frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

YouTube's CEO limits his kids' social media use – other tech bosses do the same

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/13/youtubes-ceo-is-latest-tech-boss-limiting-his-kids-social-media-use.html
60•pseudolus•2h ago

Comments

michaeljx•1h ago
I am sure the coca-cola boss limits his kids soft drink consumption too.
jasonsb•1h ago
Does it really matter? Even if a billionaire’s kid gets hooked on Coca-Cola or social media, they still have vastly more resources (therapy, education, support) to overcome it. Meanwhile, kids in underprivileged communities don’t get that safety net. For CEOs like Zuckerberg or Coca-Cola’s leadership, that disparity is just a small price to pay for the profits their products generate.
michaeljx•1h ago
It's part of the parental responsibility to provide enough structure and instill enough discipline to your kids so that they grow to be complete persons. Sure it will be nice if social media was restricted like tobacco, and I am sure one day it will, but you can't relegate all responsibility for everything to the state. I don't want to live in a bubble wrapped society for the sake of the children.
tonyedgecombe•1h ago
I expect Sergey and Brin run ad-blockers as well.
notpushkin•57m ago
What about Larry and Page?
rightbyte•1h ago
Ye and Zuckerberg plugs the laptop mic with a dud cable.

I guess most parents try to limit screen time. But some have a hard time doing it since it is a great babysitter.

I try to do a total blockade of YT at home for kids. Watching other kids be hypnothized by the feed years ago was enough. The algorithm seems to converge to unboxing videos and surreal spam.

concinds•1h ago
> But some have a hard time doing it since it is a great babysitter.

We should be clearer on what it means. An iPad will satisfy their need for stimulation but not their developmental emotional and social needs, nor their fine motor skills and executive functioning skills (and it likely harms the latter two, unlike old-school toys). Boredom and non-excessive stimulation levels are essential to letting the child’s inner world develop. Giving young kids iPads so they’ll be quiet is a normalized form of neglect.

politelemon•1h ago
It's worse, iPads don't satisfy the simulation but instead create a harmful dependency on it. I'll go as far to say that giving young kids iPads is a form of abuse that doesn't get called out.
concinds•44m ago
Significant emotional neglect will put you in the 1st or 2nd decile of emotional health. It can make you a total train wreck. I don’t think every bad thing needs to be abuse.
seanmcdirmid•25m ago
iPads are so easy to lockdown though, Apple did a good job on their parental controls. Roblox is the main brain stealer these days with a horrible social component, we only give our kid an hour a week now and even Thats probably too much.
seneca•56m ago
> Giving young kids iPads so they’ll be quiet is a normalized form of neglect.

I'd say it's closer to outright abuse. One of the better things you can do is a parent is seek out a community where this sort of thing is frowned upon. It's much harder to control when those around you think it's ok. I wish that were easier for people to find.

rightbyte•51m ago
> We should be clearer on what it means.

In this occurrence I mean "distract the kids with something such that they don't hurt them self, fight or destroy stuff so the parent can do X" such as doing the disches or resting.

Not like, great at raising the kids in some moral sense. In which YT etc is terrible.

I cheat on fancy restaurants and might hand the kids some screen (not YT) to give us a chance to finnish the meal. Stuff like that, but overused.

concinds•41m ago
Harm is a spectrum, but being able to sit still, and not harm yourself and destroy things, is a skill kids need to learn and using an iPad for that can stunt their growth.
leosanchez•1h ago
> Ye and Zuckerberg plugs the laptop mic with a dud cable.

Are you talking about Kanye West ? also can you expand what this means? "plugs the laptop mic with a dud cable"

myko•1h ago
What they're saying is these folks don't trust the privacy of their hardware, they use a dud cable to block the microphone from listening.

I think what they're getting at is people close to the situation (not sure why Ye is in the privacy discussion, but Zuck certainly is) don't trust the controls in place.

rightbyte•1h ago
Appearantly there is a mixup risk using "ye" between "Kayne West" and "yeah" I wasn't aware of.
kankerlijer•1h ago
I can think of a lot of reasons why someone like Zuck would be targeted for surveillance but the rest of us are fine.
markus_zhang•59m ago
It is easy to limit at home, but what if all of his/her friends are on social media? It is so difficult nowadays because many parents DGAF.
colechristensen•52m ago
A lot of parents also drug their kids A LOT to get them to behave the way they want, sleep the way they want. "Kids melatonin", Benadryl, essential oils (plenty of which DO have some drug effect though not often what is claimed)

An iPad addiction is arguably better than being sedated so you don't bother your parents.

mattgreenrocks•1h ago
All ages benefit from time-limited exposure to social media. We have a term for it now: brainrot. Fully convinced it is the cigarettes of our generation: ubiquitous enough to be pervasive despite negative externalities.
colechristensen•55m ago
"brainrot" is not used that way

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=brainrot

The best definition I see is

> the crippling addiction to low effort content

But also have seen it used plenty to refer to the low effort content itself

Brainrot is a small portion of social media

oersted•39m ago
I have seen it used plenty by younger people even in a positive sense as a genre label for the aesthetics and humor of their generation.
Thorrez•31m ago
>All ages benefit from time-limited exposure to social media.

As compared to what? To no exposure? Or to unlimited exposure?

elestor•20m ago
Unlimited.
Jaxan•20m ago
As opposed to unlimited exposure. There are also many adults that spend several hours per day on social media. It’s not good for society.
amelius•5m ago
In schools there should be a class about safe internet use and it should be mandatory to write an essay about the benefits children get personally from using social media as well as the downsides.
concinds•1h ago
Meanwhile “normal” (neglectful) parents give iPads or internet-connected computers to 5-year olds. They never stood a chance.
pj_mukh•1h ago
“BREAKING: Rich people can purchase adequate childcare”

Dig a little deeper CNBC.

Pooge•1h ago
Their point is that despite being the designers of such systems, they prevent their own children from using them. Akin to a drug dealer not consuming what he sells.
techblueberry•59m ago
Although I hate social media with a passion and would be fine if the government banned it outright, I don’t think this is a fair reading.

Do toy manufacturers let their kids play with their toys 24 hours a day and not go outside or do homework? Video game devs? Parents are supposed to help their kids limit their time in everything.

‘He stressed “everything in moderation”’

lesuorac•57m ago
I would expect an x-ray technician to limit their kid's time in x-rays.

It doesn't mean kids should never get an x-ray.

Sometimes moderation means complete abstinence but generally not.

websiteapi•54m ago
You cannot be serious with this comparison.
hamburglar•53m ago
Breaking: Willy Wonka execs don’t let their kids eat unlimited amount of candy.

See how uninteresting and obvious that is?

pj_mukh•51m ago
Personally haven’t met any parents who don’t know this already.

The problem is childcare not knowledge.

Thorrez•34m ago
>“We do limit their time on YouTube and other platforms and other forms of media. On weekdays we tend to be more strict, on weekends we tend to be less so. We’re not perfect by any stretch,”

>He stressed “everything in moderation” is what works best for him and his wife, and that extends to other online services and platforms.

>YouTube’s former CEO Susan Wojcicki, also barred her children from browsing videos on the app, unless they were using YouTube Kids. She also limited the amount of time they spent on the platform.

So they're not completely banning their kids from using YouTube. The current YouTube CEO uses a time limit. The previous YouTube CEO uses a time limit and limits usage to the YouTube Kids app.

Disclosure: I work at Google but not on YouTube.

concinds•33m ago
You’re the one bringing the conversation back to superficials (blaming society and stuff you have no control over) instead of digging deeper. You don’t need to be rich or stay-at-home to be involved in your kids’ life. Restricting tech use is common-sense and free. Books are cheaper than an iPad for each kid.

I’m from Europe. We have early childcare. Kindergarten teachers (I don’t know if that’s the right term) are still seeing obvious issues with screens and really neglected kids that the parents barely interact with.

petercooper•1h ago
Somehow we've not had the problem (yet). They get bored quickly and self-limit themselves, though we reserve the right to look at what they're up to whenever we see fit. Having lots of extracurricular activities might be helping, but my introverted, nerdy self spent way more time glued to a CRT as a teen. Hmm, maybe that's the secret.. having a nerd for a dad makes tech look uncool! :-D
adverbly•1h ago
This has been the case for a while. Look up Waldorf schools. Screen free.
dmurray•1h ago
I attended a screen free school, but back then we just called it a school.
hamburglar•27m ago
Careful. Waldorf schools have some great ideas but they’re also rife with crackpottery and are somewhat cult-like in many ways.
jswelker•10m ago
But they do have great salads.
mikeodds•1h ago
I don’t think this idea is that controversial? Most (?) people would agree watching YouTube 16 hrs a day is bad, but agree there is also a benefit to some of the content available.
dredmorbius•20m ago
It's almost as if ... being able to download specific content for offline viewing ... might be a far preferable option in terms of selection, control, and not getting sucked into an algorithmic wormhole.
websiteapi•1h ago
It’s not just about limiting - why don’t these people make it easier on the apps themselves to do it? We know why.
Waterluvian•59m ago
YouTube Kids itself has a parental locked section where you can set a timer. The rest just don’t feel like they’re meant for kids at all. And that leaves adolescents in such a vulnerable spot.
websiteapi•56m ago
The kids or non kids distinction is irrelevant. It’ll be clear once most of the world implements child block (which I personally disagree with). They’re gonna get decimated.
seanmcdirmid•27m ago
It’s more convenient to use Apple’s parental control feature because you can set limits in one place.
markus_zhang•1h ago
Just throw it out of the window. I'm not going to give my 6y son access to a smart phone until he is much older, ideally when he is in senior high school. The only issue is that his future friends may not have the same idea, so it's going to be extremely difficult when he grows older. Fortunately we have a mobile ban in the school, so at least they know this is not a good thing.
Forgeties79•53m ago
The problem with this approach is their peers. Prohibition culture does not work if it’s so easy to access it elsewhere. My parents learned this when they tried to restrict video games strictly to the weekends when I was a kid haha!

I find having conversations with parents at school and the parents of their friends leads to the best results (so far, I’ve only been at it a few years for my kiddos so we’ll see I guess longterm). If you’re all vaguely on the same page it just seems to make things a little easier. If that’s not an option, then just don’t be the first person to buy one and when all their peers start having certain technology you give them access too, but you sit down and talk to them about it or find ways to restrict the faucet.

For instance, when it became clear YouTube was not going to be completely eradicated from my house, I just ripped a few videos and added them to my Plex server. They get to watch a little bit of nonsense content, but they’re not just getting flooded with more of it constantly (or ads). As a result those YT videos are just one among several things they watch. It isn’t special or all consuming.

Video games have also been interesting. Most of the parents I know have, like me, adopted to use older stuff and/or just not let them get on the Internet.

Ultimately at some point you have to do some combination of “controlling the faucet,” watching what your kids are watching so you know what’s going on, and ultimately educating them/giving them context to the media they are enjoying.

seanmcdirmid•18m ago
> The only issue is that his future friends may not have the same idea, so it's going to be extremely difficult when he grows older.

Third grade and it’s already happening: My kid has already had trouble in his social circle at school because we made him cut back his Roblox time by a lot. It’s not even that anyone plays at school, but supposedly almost all the boys (and many girls) are playing after school.

RHSman2•42m ago
CEO of tobacco do the same. What’s your point? We sell things that are bad for humans. It’s a significant part of our global GDP
mrkramer•20m ago
Instead of teaching kids self control they snatch stuff from them left and right.
Xiol•15m ago
You clearly don't have children.
juujian•11m ago
On that note, I'm happy to let my daughter play switch, because it has the best system for limiting screentime that I've see to date. I can set a limit, and then I can increase that limit for the day or lock it down again, remotely from the app. Very streamlined experience, clearly made by someone with user experience. In comparison, on iOS the system is janky and the Chromecast it's close to broken (and feels like abandonware).

We built another object storage

https://fractalbits.com/blog/why-we-built-another-object-storage/
27•fractalbits•2h ago•2 comments

How exchanges turn order books into distributed logs

https://quant.engineering/exchange-order-book-distributed-logs.html
38•rundef•5d ago•17 comments

Java FFM zero-copy transport using io_uring

https://www.mvp.express/
17•mands•5d ago•3 comments

macOS 26.2 enables fast AI clusters with RDMA over Thunderbolt

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/macos-release-notes/macos-26_2-release-notes#RDMA-over-...
461•guiand•17h ago•236 comments

Photographer built a medium-format rangefinder, and so can you

https://petapixel.com/2025/12/06/this-photographer-built-an-awesome-medium-format-rangefinder-and...
72•shinryuu•6d ago•7 comments

Sick of smart TVs? Here are your best options

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/12/the-ars-technica-guide-to-dumb-tvs/
413•fleahunter•1d ago•354 comments

Apple has locked my Apple ID, and I have no recourse. A plea for help

https://hey.paris/posts/appleid/
774•parisidau•9h ago•397 comments

A 'toaster with a lens': The story behind the first handheld digital camera

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251205-how-the-handheld-digital-camera-was-born
35•selvan•5d ago•14 comments

GNU Unifont

https://unifoundry.com/unifont/index.html
285•remywang•17h ago•67 comments

AI is bringing old nuclear plants out of retirement

https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/12/09/nuclear-power-ai
17•geox•1h ago•10 comments

Beautiful Abelian Sandpiles

https://eavan.blog/posts/beautiful-sandpiles.html
80•eavan0•3d ago•12 comments

Rats Play DOOM

https://ratsplaydoom.com/
329•ano-ther•18h ago•123 comments

OpenAI are quietly adopting skills, now available in ChatGPT and Codex CLI

https://simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/12/openai-skills/
471•simonw•15h ago•270 comments

Show HN: Tiny VM sandbox in C with apps in Rust, C and Zig

https://github.com/ringtailsoftware/uvm32
164•trj•16h ago•11 comments

Formula One Handovers and Handovers From Surgery to Intensive Care (2008) [pdf]

https://gwern.net/doc/technology/2008-sower.pdf
79•bookofjoe•6d ago•31 comments

Show HN: I made a spreadsheet where formulas also update backwards

https://victorpoughon.github.io/bidicalc/
175•fouronnes3•1d ago•83 comments

Computer Animator and Amiga fanatic Dick Van Dyke turns 100

92•ggm•6h ago•21 comments

Poor Johnny still won't encrypt

https://bfswa.substack.com/p/poor-johnny-still-wont-encrypt
49•zdw•10h ago•61 comments

Freeing a Xiaomi humidifier from the cloud

https://0l.de/blog/2025/11/xiaomi-humidifier/
119•stv0g•1d ago•50 comments

Go is portable, until it isn't

https://simpleobservability.com/blog/go-portable-until-isnt
115•khazit•6d ago•92 comments

Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/eliminating-state-law-obstruction-of-nati...
163•andsoitis•1d ago•210 comments

YouTube's CEO limits his kids' social media use – other tech bosses do the same

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/13/youtubes-ceo-is-latest-tech-boss-limiting-his-kids-social-media-u...
63•pseudolus•2h ago•58 comments

50 years of proof assistants

https://lawrencecpaulson.github.io//2025/12/05/History_of_Proof_Assistants.html
106•baruchel•15h ago•15 comments

Obscuring P2P Nodes with Dandelion

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2025/12/08/dandelion/
52•ColinWright•4d ago•1 comments

Gild Just One Lily

https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2025/04/gild-just-one-lily/
28•serialx•5d ago•5 comments

Slax: Live Pocket Linux

https://www.slax.org/
39•Ulf950•5d ago•5 comments

The Checkerboard

https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/650-the-checkerboard/
67•thread_id•13h ago•24 comments

Capsudo: Rethinking sudo with object capabilities

https://ariadne.space/2025/12/12/rethinking-sudo-with-object-capabilities.html
74•fanf2•16h ago•44 comments

Google removes Sci-Hub domains from U.S. search results due to dated court order

https://torrentfreak.com/google-removes-sci-hub-domains-from-u-s-search-results-due-to-dated-cour...
182•t-3•11h ago•33 comments

String theory inspires a brilliant, baffling new math proof

https://www.quantamagazine.org/string-theory-inspires-a-brilliant-baffling-new-math-proof-20251212/
164•ArmageddonIt•22h ago•152 comments