frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Show HN: My not-for-profit search engine with no ads, no AI, & all DDG bangs

https://nilch.org
57•UnmappedStack•3h ago
I've been working on a little open source [1] search engine, nilch. I noticed that nearly all well known search engines, including the alternative ones, tend to be run by companies of various sizes with the goal to make money, so they either fill your results with ads or charge you money, and I dislike this because search is the backbone of the internet and should not be commercial, so it runs in a not-for-profit style and aims to survive on donations. Additionally I'm personally really sick of AI in my search results so I got rid of that, and I wanted DuckDuckGo bangs so it supports all of them. Like many alternative search engines, it is fully private.

Sadly, it currently does not have its own index but rather uses the Brave search API. Once I'm in a financial position that it's possible, I would absolutely love to build a completely new index from the ground up which is open source, as well as an open source ranking and search algorithm, to back it.

I posted on Reddit and got an amazing amount of feedback which I implemented a number of feature requests, so I would really like your ideas, critiques, and bug reports as well. Thank you and sorry for the long post!

[1] https://github.com/UnmappedStack/nilch

Comments

Imustaskforhelp•1h ago
Awesome project, I have a quick suggestion but can you please make adding custom ddg bangs into your project itself rather quickly?

There was this project on hackernews which was recently shown where they (scraped?) the internet and then created an really efficient embedding of the search engine. I wish if you could look more into it or contact the creator of that project perhaps.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44878151 (Show HN: Building a web search engine from scratch with 3B neural embeddings)

Looks like https://search.wilsonl.in/ they have since then closed the live demo but I had used it when it was live and in my opinion, it was a mix of that if things needed some improvements but that it was also usable for some things which were in the dataset (Of course you wouldn't get Organic chemistry questions/answers for high schoolers as an example in there but you will find most things (usually wikipedia) and then some good sources, usually the ones popular but it was really cool overall so perhaps you can look more into it and helps

Now I really love your project a lot and I think there should be not for profit search engines, but I am a little worried about using it since if I use it as my search engine, then it might cost you a lot of money (using the brave api) .

I just searched and it seems that ecosia is a non profit as well so you can definitely partner up with them, I remember a post about qwant and ecosia partnering up to create an independent search engine.

I think that there should be competition within the search engine space especially via non profits in a way similar to wikipedia one might say ideally. Wishing you the best for this project's future!

prmoustache•1h ago
Ecosia is still making money (that it uses to plant trees). That means it is selling something and we can reasonnably think that is your data/privacy.
UnmappedStack•1h ago
As far as I'm aware, Ecosia does sell ads.
UnmappedStack•1h ago
Thank you! I would definitely consider custom ddg bangs, yes. Is there any particular reason you want that rather than just all ddg's bangs like it is currently?

I'll have a look into that project, thank you. Cost is a slight issue so far, yes. There have been about 4,000 searches in the past couple days but I've slightly improved cost efficiency with caching, and I've received two small donations which do help a bit, so the hope is that donations will be able to sustain it.

Partnering with Ecosia is a really interesting idea, however I think that there may be a conflict of interest since they do aim to make money with ads, just to go towards environmental efforts rather than a corporation. They would be disadvantaged if nilch was at an advantage over their users.

I do love the wikipedia model and I hope that nilch can run similarly. Thank you again!

everfree•1h ago
I believe an open source ranking algorithm is antithetical to good search, sadly. It hands spammers a recipe for how to push past legitimate sites to dominate the search results.
UnmappedStack•1h ago
This is sadly probably quite true. I'm sure there are workarounds, like slightly changing it every month or two, although that would require quite heavy maintenance. Perhaps the core algorithm stays the same but some constants that decide on the weights of different things are randomised? Not too sure.
Tepix•18m ago
The topic of ranking mechanisms sits at the core of many of our issues with social networks and centrally operated instances. I think it deserves far more attention.

And these algorithms should be open source and we should be able to pick our own and mash them.

Related:

Build Your Own Timeline Algorithm: A Blueprint

https://blog.mozilla.ai/build-your-own-timeline-algorithm-a-...

renegat0x0•1h ago
How is it different from searxng then?
UnmappedStack•1h ago
I see nilch as slightly more about being simplistic and not having many features that are unnecessary. I do share many of the values and benefits with searxng (and really love their work!), however this is also about my own specific desire for something that is clean and has very little that is unnecessary.
DeepSeaTortoise•1h ago
I'm in no way an expert, but IMO there is a major misconception in the free-ish software community that profit should be at most secondary to offering a fair and as good as sustainably possible product.

I strongly disagree with this. IMO developers of free-ish as in freedom products OWE it, not only to themselves, but their community to be as profitable as possible within the rules they think that should be followed (and those that are mandatory ofc).

Profit is not only by far the strongest motivating factor for others to adopt your set of rules, but also a guarantee to your community that the product will still be around in a few years and not turn into a rug pull because its developer is burned out after working 80 hour weeks for months or even years for less than minimum wage. It is also something you can trade for your values, e.g. offering great working conditions to your employees or funding projects or lobbying for laws you think will benefit society.

grey-area•59m ago
Profit is fine.

Profit from advertising is highly corrosive and corrupts everyone it touches (social networks, your tube, search etc etc).

UnmappedStack•53m ago
Honestly I agree. This is part of what I love about the idea of Kagi. I do believe a not-for-profit alternative is needed, however if there's any for-profit model a search engine should have, it should be paid for by the user rather than the advertiser imo.
BrenBarn•56m ago
It depends what you mean by "profit". If you mean "the developers/maintainers can pay the bills of a modest lifestyle", then yes, I think that's important. But often "profit" is used to refer to the idea of unlimited upside, that there are stocks, that the project will be sold, that some kind of sizable windfall is expected, etc. And that I think is to be avoided.
UnmappedStack•55m ago
This is a really interesting view, but I'm not sure I agree. So many amazing projects are truly free without the goal of profit yet their maintainers still do amazing work. I feel like part of the reason this works is because often the load is split between several maintainers (of which I hope to onboard soon, and have one or two offers already from people to contribute) and also the fact it's genuinely something enjoyable to work on (of course, to the extent it's not too stressful and overworked).
NitpickLawyer•47m ago
There's a difference between awesome projects that don't have a recurring cost (i.e. open source software that users run themselves) and a search engine. You cannot physically run a search engine without real-world costs today. Those funds need to come from somewhere. And offering a good product at scale costs a lot of money.
UnmappedStack•44m ago
That is very true, and it's not cheap to maintain. I do however really hope that donations can cover it enough, and I have plans about other ways to monetise it while remaining not-for-profit without ads or anything that affects the user.
barrell•34m ago
There’s part of this that I agree to - I tend to disagree with most anti-capitalist (or anti-profit) sentiment. However, I disagree that builders “owe” anyone anything, and I strongly disagree with goal of as much profit “as possible”.

I miss the days when someone would make a service where the user would benefit as much as possible and the creator got compensated fairly. I feel like that system worked for hundreds of years. It’s only in the last couple decades that we’ve made this obligation for maximal profits - something that I personally hold responsible for all the mass enshittification going on these days.

angel-•59m ago
Will you include suggested autocomplete searches?
UnmappedStack•54m ago
I do intend to support this and have actually already been asked to!
Tiberium•7m ago
Right now it seems like the project is just a thin wrapper over Brave Search. Building a complete search engine is way harder than that. You could look into using https://github.com/MarginaliaSearch/MarginaliaSearch if you want to run a real search index - https://marginalia-search.com/ is powered by it.
UnmappedStack•6m ago
Yup, it is pretty much just a better frontend for existing search. I want to build my own index and ranking algorithm in the future, but sadly it's quite resource intensive so it will depend on financial viability a bit in terms of timeframe.
axiolite•7m ago
Doesn't seem to like double-quoted search strings:

  SyntaxError: JSON.parse: unexpected character at line 1 column 1 of the JSON data
Single-quotes don't seem to work (doesn't change search results... doesn't exclude irrelevant results that don't contain the exact string).
UnmappedStack•7m ago
Oh! I will make sure to fix that, thank you for the bug report!

What an unprocessed photo looks like

https://maurycyz.com/misc/raw_photo/
1262•zdw•10h ago•222 comments

Staying ahead of censors in 2025

https://forum.torproject.org/t/staying-ahead-of-censors-in-2025-what-weve-learned-from-fighting-c...
92•ggeorgovassilis•3h ago•43 comments

Show HN: Z80-μLM, a 'Conversational AI' That Fits in 40KB

https://github.com/HarryR/z80ai
93•quesomaster9000•3h ago•27 comments

You can make up HTML tags

https://maurycyz.com/misc/make-up-tags/
207•todsacerdoti•6h ago•88 comments

Show HN: My not-for-profit search engine with no ads, no AI, & all DDG bangs

https://nilch.org
58•UnmappedStack•3h ago•23 comments

Binaries

https://fzakaria.com/2025/12/28/huge-binaries
28•todsacerdoti•3h ago•11 comments

My First Meshtastic Network

https://rickcarlino.com/notes/electronics/my-first-meshtastic-network.html
37•rickcarlino•3h ago•12 comments

Developing a Beautiful and Performant Block Editor in Qt C++ and QML

https://rubymamistvalove.com/block-editor
19•michaelsbradley•2d ago•3 comments

Unity's Mono problem: Why your C# code runs slower than it should

https://marekfiser.com/blog/mono-vs-dot-net-in-unity/
181•iliketrains•11h ago•86 comments

Software engineers should be a little bit cynical

https://www.seangoedecke.com/a-little-bit-cynical/
183•zdw•11h ago•126 comments

As AI gobbles up chips, prices for devices may rise

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/28/nx-s1-5656190/ai-chips-memory-prices-ram
144•geox•10h ago•164 comments

MongoBleed Explained Simply

https://bigdata.2minutestreaming.com/p/mongobleed-explained-simply
177•todsacerdoti•11h ago•66 comments

Researchers discover molecular difference in autistic brains

https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/molecular-difference-in-autistic-brains/
120•amichail•10h ago•67 comments

Growing up in “404 Not Found”: China's nuclear city in the Gobi Desert

https://substack.com/inbox/post/182743659
758•Vincent_Yan404•1d ago•337 comments

PySDR: A Guide to SDR and DSP Using Python

https://pysdr.org/content/intro.html
173•kklisura•12h ago•8 comments

Line scan camera image processing

https://daniel.lawrence.lu/blog/2025-09-21-line-scan-camera-image-processing/
30•vasco•3d ago•1 comments

Spherical Cow

https://lib.rs/crates/spherical-cow
88•Natfan•9h ago•8 comments

Formulaic Delimiters in the Iliad and the Odyssey

https://glthr.com/formulaic-delimiters-in-the-iliad-and-the-odyssey
16•glth•1d ago•4 comments

Show HN: My app just won best iOS Japanese learning tool of 2025 award (blog)

https://skerritt.blog/best-japanese-learning-tools-2025-award-show/
104•wahnfrieden•8h ago•14 comments

Fast GPU Interconnect over Radio

https://spectrum.ieee.org/rf-over-fiber
18•montroser•5h ago•1 comments

Mouse: Computer Programming Language

http://mouse.davidgsimpson.com/
9•gappy•2d ago•2 comments

Slaughtering Competition Problems with Quantifier Elimination (2021)

https://grossack.site/2021/12/22/qe-competition.html
49•todsacerdoti•9h ago•0 comments

A bitwise reproducible deep learning framework

https://github.com/microsoft/RepDL
22•noosphr•6d ago•0 comments

Finding Jingle Town: Debugging an N64 Game Without Symbols

https://blog.chrislewis.au/finding-jingle-town-debugging-an-n64-game-without-symbols/
28•knackers•5d ago•1 comments

Fast CVVDP implementation in C

https://github.com/halidecx/fcvvdp
31•todsacerdoti•9h ago•2 comments

How to complain (2024)

https://outerproduct.net/trivial/2024-03-25_complain.html
57•ysangkok•9h ago•10 comments

Why I Disappeared – My week with minimal internet in a remote island chain

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/why-i-disappeared
80•eh_why_not•11h ago•82 comments

62 years in the making: NYC's newest water tunnel nears the finish line

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2025/11/09/water--dep--tunnels-
120•eatonphil•9h ago•74 comments

Panoramas of Star Trek Sets

https://mijofr.github.io/st-panorama/
53•jfil•3h ago•6 comments

No, it's not a battleship

https://www.navalgazing.net/No-its-not
135•hermitcrab•13h ago•182 comments