I'll make the same comment I did on the other post about this. Either document how it differs from FreeBSD jails or give it some other name. Anything else is asking for confusion.
LargoLasskhyfv•2h ago
Does the third entry of the FAQ not suffice?
ggm•45m ago
No. A feature table would help. An abstraction/layer diagram. A lot more.
Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?
LargoLasskhyfv•18m ago
> Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?
He wrote things like these are out of scope.
Just light and robust jails without further external dependencies.
PunchyHamster•5m ago
so it's useless then as you can't run anything you'd want to there
__patchbit__•1h ago
That some other name: 'cells' (or 'tiles'), in the compositional sense of leaf and tree, forest, framework is more inviting for creative work than 'jails'.
dizhn•1h ago
It's not a port of FreeBSD jails ?
DeathArrow•42m ago
It would have been more interesting have they released something compatible with Open Container Initiative. Most people use Docker containers and having Docker compatible containers would have helped with improved adoption of BSDs.
PunchyHamster•4m ago
OCI is kinda layer above whatever solution is used for separation
ggm•3h ago
LargoLasskhyfv•2h ago
ggm•45m ago
Could bastille port to it as-is? How about podman?
LargoLasskhyfv•18m ago
He wrote things like these are out of scope.
Just light and robust jails without further external dependencies.
PunchyHamster•5m ago
__patchbit__•1h ago
dizhn•1h ago