C does not have closures. You could simulate closures, but it is neither robust not automatic compared to languages tha truly support them.
aragilar•1h ago
C does not currently have closures, the post it looking at their performance properties with an eye for what form closures should be added to the standard.
skavi•19m ago
I think maybe this post would make more sense if you were familiar to its antecedent [0] which compares existing closure extensions to C. IIRC the comparison was in the context of considering designs for standardization.
Those graph axes units are... perplexing, to say the least.
So, we need to swap to the logarithmic graphs to get a better picture
I wish more people would know about decibels.
Panzerschrek•1h ago
Why struggling using qsort? std::sort from C++ is much better in terms of usability and performance.
djaouen•1h ago
Lisp solves the performance hit of closures with macros. However, given what macros look like in C, I hope it never amounts to that!
skavi•13m ago
There’s no necessary performance hit for closures. The performance cost here is caused by these closures needing to conform to a function pointer looking interface in order to be generally useful in C.
andsoitis•2h ago
C does not have closures. You could simulate closures, but it is neither robust not automatic compared to languages tha truly support them.
aragilar•1h ago
skavi•19m ago
[0]: https://thephd.dev/the-cost-of-a-closure-in-c-c2y