frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: LocalGPT – A local-first AI assistant in Rust with persistent memory

https://github.com/localgpt-app/localgpt
135•yi_wang•4h ago•40 comments

Haskell for all: Beyond agentic coding

https://haskellforall.com/2026/02/beyond-agentic-coding
57•RebelPotato•4h ago•13 comments

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes (2023)

https://xorvoid.com/sectorc.html
256•valyala•12h ago•51 comments

Speed up responses with fast mode

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/fast-mode
166•surprisetalk•12h ago•158 comments

Software factories and the agentic moment

https://factory.strongdm.ai/
199•mellosouls•15h ago•353 comments

Bye Bye Humanity: The Potential AMOC Collapse

https://thatjoescott.com/2026/02/03/bye-bye-humanity-the-potential-amoc-collapse/
41•rolph•2h ago•26 comments

Total surface area required to fuel the world with solar (2009)

https://landartgenerator.org/blagi/archives/127
22•robtherobber•4d ago•16 comments

LLMs as the new high level language

https://federicopereiro.com/llm-high/
66•swah•4d ago•120 comments

Brookhaven Lab's RHIC concludes 25-year run with final collisions

https://www.hpcwire.com/off-the-wire/brookhaven-labs-rhic-concludes-25-year-run-with-final-collis...
73•gnufx•11h ago•59 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
180•AlexeyBrin•17h ago•35 comments

Stories from 25 Years of Software Development

https://susam.net/twenty-five-years-of-computing.html
172•vinhnx•15h ago•17 comments

Vocal Guide – belt sing without killing yourself

https://jesperordrup.github.io/vocal-guide/
319•jesperordrup•22h ago•97 comments

First Proof

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05192
135•samasblack•14h ago•79 comments

Vouch

https://twitter.com/mitchellh/status/2020252149117313349
67•chwtutha•3h ago•10 comments

Why there is no official statement from Substack about the data leak

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/05/substack-confirms-data-breach-affecting-email-addresses-and-pho...
17•witnessme•1h ago•6 comments

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

https://github.com/Momciloo/fun-with-clip-path
83•momciloo•12h ago•17 comments

Wood Gas Vehicles: Firewood in the Fuel Tank (2010)

https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2010/01/wood-gas-vehicles-firewood-in-the-fuel-tank/
31•Rygian•2d ago•7 comments

Homeland Security Spying on Reddit Users

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/homeland-security-spies-on-reddit
63•duxup•2h ago•14 comments

Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and working with Disney

https://spillhistorie.no/2026/02/06/interview-with-sierra-veteran-al-lowe/
105•thelok•14h ago•24 comments

Show HN: A luma dependent chroma compression algorithm (image compression)

https://www.bitsnbites.eu/a-spatial-domain-variable-block-size-luma-dependent-chroma-compression-...
40•mbitsnbites•3d ago•5 comments

Start all of your commands with a comma (2009)

https://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2009/commands-with-comma/
580•theblazehen•3d ago•211 comments

FDA intends to take action against non-FDA-approved GLP-1 drugs

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-intends-take-action-against-non-fda-appro...
112•randycupertino•7h ago•235 comments

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/
306•1vuio0pswjnm7•18h ago•486 comments

Learning from context is harder than we thought

https://hy.tencent.com/research/100025?langVersion=en
233•limoce•4d ago•125 comments

Where did all the starships go?

https://www.datawrapper.de/blog/science-fiction-decline
156•speckx•4d ago•240 comments

Microsoft account bugs locked me out of Notepad – Are thin clients ruining PCs?

https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/windows-locked-me-out-of-notepad-is-the-thin-...
144•josephcsible•10h ago•179 comments

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

https://openciv3.org/
904•klaussilveira•1d ago•276 comments

Selection rather than prediction

https://voratiq.com/blog/selection-rather-than-prediction/
34•languid-photic•4d ago•16 comments

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

https://github.com/valdanylchuk/breezydemo
304•isitcontent•1d ago•39 comments

I write games in C (yes, C) (2016)

https://jonathanwhiting.com/writing/blog/games_in_c/
189•valyala•12h ago•178 comments
Open in hackernews

CEOs to Keep Spending on AI, Despite Spotty Returns

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ceos-to-keep-spending-on-ai-despite-spotty-returns-2eaeb6b
73•1vuio0pswjnm7•1mo ago

Comments

mghackerlady•1mo ago
Breaking: Fork found in kitchen
nathanaldensr•1mo ago
If only we could stick that fork in the AI bubble and call it "done."
ChrisArchitect•1mo ago
url update: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ceos-to-keep-spending-on-ai-desp...
bArray•1mo ago
Archive link: https://archive.is/l6jpQ
steve1977•1mo ago
Most CEOs do what most other CEOs do, we haven't reached the turning point yet.
alecco•1mo ago
Most CEOs do what the board wants. And the board usually reflects shareholder primacy.
steve1977•1mo ago
I'm pretty sure shareholders are not too keen on spotty returns...
stocksinsmocks•1mo ago
You might be surprised. Disney is a pretty good example of activist shareholders undermining the value of their brand for purely ideological reasons. This is a little easier to wrap your head around when you recognize Black Rock-type situation where the custodians of the funds are able to take extraordinary personal liberty with other people’s money.
goryDeets•1mo ago
Yeh, cause they (the truly wise and savvy ones) realize it's not about fiat money (that's just political propaganda). It's about attention control.

Government will always financially bail out they who control the most eyeballs as it keeps politicians from dangling from capital buildings and bridges.

turnsout•1mo ago
Only institutional shareholders matter, and they're on the same page as the CEOs.
thijson•1mo ago
Jim Chanos legendary short seller talks about AI bubble.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1HrPsfUkbk

jordanb•1mo ago
Ironically I think Chanos got murdered by the data center boom. Back before his fund folded he was talking constantly about how data center REITs were an awful business by the numbers and they were an artifact of ZIRP because they were making small amounts of revenue on large amounts of capital. Longer term they were slowly losing to market consolidation by the "hyperscalers" (AWS, Azure etc).

His thesis was sound in a rational world but our world isn't rational anymore and his data center REIT short got obliterated by the AI bubble.

htrp•1mo ago
>His thesis was sound in a rational world but our world isn't rational anymore and his data center REIT short got obliterated by the AI bubble.

I suspect he might be a bit bitter about that one. He has also shorted tesla (rightly or wrongly) as well as Carvana

jordanb•1mo ago
His Tesla short was off many years before his fund closed and he pretty much said he wasn't going to bet in meme stocks since their value is so detached from any kind of objective analysis.

The problem for him (and muddy waters and other shorts) was the memification of the entire economy. If you listen to his data center REIT short thesis it was very sound. Data center REITs were not meme stocks and there was every reason for them to respond to economic gravity. There was a lot of inflow of capital during ZIRP leading to a lot of buildout, but with the end of ZIRP the low return on capital in their business was going to kill them. But then the AI bubble came along and everything within three degrees of bacon went to the moon.

ruralfam•1mo ago
M$FT increased 365 student monthly charges from $7 to nearly $20 per month automatically to cover CoPilot for 2026. Evidently did not inform the college about this. Just sent yearly charges for nearly $200 to gob-smacked parents. We canceled the next day. WTF M$FT.

They say you will get refunded in you cancel within 30 days of the yearly charge. We did so, but I am wondering if M$FT simply and reliably does the refund. Or will I need to spend hours on the phone talking to a M$FT AI Customer Rep trying to get what is promised. Sincerely... I would appreciate others experience. I could do a charge-back in the next few days if the "promised, easy route" is not available. TIA, RF

benterix•1mo ago
My kid needed Windows and Office for school. I went through the pain of installing the system for her while avoiding creating a Microsoft account. As for Office, I bought a perpetual license. I believe these are the last months while these two options are still available.
giancarlostoro•1mo ago
> while avoiding creating a Microsoft account

They're going to eventually make it so the entire OS squawks if you aren't on a Microsoft account.

Der_Einzige•1mo ago
The “AI is in a bubble crowd” still has no answer to “why didn’t the tech bubble pop in 2022?”

Snowflake bought streanlit (a bad python UI/UX) for 800 million in 2022. I still have not seen a single deal even close to that bad post 2023, and especially post interest rate hikes.

https://datafortune.com/snowflake-acquires-streamlit-for-usd...

Actually investing in AI is smart and will deliver unfathomable ROI. AI bears deserve to reap what they (don’t) sow.

0x3f•1mo ago
> The “AI is in a bubble crowd” still has no answer to “why didn’t the tech bubble pop in 2022?”

Are these things related? Why is the tech bubble popping in 2022 a necessary condition for current AI hype being a bubble?

JohnMakin•1mo ago
unfathomable. The imagination has no limits. It could be billions, trillions even! The fact we do not know only means we don't know how high the ceiling can be. It could even be gazillions!
layer8•1mo ago
Many people are saying this!
NikolaNovak•1mo ago
"It could even be a boat!" :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZpIog7e-R4

ceejayoz•1mo ago
> The “AI is in a bubble crowd” still has no answer to “why didn’t the tech bubble pop in 2022?”

I mean, the Fed funds rate was at 0.25%. Free money helps, for a while.

SpicyLemonZest•1mo ago
The answer seems very straightforward? The bubble did pop, as you can clearly see in a number of stocks like Comcast. But OpenAI also released a genuinely impressive innovation in ChatGPT, which reinflated it for AI and AI-adjacent companies. Whenever the next recession comes, investors will start to ask more serious questions about whether another ChatGPT-level innovation is on the way, and even from my relatively AI-sympathetic stance the answer seems to be no.
paulglx•1mo ago
https://archive.ph/l6jpQ
bArray•1mo ago
> After a year in which trillions of dollars worth of AI investments buoyed global markets and the economy, 68% of CEOs plan to spend even more on AI in 2026

They are too far in to turn back. They got into AI via fear of missing out (FOMO) and now they are too heavily invested to write it off on their balance sheet. To revert now would cause nothing but trouble.

> Less than half of current AI projects had generated more in returns than they had cost, respondents said. They reported the most success using AI in marketing and customer service and challenges using it in higher-risk areas such as security, legal and human resources.

I.e., the best success has been in cutting jobs, not in aiding the productivity of individuals.

ryandrake•1mo ago
The promise of being able to run a business without having to employ people is just too alluring to these guys. They feel like they're nearly on the cusp of it: Like any day now, the technology will be there, and it can just be AI + robots, and the C-suite and shareholders can just pocket all the returns. No more pesky bags of meat to feed and clothe. You can feel it--they are absolutely salivating over the idea. "If we can just get rid of the need for human labor, Line Will Go Up forever!"
nathanaldensr•1mo ago
Then they can stand alone on a pile of ashes at The End of the World and then see how much happiness their "money" bought them.
palmotea•1mo ago
> Then they can stand alone on a pile of ashes at The End of the World and then see how much happiness their "money" bought them.

Like the book "Don't Create the Torment Nexus," the wisdom of this cartoon is an inspiration to business leaders everywhere who know that shareholder value is paramount:

https://condenaststore.com/featured/the-planet-got-destroyed...

spwa4•1mo ago
The whole history of AI from at least the 1930s happened in waves, and each wave could be accurately summarized by what you just said. Oh, and add Bitcoin with the same logic.

But it never happened. None of the AI waves, not perceptrons, not "deep neural networks", not RNNs, not support vector machines, not ... made zero-human companies possible, or even less-human companies, in contrast to buying from China I might add, and other nations before China.

Borborygymus•1mo ago
I concur.
turnsout•1mo ago
Having seen a lot of AI-generated ads, I'm so skeptical that AI is actually improving marketing metrics. Every time I see one of these abominations on YouTube I think "is this working for you?"

With that said, I'm long-term bullish on AI. A lot of companies will over invest, just as they did during the dot-com bubble. But some of those investments will actually pay off, because this technology is not going anywhere.

msdz•1mo ago
Regarding your first paragraph, I've even talked with people who go out of their way to actively _avoid_ said product after encountering AI-generated advertising. So that'll probably continue to have an effect for as long as average people with good eyes can still distinguish "AI"/generative media from "real"/traditional footage.
turnsout•1mo ago
I have observed this as well, and we've already seen some pushback when major brands use AI in their creative. I wonder if we're entering an era where AI will actually taint a brand.
rsynnott•1mo ago
Measuring the effectiveness of ad campaigns, particularly in the short term, is notoriously difficult. They likely mostly don't _know_ if it's working at this point (though, yeah, I'd kind of assume it isn't.)
turnsout•1mo ago
Really? It shouldn't be difficult to measure the performance of a YouTube campaign. There are very clear metrics related to watch time, CTR and conversion rate (if applicable).
bArray•1mo ago
> Having seen a lot of AI-generated ads, I'm so skeptical that AI is actually improving marketing metrics.

I'm sure that firing tonnes of marketing people for prompt engineers will be a good return on investment... Perhaps it reveals something deeper - which is that a 30 second Youtube ad doesn't generate that much revenue at all.

> With that said, I'm long-term bullish on AI

In the long run, yes. But a lot of people will end up losing their shirts over this.

turnsout•1mo ago
> But a lot of people will end up losing their shirts over this.

Oh absolutely. In particular, it's hard for me to see a path forward for OpenAI. If they implode, it will be a tsunami.

riku_iki•1mo ago
> Having seen a lot of AI-generated ads, I'm so skeptical that AI is actually improving marketing metrics. Every time I see one of these abominations on YouTube I think "is this working for you?"

they likely track conversions, so someone is clicking and buying.

empiko•1mo ago
> Less than half of current AI projects had generated more in returns than they had cost, respondents said.

Compares to non-AI software, is this a bad number?

ahartmetz•1mo ago
Zero is technically a number smaller than 0.5
bob1029•1mo ago
I believe we will see breakthrough success in the B2B/SaaS market sometime in 2026. I am getting an uneasy feeling regarding the notion of a bubble. By most accounts it should have popped by now. I am still using the LLM tech on a daily basis. It definitely adds value. Concerns like whether or not a human needs to be in the loop seem practically irrelevant at this point. Applying this value through productized channels is only a matter of time.

That said, the B2C AI market is a joke compared to the B2B market. Consumer AI use is an undeterminable black hole of money. All the bubble talk does make sense in context of normal-ass people using ChatGPT on their phones all day. Advertising is the only possible application for this market and it's already incredibly saturated.

chasd00•1mo ago
Don't forget, the bubble talk is more around "AGI is right around the corner, don't get left out!" and not so much the application of an LLM to business process flows. There's definitely value in some use cases to using an LLM but I don't see the massive bets on AGI paying off in timelines Wall St. is comfortable with. Further, my feeling is the AGI promise and investment is what is keeping some of the model providers in business. From what I understand, inference cost per user doesn't scale the way a webserver does. With an LLM, more users means significantly more infrastructure cost and Google, Meta, MSoft can afford to run/train models at a loss because they get revenue elsewhere but not everyone is in that boat.
tarsinge•1mo ago
Yes the problem is not whether LLM have value, but whether they will add enough value in the next two three years to pay for the hundred of billions of trillions needed to match the expectations. OpenAI has to find more than a trillion by the end of the decade, project Stargate still has 500 billions to find, etc. Also add fast depreciation on everything invested. The ZIRP playbook of building a monopoly for years before turning a profit cannot work here, models are commoditizing fast so no moat there either, and capabilities as a function of compute have plateaued.
victor106•1mo ago
https://x.com/i/status/1999124665801880032
spwa4•1mo ago
404 page not found?