The PCI-Express bus is actually rather slow. Only ~63 GB/s, even with PCIe 5 x16!
PCIe is simply not a bottleneck for gaming. All the textures and models are loaded into the GPU once, when the game loads, then re-used from VRAM for every frame. Otherwise, a scene with a lowly 2 GB of assets would cap out at only ~30 fps.
Which is funny to think about historically. I remember when AGP first came out, and it was advertised as making it so GPUs wouldn't need tons of memory, only enough for the frame buffers, and that they would stream texture data across AGP. Well, the demands for bandwidth couldn't keep up. And now, even if the port itself was fast enough, the system RAM wouldn't be. DDR5-6400 running in dual-channel mode is only ~102 GB/s. On the flip side the RTX 5050, a current-gen budget card, has over 3x that at 320 GB/s, and on the top end, the RTX 5090 is 1.8 TB/s.
I wish it was possible to put several M.2 drives in a system and RAID them all up, like you can with SATA drives on any above-average motherboard. Even a single lane of PCIe 5.0 would be more than enough for each of those drives, because each drive won't need to work as hard. Less overheating, more redundancy, and cheaper than getting a small number of super fast high capacity drives. Alas, most mobos only seem to hand out lanes in multiples of 4.
Maybe one day we'll have so many PCIe lanes that we can hand them out like candy to a dozen storage devices and have some left to power a decent GPU. Still, it feels wasteful.
When did the GHz race start again?
Leaks = the author just made something up, but now it ranks extra highly when someone searches for "[upcoming thing] leaks"
Now, it's either a fancy term for "announcement", or people use it synonymously with "rumor".
https://chipsandcheese.com/p/telum-ii-at-hot-chips-2024-main...
https://www.eecg.utoronto.ca/~moshovos/ACA07/projectsuggesti...
(if you do ML things you might recognize Doug Burger's name on the authors line of the second one)
magicalhippo•2h ago
Pet_Ant•1h ago
Ritewut•1h ago
0cf8612b2e1e•1h ago
(Ignore my AM5 workstation with 192GB RAM in the corner)
imtringued•1h ago
0cf8612b2e1e•56m ago
glitchc•43m ago
bikelang•57m ago
In fact my wife is still rocking that machine - although her gaming needs are much less equipment intense than mine. After a small refurb I gave it (new case, new air cooler, new PSU) - I expect it to last another 5 years for her.
ocdtrekkie•10m ago
My new one is a 9700X. Didn't feel the need to spring for higher power budget for a marginal gaming performance bump. But I suppose that also means it's much more practical for me to jump to a newer CPU later.
Sohcahtoa82•48m ago
I'm a gamer, often playing games that need a BEEFY CPU, like MS Flight Simulator. My upgrade from an i9-9900K to a Ryzen 9800X3D was noticeable.
johnbellone•37m ago
0cf8612b2e1e•28m ago
Pet_Ant•1h ago
Macha•1h ago
PunchyHamster•48m ago
parineum•52m ago
Only if they overestimate demand and overproduce CPUs. Otherwise it will lead to higher prices because there's less economy of scale.
FootballMuse•48m ago
https://overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/amd-extends-am5-l...
XCSme•5m ago
Something like 5900x on 2nm or 4nm