frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Article by article, how Big Tech shaped the EU's roll-back of digital rights

https://corporateeurope.org/en/2026/01/article-article-how-big-tech-shaped-eus-roll-back-digital-rights
195•robtherobber•1h ago

Comments

Sharlin•1h ago
One gossamer-thin silver lining in this current geopolitical lunacy is that it's likely to show the current Commission's pro-corpo anti-citizen endeavors like this, to bend the knee to US corporate interests, in an increasingly bad light. Particularly given that activating anti-coercion measures that target those very corporate interests is now being seriously discussed.
shrubby•32m ago
Yes. Masks are off. And Musks.
MonkeyClub•24m ago
Masks have been of for a while, but as long as the EU people can't vote the EU presidency out of office, it's to no avail.

It was a (steel and coal) corp affordances union to begin with, so it's no wonder it's pandering to business rather than civic interests after all.

Von der Leyen is corrupt yet shapes EU policy without backlash, and the citizenry is left to pay the price, precisely because the EU pretends to speak for the people.

sph•23m ago
Is it a silver lining? I think it's clear that whoever runs any government is free to do whatever they want with total impunity. Dissatisfied citizens complaining on Twitter is not gonna remove any "pro-corpo anti-citizen" politician from power. And if they take it to the streets, they'll just copy the UK's playbook.

Power corrupts, and the more steps removed politicians are from whomever put them in power, the safer they are.

Sharlin•3m ago
There's a fair chance that dissonant voices in the Parliament will grow increasingly stronger, party affiliations notwithstanding. It wouldn't be the first time that the EU's legislative branch has asserted its power over the executive.
trueno•22m ago
EU and the rest of the world needs to ditch their anti circumvention laws that they put in place to appease the US demands on trade deals historically. They're getting tarrif'd anyways so YOLO. I think you'd see a lot of pressures ease up that are probably putting a lot of politicians around the world in compromised or blackmail-able positions. US Tech really needs to lose this massive leverage they have over the world right now.
201-12958•1h ago
The EU leaders falsely assume that US cloud services are essential and let themselves be blackmailed over and over again.

If you want to do your part as a consumer, boycott all American products:

https://www.goeuropean.org/

sschueller•1h ago
https://di.day/
devsda•1h ago
When my country and China had border clashes, there was a nation-wide grassroot level movement to boycott Chinese goods and services where possible. It worked to an extent but it fizzled out in few weeks/months. Some of the reasons were the impracticality of total boycott so you start from a position of compromise, difficulty to sustain a movement born out of anger and some inter-govt agreements to avoid escalations etc.

Do you have plans to overcome those sort of challenges and sustain this initiative ?

joe_mamba•56m ago
You speak about India?

Yeah, EU is super fucked too since it outsourced its energy dependence to Russia, consumer manufacturing to China, defence and tech services to US, and only just woke up in the last 3 or so years that it was all a huge mistake that's now costing us dearly since we're at the whims of all 3 belligerents who know that now is the time they can squeeze us.

Trying to undo just one dependency is a slow and painful process, but fighting all 3 at the same time is a suicide mission.

The US outsourced its manufacturing too, but unlike EU, it has a strong enough economy and military that they can just snap their fingers and the likes of Taiwan and Korea will immediately onshore manufacturing of their high end chips and ships to the US, but EU doesn't have this kind leverage.

boerseth•54m ago
It is understanably hard to stay vigilant with respect to individual everyday purchases, but services and subscriptions are an easy and continuous win.
deaux•48m ago
Boycotting US tech is magnitudes easier than boycotting Chinese-made products. They're in whole different universes. Especially on a country level, let alone a EU level.

Is removing the dependence on US tech easy for the EU? No, it's tough and takes a lot of work and time. It's still a piece of cake compared to the dependence on Chinese manufacturing. They're incomparable.

the_duke•41m ago
Tell that to all the companies that built their entire tech stacks on US cloud providers...

Massive endeavor for a lot of setups.

GuB-42•15m ago
While it is a "massive endeavor", it is not impossible, it essentially amounts to writing portable code. A computer is a computer, and most of the tech stack in US cloud providers is based on open source projects.

Not depending on Chinese manufacturing is borderline impossible even if you are starting from scratch. Not only it will be way more expensive, with potentially longer delays and lesser capacities, but just finding some company that can and wants to do the job can be a nightmare. From what I have seen, many local manufacturers in the US and Europe are really there to fulfill government contracts that requires local production.

Most hardware kickstarter-like projects rely on Chinese manufacturing as if it was obvious. It is not "find a manufacturer", it is "go to China". Projects that instead rely on local (US/Europe) manufacturing in order to make a political statement have to to though a lot of trouble, and the result is often an overpriced product that may still have some parts made in China.

austinthetaco•36m ago
Does that include not using AWS or anyone that is a host interface to AWS? Does that include social media like hacker news or instagram? I have no stakes here (I'm an American who doesn't run a tech business) but it seems like it would be unfathomly difficult if not impossible to avoid US tech altogether.
danmaz74•6m ago
Nobody serious is advocating to avoid US tech altogether, at least unless Trump starts a hot war, but reducing dependency would be a very smart move.
devsda•24m ago
The most critical and impactful modern day tech is smartphone and that is US tech.

As long as mobile os and adjacent services like the store etc are controlled there is no true path to digital independence especially in a highly digitalized region like the EU.

One example is if EU allows the Android developer verification to pass this year in its current or even in more relaxed form, that just means EU is still open for some hard lessons in the future.

danmaz74•8m ago
By the way, the emergence of LLM coding tools could make it even easier than before to reduce that dependence, as the cost of reproducing many of the mature technologies is going to cost less than it would have before. Ironically, doing that may require using US tools (like Claude Code), at least for now, but it could be a very interesting evolution/opportunity for Europe.
bluegatty•27m ago
The government has to mandate it on some level with purchasing power.

If the government switched away from Microsft and refused to accept MS document formats for any legal reason - then things might shift.

Most businesses just don't care, they want they easy button.

A law firm does not want to screw around, they just click 'buy' on Word, Outlook, Teams.

There's a deep psychology to it.

I remember a developer telling me that Oracle 'was the only real database'.

It's not so much propaganda, just the propagandistic power of incumbency. People who only know one thing are hard pressed to believe there could be something else.

This is more than 50% brand, narrative etc.

We techies tend to underestimate the power of perception, even when it's of our own creation etc. i.e. people fighting over Linux and it's various distros.

rob74•43m ago
Since "Cola" is listed in the "popular alternatives" box, I think it's important to mention that most European Coca-Cola bottlers operate as franchises, i.e. they license the Coca-Cola brand and get the syrup for the drinks they bottle from the Atlanta-based HQ, but other than that they are locally-owned companies. So if you boycott Coca-Cola brands, maybe 20% of the impact goes to Coca-Cola US, while 80% is felt by the local company and its employees.
dukeyukey•26m ago
> So if you boycott Coca-Cola brands, maybe 20% of the impact goes to Coca-Cola US, while 80% is felt by the local company and its employees.

Assuming the person burns the money they would've spent on Cola in the first place. But they aren't, they'll probably just redirect that money to an alternative soft drink, probably a more local one.

xvector•13m ago
If you totally remove Coke from the market, sure, but no one wants to drink a knockoff Coke, they want the actual thing.
dukeyukey•8m ago
We are talking about individuals here. People are absolutely capable of not drinking Coke because they want to avoid American products.
xvector•7m ago
I promise you that virtually no people care about avoiding American products that much. You are being idealistic, and are simply out of touch with the average person if you actually believe this.

Virtually one will stop buying Coke. Virtually no one will stop wanting an iPhone. So on and so forth. They will gladly criticize the US while continuing to indulge in the biggest brand names.

toyg•3m ago
> no people care about avoiding American products that much.

Today, yes. Once US troops start forcefully occupying European territory, eh...

toyg•4m ago
Only if knockoff are not of the same quality, which is the case because competing on price is a race to the bottom. But if it becomes a brand issue, and some serious investment can be justified, then consumer adoption can be engineered.
xvector•2m ago
It was always a branding issue. But it is not so easy to engineer consumer adoption unless you directly subvert consumer will (ie higher taxes on Coke, etc.)
PaulRobinson•25m ago
That just means they have all the infrastructure they need to bottle syrup from another source and start selling that instead - no capex needed, just maybe need to get together with other franchisees and figure out how to spend some opex on marketing and getting it onto store shelves. Coca-cola has a moat, but it's hardly protective of franchisees here.
blell•23m ago
There must be thousands of soda manufacturers in Europe. I can buy dozens of sodas where I live. But they are not Coca Cola.
anilgulecha•12m ago
From a recent hn discussion there's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDkH3EbWTYc
wpm•9m ago
Someone just used gas chromatography to develop a seemingly passable knock off of the unpainted Coca Cola formula and posted it online.

https://youtu.be/TDkH3EbWTYc

pjc50•17m ago
It's arguably unhealthy that one company has such global dominance over any market, even a trivial one like soft drinks.
anal_reactor•38m ago
China making a firewall so that it would grow its own tech industry instead of relying on the US was, in retrospect, a really smart move.
xienze•22m ago
It was also very smart of them to send their citizens to US universities and companies and exfiltrate research and IP to grow their own tech industry...
sillyfluke•8m ago
>The EU leaders falsely assume that US cloud services are essential and let themselves be blackmailed over and over again.

I for one seriously doubt they assume such a thing. They are most likely given something in return that they think somehow makes such a trade worth it. Whether it's access to some fancy US intel/survelliance tech, "discounts" on US defense purchases or what have you, until you get transparency or clarity on the very specific items included in all these deals it's hard to determine the scale of their stupidity. It's either that or personal bribes, blackmail, and kickbacks to key EU politicians depending on the EU country in question.

seydor•1h ago
Almost nobody in europe cares about these things. Nobody has gone out demonstrating for digital rights vs american companies. If we did we we would have already firewalled europe outside big tech.

Why are these articles finding their way here? In europe , this is not news, never.

pbhjpbhj•1h ago
I've been actively moving away from USA originated products. I'm happy to see alternatives being discussed. I really don't think it's moral to fund fascist states in this way, sorry.

Yes, I'm still here, despite being told (paraphrasing) 'fuck off we don't want anyone from outside USA here'.

akramachamarei•45m ago
What does fascism mean to you, exactly?
vixen99•41m ago
Fascism: 'A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.'

Interesting because doesn't every sort of democratic state try to be 'a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls'? Depends how stringent and usually not stringent enough for many on the Left and on the Right.

When tempted to use the word 'fascism', is it not better to describe the issue with which one's concerned (maybe deeply) rather than using a fit-all word and take care not to devalue the significance of the word as it was, for instance, applied in WW2 to some of the appalling atrocities that occurred in that period and those we've seen reports of recently?

NotGMan•1h ago
This. Outside of an extremely small minority no-one cares.
NalNezumi•57m ago
>Why are these articles finding their way here? In europe , this is not news, never.

... Because this is hacker news and not euro news? This is pretty much on point both for tech topic and vague "hacker ethos" as a topic.

lucianbr•55m ago
Conveniently sidestepping the discussion of "should we care". I don't know how many people care or not, but I think more would care if the situation and implications were better known. It's good that this is brought to attention, and to say "people don't know so let's not talk about it" is absurd.
brazzy•55m ago
> Why are these articles finding their way here? In europe , this is not news, never.

A provably untrue statement. Examples:

https://www.politico.eu/article/big-tech-lobbying-brussels-d...

https://www.brusselstimes.com/1916422/us-tech-giants-allying...

https://taz.de/Digitale-Rechte-in-Europa/!6130097/

https://fr.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/04/18/champ-de-batail...

zecg•53m ago
> In europe , this is not news, never.

That's just false. Example, here's a shitty tabloid in Croatia:

https://www.24sata.hr/news/vrh-europske-komisije-mijenja-pra...

saubeidl•53m ago
Speak for yourself.
pjc50•18m ago
People have been caring about this for 20+ years. I'll admit that it's a minority position, but Germans in particular get very upset about mass surveillance.
terespuwash•1h ago
“Since the start of the parliamentary mandate, Meta has met 38 times with far-right MEPs”

Hmmmm

joe_mamba•1h ago
Far left EU MEPs complain about what far right are doing. So what else is new in politics?

Do they also complain when they themselves meet with Meta, or is it an issue only when their growing opposition do it?

You know the saying "For my friends everything, for my enemies, the law"?

Manfred•42m ago
The fight against “left” and “right” is just a narrative to gin up allegiance with certain groups.

The only relevance to the article is that it indicates which parties have sided with the US administration to fight consumer’s digital rights.

joe_mamba•33m ago
Yeah that was my point, it doesn't matter if it's left or right, because the only ideology Meta et-al speak, is USD, so they will kiss the ring of whoever is in power at the present moment in EU, far left or far right. Same how many of them also kissed the ring of the CCP or Saudi Arabia while flying the pride flag in the west.

They don't really care about those ideologies they preach, they just virtue signal however needed in order to appease the mobs and governments in power so they can be allowed to extract wealth.

instig007•35m ago
Is there a list of MEPs who are just right, without the far prefix?
speedgoose•29m ago
Yes ?
blell•22m ago
Yes. But if you look into the policies they push, they are all progressive for some reason.
clydethefrog•10m ago
Nonsense since the 2024 European Parliament that has a big far-right wing. The EPP has already broken down a lot of progressive green policies with help of the far right [1], the "cordon sanitaire" is now broken.

https://www.politico.eu/article/epp-votes-with-far-right-to-...

pjc50•20m ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_groups_of_the_Europe...
clydethefrog•19m ago
Just as with most parts of the EU (imo both it's strength and it's weakness) there is some complexity and bureaucracy involved with founding out the political spectrum of MEPs. You can research the EU political groups and the political alliances and the corresponding positions on these Wikipedia pages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_groups_of_the_Europe... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_political_alliances

geremiiah•1h ago
Somebody needs to investigate the EC for corruption.
RalfWausE•1h ago
Luckily, the orange idiot in charge is doing us (the Europeans) a favor showing us that America (and its companies) are no longer a trustworthy partner. In a way i really hope he goes through with the Greenland stuff... this would be the final nail in the coffin.
Forgeties79•56m ago
Brexit didn’t do anything to correct the UK’s current trajectory. I guarantee you even destroying the relationship with NATO would not shift the course the US is on. Every time something extreme happens, people gasp for a second then accept it and move on. I don’t think the situation in the US is hopeless by any means, but Greenland is not going to suddenly be some magical moment that wakes everybody up. We’ve done this song and dance for a decade with Trump. After the attack on the capitol it be became very clear that it’s going to take a hell of a lot more than we thought.
bondarchuk•48m ago
GP was not about America changing but about Europe.
Forgeties79•9m ago
I originally read it as “the final nail in the coffin for him and the shenanigans coming out of the US” but yeah I see I read it wrong now.
taneliv•55m ago
I suppose you're not one of the conscripted (or even professional) soldiers that would be called to duty to protect the region in case of an armed conflict?
RalfWausE•40m ago
I am in the reserve of the german army, so i can be called up if things escalate beyond a certain point (the so called "Verteidigungsfall").
ta20240528•52m ago
Europe is desperately trying to find some way to let US have "control" without destroying the Danish kingdom; A Minsk Agreement for Greenland if you will.

They don't have the stomach for a fight.

bootsmann•49m ago
Very bold claim to make unsourced from an account with a very _interesting_ posting history.
joe_mamba•47m ago
Greenland invasion is just a distraction by Trump from the Epstein files. The US already have massive military presence in Greenland with permission from Denmark since the 1950s, they can already do whatever illegal things they want there (and they have, like installing a portable nuclear reactor), without the downsides that come with actual ownership of the island. They already have a really sweet deal.

Trump keeps talking about taking it because he knows the media will bite the bait and talk about that instead and forget about the epstein list and other illegal shit his administration did.

Remember how he was also talking about annexing Canada in his election? Trump just loves to bait the media by saying crazy stuff since the media feeds on sensationalist stuff like that.

rob74•28m ago
So, he wants to distract from past illegal shit by doing more illegal shit? Doesn't sound like a viable long-term strategy to me...

But yeah, I also wonder what would happen if the media would just stop dissecting every late-night bleat (as some commentators have decided to call his Truth Social posts) and start treating them as what they are (the ramblings of a deranged 79-year old) instead? But of course those ramblings now spill into other places too: plaques on the "presidential walk of fame" (https://eu.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/news/politics/2025/1...), letters to allies (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/trump-letter...) etc.

joe_mamba•25m ago
>by doing more illegal shit?

Who said anything about doing. He doesn't have to do anything other than bring it up all the time.

The media loves this since it means more engagement farming and Trump knows this which is why he's doing it. ALong with things like "quiet piggy".

pjc50•14m ago
He also attacked Venezuela, after talking about it a lot.

The problem is our Kremlinology is no longer capable of discerning what's a bluff and what's not. Therefore, at significant cost to both sides, we have to unravel some of the interdependency between the EU and the US.

soco•6m ago
How about building in Greenland that "freedom city" all tech bros are salivating about? Would that be a reason enough to invade?
hairofadog•3m ago
No doubt the distraction from the Epstein files is a contributing factor, but it’s a mistake to think he won’t do incredibly harmful things simply because they seem insane and without purpose to us, who grew up post World War II.

His decision tree is like

Does it make me feel like a tough guy? -> Is there some way I can leverage it for grift and personal gain? -> Does it make my political enemies and undesirables feel angry and helpless? -> Is it a decision I can make unilaterally? -> Then YES

PaulRobinson•21m ago
The US already has bases on Greenland. It is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and therefore is already a NATO ally territory. They already have all the "control" they need to keep it out of the hands of Russia and China. There is no need to "let" the US have "control". If the US were being run by people who understood the basis on which they have a base there, they would realise they already have all the control they need from a strategic perspective.
zo1•14m ago
This is the kind of commentary that makes me come to HN less and less, which justifies my own low effort comment. Western europe, Germany included, is well on track to becoming a third world sharia "shithole" with nukes, and the more sane countries distance themselves from such a suicidal trajectory, the better.
zerosizedweasle•50m ago
"Oxfam, the world-renowned advocacy group, issued a report ahead of the Davos event which showed that billionaire wealth rose by more than 16% last year, three times faster than the past five-year average, to more than $18 trillion. It drew on Forbes magazine data on the world’s richest people.

Oxfam said the $2.5 trillion rise in the wealth of billionaires last year would be enough to eradicate extreme poverty 26 times over. Their wealth has risen by more than four-fifths since 2020, while nearly half the world’s population lives in poverty, the group said.

The Trump administration has led a “pro-billionaire agenda,” the group said, through actions such as slashing taxes for the wealthiest, fostering the growth of AI-related stocks that help rich investors get richer, and thwarting efforts to tax giant companies."

AI is killing humanity

arneeiri•45m ago
Ironic if Trump's Greenland stunt ends up killing the Digital Omnibus. Hard to gift-wrap GDPR rollbacks for US tech giants while they're simultaneously being tariffed.
toyg•33m ago
Sadly, I fear the opposite might be true. Trump acts by creating leverage and then asking for something in return to renounce that leverage (in other contexts this could be described as blackmail or racketeering - "nice Greenland you have there...").

Luckily, his reign of terror is not infinite. In November he'll be cut to size.

StopDisinfo910•32m ago
The article paints a situation where the EU is caving in to US pressure and completely ignores the very real criticisms of the current regulatory push coming from the EU itself.

A significant part of the Draghi report on European competitiveness is about how the Parliament has been stifling the ability of EU companies to efficiently compete under the weight of more and more complex laws.

It's not very useful being the first to put in place complex regulations if nothing remains to regulate because every company has moved somewhere else.

xvector•8m ago
It is interesting how downvoted you are for stating simple facts. Many people in the EU will just willfully bury their head in the sand when it comes to the impact of regulation on the economy.

It's a night and day difference trying to get something built in the EU vs the US.

jmyeet•28m ago
This has been my prediction for the last year: the EU is going to be forced to take the China approach of creating their own version of all US tech companies.

The current US administration has done more to destroy US soft power on the world stage than any other in the country's history. The administration seems intent on destroying NATO. Personally I'm fine with that because it's a protection racket and a tool of imperialism. But this is going to materially hurt the US defense contractors who profit off of arms sales. That's really the turning point for any fascist regime: when you start screwing up the bag.

US tech companies are also a tool of American foreign policy in pretty much the exact same way the administration accuses China of doing.

So the EU needs to be responsible for its own security. And it's own platforms. But it may be too late for that as the EU itself may well splinter under the rise of far-right governments that are currently in place (eg Hungary) and only one election away from taking place (eg UK, Geermany maybe even France; even though the UK isn't in the EU I'm still counting it as part of Europe).

Unfortunately the EU (and the UK) is too committed to the US imperial project, such as in the Middle East. People don't seem to realize just how connected things like imperialism and the erosion of your own rights at home are inextricably intertwined.

gyanchawdhary•23m ago
I don’t see/share the HN outrage. If the EU wants to stay in the game, it has to be realistic about how regulation affects scaling and investment ... tweaking or rolling back parts of digital rules to compete with US/China tech isn’t “evil” .. it’s just how global competition works tbh.
xvector•10m ago
Seriously, the EU needs to actually make it possible to build successful businesses in the EU. Starting any business there is such a nightmare, it's no wonder everyone takes their ideas to the US.
soco•4m ago
Becoming like your opponent must be for sure not the only way to compete with them... China and the US are not the same, why should the EU become like either?
eclipsetheworld•12m ago
As a European founder building startups since 2015, I’ve spent a massive chunk of my career navigating the "alphabet soup" of EU regulation: GDPR, DSA, DMA, AI Act, CSRD, SFDR, CBAM... the list is exhausting.

While the goals are usually noble, I’m increasingly convinced we’re regulating ourselves into irrelevance. I’m not a Big Tech company yet my interests align with theirs. We desperately need an EU that prioritizes actual growth over well-intentioned paperwork. To me, the AI Act and the GDPR are the worst offenders here, representing the largest possible gap between "good intentions" and the actual effect they have on the ground.

Consider frontier LLM labs. We have the talent, the Nordic data centers, and access to the GPUs. But why would any investor drop $100B on a frontier LLM lab here when the legislative environment is fundamentally more hostile than the US? It feels like we’ve already watched Mistral and Aleph Alpha get left in the dust.

To give you an idea of the "compliance vs. reality" GDPR gap: I worked on a project processing healthcare data for millions of people. We had a clear, easy-to-find privacy policy and a responsive DPO. Total GDPR requests for info or deletion? Exactly 53. Out of millions. We spent thousands of hours building systems for rights that only 0.001% of our users cared to use.

If you look at the courts, the "damage" being prevented is equally vague. Since EU courts don't really do punitive damages, most awards are tiny unless there’s actual identity theft. Most of what GDPR protects is "mental distress" or "loss of control"-concepts so ambiguous that courts rarely award anything for them unless something else went wrong.

The result of all this "protection"? No FAANG-equivalent, no frontier AI leader, and no homegrown ad-tech. It turns out the most perfectly regulated company is the one that never exists in the first place.

soco•10m ago
So deletion of user accounts meant thousands of hours of development time?
PeterStuer•4m ago
Close the 'legitimate interest' loophole that made the whole GDPR a farce in practice, and I'll take that as a sign you're actually serious.

Radboud University selects Fairphone as standard smartphone for employees

https://www.ru.nl/en/staff/news/radboud-university-selects-fairphone-as-standard-smartphone-for-e...
325•ardentsword•6h ago•150 comments

A decentralized peer-to-peer messaging application that operates over Bluetooth

https://bitchat.free/
325•no_creativity_•7h ago•190 comments

Ask HN: COBOL devs, how are AI coding affecting your work?

53•zkid18•1h ago•23 comments

Gaussian Splatting – A$AP Rocky "Helicopter" music video

https://radiancefields.com/a-ap-rocky-releases-helicopter-music-video-featuring-gaussian-splatting
695•ChrisArchitect•21h ago•221 comments

Folding NASA Experience into an Origamist's Toolkit

https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Folding_NASA_Experience_into_an_Origamist%E2%80%99s_Toolkit
10•andsoitis•2d ago•2 comments

Vm0

https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0
58•handfuloflight•4d ago•15 comments

Nepal's Mountainside Teahouses Elevate the Experience for Trekkers

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/nepal-mountainside-teahouses-elevate-experience-trekkers-he...
50•bookofjoe•4d ago•22 comments

Dead Internet Theory

https://kudmitry.com/articles/dead-internet-theory/
446•skwee357•18h ago•520 comments

Show HN: I quit coding years ago. AI brought me back

https://calquio.com/finance/compound-interest
216•ivcatcher•13h ago•284 comments

Flux 2 Klein pure C inference

https://github.com/antirez/flux2.c
374•antirez•20h ago•129 comments

Amazon is ending all inventory commingling as of March 31, 2026

https://twitter.com/ghhughes/status/2012824754319753456
214•MrBuddyCasino•2h ago•98 comments

Wikipedia: WikiProject AI Cleanup

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_AI_Cleanup
145•thinkingemote•4h ago•56 comments

Provide agents with automated feedback

https://banay.me/dont-waste-your-backpressure/
148•ghuntley•2d ago•75 comments

AVX-512: First Impressions on Performance and Programmability

https://shihab-shahriar.github.io//blog/2026/AVX-512-First-Impressions-on-Performance-and-Program...
91•shihab•5d ago•35 comments

Robust Conditional 3D Shape Generation from Casual Captures

https://facebookresearch.github.io/ShapeR/
5•lastdong•2h ago•0 comments

Fire Shuts GTA 6 Developer Rockstar North, Following Report of Explosion

https://www.ign.com/articles/fire-shuts-gta-6-developer-rockstar-north-following-report-of-explosion
31•finnlab•1h ago•25 comments

Gladys West's vital contributions to GPS technology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladys_West
40•hackernj•2d ago•5 comments

Article by article, how Big Tech shaped the EU's roll-back of digital rights

https://corporateeurope.org/en/2026/01/article-article-how-big-tech-shaped-eus-roll-back-digital-...
195•robtherobber•1h ago•86 comments

Gas Town Decoded

https://www.alilleybrinker.com/mini/gas-town-decoded/
165•alilleybrinker•4d ago•161 comments

The Code-Only Agent

https://rijnard.com/blog/the-code-only-agent
105•emersonmacro•12h ago•48 comments

Self Sanitizing Door Handle

https://www.jamesdysonaward.org/en-US/2019/project/self-sanitizing-door-handle/
36•rendaw•4d ago•39 comments

Fil-Qt: A Qt Base build with Fil-C experience

https://git.qt.io/cradam/fil-qt
126•pjmlp•3d ago•86 comments

RISC-V is coming along quite speedily: Milk-V Titan Mini-ITX 8-core board

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/milk-v-titan-mini-ix-board-with-ur-dp1000-process...
44•fork-bomber•4h ago•16 comments

Nuclear elements detected in West Philippine Sea

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/01/18/2501750/nuclear-elements-detected-west-philippine-sea
58•ksec•4h ago•22 comments

Using proxies to hide secrets from Claude Code

https://www.joinformal.com/blog/using-proxies-to-hide-secrets-from-claude-code/
108•drewgregory•5d ago•35 comments

Simulating the Ladybug Clock Puzzle

https://austinhenley.com/blog/ladybugclock.html
40•azhenley•1d ago•12 comments

Astrophotography visibility plotting and planning tool

https://airmass.org/
43•NKosmatos•3d ago•5 comments

High-speed train collision in Spain kills at least 39

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cedw6ylpynyo
209•akyuu•14h ago•175 comments

Show HN: Beats, a web-based drum machine

https://beats.lasagna.pizza
118•kinduff•17h ago•34 comments

Nvidia Contacted Anna's Archive to Access Books

https://torrentfreak.com/nvidia-contacted-annas-archive-to-secure-access-to-millions-of-pirated-b...
33•antonmks•3h ago•11 comments