https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262132855/geometric-invariance-...
* interpret generously
Some people see a mystery at the point where these mathematical constructs are applied to our physical universe. Eugene Wigner wrote about “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.”
There are explanations for many of the points he raised in that paper. Perhaps the one that remains most unresolved is the question of why universal law or behavior isn’t messier, more chaotic - why it should so often correspond so neatly to physical phenomena. Intuitively, this doesn’t seem surprising to me, but Wigner correctly points out that we don’t really know why this is the case.
Answering that gets deeper into philosophy: structural realism, the anthropic principle, and so on. But one possible explanation is an extension of ideas like Noether’s: that the various mathematical constraints collapse the space of possibilities enough to make it likely, if not inevitable, that the universe ends up embodying relatively simple mathematical structures.
I've also written a series on Abstract Algebra for computer programmers if you're serious about learning it:
quchen•2h ago
So many great minds have had to fight an uphill battle, but few had it as steep and even fewer were as successful as her doing so.
It really is a shame that she's not as recognized as the Bohrs and Feynmans and Paulis and so on, but at least everyone with a passing interest in theoretical physics ought to know about her.