Starlink satellites being lowered from 550 km to 480 km

https://twitter.com/michaelnicollsx/status/2006790372681220530

36•wmf•3h ago

Comments

jagaerglad•2h ago

So instead of having to launch new satellites to replace the deorbited ones ever couple of years, do they have to send new ones every couple of months? Or can the functioning ones maintain their orbits somehow and this is only for the malfunctioning ones?

lefra•2h ago

They have an ion thruster to compensate for atmospheric drag.

m4rtink•47m ago

There has been some research (IIRC by ESA) for using the upper atmosphere to feed a ion engine. That way you should be able to put satellites even lower as long as they have enough power from solar panels and are functional.

manmal•2h ago

They have ion thrusters that prevent them from losing altitude as long as they are operational.

jws•1h ago

It sounds like this corresponds to an atmospheric contraction. They are lowering to avoid extending the lifetime of possible debris, but that also probably means the regular lifetime is not shortened. They are just staying in the designed density to match their designed service lives. The field of view of the satellites will be reduced, but presumably they have enough units up there to maintain full coverage.

This is distinct from the FCC application they have made for another Starlink shell in VLEO (~330km) for another 15000 satellites to better serve cellular phones.

verzali•1h ago

At 480km there will be increased drag, even as we get closer to the solar minimum. The trade-off may be between using propellant for collision avoidance vs using it to counter altitude loss and for station keeping.

Maybe it is also linked to the falling altitude of the ISS? 480km is about the upper bound of its altitude but they seem unlikely to actually raise it that high before it is deorbited.

wmf•1h ago

Usually orbits are reserved years in advance. AFAIK this kind of move is unprecedented (although everything about Starlink is unprecedented since it's the first megaconstellation).

Two weeks ago, a Starlink satellite exploded. SpaceX believes it wasn't caused by a collision which means the explosion was probably caused by a malfunction in the satellite itself. Now 4,400 Starlink satellites are moving to a lower orbit for "safety". Is this an emergency change to account for a design flaw that they just discovered?

vipa123•20m ago

How much Delta-V would that take, and how much would they typically have onboard at the start of their life?

wmf•7m ago

Drag is constantly pulling them down so maybe they won't have to use any propellant.

GeertB•12m ago

I wonder if this will improve latency and signal strength

A website to destroy all websites

Can Bundler be as fast as uv?

Cameras and Lenses (2020)

Show HN: OpenWorkers – Self-hosted Cloudflare workers in Rust

Dell's version of the DGX Spark fixes pain points

Python numbers every programmer should know

BYD Sells 4.6M Vehicles in 2025, Meets Revised Sales Goal

Linux is good now

Moving Images Related to the Apollo Missions, 1967–1969

2025 Letter

iOS allows alternative browser engines in Japan

C-events, yet another event loop, simpler, smaller, faster, safer

Straussian Memes

Quickemu: Quickly create and run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux VMs

A silly diffuse shading model

Prompting People

Bluetooth Headphone Jacking: A Key to Your Phone [video]

I rebooted my social life

Building an internal agent: Code-driven vs. LLM-driven workflows

How to construct complex data declaratively and progressively?

All my Deutschlandtickets gone: Fraud at an industrial scale [video]

Build a Deep Learning Library

Common Lisp SDK for the Datastar Hypermedia Framework

Memory Subsystem Optimizations

Show HN: Wario Synth – Turn any song into Game Boy version

Street-Fighting Mathematics (2008)

Love your customers

Implementing HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) Vector Search in PHP

Sony PS5 ROM keys leaked – jailbreaking could be made easier with BootROM codes

Worlds largest electric ship launched by Tasmanian boatbuilder