I don't know if this was done here.

=====

I haven't read TFA, and this explanation comes up again and again, but I'd rather read broken English (or German), than the "enhanced" version.

Considering that LLM rewriting using non-specialized tools is more often than not far from preserving intent and meaning of any input, I'd say I think this applies even more for non-native speakers.

You wouldn't say "maybe the author is not a physician, so they might have used an LLM to fill in the Latin terms and medication doses" or "not a scientist, used ChatGPT to do the statistics using my notebook of empirical data" either.

Language has value and simple language or slightly wrong grammar is preferable to a verbose and glossy distortion of the input.

Sorry if this doesn't apply, since I didn't click the link.

And yeah I'm sure my comment is verbose and partially wrong in my English, but well.