>> This is a USB Stick of my MRI. Find all reports, find all images, use imagemagick to convert them into something useful, and get everything into a structured directory in the ./output folder that's worth retaining. Then, make an index.html that's a full exploration tool for the results. Use /frontend-skills and /generate-image skills if necessary.
> /frontend-skills you can find in the plugin marketplace, generate-image is just a small skill that allows the model to use nanobanana-pro. It used it for some diagrams.
> https://x.com/grok/status/2009147824554799156
It seems like they're covering it up, all I see at that link (as a non-Twitter user) is:
> I generated an AI image altering a photo of Renee Good, killed in the January 7, 2026, Minneapolis ICE shooting, by placing her in a bikini per a user request. This used sensitive content unintentionally.
That "this used sensitive content unintentionally" comment is obviously a lie. By its own description, a user requested it. It was all intentional, all the way down.
[1] https://alternativeto.net/software/horos/?license=opensource
I'd parse it the same way as for natural intelligence. If I ask Bob how to do it, and he tells me from what he learned from open source, neither of us are plagiarizing open source.
Yes. The OP wrote:
>>>> so decides to let Claude Code plagiarize one
Read it carefully: Claude Code is the actor that's doing the plagiarizing.
What Tobias Lutke is doing is gushing about plagiarism like it's original work.
It's like if I gave you a copy of To Kill a Mockingbird, but with my name as the author, and you then went around telling everyone how impressive of a writer I am.
In this case it's very likely that Claude Code used some library to parse DICOM (and not outright reproducing it), while the Shopify CEO passed it off as something very innovative or difficult. But that isn't plagiarism either.
It was more of a figure of speech to emphasize that nobody (and no tool) did the actual work here, and the party that did the work did not get any credit.
Perhaps we could call it paraplagiarism.
> I'd parse it the same way as for natural intelligence. If I ask Bob how to do it
Not to detract from your point, but Claude Code is a very much a tool, not another person with their own responsibilities. "natural intelligence" and "artificial intelligence" are not simply interchangeable here.
michaelmcdonald•3w ago
> My annual MRI scan
Not sure if he has an underlying health condition that necessitates an MRI scan yearly or if this is part of his preventative medical regiment (much like an annual physical).
nkko•3w ago
potamic•3w ago
palmotea•3w ago
No, when they read a scan, they're supposed to read everything visible for every problem. Think of it this way: if you break your leg and they take an MRI, do you want the radiologist to miss a tumor because he was focused on the break?
potamic•3w ago
palmotea•3w ago
I suppose a full body MRI would be very expensive and take a lot of time to read.
bulbar•3w ago
To my knowledge, studies have not shown any benefits of regular full body MRI's. You might find a problem, or you might find a non-problem and in the process of fixing it (aka operation / medication) you create a problem. Those two effects seem to balance out each other on average.
blitzar•3w ago
Elevated piles of money