Ergo...
This kind of work has been my primary income for the last 4 years or so. Nowhere near on the same level as Feynman, but I know enough about enough other things that I get a lot of reputational referrals.
sometimes (i'd argue often, actually), you don't even need that. simply having an outside/fresh perspective and the fact that you aren't part of any of the existing groups/silos is valuable.
moralestapia•1h ago
Supermancho•1h ago
boxed•1h ago
moralestapia•1h ago
What does "adds back an oxygen molecule" mean?
boxed•1h ago
moralestapia•54m ago
Elaborate and you'll find the issue with this setup.
throwway120385•1h ago
brk•30m ago
By keeping the state of oxygen inside the probe constant and replacing consumed molecules you now can measure almost instantly.
comrade1234•1h ago
At least that's what I assume.
spott•5m ago
Before, you measured diffusion rate of oxygen and inferred oxygen concentration from that (the concentration outside the chamber is always greater than the concentration inside). Dirty membranes etc all changed the rate of diffusion, which caused issues.
After you measure oxygen concentration directly (the concentration inside and outside the chamber are always the same).
speak_plainly•52m ago
By adding a third electrode to replace the oxygen every time one is smashed, you maintain a perfect balance and eliminate that suction. Because the room stays full, the sensor no longer relies on the speed of the oxygen rushing in; it simply measures the steady state of the oxygen already there. Even if gunk gets on the window, the sensor won't be starved of a reading. It might take a few extra seconds for the levels to settle, but the final number will be 100% accurate because the sensor is no longer emptying its own room to get a count.
Coeur•9m ago
0-_-0•42m ago