Actual ad since it's not available in the tweet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQRu7DdTTVA

Surely hit a nerve.

Defensive much, Sam?

The response is good if this means ads like that will never happen.

Google though... they make fake ad Emails so fake ad Replies seems exactly like their style.

Discussion (53 points, 77 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46894151

My read:

Sam's goal is to create viral products. This has always been his goal. While his interest in and passion for AI are almost certainly genuine, he famously hedged his bets before committing to OpenAI up to the point of being ambiguously fired from his previous job. ChatGPT was one of the greatest viral products of all time. His subsequent attempts to create virality haven't been working in any real, durable way.

Enter Claude Code. It went viral, not in the awe-inspiring world-changing way that ChatGPT did, but in a way that allowed it to decisively overwhelm OpenAI's advantage in some very valuable niches. It wasn't born out of a search for a viral product, but rather out of an intellectual obsession with safe, steerable AI systems -- an obsession that could've just as easily ended up producing no products at all. It's the kind of obsession that can't be replicated if the only motive is virality.

So yeah, this is going to bother him a lot. He's defending ads while his competitor's product is having its "iPhone moment." You know this is part of the raw emotional driver because he ends his defense of ads by talking about Codex app downloads and saying he "believe[s] Codex is going to win," implying that significant doubt exists that he feels the need to correct.

>One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path.

It warms my heart to hear that Sam is against authoritarianism. Hopefully he doesn't hang out with anyone that supports that kind of thing.

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/the-real-story-behind-sam-altman...

Sam is an entrepreneur trying to play an industrialist game. He will lose. OpenAi will be sold to Microsoft on the profit side and control of the open source board will effectively be awarded to Elon. OpenAi had their chance to oust him, but his c-suit judo was too strong.

While I love to see billionaires duking it out. I am rooting for Chinese open source models that I can run on my MacBook.

Deleting paragraphs 2 and 3 and tweaking paragraph 4 could have made this a great and informative reply by Altman.

That would favorably contrast ChatGPT's products, pricing, and market size with Claude's.

Instead, well, it's not a good look.

> Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be.

OpenAI's terms of service (https://openai.com/policies/row-terms-of-use/):

What you cannot do. You may not use our Services for any illegal, harmful, or abusive activity. For example, you may not:

1. Use our Services in a way that infringes, misappropriates or violates anyone’s rights.

2. Modify, copy, lease, sell or distribute any of our Services.

3. Attempt to or assist anyone to reverse engineer, decompile or discover the source code or underlying components of our Services, including our models, algorithms, or systems (except to the extent this restriction is prohibited by applicable law).

4. Automatically or programmatically extract data or Output (defined below).

5. Represent that Output was human-generated when it was not.

6. Interfere with or disrupt our Services, including circumvent any rate limits or restrictions or bypass any protective measures or safety mitigations we put on our Services.

7. Use Output to develop models that compete with OpenAI.

Learning: Marketing and Legal team are not in sync with each other.

I can’t put my finger on it but he’s just such an unlikeable figure

Of course the first version of the ad will be separated very clearly, just like how Google search started.

While I found the golden dating app the funniest anc creepiest, credit loan ad was the most viewed for a reason: it's the most profitable ad from the scenarios, and it will come in a few years.

I write all this as a mostly happy OpenAI subscriber (my only wish is still being able to have a sticky legacy o3 model as my default for my Pro subscription everywhere).

I don’t care for Sam Altman but so far I have been impressed with Codex and at least for our use right now its performing much better than Opus 4.5. Of course this will probably change again but the larger context window with Codex is god sent for us.

> We are building safe and beneficial AGI, but will also consider our mission fulfilled if our work aids others to achieve this outcome.

Maybe it's just me, but sometimes it feels like Sam does not actually want to aid others in achieving this outcome.

> But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest.

Mr. Dishonest accusing others of being dishonest.

> More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency.

I think you meant "psychological dependence", not agency.

I would have run this one past ChatGPT before hitting send.

Now I want to find and watch the Anthropic advertisement.

[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46892904

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46894151

I honestly think OpenAI needs a new leader, they are so lost. They have no vision, it seems like they are just always chasing and not leading anymore.

Anthropic has a clear vision, they want to build the best agentic models so they can build products for humans to use like Claude Cowork, and Claude Code.

Google has a clear vision, they want to build the smartest model possible to give to consumers to use and to implement into their products.

OpenAI doesn't have any vision. GPT 5.2 alone has 5 different version that are all essentially the same. They are slow, take forever to do anything, and aren't smart in any area. They released Sora then just forgot about like everyone did. They released Atlas and forgot abotu like everyone did. They release GPT Image which honestly is probably the main reason they still have users they have.

They honestly might be in trouble, Oracle is fucking themselves over with the amount of debt they have to build out infrastructure for them. Microsoft and Nvidia are backing away from putting more eggs in the basket.

It actually no surprise they are trying to find every way to make money because if they don't they might be the first to fall.

Anthropic might not be winning the consumers, but it almost like you don't want to win consumers yet until you figure out how to make enough money to support them as Anthropic and OpenAI don't have business producing 100b in net income every year.

The other HN thread on this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46892904