frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

http://www.tinycorelinux.net/
298•LorenDB•7h ago•141 comments

GrapheneOS is the only Android OS providing full security patches

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/115647408229616018
331•akyuu•7h ago•111 comments

OMSCS Open Courseware

https://sites.gatech.edu/omscsopencourseware/
73•kerim-ca•2h ago•26 comments

Zebra-Llama: Towards Efficient Hybrid Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17272
15•mirrir•1h ago•2 comments

Z-Image: Powerful and highly efficient image generation model with 6B parameters

https://github.com/Tongyi-MAI/Z-Image
175•doener•6d ago•54 comments

HTML as an Accessible Format for Papers

https://info.arxiv.org/about/accessible_HTML.html
166•el3ctron•6h ago•90 comments

Abstract Interpretation in the Toy Optimizer

https://bernsteinbear.com/blog/toy-abstract-interpretation/
21•ChadNauseam•2d ago•1 comments

Autism's confusing cousins

https://www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/autisms-confusing-cousins
177•Anon84•10h ago•184 comments

Touching the Elephant – TPUs

https://considerthebulldog.com/tte-tpu/
132•giuliomagnifico•9h ago•39 comments

CATL Expects Oceanic Electric Ships in 3 Years

https://cleantechnica.com/2025/12/05/catl-expects-oceanic-electric-ships-in-3-years/
11•thelastgallon•1h ago•3 comments

Finding Gene Cernan's Missing Moon Camera

https://www.spacecamera.co/articles/2020/3/3/gene-cernans-missing-lunar-surface-camera
40•theodorespeaks•3d ago•3 comments

The unexpected effectiveness of one-shot decompilation with Claude

https://blog.chrislewis.au/the-unexpected-effectiveness-of-one-shot-decompilation-with-claude/
145•knackers•1w ago•75 comments

Linux Instal Fest Belgrade

https://dmz.rs/lif2025_en
135•ubavic•11h ago•17 comments

A compact camera built using an optical mouse

https://petapixel.com/2025/11/13/this-guy-built-a-compact-camera-using-an-optical-mouse/
222•PaulHoule•3d ago•42 comments

Infisical (YC W23) Is Hiring Engineers to Build the Modern OSS Security Stack

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/infisical/jobs/2pwGcK9-senior-full-stack-engineer-us-canada
1•vmatsiiako•4h ago

The general who refused to crush Tiananmen's protesters

https://www.economist.com/china/2025/12/04/the-general-who-refused-to-crush-tiananmens-protesters
80•marojejian•2h ago•25 comments

Mapping Amazing: Bee Maps

https://maphappenings.com/2025/11/06/bee-maps/
48•altilunium•6d ago•29 comments

Self-hosting my photos with Immich

https://michael.stapelberg.ch/posts/2025-11-29-self-hosting-photos-with-immich/
588•birdculture•6d ago•337 comments

Kids who ran away to 1960s San Francisco

https://www.fieldnotes.nautilus.quest/p/the-kids-who-ran-away-to-1960s-san
112•zackoverflow•4d ago•12 comments

Nook Browser

https://browsewithnook.com
85•ray__•18h ago•71 comments

Cloudflare outage on December 5, 2025

https://blog.cloudflare.com/5-december-2025-outage/
748•meetpateltech•1d ago•547 comments

Traveling Neighborhoods

https://supernuclear.substack.com/p/traveling-neighborhoods
6•surprisetalk•6d ago•1 comments

How I discovered a hidden microphone on a Chinese NanoKVM

https://telefoncek.si/2025/02/2025-02-10-hidden-microphone-on-nanokvm/
305•ementally•7h ago•89 comments

Gemini 3 Pro: the frontier of vision AI

https://blog.google/technology/developers/gemini-3-pro-vision/
533•xnx•1d ago•277 comments

Netflix to Acquire Warner Bros

https://about.netflix.com/en/news/netflix-to-acquire-warner-bros
1666•meetpateltech•1d ago•1277 comments

The Absent Silence (2010)

https://www.ursulakleguin.com/blog/3-the-absent-silence
67•dcminter•4d ago•23 comments

PalmOS on FisherPrice Pixter Toy

https://dmitry.gr/?r=05.Projects&proj=27.%20rePalm#pixter
179•dmitrygr•18h ago•27 comments

Perl's decline was cultural

https://www.beatworm.co.uk/blog/computers/perls-decline-was-cultural-not-technical
168•todsacerdoti•4h ago•204 comments

Schizophrenia sufferer mistakes smart fridge ad for psychotic episode

https://old.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1pc7999/my_schizophrenic_sister_hospitalised_hers...
447•hliyan•14h ago•404 comments

Making tiny 0.1cc two stroke engine from scratch

https://youtu.be/nKVq9u52A-c?si=KVY6AK7tsudqnbJN
139•pillars•6d ago•33 comments
Open in hackernews

Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

https://www.irishpoliticsnewsletter.ie/p/ireland-neutrality
51•arthurz•4h ago

Comments

jmclnx•54m ago
My first thought was "defend itself from what ?", but in this new ages of drones, I guess it could be an issue.

IIRC, doesn't Ireland pay the UK for some type of defense ?

_dain_•44m ago
Drones, and hostile ships fucking around with transatlantic cables and pipelines.

>IIRC, doesn't Ireland pay the UK for some type of defense ?

No, we do it for free.

TulliusCicero•43m ago
> defend itself from what ?"

The article addresses this unfortunate attitude: the whole premise of your question is, "well they'd have to go through these other countries first, so not our problem".

It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first.

But, as the article also notes, air and sea power are things. If a hostile power decides to fuck with one of the many undersea Internet cables that make their way to and through Ireland, what's Ireland going to do about it?

Animats•20m ago
> It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first

That's Spain's current position in NATO.

TulliusCicero•18m ago
I don't entirely disagree, but at least Spain does have some semblance of a real military, even if it's underfunded.
Spooky23•19m ago
The Russians have actively sabotaged undersea cables belonging or connecting to NATO countries. What have they done about it?

In general, states like Kansas are dependent on Federal money anyway, so they they don’t really contribute much. 10 states basically support the Federal government from a tax perspective.

jltsiren•10m ago
Kansas would probably spend very little on defense, if it was a sovereign state.

Defense spending is not virtue signaling. It's money countries may have to waste if they feel threatened. But if there are no credible threats, it's better to lower the taxes or to spend the money on something that actually benefits the citizens.

Ekaros•24m ago
What if UK would be one to invade them?
Animats•19m ago
Um.

See Irish history vs. the UK.

dontlaugh•14m ago
The UK already occupied the north of Ireland.
osiris970•37m ago
Ireland having 0 military capabilities, and being completely dependent on NATO, while being extremely opinionated, on how and what NATO does, always irked me deeply.
TulliusCicero•34m ago
Ireland nobly took a stand against fighting the Nazis in WW2, and they've been similarly brave ever since.
beezlewax•28m ago
Notably thousands of Irish soldiers did fight the Germans in WW2 but via joining the British Army... an act that was frowned upon at the times. Many were killed.
whenc•25m ago
And when they came back, they were blacklisted by order of the government:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16287211

hexbin010•8m ago
Jesus I never knew that. Shocking
TulliusCicero•24m ago
I don't dispute that there are many brave individual Irish people of course, but in terms of the country as a whole in matters of policy...
Spooky23•21m ago
Assuming you’re not just some Russian bot, which countries embrace the return of deserters?

Ireland chose to take a position against colonialism, after having experienced the warm embrace of the British Empire, ethnic cleansing and oppression for centuries.

TulliusCicero•13m ago
> Ireland chose to take a position against colonialism

By refusing to fight the Nazis? What?

Are you implying that the Allies were the colonizers in WW2? (The Allied countries were also colonizers obviously, but within WW2 it's pretty obvious which countries were doing more of that, and more aggressively)

reorder9695•25m ago
Ireland doesn't have 0 military capabilities, they have enough of a military to conduct peacekeeping missions elsewhere, which they don't need to do. They just don't have the ability to defend an invasion, but they do certainly have a military that does good in the world.
dralley•19m ago
Their "peacekeeping" missions are somewhere between utterly impotent / useless and actively counterproductive. Playing dumb and doing nothing while Hezbollah uses you as cover to launch missiles over the border from a couple hundred meters away is not keeping the peace.
osiris970•14m ago
Yeah, didn't they completely fail at stopping hezbollah from rebuilding, right in their backyard?
istultus•7m ago
That assumes that their mission is to stop anything. UNRWA's sole mission (like most large-scale nonprofits - not suggesting they're unique) is to continue to procure money for its 30,000 or so salaried posts.
simmerup•11m ago
Ireland have an army with no tanks and an air force with no jets.

How would they maintain peace in another country without the help of others

nradov•1m ago
OK so their capability isn't precisely 0, but it rounds to 0.
happytoexplain•2m ago
The implication that having military strength is a prerequisite for having opinions about international policy is horrifying.
missedthecue•1m ago
No offense but how is that not obvious by second grade. Don't have a big mouth if you don't have a big stick too.
TulliusCicero•35m ago
100% agreed with this article. The whole idea of Ireland's supposed neutrality is a farce. Does anyone really think that if a country like Russia decided to full-on invade Ireland, other European nations would just shrug it off? Of course not, and the Irish are well aware of that and rely on it (already they explicitly rely on the UK to help defend their country as a matter of policy).

So really it's a simple hypocrisy, a one-way street. You help us, but we don't help you. We're too principled to help others, you see.

beezlewax•31m ago
Except the Irish army has conducted large numbers of peacekeeping missions as part of the United Nations. Irish soldiers have died in said operations. The Siege at Jadotville is one example - there is a pretty great film about this.
TulliusCicero•17m ago
That's laudable, but it doesn't change the fact that they rely on their European neighbors to defend them while feigning "neutrality" and wouldn't return the favor if another, say, EU country were seriously attacked.
tonymet•26m ago
Nearly Everything consequential in history was unexpected, and for the most part we have a record of someone important saying "that will never happen"
throw310822•13m ago
If Russia decided to full-on invade Ireland, a country of 4.5 million (as completely absurd as this idea is, being Ireland where it is) having its own military would not help Ireland- it should better capitulate quickly to limit damage.
TulliusCicero•12m ago
There's a similar population ratio between the PRC and Taiwan I believe, so I guess Taiwan should just give up on having a military entirely then?

Not possible for them to stop China, so why bother? Just lie back and think of Ireland.

Avicebron•5m ago
Russia invading Ireland would be like China invading Cuba.. there's a geo in geopolitics for a reason..
throw310822•5m ago
If Taiwan weren't defended by the US (for purely strategic interests, certainly not because of idealism or democracy) then yes, sure. Better than a destructive war with the same identical outcome.

Btw, do you also happen to think that Ireland should arm itself against a possible invasion from the US?

dralley•5m ago
What? The very distance involved and difficulty of such an invasion is precisely why resistance is extremely plausible and not being able to do so is indefensible. Even a "token" amount of resistance makes it exponentially more difficult.

You would certainly have been the type of person whining about how Ukraine was doomed to fall in a matter of hours under the incredible size and capability of the Russian military. Like, these guys are just not that competent. You can make the job nearly impossible for them by just giving a single solitary fuck.

To say nothing of the fact that "full invasion" isn't even really the target. They just need to be able to defend their own airspace and sea lanes against errant Russian planes and ships.

sonofhans•29m ago
You know, there’s something to be said for Ireland’s attitude. The other islands (ha!) and the continent have treated them as second-class chattel for centuries, while competing amongst themselves for global hegemony. Better to stay out of that game and sort their own business, many of them think.
_dain_•26m ago
>Better to stay out of that game

The Russians are making incursions into Irish waters and airspace, it's just a brute fact. So either they play the game, or Britain plays it for them. They don't get to sit aloof above it all, that's not how reality works.

They are a protectorate in all but name, it's disgraceful.

AlexandrB•17m ago
Canada is in a similar situation. A lot of high-minded talk about peacekeeping and neutrality, but constantly benefitting from being implicitly protected by US defence policy. The real test will come if/when Russia decides to challenge Canadian arctic sovereignty.
TulliusCicero•21m ago
Ireland literally has a policy of relying on the UK to defend them.
cdilld•22m ago
I think Ireland's commitment to pacifism and neutrality is laudable. Too few people live here to be able to defend against attacks from a larger power, and Ireland's strong suit has always been diplomacy, anyway. That obviously annoys people who either (for some unfathomable reason) like war or stand to gain personally from increased defence spending. Fortunately, there is little appetite for the kind of militarisation that the author of this article is hoping for. I'll add, too, that societies organised around the sort of violence, hostility, aggression, and cynicism that go hand in hand with powerful militaries don't seem to be very nice places to live.
dralley•21m ago
There are legitimate practical issues with Ireland not being capable of policing its airspace or marine borders that don't go away just because Ireland is good at diplomacy (an assertion which I question in the first place).
TulliusCicero•20m ago
Ireland literally relies on the UK to defend them.

It's hypocritical mooching, plain and simple.

cdilld•12m ago
given Britain's entire history wrt Ireland, I'd say defending Ireland is the least they could do.
hexbin010•12m ago
Inability through choice, it should be clarified, given the title the poster or mods decided upon. Perhaps "unwillingness" is more accurate - they are a rich country after all, what with all that GDP
istultus•5m ago
Ireland is such a useful tax haven that it's within all of our interests to protect it </kidding not kidding>