frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Janet Jackson had the power to crash laptop computers (2022)

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20220816-00/?p=106994
86•montalbano•1h ago•32 comments

Apple releases open-source model that instantly turns 2D photos into 3D views

https://github.com/apple/ml-sharp
312•SG-•5h ago•162 comments

Gpg.fail

https://gpg.fail
71•todsacerdoti•1h ago•32 comments

Floor796

https://floor796.com/
225•krtkush•5h ago•35 comments

Windows 2 for the Apricot PC/Xi

https://www.ninakalinina.com/notes/win2apri/
7•todsacerdoti•31m ago•0 comments

Clock Synchronization Is a Nightmare

https://arpitbhayani.me/blogs/clock-sync-nightmare/
14•grep_it•3d ago•2 comments

Show HN: Ez FFmpeg – Video editing in plain English

http://npmjs.com/package/ezff
279•josharsh•10h ago•128 comments

OrangePi 6 Plus Review

https://boilingsteam.com/orange-pi-6-plus-review/
63•ekianjo•6h ago•50 comments

How uv got so fast

https://nesbitt.io/2025/12/26/how-uv-got-so-fast.html
1131•zdw•1d ago•380 comments

Ask HN: Resources to get better at outbound sales?

72•sieep•6d ago•23 comments

NMH BASIC

https://t3x.org/nmhbasic/index.html
24•AlexeyBrin•4h ago•2 comments

Splice a Fibre

https://react-networks-lib.rackout.net/fibre
64•matt-p•6h ago•29 comments

Show HN: Mysti – Claude, Codex, and Gemini debate your code, then synthesize

https://github.com/DeepMyst/Mysti
109•bahaAbunojaim•4d ago•96 comments

Mruby: Ruby for Embedded Systems

https://github.com/mruby/mruby
98•nateb2022•5d ago•26 comments

Intertapes – collection of found cassette tapes from different locations

https://intertapes.net/
67•wallflower•6d ago•7 comments

Nvidia's $20B Antitrust Loophole (Not an Acquisition)

https://ossa-ma.github.io/blog/groq
6•ossa-ma•1h ago•1 comments

USD Share as Global Reserve Currency Drops to Lowest Since 1994

https://wolfstreet.com/2025/12/26/status-of-the-us-dollar-as-global-reserve-currency-usd-share-dr...
36•stevenjgarner•1h ago•28 comments

This PNG shows a different version when loaded in Chrome than in Safari

https://lr0.org/blog/p/pngchanges/
37•lr0•2h ago•22 comments

Cleartext Signatures Considered Harmful

https://gnupg.org/blog/20251226-cleartext-signatures.html
9•derleyici•50m ago•1 comments

Faster practical modular inversion

https://purplesyringa.moe/blog/faster-practical-modular-inversion/
44•todsacerdoti•6d ago•3 comments

Detect memory leaks of C extensions with psutil and psleak

https://gmpy.dev/blog/2025/psutil-heap-introspection-apis
44•grodola•3d ago•8 comments

Exe.dev

https://exe.dev/
362•achairapart•19h ago•215 comments

Pre-commit hooks are broken

https://jyn.dev/pre-commit-hooks-are-fundamentally-broken/
89•todsacerdoti•15h ago•78 comments

Some Junk Theorems in Lean

https://github.com/James-Hanson/junk-theorems-in-lean
63•saithound•4d ago•46 comments

Always bet on text (2014)

https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/193447.html
304•jesseduffield•19h ago•149 comments

QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

https://devblog.qnx.com/qnx-self-hosted-developer-desktop-initial-release/
236•transpute•17h ago•132 comments

Langjam-Gamejam Devlog: Making a language, compiler, VM and 5 games in 52 hours

https://github.com/Syn-Nine/gar-lang/blob/main/DEVLOG.md
93•suioir•5d ago•9 comments

The best things and stuff of 2025

https://blog.fogus.me/2025/12/23/the-best-things-and-stuff-of-2025.html
346•adityaathalye•4d ago•65 comments

Package managers keep using Git as a database, it never works out

https://nesbitt.io/2025/12/24/package-managers-keep-using-git-as-a-database.html
728•birdculture•1d ago•412 comments

Publishing your work increases your luck

https://github.com/readme/guides/publishing-your-work
226•magoghm•18h ago•82 comments
Open in hackernews

New York to require social media platforms to display mental health warnings

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/new-york-require-social-media-platforms-display-mental-health-warnings-2025-12-26/
42•pseudolus•3h ago

Comments

delichon•3h ago
Also LLMs. Also television. Also smart phones, particularly those. Also books, the wrong ones can really cripple the intelects. Also talking to children, they can be so cruel. And adults too. Also math and chess, they can send people right over the edge. It's astonishing how many mental health threats are insufficiently labeled, no wonder people are so messed up.

Stop infantalizing us.

nutjob2•2h ago
You seem unable to tell the difference between heroin and aspirin.
robocat•43m ago
What's your point?

Aspirin comes with heavy health warnings (and social warnings that have been strongly influenced by the paracetamol/acetominiphin industry).

Heroin lacks the health warnings, and is recommended within the social group that accesses it?

I know of plenty of people that wouldn't touch Aspirin because of its dangers...

throaway123123•2h ago
ya we should take health warnings off of smokes. And alcohol. Also we should get rid of mandatory seat belts. And restrictions on lead. And asbestos. I mean we dont want to coddle people and remove personal choice right?
everyone•1h ago
You dont need to become hysterical, just look at the data. There's loads coming to light about the deleterious health effects of social media, that's not the case for books.
throaway123123•2h ago
Thank God. Social Media is a parasite. The more people re-learn to live without it, the better off society will be!
nutjob2•2h ago
A parasite that turns its host into a zombie.
websiteapi•1h ago
these sorts of comments always make me laugh considering where they are posted.

in before: "HN isn't social media!"

joshdavham•1h ago
HN is social media and I think most people recognize that.

It's just that HN is a social media that respects your time and doesn't try to get you addicted. For example, HN has a very useful 'noprocrast' feature and one of the co-founders, pg, has openly worried about HN's addictiveness in the past [0].

So while HN is social media, I feel like it's qualitatively different than other platforms.

[0] https://paulgraham.com/hackernews.html

wtcactus•2h ago
“So, this is how democracy dies. With thunderous applause.”
throaway123123•2h ago
You're kidding, right? Social media is democracy now? Health warnings are fascism?
wtcactus•2h ago
Social Media is free speech. And it’s not fascism, is communism. Just as bad.
floren•2h ago
The Star Wars prequels are quotable in a serious context now?!???!?
zdragnar•1h ago
Star Wars only ever had three movies. It'd be neat if they made some prequels though!
froidpink•2h ago
Will HN add the label too?
CSMastermind•2h ago
> auto play or infinite scroll

I don't think HN has either of these.

tekla•1h ago
> algorithmic feeds

It does have these

skilled•1h ago
Well, no. Upvoting a certain story doesn’t change the homepage to match it to similar stories.
shagie•1h ago
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S4505

"Addictive feed" is used, but it's circularly defined.

"Algorithmic feed" doesn't appear in the text.

andyjohnson0•1h ago
> > algorithmic feeds

> It does have these

If you consider "feeds" to be the home page, ask hn, etc. then afaik content is determined by user submission after spam/abuse filtering, and all users see the same content. Article position is largely determined by user votes, with some ageing. Again, everyone sees the same ordering (unless they choose to hid le articles).

Hard to see how this can be interpreted as "algorithmic".

petcat•1h ago
It's hard to see it as anything but algorithmic considering that an algorithm is deciding what you see. It doesn't matter if everyone is also seeing the same thing.
andyjohnson0•1h ago
The algorithm that is deciding what you see is simply <things submitted by other humans> + <voting on those things by other humans>. There's no per-user content customisation and profiling to drive engagement. And hn has an optional "no procrastination" feature that is provided to mitigate excessive engagement.
petcat•53m ago
We don't know what the algorithm is. But it's clearly more sophisticated than just vote counts.

It's an algorithmic feed.

andyjohnson0•48m ago
From the FAQ [1]:

"How are stories ranked?

"The basic algorithm divides points by a power of the time since a story was submitted. Comments in threads are ranked the same way.

"Other factors affecting rank include user flags, anti-abuse software, software which demotes overheated discussions, account or site weighting, and moderator action."

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

petcat•42m ago
Pretty obvious and vague overview. Obviously the weights are the important part that is missing.

I don't know why you're trying to argue that this isn't an algorithmically driven social news feed website with an addictive homepage. It's exactly what the NY state law is targeting.

shagie•1h ago
> Social media platforms with infinite scrolling, auto-play and algorithmic feeds will be required to display warning labels about their potential harm to young users’ mental health under a new law, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced on Friday.

https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-signs-legis...

> Legislation S4505/A5346, under the chapter amendment, requires social media platforms that offer addictive feeds, auto play or infinite scroll to post warning labels on their platforms.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S4505

   § 1520. DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE,  THE  FOLLOWING
 TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   1.  "ADDICTIVE  FEED"  SHALL  MEAN  AS  DEFINED  IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF
 SECTION FIFTEEN HUNDRED OF THIS CHAPTER.
   2. "ADDICTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM"  SHALL  MEAN  A  WEBSITE,  ONLINE
 SERVICE, ONLINE APPLICATION, OR MOBILE APPLICATION THAT PRIMARILY SERVES
 AS  A MEDIUM FOR COVERED USERS TO INTERACT WITH MEDIA GENERATED BY OTHER
 USERS AND WHICH OFFERS OR PROVIDES COVERED USERS AN ADDICTIVE FEED, PUSH
 NOTIFICATIONS, AUTOPLAY,  INFINITE  SCROLL,  AND/OR  LIKE  COUNTS  AS  A
 SIGNIFICANT  PART  OF  THE  SERVICES  PROVIDED  BY  SUCH WEBSITE, ONLINE
 SERVICE, ONLINE APPLICATION, OR MOBILE  APPLICATION.  "ADDICTIVE  SOCIAL
 MEDIA  PLATFORM" SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY SUCH SERVICE OR APPLICATION WHICH
 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINES OFFERS THE FEATURES DESCRIBED HEREIN FOR
 A VALID PURPOSE UNRELATED TO PROLONGING USE OF SUCH PLATFORM.
...

   7.  "LIKE  COUNTS" SHALL MEAN THE QUANTIFICATION AND PUBLIC DISPLAY OF
 POSITIVE VOTES, SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE EXPRESSED VIA  A  HEART
 OR  THUMBS-UP  ICON, ATTACHED TO A PIECE OF MEDIA GENERATED BY A COVERED
 USER.
(note that there is no public display of positive votes on HN)

HN doesn't have push notifications, autoplay, infinite scroll, or like counts.

"Addictive feed" is poorly defined.

---

Edit: The harmful nature of social media is something that HN has recognized for well over a decade. There is a feature "noprocrast" to help manage this if you do have this problem.

From 2010:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1492902

   7 Nov: Anti-procrastination features

   Like email, social news sites can be dangerously addictive. So the latest version of Hacker News has a feature to let you limit your use of the site. There are three new fields in your profile, noprocrast, maxvisit, and minaway. (You can edit your profile by clicking on your username.) Noprocrast is turned off by default. If you turn it on by setting it to "yes," you'll only be allowed to visit the site for maxvisit minutes at a time, with gaps of minaway minutes in between. The defaults are 20 and 180, which would let you view the site for 20 minutes at a time, and then not allow you back in for 3 hours. You can override noprocrast if you want, in which case your visit clock starts over at zero.
oefrha•2h ago
> Hochul compared the social media labels to warnings on other products like tobacco, where they communicate the risk of cancer, or plastic packaging, where they warn of the risk of suffocation for small children.

Great. I’m sure this will be just as effective as California Prop 65 cancer warnings.

boplicity•1h ago
Research says, apparently, that Prop 65 has actually been affective.

> The researchers analyzed concentrations of 11 chemicals placed on the Proposition 65 warning list and monitored by the CDC between 1999 and 2016. They included several types of phthalates, chemicals used to make plastics flexible; chloroform, a toxic byproduct from disinfecting water with chlorine; and toluene, a hazardous substance found in vehicle exhaust.

> They found that the majority of samples had significantly lower concentrations of these chemicals after their listing. But the levels didn’t just decline in California, they fell nationwide. [1]

Unfortunately, the NIH website [2] where the study is hosted is no longer operational. I don't think certain people want to support scientific inquiry. Maybe someone else can find the study text?

[1] https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-11-11/study-d...

[2] https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP13956

mgraczyk•1h ago
Most of the labeled chemicals aren't harmful, so decreasing concentrations is not a good thing
andyjohnson0•1h ago
What about the outcome of decreasing the concentrations of chemicals that are harmful? Is that a positive result?
SilasX•29m ago
Was that because of Prop 65, though? The day-to-day effect seems to be alert fatigue and people ignoring the warnings because they're everywhere.

I read the links to find the proposed mechanism (NIH link is dead btw), and it says that businesses pre-emptively reformulated to avoid having the label, but the LA Times story also says this is a mixed bag, often resulting in a switch to less-tested, possibly unsafe substitutes simply because they weren't on the list.

>>But swapping one chemical for an unlisted substitute has sometimes resulted in its own consequences.

>>For example, when bisphenol A, an ingredient in plastics, was listed in 2013, chemical concentrations in blood and urine samples subsequently fell by 15%. However, that was followed by a 20% rise in bisphenol S — a closely related chemical also linked with reproductive toxicity.

Teever•1h ago
Labels on products designed to be addictive like modern social media isn’t a silver bullet but it’s an important first start.

You’re right though that it’s going to take far bigger things like antitrust action and fining companies for making misleading statements about the health consequences and purposes of their products.

Another way this problem can be attacked is by changing the cultural perspective around working at companies like Meta.

There was a time where it was socially acceptable to work at s tobacco company. People would proudly tell their family that they work in marketing for tobacco companies but now? When have you ever heard someone tell you they work for big tobacco?

If the government mandated that social media had to have pictures of neckbeard nests in people’s feeds with warnings that this could happen to you with repeated social media use I bet the people who work at Meta would be a laughing stock in their social circles which would go a long ways to disrupting the pipeline of people willing to destroy our society for a quick buck.

vjvjvjvjghv•1h ago
"When have you ever heard someone tell you they work for big tobacco?"

Go to southern Virginia or North Carolina.

miltonlost•1h ago
Great! I'm sure they'll be as effective as tobacco warnings are!
everyone•1h ago
The title made me think NY would be running a mental health ad campiagn but the messages would only be visible on big social media platforms.. Tbh that seems a more likely interpretation of the title in 2025.
stocksinsmocks•1h ago
Reading the title, my mind immediately drifted to the thought that there should be mental health warnings for living in a place like New York.
mgraczyk•1h ago
Every time I look at the evidence, I end up finding that social media improves mental health for teens overall. Is there a new study that motivated this or are we still misinterpreting statistics?
nielsbot•1h ago
what evidence have you found that in?
mgraczyk•1h ago
For example here is a recent widely cited study that did not find a statistically significant link between Facebook/Instagram and mental health outcomes, broadly miscited as having found an effect: https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/briefs/ifs-gallup-...

They did claim to find a very small link between TikTok/YouTube and mental health, but this seems to defy the narrative of "social" media being the culprit. YouTube was not significant if you adjust for multiple hypotheses, only TikTok

andyjohnson0•1h ago
Parent of young adults (recent former teens) here.

Anecdotal, but I can assure you that no-one in their cohort feels that social media makes a positive contribution to their mental health. Neither did their teachers. The ones I know of tend to try to actively avoid it.

I know of older adults (late 20s / early 30s) who have had similarly negative experiences with anxiety and addictive engagement.

mgraczyk•1h ago
My sister does, who is sitting next to me talking to me about this
kelseyfrog•1h ago
My alcoholic uncle says that alcohol is actually good for him too.
mgraczyk•1h ago
Is anecdote only acceptable evidence when it agrees with what you already believe?
kelseyfrog•40m ago
Why does this apply to me but not to you?
mgraczyk•38m ago
It doesn't, I think both anecdotes are not useful for understanding what's really happening
kelseyfrog•21m ago
My apologies. I thought we were in disagreement.
osti•1h ago
Social "science" be social science.
xyzal•1h ago
A meta-analysis> https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12108867/

Results: The majority of studies linked social media use to adverse mental health outcomes, particularly depression and anxiety. However, the relationship was complex, with evidence suggesting that problematic use and passive consumption of social media were most strongly associated with adverse effects. In contrast, some studies highlighted positive aspects, including enhanced social support and reduced isolation. The mental health impact of social media use, specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic, was mixed, with the full range of neutral, negative, and positive effects reported.

GeoAtreides•20m ago
Not insinuating anything, but when it comes to such a hot topic, and such a hot take, maybe you should disclose you worked at Meta (Instagram) for 3 years. Again, I'm not accusing anyone of anything, god forbid. Studies usually disclose source of funding and sources of conflict, and people disclose owning stocks when discussing economy, it seems like a good idea.
mgraczyk•16m ago
I didn't work there for 3 years (1 year), and I'm not publishing a study.

Should people who post anti social media sentiment disclose that they've never worked on it, have never run experiments on well being, and have never looked at the data?

GeoAtreides•4m ago
My bad, I did the math wrong, 2019-2021 is indeed about 1-2 years.

Disclosures are necessary only when something happened, not when something didn't happened.

ethin•1h ago
I'm sure this will be shot down as being just as unconstitutional as when Texas tried this stunt with porn sites.
xyzal•1h ago
Don't fall for the illusion that major social media are somehow a modern agora. It is a personalized, individually tailored psyop.