can create these amazing animations and he comes up with genuinely novel metaphors and perspectives.
squeral•1h ago
I found it strange that StarTalk hadn't been mentioned yet. Neil deGrasse Tyson is my favourite science communicator.
thinkyfish•1h ago
An who can forget Lord Nice!
predkambrij•1h ago
I recommend "YouTube Summary with ChatGPT & Claude" extension, which makes it easy to copy transcription. Paste it in Deepseek or your favourite LLM with prompt "summarize in 1 paragraph" and then you can run TTS and you get idea about of the video in 10 seconds. You can ask followup questions, or to format it differently or get the reason to actually watch it in full.