> https://x.com/grok/status/2009147824554799156
It seems like they're covering it up, all I see at that link (as a non-Twitter user) is:
> I generated an AI image altering a photo of Renee Good, killed in the January 7, 2026, Minneapolis ICE shooting, by placing her in a bikini per a user request. This used sensitive content unintentionally.
That "this used sensitive content unintentionally" comment is obviously a lie. By its own description, a user requested it. It was all intentional, all the way down.
[1] https://alternativeto.net/software/horos/?license=opensource
I'd parse it the same way as for natural intelligence. If I ask Bob how to do it, and he tells me from what he learned from open source, neither of us are plagiarizing open source.
michaelmcdonald•2h ago
> My annual MRI scan
Not sure if he has an underlying health condition that necessitates an MRI scan yearly or if this is part of his preventative medical regiment (much like an annual physical).
nkko•2h ago
potamic•1h ago
palmotea•4m ago
No, when they read a scan, they're supposed to read everything visible for every problem. Think of it this way: if you break your leg and they take an MRI, do you want the radiologist to miss a tumor because he was focused on the break?
blitzar•2h ago
Elevated piles of money