Did it make no difference when you mentioned in your AGENT.md which LSP servers are installed?

Have you figured out what triggers it?

Thanks! I saw typescript-lsp in the plugins list, but I wasn't sure if that was related.

If you want to add custom lsps, they need to be wrapped in a Claude code plugin which is where the little bit of actual documentation can be found https://code.claude.com/docs/en/plugins-reference

Yeah, I posted here because I was completely blindsided when my claude asked if I wanted to install a go lsp. I didnt even know that was a thing. A little googling led to this changelog from 3 days ago, but I was surprised I hadnt seen any previous mentions of this online (from either creators, anthropic, or HN posts).

I am disabling it for now since my flow is fine at the moment, I'll let others validate the usefulness first.

Your test suite and linter don't code. They don't help your agent look up definitions of variables, etc.

The same reason you want an LSP in your editor: so you get inline docs and error messages, autocomplete, jump to definition, refactoring actions etc.

I came here just to say that. The commit history on that changelog blew me away.

Are you having a positive experience with Codex compared to Claude Code? Codex in my brief experience was... not good w/ 5.1

Interesting to see that you work at OpenAI but had to build a skill like this yourself.

Surprised that you don't have internal tools or skills that could do this already!

Shows how much more work there is still to be done in this space.

Every once in a while it runs 'sudo rm -rf /'.

I believe it’s to do with supporting shift+enter (to do multiline prompts).

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/1259#issuec...

There's pyright-lsp. Isn't this a Python LSP ? or is it lacking important features ?

It's a shame that my company tied itself to claude-code way too fast. It was like a single week last summer of, "oh what's everyone's favorite? claude? okay, let's go!"

OpenCode has been truely innovating in this space and is actually open source, and would naturally fit into custom corporate LLM proxies. Yet, now we've built so many unrulely wrappers and tools around claude-code's proprietary binary just to sandbox it, and use it with our proxy, that now I fear it's too late to walk back.

Not sure how OpenCode can break through this barrier, but I'm an internal advocate for it. For hobby projects, it's definitely my goto tool.

OpenCode is so underrated.

One of my favorite features is that you can run it as a server, and then it has a API and SDKs to manage sessions etc.

Great to build a centrally managed agent for your team.

Uninstall it and install it via home brew fixed it for me.

I have the same issue since for ever (and update by hand because of it). I always assumed it is because it gets confused by me using Volta for node/npm version management and Volta‘s shim masking where Claude Code is globally installed.

Depends on your installation method. I have CC installed on macOS with `bun install` and it self-updates. But you could have different results with, oh, npm or yarn or homebrew or nix or probably asdfvm or maybe there’s a native .pkg I don’t know about or…you get the idea.

Yeah, I uninstalled and reinstalled with homebrew, and it’s working well now.

Always have a lot of sessions running locally and don’t recall this

Jetbrainz needs to give up on Junie and their in house ai and focus on integrating with the established tools. If they don’t, VS code will consume them.

there is a jetbrains MCP server that gives Claude Code access to this sort of thing, but I think its still fairly jank and bloats context.

I think they are completely screwing up the AI integration.

After years of JetBrains PyCharm pro I'm seriously considering switch to cursor. Before supermaven being acquired, pycharm+supermaven was feeling like having superpowers ... i really wish they will manage to somehow catch up, otherwise the path is written: crisis, being acquired by some big corp, enshitification.

People keep saying how amazing IntelliJ is at refactoring, but then you realize the talk about "rename thing" and "extract function".

This is 5% of what refactoring is, the rest is big scale re-architecting code where these tools are useless.

The agents can do this big scale architecturing if you describe exactly what you want.

IntelliJ has no moat here, because they can do well 5% of what refactoring is.

They wanted to, but they’re still waiting for the IDE itself to simply load.

A big use case will be to tell the LLM what the type of an expression is.

What IDE agent gets access to LSP?

I use Zed and unless there is some MCP server that provides the same thing as the LSP server, the Zed agent won't have access, even though it's in an IDE that supposedly has this information

I just saw a video of non-technical person describing how they use claude code to automate various workflows. They actually tried vscode and then the desktop gui.

Yet they preferred the CLI because it felt "more natural"

With agents, and Claude Code, we are *orchestrating* ... this is an unresolved UI/UX in industry. The same reasons `kubectl` didn't evolve to GUI probably apply here.

It's less about the codebase, more about the ability to conduct anything on the computer - you are closest to that in the terminal. https://backnotprop.com/blog/its-on-your-computer/

i'm not sure i agree with the assessment that claude code has been moving slowly... but it is cool that opencode has had this for a while. will def check it out

tbf, OpenCode's development cycle seems pretty fast. If someone announced AGI in the morning, I'd bet they have it integrated by EOD.

I also use OpenCode extensively, but bounce around to test out the other ones.

I must be doing something wrong, because I can't get OpenCode to actually do anything useful, and not for lack of trying. Claude code gets me great results instantly, opencode (if I can't make it talk to a model, which isn't easy for Gemini) gets me… something, but it's nowhere near as useful as claude code. I don't know why there is so much difference, because theoretically there shouldn't be. Is it the prompt that Anthropic has been polishing in Claude code for so long?