A quick search didn't turn up anything about the model's skill or resolution, though I'm sure the data exists.
One of the big benefits of both the single run and ensemble AIGFS models is the speed and (less) computation time required. Weather modeling is hard and these models should be used as complementary to deterministic models as they all have their own strengths and weaknesses. They run at the same 0.25 degree resolution as the ECMWF AIFS models which were introduced earlier this year and have been successful[4].
[1] https://www.weatherbell.com/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47HDk2BQMjU
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCQBgU0pPME
[4] https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/aifs-machine-lear...
> so what’s AI about this that wasn’t AI previously?
The weather models used today are physics-based numerical models. The machine learning models from DeepMind, ECMWF, Huawei and others are a big shift from the standard, numerical approach used for the last decades.
This makes me skeptical that it isn’t just politicized Trumpian nonsense.
margalabargala•1h ago
username223•1h ago
akdev1l•1h ago
RHSeeger•34m ago
idontwantthis•1h ago
trueismywork•22m ago
sigmar•31m ago
[1] https://github.com/google-deepmind/graphcast
lynndotpy•19m ago
Even before LLMs got big, a lot of machine learning research being published were models which underperformed SOTA (which was the case for weather modeling for a long time!) or models which are far far larger than they need to be (e.g. this [1] Nature paper using 'deep learning' for aftershock prediction being bested by this [2] Nature paper using one neuron.
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0438-y
[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1582-8
Legend2440•27m ago
adamweld•6m ago
astrange•56s ago
(It's an autoregressive GNN plus a diffusion model.)
lukeschlather•27m ago