The 2nd name change is just inexcusable. It's hard to take a project seriously when a random asshole on Twitter can provoke a name change like this. Leads me to believe that identity is more important than purpose.
That's not to diminish anything he's done because frankly, it's really fucking impressive, but I think weekend project gives the impression of like 5 hours a week and I don't think that's accurate for this project.
Now if it changes _again_ that's a different story. If it changes Too Much, it becomes a distraction
Edit: looks like org is taken. Net and xyz were registered today... Hopefully one of them by the openclaw creators. All the cheap/common gtlds are indeed taken.
reminds me of Andre Conje, cracked dev, "builds in public", absolutely abysmal at comms, and forgets to make money off of his projects that everyone else is making money off of
(all good if that last point isn't a priority, but its interrelated to why people want consistent things)
There are still improvements to be made to the security aspects yet BIG KUDOS for working so hard on it at this stage and documenting it extensively!! I've explored Cursor security docs (with a big s cause it's so scattered) and it was nothing as good.
Once agents have tools and a shared surface, coordination appears immediately.
https://www.moltbook.com/post/791703f2-d253-4c08-873f-470063...
Literally the top 2 HN posts are about this. Either it having book, or the first comment on it showing it create religion or now this.
Can we stop all of this hype around Clawdbot itself? Even HN is vulnerable to it.
ChrisArchitect•2h ago
Clawdbot Renames to Moltbot
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46783863